NCHRP Project SP20-59 (17)
CAPTA
Costing Asset Protection:
An All Hazards Guide for Transportation Agencies
November 2008
Michael Smith (SAIC)
Steve Lockwood (PB Consult)
Briefing Overview
Objectives Evolution
Model Overview
Discussion
11/13/2008
2
Evolution: Initial NCHRP SP2-59(17) Project
Objective
To develop a Guide to Risk Management of
Multimodal Transportation Infrastructure that
will provide state DOTs and other transportation
entities with a risk management methodology
that can be used to conduct threat, vulnerability,
and criticality assessments of their facilities and
to determine cost-effective countermeasures to
prevent, detect, and reduce threats to assets on a
multimodal basis.
11/13/2008
3
Evolution: Initial Approach to Multimodal
Transportation Risk Management Methodology
2) Intermodal
Transportation Asset
Criticality
How important is the asset
to the agency mission?
(criticality score)
6) Consequences
What effect will the loss have
on the agency mission?
(% loss x criticality score)
Asset criticality scores
Structural features by asset class
Physical
features
4) Vulnerability to
Damage (VTD)
What damage will occur if
the postulated attack
scenario is successful?
(% loss)
% loss due
to attack
Mitigate damage
Design threat
scenarios
1) Asset Characteristics
What are the salient
features of the asset
(configuration, structure,
and security)?
Attack
Consequences
Score
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
9) Risk Mitigation
Countermeasures
Structural hardening
Access controls
Intrusion detection
Lighting
Fencing/barriers
Security patrols
Response force
Etc.
Relative
risks by
asset class
8) Risk Assessment
How likely is the attack to be
successful and what are the
consequences of a successful
attack?
Risk = Likelihood x Consequences
Mitigate attack
Risk mitigation “packages”
Physical
features
Existing security features
3) Threat Characteristics
How likely is an attack?
How attractive is the target?
Will the threat be deterred?
What are the likely attack
scenarios (weapon, mode,
path, tactics)?
11/13/2008
5) Susceptibility to Attack
(STA)
Will the threat be
successful in accessing the
asset without detection and
defeat?
Attack likelihood
(by threat scenario)
10) Risk Mitigation
Countermeasures Cost
Analysis
What is the life cycle cost
of implementing,
maintaining, and operating
the proposed measure?
Relative likelihood of successful attack
Threat
Likelihood
Score
7) Relative Likelihood
For a given threat scenario
and VTA, how likely is a
successful attack?
(% successful)
4
Evolution: Focus on Realistic View of Utility Context
Current available risk management strategies are asset, mode, threat/hazard
specific. These tactical approaches do not accommodate strategic, highlevel, multimodal, all-hazard considerations needed for overall agency-level
planning, budgeting and allocating.
The full range of risks faced by a transportation owner/operator forms a
continuum. This range of risk requires a systematic, cohesive, risk
management approach that encompasses all modes.
Many Transportation agencies have already internalized (1) natural hazards,
(2) unintentional events and (3) some intentional threats (crime) in
established design standards and operational planning. Adding terrorism as a
separate matter
Agency threat management expertise is minimal, but risk awareness in terms
of consequence understanding is keen. CAPTA uses this knowledge as input
to the assessment process with minimal resort to “black box” methods
(multiple T x V x C methods)
Refocused on management of consequences and cost implications – an
objective framework
11/13/2008
5
Evolution: Capstone Role in State DOT
Methodology Portfolio
FIX
Costing Asset Protection: An All Hazards Guide for
Transportation Agencies (CAPTA)
11/13/2008
NCHRP 20-59(23), A Guide to
Emergency Response Planning at
State Transportation Agencies
(NAS)
Surface Transportation Security,
Volume 6: Guide for Emergency
Transportation Operations
(NCHRP Report 525 Volume 6)
Transportation Security, Volume 12:
Making Transportation Tunnels Safe
and Secure (NCHRP Report 525
Volume 12)
TCRP Report 86 Volume 11
Security Measures for Ferry
Systems
2002 AASHTO Guide to Highway
Vulnerability Assessment for Critical
Asset Identification and Protection
Report To Congress On
Catastrophic Hurricane
Evacuation Plan Evaluation,
(FHWA/DHS)
DHS Special Jurisdictions (DHS)
Other Asset, Mode, Threat,
Hazard, or Sector Specific
Guidance
6
Evolution: Revised NCHRP SP2-59(17)
Project Focus
To support mainstreaming an integrated, high
level, all-hazard, NIMS-responsive, multimodal
consequence-driven, risk management process
into transportation agency programs and
activities by providing a convenient and robust
planning tool for top-down estimation of both
capital and operating budget implications of
measures intended to reduce risks to locally
acceptable levels.
