Funding

advertisement
Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV)
Career
Technical
Education
Act
Click and
to edit
Master
title style
Core Indicator
Cohort Selection
Dr. W. Charles Wiseley
Spring 2011
1
Agenda
Click to edit Master title style
• Perkins IV
– Data,
– Cohort Selection,
– Core Indicator Denominators
2
Data Flow: College
Data collection
Admissions
& Records
Course
Characteristics
Classroom
Financial Aid
Student Services
Student
Achievement
Student
Characteristics
Demographics
District
MIS
Types of data
CCC
Chancellor's Office
MIS
Special
Population
Status
Data Flow: Chancellor’s Office
Chancellor’s Office MIS
District MIS
SSN based data matches
MIS database
DSS: CalWORKs
Research & Accountability
Advisory Committee
EDD: UI wages
Perkins IV - USDE/OVAE
State Plan
Non regulatory guidance
NSC: transfers
OMB “Official Documents”
Consolidated Annual Report
Accountability Framework &
CO MIS
Report Specifications
Programming
Funding Reports
Accountability Reports
The magic happens here!
Click to edit Master title style
Chancellor’s Office
District data
Management Information
Perkins counts
Systems (MIS) Group
5
Core Indicator Data
Click to edit Master title style
• MIS Data
– Data Elements
– Funding
– Accountability
6
Defining the Data
Click to edit Master title style
•
•
•
•
SAM Codes
TOP Codes
Data Elements
Core Indicators
Funding
– Definitions
– Negotiated Performance Targets
– Denominator Selection
7
Student Accountability Model (SAM)
Click
to edit of
Master
title(TOP)
style
& Taxonomy
Programs
• Priority “A“ - Apprenticeship
– Must have the of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards
approval
• Priority “B“ – Advanced Vocational
– Used sparingly, no more than two courses in any one
program
– “B” level courses must have a “C” prerequisite in the same
program area
• Priority "C" – Clearly Occupational
– Generally taken in the middle stage of a program, detracts
"drop-ins."
8
Student Accountability Model (SAM)
Click to edit
Master(TOP),
title style
& Taxonomy
of Programs
Continued
• Priority "D" – Possibly Occupational
– Taken by students in the beginning stages of their
occupational programs
– Can be survey course
• Priority “E” = Non-Occupational
Vocational Flag on TOP code
– Designed to identify vocational “Programs” for federal
reporting (*) - see Taxonomy of Programs, Sixth Edition,
July 2007
9
Data Elements
MIS
System title style
Click to edit
Master
• Students, Courses, Degrees, Services
• Student VTEA Data Elements
–
–
–
–
–
–
Economically Disadvantaged
Single Parent
Displaced Homemaker
Cooperative Work Experience Education
Tech Prep
Migrant Worker - Implementation SU 09
10
2011-2012
Section IE-D
Cohort Definitions
for Master
Measurement
ClickUsed
to edit
title style
Participant:
–
Counts: - Any enrollment in a CTE course (SAM A-D)
–
NT Participation: – Concentrator using assigned major
Concentrator: All other indicators
•
Cohort of participants enrolled during the cohort year* and
–
•
Successfully completed
•
at least one course in the middle or end of a program (SAM A-C) and
•
12 vocational units (SAM A-D) within a single discipline (two digit TOP)
in the last three years
or
–
Program completion as indicated by receipt of ANY vocational credit
certificate or degree in the cohort year (or subsequent year /wo *)
Leavers: Not enrolled in the year following the cohort year
Life-Long-Learners (LLL): Previously Earned Certificate or Degree 12
Assigning a Program to a Student
Click to edit Master title style
1. Award –TOP code of CTE Certificate or Degree
2. Concentrators (no CTE award)
•
Hierarchy based on SAM Priority code
•
Assigned to the TOP where most CTE units occurred
13
Perkins IV (2006)
CoretoIndicator
Denominators
Click
edit Master
title style
1. Technical Skill Attainment
Unduplicated Concentrators w Grades A-F (GPA)
2. Completions
Leavers & Completers:
not non-completing Persisters or Life-Long-Learners
3. Persistence & Transfer
Concentrators who were not completers (unless transferring)
4. Placement
Concentrators who were leavers or completers (certificates
and degrees).
5. Gender Equity -- Nontraditional Fields
Only students in nontraditional TOP coded programs
14
My Numbers Don’t Look Right
Click to edit -Master
Recap title style
• Reasons for 80 in the Total,
rather than the 500 students I see in my classes:
– 12 CTE units (SAM A-D) within a 2-digit TOP
in the last 3 years
– Plus, At least one course at a SAM A-C
– Assigning a TOP by highest SAM
– Denominator selection: e.g., excluding Life-Long-Learners
15
Access to Details
Click to edit Master title style
• http://www.cccco.edu
 Chancellor’s Office
 Divisions
 > CTE
 >> Core Indicators
• Important Documentation
•
•
•
•
•
Accessing Negotiation Reports
Accountability Framework
Assigning majors
State Negotiated Targets
Accountability System Documentation
16
Questions?
Click to edit Master title style
– Comments or Questions:
• Your Regional Monitor
• Chuck Wiseley - cwiseley@cccco.edu,
• 916.327.5895
17
Download