Human Resource Management in the Recession Bill Roche Professor of Industrial Relations & Human Resources School of Business University College Dublin Presentation to CIPD, VHI House, May 25th 2011 The Irish Recession and the Labour Market Worst economic crisis in modern Irish history and Ireland worst case among advanced economies: GDP (2007-2009): -10.9% volume of retail sales (2007-2010(Q3): -16.7% sharp rise in incidence of company insolvencies: +80% (2008-2010) financial crisis – nationalization of the financial system & state capitalization (€70bn) debt/GDP ratio (2008-2010): 44.4% unemployment (2007-2010): 4.6% 97.25% and may rise to c 120% 14.6% net emigration (2007-2010): - 67,3000 + 34,500 collapse of social partnership pay: (2009-2010(Q3-Q3)): Average Hourly Earnings Private sector: -0.2% Public sector: -4.6% (excl 7% ‘pension levy’) ‘Human Resources in the Recession’ 2011 Study by Roche/Teague/Coughlan and Fahy* Survey of 444 employers Focus groups involving 30 HR managers Focus groups involving 17 trade union officials Six case studies of good practice in responding to the recession Irish Life and Permanent, Sherry FitzGerald, Dublin Airport Authority Superquinn. Medtronic, Ericsson * W.K. Roche, P.Teague, A.Coughlan and M. Fahy, Human Resources in the Recession: Managing and Representing People at Work in Ireland, 2011 forthcoming. How is the Recession Affecting Human Resource Management? 3 Views Evident in Commentary and the Literature 1. The recession as harbinger of HR cataclysm or a new ‘marketized’ employment model 2. The recession as a ‘shot in the arm’ for HR and a catalyst for highcommitment HR transformation 3. The recession as contributor to eclectic change in HR practice Research Issues • How is the recession affecting human resource practices? • How is the recession affecting the HR function? • How is the recession affecting relations with unions? • Will the recession transform work and employment arrangements? HR Practices & Programmes Balance Between Cost Reduction and Maintaining Motivation & Commitment HR Practices ‘hard’ HR practices ‘soft’ HR practices curbs on pay & bonuses communications headcount reductions engagement & involvement cuts in working time training, talent management & staff --redeployment curbs on recruitment & promotion larger pay cuts for higher-paid productivity measures in-sourcing work direct cost reduction maintain motivation & commitment Firms’ HR Response Programmes • Multi-stranded HR retrenchment programmes combining a range of hard practices adopted in about 1 in 2 firms & similar incidence of mainly pay-freeze focused programmes • But employers in general seeking to balance hard and soft .practices – controlling payroll costs & maintaining motivation & commitment: 7 out of 10 firms combine retrenchment programmes with a range of soft HR practices that include more emphasis on communications, employee engagement measures and the involvement of employees in developing response measures 3 out of 10 firms combine retrenchment programmes with heightened emphasis on communications Most Effective HR Practices • When asked to identify the most effective HR practices in managing ..the recession, most frequently identified were: communication & information disclosure efficiencies and cost control engagement & consultation • These practices also among those strongly associated in focus groups ..and case studies with ‘good human resource management’ in the ..recession Role & Influence of HR Function • HR functions ‘leaner’ but radical restructuring not prominent % fewer staff in HR department 32 (70% firms cut headcount) less use of external HR consultants 43 costs of HR policies/processes reduced 17 HR department restructured 15 business role of HR has been strengthened • Influence of HR has increased significantly • ‘Business partners and working the pumps’ 59 (64% firms restructured) Relations with Trade Unions • The majority of firms appear to consider the ..participation and contribution of unions during the ..recession in a fairly positive way • More than six out of ten firms stated that they had ..actively engaged with unions in developing HR ..options with which to respond to the recession • Almost six out of ten firms disagreed that the ..actions required to respond to the recession have ..been so urgent that there has