11/13/2008
7
Briefing Overview
Objectives Evolution
Model Overview
Discussion
11/13/2008
8
Model: Key Features
Application Context
– Top-down, program level – to support resource allocation
– Consequence-driven – based on user-selected thresholds
– Iterative –use to compare/refine assumptions
Model Attributes
– Objective – when possible use data rather than “best judgment”
– Transparent – avoid “weighting and rating”
– Consistent – uses simple, available data and criteria, standard data base,
default values
– Replicable – identify basis of all judgments
User Features
– Convenient – uses available resources (people and software) and
imbedded data model
– Scaleable – support a range of user contexts, mode, hazards,
– Expandable – to accommodate new threats/hazards, asset types, and
countermeasures
11/13/2008
9
Model: Ease of Use
Uses language familiar to owner/operator community
Choices offered – “basic” or “enhanced” versions
Integrated data base and user interface
No special hardware/software (Uses MSExcel®)
Simple identification of inputs and thresholds
Iterative analysis (simple enough to assess multiple options)
Default values provided for “quick look” analysis (threats
and hazards/asset data/countermeasure selection and
analysis)
Ends with summary report showing committed resources
across assets
11/13/2008
10
Model: Products
Project report that documents research activity
and methodology development
User Guide that explains and illustrates the
CAPTA methodology and its implementation
and application
Computer-based tool that implements the
methodology (“CAPTool”)
Embedded data model (updatable)
11/13/2008
11
Model Demonstration: Interactions
·
·
·
·
·
User Inputs
Risk Management Methodology
Six step methodology implemented
using Microsoft Excel®
spreadsheet to capture inputs and
display intermediate outputs
Candidate
Countermeasures
11/13/2008
User Inputs
Asset Classes of Interest
Threats/Hazards of Concern
Consequence Thresholds
Asset Attributes within Classes
Countermeasure Selection
Consolidated User Inputs
Potential Countermeasures
Master Countermeasures Data Base
Description of generic countermeasures
considered effective in mitigating risks
by asset class, hazard or threat, and
consequence.
Candidate Countermeasure Configurations
List of selected countermeasures that will
reduce risks to asset classes of interest
against threats/hazards of concern to avoid
exceeding specified consequence threshold
· Description of selected countermeasures
including rough order of magnitude costs
and selected functional characteristics
·
Countermeasure
attributes
12
Model Demonstration:
Overview of CAPTA Implementation
Basic
CAPTA
Feedback & Iteration
1
2
3
4
5
6
11/13/2008
Steps in Methodology
Identify Relevant Risks and Asset Classes
Verify High Consequence Threats and
Hazards
Establish Consequence Thresholds
Describe Infrastructure Assets
Identify Critical Assets Across Modes
Review Countermeasure Unit Costs
Identify and Describe Additional
Countermeasures
Set Countermeasure Filters based on User
Preference
Select Candidate Countermeasures
Summary Report
Expanded
CAPTA
1
1a
2
3
4
5a
5b
5c
5
6
13
CAPTool Look and Feel
Next
Physical Security
Countermeasures
Access Control
Countermeasures
Asset
Design/E
ngr
Operational
Countermeasures
High Effectiveness
Park Street Station
Government Center
State Street
College Station
Suburban Station
Airport Station
All other aboveground
All other belowground
Transit/Rail Station
Market Station
Road Tunnels
Downtown Station
Road Bridges
Quantity of Named Asset
11/13/2008
Medium
Effectiveness
Bay Station
Color Key
South Station
To add units of countermeasure, enter the desired number of units
into any cell. Alternatively, the "Analyze Asset" sheet also has a
field for adding units of countermeasure.
When you are satisfied with your CM allocation, click "Continue."
Clear All
Countermeasure
Quantities
North Station
To
Y analyze anX asset more closely, click on the name of the asset
in row 15, and then click "Analyze Asset." A new sheet will pop up
that details the effectivness of the countermeasure against every
relevant threat and hazard. The sheet will also tell you how many
units of countermeasure you have selected so far for the asset,
and the estimated cost.
