G. Monni, M. De Salve, B. Panella Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino grazia.monni@polito.it HEFAT2014 10th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics 14 – 16 July 2014 Orlando, Florida Context Objective Experimental Facility and Test Matrix Venturi Flow Meter (VFM) Experimental Results VFM Modeling Two-Phase Flow Mass Flow Rates Estimation Conclusions HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 2 Experimental Facility for thermal-hydraulic simulation of innovative small and medium size PWR SPES3 Measurement of the mixture mass flow rate instruments and methodologies to evaluate different two- phase flow parameters need to be developed Typically a set of instruments (Spool Piece - SP) must be installed: each instrument of the SP has to be sensitive to the different properties of the flow (momentum, velocity, density, void fraction, etc..) Different number of instruments can be coupled in a SP HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 3 Analysis of the response of a Venturi Flow Meter (VFM) in two-phase flow To develop a methodology for the signals interpretation and a “model of the instrument” for the phases mass flow rate estimation The SP is tested in a vertical test section for air-water flow at very high void fraction The model and the results are presented and discussed HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 4 Vertical Test section: Di = 80 mm De = 90 mm L≈4m VFM placed at L/D~ 30 from the inlet Test section equipped with pressure transducers thermocouple and Quick- Closing Valves HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 5 1 Fluids: ◦ Demineralized water ◦ Air 0.99 Jg : 14 - 18 m/s Jl : 0.0008 – 0.005 m/s x : 0.78 – 0.96 0.98 α : 0.97 - 1 p : ≈ 1 bar 0.97 T : 20 – 25 °C Jl = 0.99 0.98 0.97 Jl = Jl = 0.0017 m/s Jl = Jl = Jl = 0.0033 m/s Jl = Jl = 0.0039 m/s Jl = Jl = 0.0050 m/s 0.96 14 0.96 14 Jl = 0.0008 m/s Jl = 0.0028 m/s 1 16 16 18 18 20 Jg [m/s] 20 Jg [m/s] Very high void fraction corresponding to annular and mist-annular flow HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 6 Estimation of the fluid flow rate from the pressure drop across a pipe restriction This is perhaps the most commonly used flow measurement technique in industrial applications (low Δp, economic, no moving part, etc…) Characteristic parameters of the present tests VFM (designed by Polito) Type D1 D2 β Bi-Directional 80 40 0.5 Fluid mm mm - water θconv.= θdiv. 21° Lup-downstream Ltot 628 340 mm mm HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 7 2p Q C d A2 4 1 0.5 CTP Fa Y K A2 4 1 Fa Y 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Cd The air single-phase flow discharge coefficient is evaluated, based on the experimental data (Y and Fa ≈ 1) 0.5 0.4 C d a Re b Calibration parameters: a=1.5054 b=-0.0510 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.E+00 2.E+04 4.E+04 6.E+04 8.E+04 1.E+05 Re HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 8 ΔpV Δpirr The two-phase flow pressure drop and losses analyzed at different superficial velocities of the two phases theoretical/experimental modeling 45 24 22 40 20 200.0017 m/s Jl = Jl = 180.0028 m/s 30 Jl = 160.0033 m/s 25 20 14 Jl = 140.0039 m/s Jl = 0.0050 m/s 12 15 16 17 Jg [m/s] 18 10 8 14 pTP-irr [mbar] 220.0008 m/s Jl = 35 pVirr [mbar] pTP-V [mbar] 24 18 16 Jl = 0.0017 m/s 14 Jl = 0.0028 m/s 12 Jl = 0.0033 m/s 10 Jl = 0.0039 m/s 8 14 19 Jl = 0.0008 m/s Jl = 0.0050 m/s 15 17 16 Jg [m/s] 18 16 17 18 19 Jg – [m/s] HEFAT2014 14 