Progress Report1 WashingtonPost - pptx

advertisement

Project #3: Production Cost Savings at Washington Post

SYST 798/OR 680

Progress Report #2

31 March 2011

Thomas Kuklinski

Timothy Smith

Ling Wu

Vladimir Zivkovic

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Overview

Clients

Problem Statement

Earned Value Management

Task Breakdown Structure and Status

Methodology/Technical Approach

Issues/Concerns

Way Forward

Questions

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Clients

Kent Renk, Materials Handling Foreman,

Washington Post, renkk@washpost.com

,

703-916-2471 (office), 703-916-2471(cell)

Kim Hammett, Assistant Superintendent for

Materials Handling, hammettk@washpost.com

,

703-916-2447 (office), 703-869-2463 (cell)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Problem Statement

Background

• Fall of 2010 GMU students did initial static analysis of the Washington Post’s Shipping and Receiving Department in Springfield, VA

They conducted a process evaluation, an analysis of labor, and an analysis of routes which resulted in three groups of recommendations:

Labor cuts (implemented)

Route simplifications

Improved data tracking

Problem Statement

• Our objective will be to maximize the efficiency of the Washington Post’s materials handling system at their four work centers (i.e. Shipping and Receiving Department) in an effort to generate cost savings to the overall operation

We would like to bring to life and build upon the static analysis done by previous group in a dynamic simulation model of the helper component of the work centers

• Stakeholders

Materials Handling Foreman (Kent Renk)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Task Breakdown Structure and Status

Where Innovation Is Tradition

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Earned Value Management

Washington Post Project Earned Value

Earned Value (BCWP)

Actual Cost (ACWP)

Planned Value (BCWS)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Methodology/Technical Approach

Process Analysis (completed)

• Build upon last group’s work done on process evaluation

Develop a complete and detailed qualitative understanding of how the Shipping and

Receiving Department operates

• Data Collection and Analysis (in progress)

Collect data from both the materials tracking system (i.e. MTC) and subject matter experts

Obtain descriptive statistics on each component of the system

• Model Selection and Construction (in progress)

Evaluate model alternatives based on quantitative/qualitative data and client needs

Construct and test model (e.g. turn system processes into Arena modules)

Output Analysis (not started)

Evaluate output in terms of cost and throughput

Iterate

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Process Analysis

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Trucks

Process Analysis (actual)

1. Daily Insert Ads & Sunday Packaging

Materials

Handling

Racks

Daily Insert

2c. Jackets

Run of Press

Sunday Packaging

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Process Analysis (scope)

Materials

Handling

Racks

Daily Insert

Sunday Packaging

Run of Press

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Data Collection and Analysis

Labor data

Obtained labor markup data for this period

• Broken down by work center, day, shift, and role

Assigned helpers within the work centers to specific routes so we know which moves they would be responsible for

This required splitting helpers assigned to specific machines into subsets

(e.g. Collator 4)

Collator 1

Collator 2

Collator 3

Collator 4

Total

Sunday Packaging: Monday

1st Shift (6:30am-2:00pm) 2nd Shift (2:15pm-9:45pm) 3rd Shift (10:00pm-5:30am)

2

0

2

0

0

0

2

3

7

2

3

7

0

3

3

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Data Collection and Analysis

Route data

Obtained Summary Report for February 7-12 created by MTC

• Data obtained for a “normal” week of work

Contains pallet moves for all materials throughout the system

Mapped all of the routes to specific areas within our system so that we know how everything interacts

Client assisted with determining which routes were not relevant

This all informed our Process Analysis understanding

Obtained descriptive statistics on route times for model input, specifically route times

ISSUE DATE PALLET ID

06/22/2008

06/22/2008

06/22/2008

R555147

R555147

R555147

CLASS

CONSUMABLE

CONSUMABLE

CONSUMABLE

DESCRIPTION

Stretch wrap, clear

Stretch wrap, clear

Stretch wrap, clear

LOCATION

RD01

H52A

DATE / TIME

01/06/2011

01:14:49 PM

02/07/2011

05:30:33 PM

USER ID

HAARHOFFDS

MACKLIND

KUBEAG

LOCATION DATE / TIME

RD01

01/06/2011

12:48:45 PM

H52A

C4CON

01/06/2011

01:15:44 PM

02/07/2011

05:30:38 PM

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Route Time Statistics

Data options on route duration time

Use estimated data from sponsor (max, min, mean) for a triangular distribution

• Sponsor recommended because of “bad” MTC data

Use Arena Input Analyzer to find the best fit distribution based on MTC sample of “good”

MTC data

Very small sample size

Looked at both to obtain conclusive results

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Arena’s Input Analyzer

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Arena Input Analyzer Results

Production Data

Missing production data

Invalid production data

Inconclusive results for route times

*Estimated client SME data

Client recommended this approach for route times

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Model Selection and Construction

Discussion with client and additional system understanding has allowed us to settle with an Arena simulation model

It is very important for the client to be able to use the model to forecast the impact of different labor markups on production targets for both daily inserts and Sunday packaging

• Phase 1 - Develop an Arena model that allows the client to play with “what-if” labor markups to hit production targets (required)

Phase 2 – Add on an optimization engine that determines labor markups at minimal cost to the client to hit production targets

(desired)

Based on Process and Data Analysis, an Arena model has been started

Architecture, labor markups by day/shift, and route time & assignments finished

Arrival processes by day/shift, internal business logic, and production targets still being analyzed

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Model Selection and Construction (actual)

Raw Materials

Monday, Shift 1

Normal(2, 4)

U(6,8)

EXP(10)

C1 Machine

Dock Dock

S1 Machine

U(2,5)

Production Targets

Run of Press

EXP(5)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Model Selection and Construction (scope)

Raw Materials

Monday, Shift 1

EXP(5)

EXP(5) U(6,8)

C1HS C1PZ

Rack Dock

S1HS C1PZ

U(2,5)

Production Targets

EXP(5)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

ROP

Jackets

Model Selection and Construction (Arena)

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Issues/Concerns

• Working with sponsor to obtain accurate business rules to apply to model components

Currently there is no clearly defined business rules on the production processes at the work center

• Depends on sponsor’s ability to articulate, analyze, and abstract general business rules of the production processes

• Packaging the Arena simulation model

Graphical User Interface

Model for each day vs. Large dynamic model

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Way Forward

• Data Collection and Analysis

Arrival Process Distributions (Input Analyzer)

Determine raw material arrival processes from the rack

Determine machine output arrival process (e.g. C1, S1, etc.)

• We are waiting for all of this data to be provided

• Modeling

Determine internal business rules

Rack to C1 vs. C2 vs. C3 vs. C4

S1 to Z1 vs. Z2 vs. Z3

Etc.

• Look into production targets

Begin identifying output analysis components to investigate

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Questions?

Washington Post Project - Web site

Where Innovation Is Tradition

Download