Filter
Countermeasures
Memorial Tunnel
Select Candidate Countermeasures
Instructions
The following is a list of countermeasure opportunities for each
critical asset -- orange indicates medium effectiveness and red
indicates high effectiveness.
Analyze Asset
Uptown Tunnel
6 Basic CAPTool
6 Expanded CAPTool
Downtown Tunnel
5
5
Veteran's Bridge
4
4 5a 5b 5c
State Line Bridge
3
3
Blue River Bridge
1
2
1 1a 2
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
20
13
Lighting
Barriers & Berms
Fences
CCTV
User
Options
Intrusion Detection Devices
Physical Inspection of asset
ID Cards
Biometrics
Background Checks
Metal Detectors
Restricted Parking
Random Inspections
Visible Badges
Limited Access Points
Visitor Control & Escort
Locks
Explosive Detection
Establish Clear Zones
Visible Signs
Seismic Retrofitting
Fire Detection & Supression
Description of
this step &
instructions
Encasement, Wrapping, Jacketing
Step
indicators
Reset
Buttons
Color
code key
Patrols
WX/Seismic Information
Intelligence Networking
HAZMAT Mitigation
Security Awareness Training
Emergency Response Training
Emergency Evacuation Planning
Planned Redundancy (e.g., detours)
Public Information and Dissemination
14
Expanded CAPTool
Previous
Stamped Copy to
Default Folder
nt Risks and Asset Classes
Step 1: Relevant Risk and Asset Classes
Reset Answers to
"N"
mmended that you save this as a new project. The "Save" button to the right will rename the file as
-stamped copy to your default folder with the filename: "TransRiskManagementYYYY-MM-DD
asses of interest, please indicate the threats/hazards that you wish to include in your analysis by
ponse from "N" to "Y" for each cell. Threat/hazard and asset combinations that are likely to result in
be considered in subsequent steps. When done, click "Next."
THREATS
Small Explosives
Large Explosives
Chemical/Biological/Radiological
Criminal Acts
UNINTENTIONAL HAZARDS
Fire
Struct. Failure
HAZMAT
NATURAL HAZARDS
Flood
Earthquake
Extreme Weather
Mud/Landslide
ADDITIONAL
User entered threat/hazard 1
User entered threat/hazard 2
11/13/2008
Next
User-Entered
On/Off
Road Bridges
Road Tunnels
Transit/Rail
Station
Transit/Rail
Bridges
Transit/Rail
Tunnels
Admin & Support
Facilities
Ferry
Fleet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
15
Expanded CAPTool
to Lowest Levels
Previous
Next
Establish Consequence Thresholds Instructions
For each asset class, set the appropriate thresholds.
When done, click "Next."
"Reset" sets all thresholds to their lowest levels.
Assets Summay
(Only if Data on
Individual Assets is
Already Entered
Step 2: Establish Consequence Thresholds
ROAD BRIDGE
Category
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
Level I
Level II
Level III
Explanation
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
Demand percentile for ADT * Detour Length
Critical Threshold
0
$5,000
Level I
29000
68000
241000
Restore Defaults
The default threshold values for ADT * detour length are taken from the 75th, 85th,
and 95th percentiles for the U.S. If these are inappropriate for your state, enter
different values in the appropriate fields to the left.
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
Do you consider all road tunnels to be mission critical?
ROAD TUNNEL
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
Yes
TRANSIT/RAIL
STATION
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
Yes
Yes
TRANSIT/RAIL
BRIDGE
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
0
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
What % of ridership does a bridge need to serve in order to be mission critical?
TRANSIT/RAIL
TUNNEL
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
0
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
What % of ridership does a tunnel need to serve in order to be mission critical?
ADMIN & SUPPORT Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
FACILITIES
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
Yes
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
Do you consider all administrative and support facilities to be mission critical?
FERRY BOATS
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
Yes
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
Do you consider all ferry boats to be mission critical?
TRANSIT FLEETS
Potentially Exposed Population
Property Loss
Mission Importance
0
$5,000
Yes
Potentially exposed population threshold
Replacement cost
Do you consider all transit fleets to be mission critical?
11/13/2008
Potentially exposed population threshold
Do you consider below-ground stations to be property critical?
Do you consider all transfer stations to be mission critical?
16
toggling from "No" to "Yes" in the manual override column.
Step 3: Describe Infrastructure Assets
To add comments, toggle the "Comments" button on, and insert any desired comments for each asset. To hide
(Separatebutton
list for
the comments column, toggle the "Comments"
off. each mode/asset type)
Click "Calculate Criticality" to view a summary of criticality areas for your assets. When done, click "Next."
