Lecture 8: Testbeds Anish Arora CIS788.11J Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks Material uses slides from Larry Peterson, Jay Lapreau, and GENI.net References • EmuLab : artifact-free, auto-configured, fully controlled A configurable Internet emulator 2001: 200 nodes, 500 wires, 2x BFS (switch) 2006: 350 PCs, 7 IXPs, 40 WANodes, 27+ 802.11nodes • PlanetLab : real environment • 670 machines spanning 325 sites and 35 countries nodes within a LAN-hop of > 3M users • Supports distributed virtualization each of 600+ network services running in their own slice • GENI 2 Emulab philosophy • • • Live-network experimentation Achieves realism Surrenders repeatability e.g., MIT “RON” testbed, PlanetLab Pure emulation Introduces controlled packet loss and delay Requires tedious manual configuration Emulab approach Brings simulation’s efficiency and automation to emulation Artifact free environment Arbitrary workload: any OS, any ”router” code, any program, for any user So default resource allocation policy is conservative: allocate full real node & link: no multiplexing; assume max. possible traffic3 Emulab • Allow experimenter complete control, i.e., bare hardware with lots of tools for common cases OS’s, disk loading, state mgmt tools, IP, traffic generation, batch, ... • Virtualization of all experimenter-visible resources topology, links, software, node names, network interface names, network addresses Allows swapin/swapout • Remotely accessible • Persistent state maintenance (in database) • Separate control network • Configuration language: ns 4 Experiment Life Cycle Global Node Experiment Specification Resource Self-Configuration Swap Parsing SwapOut In Control Allocation $ns duplex-link $A $B 1.5Mbps 20ms A A B B A DB B 5 assign: Mapping Local Cluster Resources • Maps virtual resources to local nodes and VLANs • General combinatorial optimization approach to NP-complete problem • Based on simulated annealing • Minimizes inter-switch links, # switches & other constraints … • All experiments mapped in less than 3 secs [100 nodes] • WANassign for Mapping Global Resources (uses genetic algorithm) 6 Frisbee: Disk Loading • Loads full disk images (bulk download) • Performance techniques: Overlaps block decompression and device I/O Uses a domain-specific algorithm to skip unused blocks Delivers images via a custom reliable multicast protocol • 13 GB generic IDE 7200 rpm drives • Was 20 minutes for 6 GB image • Now 88 seconds 7 IDE planned for Emulab • Evolve Emulab to be the network-deviceindependent control and integration center for experimentation, research, development, debugging, measurement, data management, and archiving Collaboratory: Emulab’s project abstraction Workbench: Emulab’s experiment abstraction Device-independent: Emulab’s builtin abstractions for all things network-related 8 Collaboratory Subsystems • • • • • • • • Source repository:Sourceforge, CVS, Subversion Datapository “My Wikis” Mailing list(s) Bug database Chat/IM, chatroom management Moodle? Approach Transparently do authentication, authorization and membership mgmt: “single signon” Use separate server for information and resource security and management Support flexible access policies: default is projectprivate, but project leader can change, per-subsytem Private, public read-only, public read/write 9 Experimentation Workbench • Four types: Workflow management (processes), including Measurement and feedback steps mandatory pipelines Experiment management Data management Analyses 10 Workbench: “Time Travel” and Stateful Swapout • Time-travel of distributed systems for debugging • Generalize disk image format and handling Periodic disk checkpointing Full state-save on swapout Xen-based virtual machines Challenge: network state (packets in flight) Pragmatic approach: quiesce senders, flush buffers Stateful swapout/swapin [easier] Allows transparent pre-emption experiment • Related to workbench: history, tree traversal Can share some mechanisms, some UI 11 Planetlab: Requirements 1) • It must provide a global platform that supports both short-term experiments and long-running services. services must be isolated from each other multiple services must run concurrently must support real client workloads Key Ideas Slices Virtualization multiple architectures on a shared infrastructure Programmable virtually no limit on new designs Opt-in on a per-user / per-application basis attract real users demand drives deployment / adoption 12 PlanetLab: Slices 13 Slices 14 Slices 15 User Opt-in Client NAT Server 16 Virtualization: Per Node View Node Mgr Owner VM VM1 VM2 … VMn Auditing service Monitoring services Brokerage services Provisioning services Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) Linux kernel (Fedora Core) + Vservers (namespace isolation) + Schedulers (performance isolation) + VNET (network virtualization) 17 Global View … PLC … … 18 Requirements 2) It must be available now, even though no one knows for sure what “it” is deploy what we have today, and evolve over time make the system as familiar as possible (e.g., Linux) accommodate third-party management services 19 Brokerage Service . . . Bind(slice, pool) PLC (SA) User BuyResources( ) NM VM VM VM … VM VMM Broker . . . (broker contacts relevant nodes) 20 Requirements 3) Convince sites to host nodes running code written by unknown researchers from other organizations. protect the Internet from PlanetLab traffic must get the trust relationships right trusted intermediary: PLC 2 4 Node Owner PLC 3 1 Service Developer (User) 1) PLC expresses trust in a user by issuing it credentials to access a slice 2) Users trust PLC to create slices on their behalf and inspect credentials 3) Owner trusts PLC to vet users and map network activity to right user 4) PLC trusts owner to keep nodes physically secure 21 Requirements 4) • Sustaining growth depends on support for site autonomy and decentralized control sites have final say over the nodes they host must minimize (eliminate) centralized control Owner autonomy owners allocate resources to favored slices owners selectively disallow unfavored slices • Delegation PLC grants tickets that are redeemed at nodes enables third-party management services • Federation create “private” PlanetLabs using MyPLC establish peering agreements 22 Requirements 5) • It must scale to support many users with minimal resources available expect under-provisioned state to be the norm shortage of logical resources too (e.g., IP addresses) Decouple slice creation and resource allocation given a “fair share” by default when created acquire additional resources, including guarantees • Fair share with protection against thrashing 1/Nth of CPU 1/Nth of link bandwidth owner limits peak rate upper bound on average rate (protect campus bandwidth) disk quota 23 GENI Design • Key Idea Slices embedded in a substrate of networking resources • Two central pieces Physical network substrate expandable collection of building block components nodes / links / subnets Software management framework knits building blocks together into a coherent facility embeds slices in the physical substrate 27 National Fiber Facility 28 + Programmable Routers 29 + Clusters at Edge Sites 30 + Wireless Subnets 31 + ISP Peers MAE-West MAE-East 32 Closer Look Sensor Network backbone wavelength Dynamic Configurable backbone switch Switch Customizable Router Internet Wireless Subnet Edge Site 33 Summary of Substrate • Node Components • Bandwidth • edge devices customizable routers optical switches national fiber facility tail circuits (including tunnels) Wireless Subnets urban 802.11 wide-area 3G/WiMax cognitive radio sensor net emulation 34 Management Framework Management Services - name space for users, slices, & components GMC - set of interfaces (“plug in” new components) - support for federation (“plug in” new partners) Substrate Components 35 GENI Management Core (GMC) Slice Manager GMC Resource Controller Auditing Archive node control sensor data CM CM CM Virtualization SW Virtualization SW Virtualization SW Substrate HW Substrate HW Substrate HW 36