been little time to ..consult or negotiate with trade unions Influence of Trade Unions ‘ Concession Bargaining’ Dominates the Picture • Unions do not appear to have been able to exert much leverage on managements’ favoured measures for responding to the recession: only a very small number of firms (5 per cent) agree that unions persuaded the business to change measures initially decided on to address the recession (e.g. from redundancies to short-term working) a similarly small number (6 per cent) stated that unions had secured agreement on financial ‘claw-backs’ for their members when business conditions improve The position of trade unions is weakened by subdued and compliant employees, fearful for their jobs, pensions and livelihoods. Evidence of Transformation of Work and Employment? ‘new employment deal’ /market-driven model ? prevailing models of work and employment ? high-commitment model • Much tumult, adaptation, improvisation and innovation evident in the actions of firms – but are firms moving in any clear direction? • Abiding appeal of received principles of good HRM – ‘plus ca change’ • HR – ‘business partners’ but ‘working the pumps’ – strategically reconfiguring HR practices for recovery and beyond? • Case studies reveal firms for the most part seeking to preserve existing models Human Resource Management in the Recession: Some Key Conclusions • Employers commonly adopting multi-stranded HR ..response programmes geared to reducing payroll ..costs but also seeking to preserve motivation and ..commitment • Leaner but more influential HR functions • Unions mainly negotiating concessions & facing unprecedented challenges • Few indications that the recession is breaking the mould of established patterns of work and employment Supplementary Powerpoints Headline Findings: Incidence of ‘Hard’ HR Practices % Firms cuts in pay for all staff 40 cuts in pay for some staff 16 pay frozen for all staff 60 pay frozen for some staff 11 lower pay for new staff 23 compulsory redundancies 48 voluntary redundancies 30 changed pension arrangements 35 reduced overtime 63 Reduced part-time/contract working 21 performance managed more rigorously 47 tightened discipline, time-keeping, attendance 48 % Employees at work 19 16 69 14 17 37 39 40 60 26 50 40 Headline Findings: Incidence of ‘Soft’ HR Practices staff trained for new roles in business % Firms 40 % Employees at work 53 undertook talent management measures 21 32 staff redeployed within firm 43 56 cut training & development budget 51 54 communications more important# 89 employee engagement measures undertaken# 52 active involvement of employees in developing options to respond to recession# 55 higher pay cuts for senior staff 25 17 Higher bonus cuts for senior staff 12 20 5 7 introduced in-sourcing # Proportion of firms ‘agreeing’ or ‘strongly agreeing with item Combinations of ‘Hard’ HR Practices Table 3.10: Combined use of HR response measures Firms Adopting General HR Retrenchment Programmes Firms Adopting Pay FreezeFocused Retrenchment Programmes Predicted % of firms Cluster Size 50.2 49.8 Cut wages and salaries for some or all staff 87.5 8.6 Froze wages and salaries for some or all staff 56.0 89.6 Introduced lower pay/pay scales for new staff 28.9 14.3 Introduced voluntary and/or compulsory redundancy 77.1 45.8 Reduced overtime 75.1 54.2 Introduced short-time working 62.6 22.4 Reduced use of part-time and/or contract working 22.5 16.7 Changed pension arrangements for existing or new staff 37.9 18.8 Managed staff performance more rigorously and/or tightened discipline, time-keeping and attendance 66.0 59.7 HR Measures Adopted: (Clusters identified through latent class modeling of unweighted data) Combinations of ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ HR Practices Table 3.10: Combined use of HR response measures Combined ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ Response Programmes ‘Hard’ Response Programmes Allied to Communications Predicted % of firms 73.3 26.7 General HR retrenchment programmes 45.7 56.6. Employee engagement measures undertaken 69.0 22.0 Communications more important 95.3 71.5 Active involvement of employees in response measures 60.1 26.4 Talent management measures undertaken 28.8 3.9 Cluster Size HR Measures Adopted: (Clusters identified through latent class modeling of unweighted data)