ROAD BRIDGES
Asset ID
Fair St. Bridge
ES Rhodes Bridge
Peck Bridge
Tucker Channel Bridge
Broad Bridge
Shaw Bridge
I-95 Bridge
High Bridge
Little River Bridge
McDonald Bridge
11/13/2008
Quantity
ADT
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1469
9753
234000
4967
56099
45032
2390
89345
50345
42000
Length (ft)
2389
3409
1428
671
4530
7927
801
5609
10478
12093
Lanes
Detour (mi)
2
2
8
2
4
4
2
4
4
6
76
54
21
89
43
78
65
92
23
56
Replacement Cost Per Asset
Manually mark as
(Optional)
critical?
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
$50,000,000
No
17
Step 4: Identify Critical Assets Across Modes
RELEVANT THREATS/ HAZARDS
Next
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
SW Region TMC
Y
Property Loss
Woodbury Bridge
Tunnel
Admin & Sup
Post Road Bridge
Tunnel
Road Tunnels
Downtown
Potentially Exposed Population
Previous
Walker Tunnel
CRITICALITY
In particular, look closely at assets that have been manually
marked critical (these cells are highlighted yellow), as you may
wish to adjust the threats or hazards associated with these
assets. When done, click "Next."
Road Bridges
Return to Thresholds Sheet
McDonald Bridge
YIf you wish toXmodify the relevant risks for an asset, delete an "X"
from any cell to remove that as a risk for the corresponding
asset. Likewise, add an "X" to any field where you believe a
threat/hazard is relevant to the asset.
# of assets considered
10
7
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
30
Little River Bridge
The following is a list of all critical assets, their thresholds of
interest, and their relevant threats or hazards.
# of critical assets
7
4
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
21
High Bridge
Identify Critical Assets Across Modes
Instructions
Asset Type
Road bridges
Road tunnels
Stations
Rail bridges
Rail tunnels
Facilities
Ferry
Fleet
Other
Total
Shaw Bridge
6 Basic CAPTool
6 Expanded CAPTool
Broad Bridge
4
5
4 5a 5b 5c 5
Peck Bridge
3
3
Fair St. Bridge
1
2
1 1a 2
Y
Y
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mission Importance
Manual Override
Small Explosives
Large Explosives
Chemical/Biological/Radiological
Criminal Acts
Fire
Struct. Failure
HAZMAT
Flood
Earthquake
Extreme Weather
Mud/Landslide
User entered threat/hazard 1
User entered threat/hazard 2
Y
Y
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(Partial list of critical assets)
11/13/2008
18
Step 5: Select Candidate Countermeasures
Operational
Countermeasures
Asset
Design/E
ngr
Access Control
Countermeasures
Physical Security
Countermeasures
11/13/2008
Medium
Effectiveness
Government Center
State Street
College Station
Suburban Station
Airport Station
All other aboveground
All other belowground
Transit/Rail Station
Park Street Station
Road Tunnels
Market Station
Road Bridges
High Effectiveness
Downtown Station
Color Key
Bay Station
Quantity of Named Asset
Next
South Station
To add units of countermeasure, enter the desired number of units
into any cell. Alternatively, the "Analyze Asset" sheet also has a
field for adding units of countermeasure.
When you are satisfied with your CM allocation, click "Continue."
Clear All
Countermeasure
Quantities
North Station
To
Y analyze anX asset more closely, click on the name of the asset
in row 15, and then click "Analyze Asset." A new sheet will pop up
that details the effectivness of the countermeasure against every
relevant threat and hazard. The sheet will also tell you how many
units of countermeasure you have selected so far for the asset,
and the estimated cost.
Filter
Countermeasures
Memorial Tunnel
Select Candidate Countermeasures
Instructions
The following is a list of countermeasure opportunities for each
critical asset -- orange indicates medium effectiveness and red
indicates high effectiveness.
