Please make sure to bring all the lecture notes (up to week 10) – as I will be summarizing all the notes today 1 Decision Support & Executive Information Systems: LECTURE 10 Amare Michael Desta 2 Organizational Leadership, Cultures and Process Maturity Closed System View of Org.: Many different perspectives - Closed system perspective Organization as instrument to achieve defined goals Efficiency Effectiveness Flexibility / adaptability Job satisfaction - Four activities follow from the above Complexity and specialization of tasks Centralization of authority Formalization of jobs Stratification of employment levels 3 Closed System View - Criticism View sees humans as machines Resources are optimised Not true in all cases Responses fit into the defined plan Environmental influence seen as only noise 4 Open System View of Organizations Interested in both the objectives and responses to internal and external influences Organizational activities (Weick) Enactment, selection and retention Results of these are Understanding of the environment Recognizing problems Diagnosing causes for problems Identifying policies to solve problems Evaluating the efficiency of the policies Selecting priorities for problem solving 5 Organizational Learning Model (Daft & Weick) Three major components - Scanning Monitoring the environment - Interpretation Translating observations - Learning Knowledge about relations between organization’s state and environment Actions 6 Generic Roles for Executives To achieve the defined goals FOUR different Roles are needed by executives - Administration - Management - Concerned with efficiency Leadership - Caretaking role Setting of a vision and seeing it through Governance Stakeholder management 7 Organizational Topographies Inactive organization Tries to avoid problems Reactive organization Problem solving organization Internal environment Interactive organization Tries to adapt to external environment Waits them to go away Development of responses to external environment Proactive organization Learning to learn better Adaptive behaviour 8 Organizational Learning Organizational learning is needed to anticipate changes and improve behaviour Situation assessment Problem detection Solution Evaluation of outcome Resulting discovery The learning is not always beneficial in practice E.g. improperly simplified causal models 9 Theory of Reasoning, Learning and Action Two major inhibitions to learning 1) Distortion of information Quality of decisions affected 2) Lack of receptivity to feedback Types of organizational learning Single-loop Present policies to achieve present goals Double-loop New understanding developed No questioning of goals Goals are put under scrutiny Poor performance organizations usually use singleloop learning 10 Theory of Reasoning, Learning and Action (2) There are other inhibitions to learning Distancing Disconnectedness Not accepting responsibility Limited information about theories in use and the associated actions Five dilemmas Incongruity Inconsistency Ineffectiveness Disusability Unobservability 11 Learning Organization “Organization where people continually expand their capacity to create results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together” (Peter Senge) Five disciplines enable this learning Systems thinking Personal mastery through lifelong learning Shared mental models of markets and competitors Shared vision Team learning Lack of capability in one of the five disciplines is called a learning disability 12 11 Laws of Systems Thinking 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Future problems come about because of what were presumed past solutions Every action has a reaction Short-term improvements lead to long-term difficulties Easy solution is no solution at all Solution may be worse than the problem Quick solutions lead to more problems Cause and effect not necessarily closely linked Best actions not obvious at first Low cost and high effectiveness need not to be trade-offs The entirety is more than the sum of its parts Entire system must be considered together 13 How to Build a Learning Organization? Leaders must be Three pragmatic needs Designers Stewards Teachers Meaning Management Measurement Five building blocks Systematic problem solving process Experimentation Learning from past mistakes Learning from others Transferring the knowledge through organization 14 Problem Solving Process Assess situation and select problem for resolution Problem definition Generate solution options Evaluate options and select preferred option Implement solution Evaluate solution 15 Organizational Cultures Culture closely related to learning Critical success factors of organizational character Socially transmitted behaviour patterns Shared vision Motivational faith Distinctive skills Change in culture must be controlled Reasons for failure No shared vision of impending crisis No shared vision of a way out of crisis Culture change produces wrong results People learn in a wrong way 16 Changing Culture Change is often resisted even though it is known to be needed People do not know in which way or how to change Poor abilities at double-loop learning Past competence a path to success Stereotypical thinking Fall into ideological routines Multiphase approach to change Access corporate culture Identify approaches to culture change Negotiate a shared vision Deploy the shared vision 17 Culture Clash Three different cultures 1. 2. Corporate culture stresses loyalty to organization Professional culture emphasises given knowledge - Loyalty to profession greater than loyalty to organization 3. Social culture represents the values of individuals Clash areas Specialization Overspecifying practice Managers <-> Employees Underspecifying the end Employees want autonomy Tight supervision Formalization of control Principles more important than practice Short-term profits vs. ethics 18 Culture and leadership A number of studies discuss the interaction of culture and leadership and the role of these in creating excellence E.g Hickman and Silva suggest strategy and culture as foundations for excellence They further identify six “new age skills” aggregated under three more generic (need) categories 19 Hickman and Silva The need to forge a strong foundation for excellence through: creative insight sensitivity The need to integrate organizational and individual skills through: vision and patience The need for adaptation through: versatility and Focus 20 Kotter and Heskett Kotter and Heskett identified several important cultural realities: Organizational culture has a significant impact on the long term performance of an organization The importance of culture will increase in the future Organizational cultures that are debilitating to long term performance are not uncommon Organizational cultures can be changed to allow enhanced performance Effort is primarily concerned with identification of the characteristics of cultures that will be most supportive of excellence performance. 21 Leadership and management: Studies of individual and organizational leadership Covey’s SEVEN habits of effective people First three relate to individual concerns Next three relate to group and organizational issues The last concerns learning and renewal counterbalance independence and dependence relations 22 Covey Covey also identifies THREE primary traits of effective leaders (a) integrity (b) maturity and (c) abundant mentality and THREE types of power: 1. 2. 3. Principle-centered power, based on honor Utility power, based on fairness Coercive power, based on fear Related to various contexts for learning 23 Covey FOUR paradigms that could be used as a basis for leadership: 1. 