From Team M-4 Leader: Waifong Chan George Hammer Yimin Tang Introduction of Cell Encapsulation Commonly employed in bioprocesses to encapsulate bioactive species. Immobilize the cells. Protect the cells from shear forces. Increase the surface area and allow higher permeability. Promote the level of cell viability. Project Overview “I would like to know what parameters may control the average diameter of the beads produced and whether encapsulation imposes mass-transfer limitations for the bacteria.” -Dr. Ima Manager. To examine one method for encapsulating cells in alginate beads. To demonstrate the parameters which control the bead size. To determine the reaction is limited either by the reaction rate or the mass transfer limitation. Previous Work Phase-1: Safety Standard operating procedure Beads diameter regarding the changing flow rate. Phase-2: determine the change of oxygen uptake by changing… Bead size E. coli concentration Theory of mass transfer limitation Assumption: Steady State Particle is isothermal Mass transfer by diffusion only DAE, effective diffusivity is constant Particle is homogeneous Zero-kinetic Reaction rate is independent on the substrate concentration. Reaction rate = rate constant * particle volume Thiele Modulus Observable Thiele Modulus 2 V p rA,obs S x DAeC As 2 R rA,obs 3 DAeC As Where: Vp= catalyst volume Sx = External surface area R= radius of bead rA,obs= unit oxygen uptake rate = DAe= Effective Diffusivity of oxygen in the beads CAs= Concentration of oxygen at the surface Weisz criteria .3 i 1 3 i 1 ηi: the internal effectiveness factor ηi = (observed rate)/(rate that would occur if CA = CAS) If ηi ≈ 1, negligible mass transfer limitation If ηi < 1, mass transfer deficiencies throughout the bead Apparatus Ring stand Centrifuge tube Syringe Air jet Air rotameter Petri-dish Apparatus (Cont’d) Oxygen Probe Methods Prepare solution---- 0.5ml 3% Sodium Alginate & 0.5ml E.Coli Transfer solution----To a syringe plunger with a 22 gauge needle Secure syringe----use rubber band that needle protrudes 1 mm Prepare Petri dish----filled with CaCl2 Turn on air jet----to 60 SCFH and place it coaxially with syringe Collect beads----record volume used and drain CaCl2 Calibrate oxygen probe O2 calibration----in 30ml LB & beads mixture with parafilm Record O2 concentration----on every 5 min after stabilized Results (Bead size) Air Flow Diameter Sample 1 Diameter Sample 2 Diameter Sample 3 Diameter Sample 4 60 SCFH 50 SCFH 225µm 275µm 280µm 275µm 328µm 300µm 300µm 330µm Average Diameter 282µm 295µm Fig.1: Alginate bead at air flow rate of 60 SCFH. Results (oxygen uptake) Dissolved oxygen content (mg/L) Dissolved oxygen content (mg/l) 6 5.5 y = -0.0081x + 5.2862 R² = 0.8745 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 0 50 100 150 Time elapsed (s) 200 250 300 350 Results (oxygen uptake) rA,obs Average Bead Diameter (m) Average Unit Bead Volume (m3) Number of Beads used Overall Oxygen Uptake Rate (mg/l) (mg/l) 2.82E-04 1.17E-11 8.52E+04 8.10E-03 9.51E-08 R (m) 1.41E-04 rA,obs (mg/l) 9.51E-08 Dae (m2/s) 2.56E-09 Cas (mg/l) 5.76 Φ 1.42E-08 Ф < 0.3 ηi = 1 negligible mass transfer limitation Results from other literatures From Xiaoming Xu et al[4] Mass transfer is inversely related to beads’ diameter. Some suggest that[2] [3] Needle inside diameter and the viscosity of the alginate also contribute to the variability of bead’s diameter. Conclusion The main parameter to determine the bead size is the co-axle air flow rate. Higher flow rate corresponds to smaller beads but in better spherical shape. Using Thiele modules and Weisz criteria, alginate beads was demonstrated to have no mass transfer limitation. Other literatures shows that smaller size of alginate beads can have higher mass transfer. Recommendations Using at least 1 ml of alginate beads in order to observe significant change in oxygen consumption. Install a heater to incubate alginate beads at 37 °C. Using magnetic stirring bar with suitable glassware to minimize the vibration created by the oxygen probe. References 1. Team M-5, Phase II Memo, 04/05/2010 2. G. W. Vandenberg, C. Drolet, S. L. Scott1 and J. de la Noüe, “Factors affecting protein release from alginate – chitosan coacervate microcapsules during production and gastric/intestinal simulation Journal of Controlled Release”, Volume 77, Issue 3, 13 December 2001, pages 297-307. 3. aUlf Pr¨usse*, bLuca Bilancetti, cMarek Bučko, dBranko Bugarski, eJozef Bukowski, cPeter Gemeiner, eDorota Lewi´nska, dVerica Manojlovic, fBenjamin Massart, b Claudio Nastruzzi, gViktor Nedovic, hDenis Poncelet, iSwen Siebenhaar, hLucien Tobler, bAzzurra Tosi, cAlica Vikartovska, aKlaus-Dieter Vorlop., “Comparison of different technologies for alginate beads production”, Chemical Papers 62 (4) 364–374 (2008) 4. Xiaoming Xu, Philip S. Stewart *, Xiao Chen Transport limitation of chlorine disinfection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa entrapped in alginate beads, Biotechnology and bioengineering 1996, vol. 49, no1, pp. 93-100 (25 ref.) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc 5. Rigini M Papi, Sotiria A Chaitidou, Fotini A Trikka and Dimitrios A Kyriakidis, Encapsulated Escherichia coli in alginate beads capable of secreting a heterologous pectin lyase, Microbial Cell Factories 2005, 4:35. 6. Mehmetoglu, U. "Oxygen Diffusivity in Calcium Alginate Gel Beads Containing Gluconobacter Suboxydans." Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Biotechnology 24.2 (196): 91‐106. Web. 28 Mar 2010. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a789260358