Analyze Asset
Uptown Tunnel
6 Basic CAPTool
6 Expanded CAPTool
Downtown Tunnel
5
5
Veteran's Bridge
4
4 5a 5b 5c
State Line Bridge
3
3
Blue River Bridge
1
2
1 1a 2
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
20
13
Lighting
Barriers & Berms
Fences
CCTV
Intrusion Detection Devices
Physical Inspection of asset
ID Cards
Biometrics
Background Checks
Metal Detectors
Restricted Parking
Random Inspections
Visible Badges
Limited Access Points
Visitor Control & Escort
Locks
Explosive Detection
Establish Clear Zones
Visible Signs
Seismic Retrofitting
Fire Detection & Supression
Encasement, Wrapping, Jacketing
Patrols
WX/Seismic Information
Intelligence Networking
HAZMAT Mitigation
Security Awareness Training
Emergency Response Training
Emergency Evacuation Planning
Planned Redundancy (e.g., detours)
Public Information and Dissemination
19
Operational
Countermeasures
11/13/2008
Little River Bridge
McDonald Bridge
Walker Tunnel
Downtown
Post Road Bridge Tunnel
Woodbury Bridge Tunnel
Road Tunnels
High Bridge
Asset
Design/E
ngr
Access Control
Countermeasures
Physical Security
Countermeasures
Quantity of Named Asset
Lighting
Barriers & Berms
Fences
CCTV
Road Bridges
Shaw Bridge
To add units of countermeasure, enter the desired number of units
into any cell. Alternatively, the "Analyze Asset" sheet also has a
field for adding units of countermeasure.
When you are satisfied with your CM allocation, click "Continue."
High Effectiveness
Broad Bridge
Step 5: Select Candidate
Countermeasures
Medium
Effectiveness
Peck Bridge
To
Y analyze anX asset more closely, click on the name of the asset
in row 15, and then click "Analyze Asset." A new sheet will pop up
that details the effectivness of the countermeasure against every
relevant threat and hazard. The sheet will also tell you how many
units of countermeasure you have selected so far for the asset,
and the estimated cost.
Color Key
Fair St. Bridge
critical asset -- orange indicates medium effectiveness and red
indicates high effectiveness.
1
2
1
2
1
22
4
2
1
2
1
22
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Intrusion Detection Devices
Physical Inspection of asset
ID Cards
Biometrics
Background Checks
Metal Detectors
Restricted Parking
Random Inspections
Visible Badges
Limited Access Points
Visitor Control & Escort
Locks
Explosive Detection
Establish Clear Zones
Visible Signs
Seismic Retrofitting
Fire Detection & Supression
Encasement, Wrapping, Jacketing
Patrols
WX/Seismic Information
Intelligence Networking
HAZMAT Mitigation
Security Awareness Training
Emergency Response Training
Emergency Evacuation Planning
Planned Redundancy (e.g., detours)
Public Information and Dissemination
20
Step 6: Summary Report (Tabular)
1
2
1 1a 2
3
3
4
4 5a 5b 5c
5
5
6 Basic CAPTool
6 Expanded CAPTool
Report Date and Time:
Save Results Only
Return to Beginning
8/19/2008 21:00
Summary Report
Click Heading for Detailed
Expenditure Report
Edit
Countermeasure
Selection
Relevant Risks
Road
RoadBridges
Bridges
Small Explosives
Large Explosives
Chemical/Biological/Radiological
Criminal Acts
Fire
Struct. Failure
HAZMAT
Flood
Earthquake
Extreme Weather
Thresholds
Counts
Expenditures
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Transit/Rail
Transit/Rail
Station
Stations
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Transit/Rail
Transit/Rail
Bridges
Bridges
Transit/Rail
Admin & Support
Transit/Rail Tunnels Admin & Support Facilities
Tunnels
Facilities
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ferries
Ferry
Fleets
Fleet
Other
Other
X
X
X
X
X
X
User entered threat/hazard 1
X
X
X
X
X
X
User entered threat/hazard 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
200
101
100
200
200
101
305
50
Damage
Damage
Below Ground Stations
Critical?
Damage
Damage
Damage
Damage
Damage
$101,699,661
$101,699,661
Yes
$100,004,750
$100,004,750
$101,699,661
$101,699,661
$100,004,750
ADT * Detour Length
Road tunnels critical?
Transfer Stations Critical?
% of ridership that causes
mission criticality
% of ridership that
causes mission
Facilities critical?
Ferries critical?
Fleets critical?