2. 3. 4. The scientific management paradigm The human relations paradigm The human resources paradigm The principle-centered leadership paradigm 24 Badaracco and Ellworth Badaracco and Ellworth’s identified THREE leadership philosophies based on a set of fundamental assumptions about human nature and the resulting behavior patterns of people in organizations 1. 2. 3. Political leadership Directive leadership Value-driven leadership Philosophies are also provided with suggestions for operational management and task control 25 Rothschild - identified FOUR major leadership roles 1) 2) 3) 4) Risk-takers, often creators of an organization who have the dedication and talent to implement a strategic vision Care-takers, who nurture an organization beyond its growth stage into a healthy maturity Surgeons, who examine diseased portions of an organization and correct or remove those portions Undertakers, who harvest and/or merge the organization in order to mercifully lay to rest an unsalvageable organization & rescue those portions that are capable & in need of rebirth in a new form 26 Kotter Kotter has distinguished between leadership and management Kotter indicates that leadership involves moving people from one state to a better state without transgressing on the rights of other To do this, leadership involves three principal activities that roughly correspond to the definition, development, and deployment effort in systems engineering : 27 Kotter continues… 1. Agenda creation. Direction setting is needed to establish a future vision and strategies for the needed changes to enable realization of the vision. 2. Developing human networks. Communication of the vision and developing a set of shared assumptions and understanding the vision are needed to achieve an alignment of people who are committed to organizational progress. 3. Action implementation or execution. Motivating and inspiring people to move in directions appropriate to achieve the strategic vision despite the political challenges and bureaucratic barriers. 28 Cultural Framework Models Sage introduces two separate works on cultural frameworks Bolman and Deal’s (1991), and Bergquist (1992). They all are built for a university environment. These are suggested to be applicable in a more general organizational setting. 29 Bolman and Deal’s Cultural Framework Model Bolman and Deal (1994) identify FOUR frameworks for modeling organizational culture: 1) structural framework; formal rationality and analytical methodologic approaches are preffered for organizing 2) human relations framework; purpose of organization is support for the people in the organization 30 Dolman and Deal (cont.) 3) political framework; organization viewed as a coalition of diverse interests - most of which based on differing values and perceptions of reality 4) symbolic framework; sees that meaning, or interpretation, of the same event across subcultures will generally be very different ambiguity in organization -> formal rational analysis becomes difficult -> humans create symbols that become surrogates for more fundamental and meaningful events. 31 Bergquist’s Cultural Framework Berguist (1992) divides organizational cultures into FOUR: 1) collegial culture; sees diversity of perspective and autonomy of effort -> supports academic governance -> supports disciplinary scholarship and research 2) managerial culture; closely associated with juniorcollege culture and any very strongly top-down leadership -> acceptance of detailed plans expected 32 Bergquist (cont.) 3) developmental culture; orgzns and their processes designed to effectively accommodate needs of university (organization) -> supports fulfillment of university (organization) mission 4) negotiating culture; very concerned with personal and financial needs of faculty and staff -> change takes place through confrontational efforts and effective use of scarce resources often includes bargaining efforts 33 Cultural Dynamics Model of Oraganizational Forms This model is developed by Henry Minzberg and aims to describe organizational forms, to help design effective organizations. FIVE mechanisms describe work coordination approaches in industrial organizations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Mutual adjustment Direct supervision Standardization of work processes Standardization of skills and knowledge Standardization of norms. 34 Process maturity Process models 1) organizational lifecycle process maturity represents the extent to which specific processes are explicitly defined, managed, measured, controlled and effective in achieving their intended purpose 2) disciplined process, teams with common values, systems management infrastructure, strong Leadership process mature organization 35 Crosby five stages of development of quality maturity inspiration for the other maturity models 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Uncertainty Awakening Enlightment Wisdom Certainty 36 Capability Maturity Model (CMM) originally developed by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at CarnegieMellon University it provides software organizations with guidance on processes for developing and maintaining software five levels with key process areas 37 1. Initial level the process is not under statistical measurement control at even the operational level, and no systematic process is possible no key processes 38 2. Repeatable level a measure of thorough operational level product control is achieved through metrics associated with cost, schedule, and product configuration changes basic program management processes are established 39 2. Repeatable level (cont.) Requirements Management SW Project Planning SW Project Tracking and Oversight SW Subcontract Management SW Quality Assurance SW Configuration Management 40 3. Defined level the process has been understood and specified so that operational quality control is able to yield products with predictable costs and performance schedules the organization has a set of standardized, consistent, and repeatable processes process management is interactive and processes are well integrated five levels with key process areas 41 3. Defined level (cont.) Organizational Process Focus Organization Process Definition Training Programs Integrated Software Management Software Product Engineering Intergroup Coordination Peer Reviews 42 4. Managed maturity level comprehensive process-related measurements are possible and improvements in product quality are possible through the understanding and control interactive process management processes are well in place Quantitative Process Management Software Quality Management 43 5. Optimizing level the highest possible level of maturity is reached the organization is able to make continuous improvements in products, services and processes process management is highly proactive there are also interactive and reactive controls and measurements 44 5. Optimizing level (cont.) Defect Prevention Technology Change Management Process Change Management 45 Key process areas Each of the key process areas have a set of SIX common features associated with them. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Goals Commitment to perform Ability to perform Activities performed Systematic measurement and analysis efforts Implementation verification 46 Process Maturity: Conclusion The majority of organizations in practice today are at levels 1 and 2, with very few at levels 3, 4, and 5 There are only few programs which are at levels 4 and 5; the further research will focus on them and the evolution of the CMM at these higher maturity levels 47