I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For Feraco Search for Human Potential 13 September 2011 I have climbed highest mountains, I have run through the fields, Only to be with you…Only to be with you… I have run, I have crawled, I have scaled these city walls, Only to be with you…Only to be with you… …But I still haven’t found what I’m looking for… I have kissed honey lips, felt the healing in her fingertips It burned like a fire, this burning desire I have spoken with the tongue of angels, I have held the hand of a devil It was warm in the night, I was cold as a stone… …But I still haven’t found what I’m looking for… I believe in the Kingdom Come Then all the colors will bleed into one, bleed into one… But, yes, I'm still running You broke the bonds and you loosed the chains Carried the cross of my shame You know I believe it… …But I still haven’t found what I’m looking for… Paul David Hewson (Bono) Rhyme and Reason In a book that’s so concerned with questions of identity and meaning – who am I, why am I here, and what should I be doing? – something as simple as Siddhartha’s name serves as an entry point for our analysis. Most authors put a great deal of thought into their characters’ names. Some, such as Pete Docter (the writerdirector of Up), choose names with personal meaning and resonance Those who know that Docter named his youngest daughter Ellie watch his film from a very different perspective Catty Cady Others, such as Fyodor Dostoevsky in Crime and Punishment, use names to underscore themes or symbolic concerns, with the name’s sound/definition either reflecting that character’s arc or personality or underscoring the author’s main message(s). Dostoevsky dubs his main character Raskolnikov, a nifty variation on the Russian word for divided – a great moniker for a man whose personality swings wildly between extremes, to the point that he seems like two different men in the same body. Mean Girls actually has a pretty neat example of this as well: everyone mispronounces Cady as “Catty,” then shrugs her off when she tries to correct them. This is appropriate for a girl with some serious identity issues (for one reason or another, no one knows who she really is), and when she begins changing into someone who’s…well, catty…the name fits even more effectively. Wikipedia Mashups As it so happens, Hermann Hesse’s character names also reflect the characters’ purposes, personalities, or fates. Take, for example, Siddhartha, our eponymous protagonist. A quick Wikipedia check – always a wonderful and reliable source of academic knowledge – reveals the meanings of “Sidd” and “artha” in Sanskrit. A compound of “Sidd” can mean “fulfilled” or “accomplished”; a compound of “artha” can mean “aim” or “wealth.” Combining the two into “Siddhartha” leaves one with “wealth of the fulfilled aim.” In other words, he who searches correctly and patiently (“aim”) will eventually find what he seeks (“fulfilled” and “wealth”). The traditional meaning of Siddhartha is less literal – “he who has achieved his aims,” or “he who is victorious” – but otherwise similar. Consider the Following If, as our Freakonomics selection in Nice to Know You jokingly suggests, naming has some sort of impact on our destiny – or if we follow the Crime and Punishment approach – Siddhartha’s name indicates that he eventually finds what he’s looking for for, whatever it may be. (You’ll just have to keep reading to find out what it is.) But this explanation for his name is too simple. Consider the following: The historical Siddhartha Gautama founded Buddhism. The Siddhartha we follow throughout the story is not the historical Siddhartha Gautama. Our Siddhartha does, in fact, meet the Buddha himself; in the Rosner translation, the Buddha is referred to as Gotama. Why Focus on the Nobody? Why bother naming your character Siddhartha if he’s not the Buddha? Let’s be honest: at the end of the day, which guy is going to be leading the more impressive life – our protagonist, or one of the greatest spiritual leaders to ever walk the earth? Shouldn’t we be reading about the second guy? Why focus on the nobody? In order to understand why Siddhartha and Gotama play separate roles in the book, it’s important to understand first who the Buddha was, and why he was important. Self-Generated For one thing, the historical Siddhartha Gautama (henceforth referred to as Gautama/Gotama for clarity’s sake) is a human being, not a superhuman, deity, or immortal. Moreover, the Buddha is not perceived as a god, particularly not in a way analogous to Christian worship of God and Christ. Rather, Gautama/Gotama is simply a man who finds what he set out to look for: a greater spiritual truth. The idea that an individual could find peace – true peace – over the course of a normal human lifespan is incredibly inspirational to many, and Gautama/Gotama’s achievement is all the more noteworthy because it’s selfgenerated: he found what he searched for on his own. The Silence and the Emptiness Thus Gautama/Gotama represents independent spiritual fulfillment, which people can search for over the course of a lifetime…and never find. Just look at Mother Teresa, someone whose life’s work revolved around faith. She firmly believed that God existed, and that He did his work through her. But as revealed following the controversial release