Demand Percentile II
No
Yes
20
20
No
No
No
--
Property Loss
Mission Importance
Totals
X
X
Road
Road Tunnels
Tunnels
Mud/Landslide
Potentially Exposed Population
11/13/2008
X
X
X
X
X
X
Save Time-Stamped
Copy to Default Folder
--
---
---
# of Unique Critical Assets
7
4
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
# of Unique Countermeasures
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total # of Countermeasures
68
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Physical Security Countermeasures (x1000)
$610.2
$90.4
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
Access Control Countermeasures (x1000)
$210.0
$120.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
Asset Design/Engr Countermeasures (x1000)
$3,219.9
$1,840.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
Operational Countermeasures (x1000)
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
34%
Other Countermeasures (x1000)
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
Total Countermeasure Expenditures (x1000)
$4,040.1
$2,050.4
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
Physical Security Countermeasures
Access Control Countermeasures
Design/Engr Countermeasures
Operational Countermeasures
Other Countermeasures
Overall Total
$700,600
$330,000
$5,059,912
$0
$0
$6,090,501
21
Step 6: Summary Report (Allocation)
e:
Expenditures by CM Type
• Shows how available funds
could be allocated across all
asset types
• Shows funding required to
implement selected
countermeasures
• Shows distribution of resources
among modes
• Shows distribution of funds
among countermeasure types
• Provides a record of analysis
results for comparison to future
iterations
Transit/Rail
Admin & Support
Transit/Rail Tunnels Admin & Support Facilities
Tunnels
Facilities
Ferries
Ferry
Fleets
Fleet
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Persons
Persons
Persons
Persons
200
101
305
50
Damage
Damage
Damage
Damage
X
X
0%
Other
Other
12%
Physical Security
Countermeasures
Access Control
Countermeasures
Design/Engr
Countermeasures
Operational
Countermeasures
Other
Countermeasures
5%
X
X
X
83%
--
---
$100,004,750
$101,699,661
$101,699,661
$100,004,750
% of ridership that
causes mission
Facilities critical?
Ferries critical?
Fleets critical?
20
No
No
No
--
0
10
0
0
0
--
Expenditures by Asset Class
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
11/13/2008
0%
0%
34%
66%
Road Bridges
Road Tunnels
Transit/Rail Station
Transit/Rail Bridges
Transit/Rail Tunnels
Admin & Support Facilities
Ferry
Fleet
Other
22
Additional Options
Add threats or hazards
Modify default threat/hazard vs. asset combinations
Add or modify the countermeasures data base (cost, effectiveness,
application)
Apply countermeasure “filters”
1 1a 2
3
4 5a 5b 5c
5
6 Expanded CAPTool
Set Countermeasure Filters based on User Preference
Instructions
In order to better identify useful countermeasures for critical assets, answer
the filtering questions below. When done, click "Continue."
Previous
Basic
Enhanced
Both
Next
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Transit/Rail
Station
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Transit/Rail
Bridges
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Transit/Rail
Tunnels
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Admin & Support
Facilities
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Road Bridges
Road Tunnels
Ferry
Fleet
Other
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Both
Both
Both
Both
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
$999,999.0
$999,999.0
$999,999.0
$999,999.0
$999,999.0
PREDICT
DETER
DETECT
INTERDICT
RESPONSE PREP.
DESIGN/ENGINEERING
Is prediction a desirable countermeasure function?
Is deterrence a desirable countermeasure function?
Is detection a desirable countermeasure function?
Is interdiction a desirable countermeasure function?
Is response preparedness a desirable countermeasure function?
Are countermeasures related to design/engineering desirable?
Area -Wide and AssetSpecific
Do you wish to consider only area-wide countermeasures, only
asset-specific countermeasures, or both?
Both
Both
Both
Both
Both
Temporary/Redeployable
Do you wish to consider temp/redeployable countermeasures?
Y
Y
Y
Y
Are you willing to consider CMs that are NOT multipurpose?
Y
Y
Y
Both
Both
Y
$999,999.0
Package
Multipurpose Potential
Basic and Enhanced
Cost
Implementation
Functions
"Reset" restores the defaults.
Reset to Most
Inclusive
Filters
Max Unit Cost (x1000)
Threat Responsive
11/13/2008
Do you wish to consider only basic countermeasures, only
enhanced countermeasures, or both?
Do you wish to consider threat responsive countermeasures?
(Answer "N" if only want permanent countermeasures.)
What is the maximum per unit countermeasure cost you are willing
to pay?
$999,999.0 $999,999.0 $999,999.0
23
Next Steps
CAPTool version 1.0 – updates and
enhancements
Roll-out – how to get to states and other
owner/operators
Access – CDROM, Server, etc.
Possible AASHTOWare®
11/13/2008
24