of her private letters after her death, Mother Teresa felt very much removed from the deity she worshipped. Jesus has a very special love for you. As for me, the silence and the emptiness is so great that I look and do not see, listen and do not hear. Lord, my God, who am I that You should forsake me? The Child of your Love – and now become as the most hated one – the one – You have thrown away as unwanted – unloved. I call, I cling, I want – and there is no One to answer – no One on Whom I can cling – no, No One. – Alone… Where is my Faith – even deep down right in there is nothing, but emptiness & darkness – My God – how painful is this unknown pain – I have no Faith – I dare not utter the words & thoughts that crowd in my heart – & make me suffer untold agony. So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them – because of the blasphemy – If there be God – please forgive me – When I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven – there is such convicting emptiness that those very thoughts return like sharp knives & hurt my very soul. I am told God loves me – and yet the reality of darkness & coldness & emptiness is so great that nothing touches my soul. Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly to the Call of the Sacred Heart? Seek, Crave, Reject In Mother Teresa’s private pain, we see why so many admire Gautama/Gotama. By finding that which he sought, by filling the silence with something, he has essentially completed himself – fulfilling his potential in the process. We see that Gautama/Gotama has already achieved what Siddhartha seeks, as well as obtained the knowledge and sense of peace that the younger man craves. Yet Siddhartha rejects the opportunity to learn from the master, arguing that he must discover what he seeks himself in order for it to have personal meaning for him. (In this, I find we are similar – at least with respect to my feelings regarding faith and “gravitation.”) An Unfinished Product In many ways, Siddhartha represents a fundamental contradiction: he knows everything in the world as he knows it (the village), yet he knows nothing. This is why Siddhartha has been denied a last name, and why Gautama/Gotama has been given nothing else: the latter man is a finished product, and our protagonist is woefully raw and unfinished. The implication, then, is that he will someday walk a path that’s similar to Gautama/Gotama’s, one where he not only finds what he’s looking for, but generates the solution himself. Thus we’ve covered two of the factors that most influenced Hesse’s choice for his main character’s name: the meaning of the word’s components and the importance of its “incompleteness.” Fighting Destiny Yet there is another reason for the name: a parallel between Siddhartha and Gautama/Gotama that Hesse recognized as he wrote. At birth, Gautama/Gotama was predicted to realize one of two destinies: he would either become a great king or a spiritual leader. His father, a king himself, was determined to prevent his son from becoming a religious leader. He reasoned that the best way to keep Gautama/Gotama from turning to that path was to shield him from human suffering: if my son never knows pain, and never knows of others’ suffering, he will never turn from the throne. Discovering Misery Consequently, Gautama/Gotama stayed within the confines of his family’s royal estate and property, knowing nothing of illness, sadness, or death. But when he finally went out into the world at the age of twenty-nine, he caught his first glimpses of ordinary peoples’ pain: decline, misery, poverty, sickness – and yes, even death. This resulted in a profound change in his philosophy. (The king’s worst fears were realized.) Everything… Siddhartha walks the same path as the man who would become the Buddha – the path to realization, to awareness of a larger world. By discovering pain outside of his sheltered village world – just as Gautama/Gotama did – Siddhartha will grow more aware of interconnectedness, of the essential unity of existence. This is one of the book’s fundamental ideas: that everything changes, everything repeats, everything is connected. Clearly, the name wasn’t simply meant to foreshadow Siddhartha’s fate; it was also meant to directly recall his spiritual predecessor…a man whose guidance Siddhartha dismisses as firmly as his own father’s. Hubristic If this strikes you as arrogant, foolish, or hubristic – like a young basketball player responding to a tutoring offer from Kobe Bryant with “No thanks, I’m good” – I can’t entirely disagree. By forsaking the Buddha’s guidance, Siddhartha loses his best friend, veers from an easy road, and commits himself to genuine human existence – a lifetime of uncertainty and discovery. I’m not sure whether that’s a wise choice, and I’m certain that Siddhartha has no idea how vulnerable he’s left himself by making it. Without a teacher to guide him at every step of the way, he risks making mistakes, suffering, and inflicting pain on others. Exciting! But in casting off guidance, Siddhartha opens himself to new, exciting possibilities. It may be a foolish decision, but it’s not a decision someone who lacks courage can make. For better or for worse, Siddhartha is brave, strong in his convictions, and determined to fulfill his potential. His journey should make for interesting reading, no?