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 19 15 9 The measured ΔpV increases of about 10%, if compared to the single-phase flow, the ΔpV –irr increases from about 20% to 100% depending on the liquid flow rate ΔpV –irr high sensitivity to the liquid flow rate 2 1.08 1.9 1.07 1.06 1.7 pV-TP / pV-g ( p /Δp p )) (Δp TP g girrirr TP 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.05 Jl = 0.0033 m/s J = 0.0033 m/s 1.03 Jl = 0.0039 m/s J = 0.0039 m/s Jl = 0.0050 m/s Jl = 0.0050 m/s 1.01 0.9 0.95 1 l 1.04 1.3 0.85 J = 0.0017 m/s J = 0.0028 m/s 1.02 0.8 Jl = 0.0008 m/s Jl = 0.0017 m/s Jl = 0.0028 m/s 1.4 0.75 Jl = 0.0008 m/s 1 14 15 x ΔpTP-irr = f(x,Jg,Jl) 17 16 Jg [m/s] l l l 18 HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 19 10 VFM Experimental Results: Two-Phase (III) 45 pV [mbar] 40 35 30 25 20 0.08 0.09 0.1 W t [kg/s] 0.11 0.12 0.13 11 VFM Experimental Results: Two-Phase (IV) 50 25 V: in-throat Irr: in-out 20 pirr [mbar] p [mbar] 40 30 10 20 10 0.08 15 0.09 0.1 0.11 W t [kg/s] 0.12 VFM pressure drop and VFM irreversible pressure loss vs. total mass flow rate 0.13 5 25 single-phase (air) two-phase 30 35 pV [mbar] 40 45 VFM irreversible pressure loss vs. VFM pressure drop 12 pTP pg 2 g 1.12 2M 1.1 2C 2 mod 7.8 1 2mod 1.08 2 g 2exp 1 x g 2 x l 2 g 1.06 C 1.04 1.02 2 g 1 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 exp M 0.008 1 5 2 0.01 0 .5 1 C 2 A Two-Phase flow Multiplier correlation has been developed, based on experimental data and compared with classical correlations. The new correlation predicts ΔpV with an error lower than 5% HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 13 pTP irr k1 g J gk2 J l J g 3 k4 k k1 = 0.2096 - k2 = 2 - k3 = 0.13 - k4= -2.9786 26 +5% pirr [mbar] 22 -5% 18 14 10 10 A new correlation has been developed, based on experimental data. The proposed correlation describes the irreversible pressure loss change as a function of the superficial velocities of the two phases and of the ratio between the liquid and the gas superficial velocities, highlighting the effect of the dispersed phase. The new correlation predicts ΔpVirr with an error lower than 5% 14 18 pirr [mbar] 22 26 HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 14 Mass Flow Rate Estimation The Model consists of a set of equations able to derive the mass flow rate of the phases from the instruments signals of: ◦ Venturi flow meter ◦ Pressure transducers ◦ Thermocouples • An iterative approach is used to estimate the flow parameters of the two phases ΔpV Δpirr T, P l g l g 1 x g 2 x l xguess 0 .5 pV TP (7.8 1) pV g pirr k1 g J gk2 J l J g 3 k 4 k WTP HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 15 Results 0.11 0.035 0.105 0.03 [kg/s] 0.095 -2% 0.09 -20% 0.02 0.015 -30% 0.01 0.085 0.08 0.08 +30% 0.025 +2% l,est 0.1 +20% W W g,est [kg/s] With the proposed approach the flow quality of the mixture can be evaluated with an accuracy of 5% and the mass flow rate of air and water can be estimated with a minimum accuracy of 2% and 30% respectively 0.005 0.09 0.1 W g,exp [kg/s] 0.11 0 0 0.01 0.02 W l,exp [kg/s] 0.03 The standard deviations are 1%, 10 % and 2 % for the air flow rate, the liquid flow rate and the quality respectively HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 16 In the present research work, the experimental investigation of a vertical upward annular two-phase flow by a Venturi Flow Meter (VFM) has been performed. The dependence of the pressure drops, evaluated between the VFM inlet and throat sections and between the inlet and outlet sections, on the characteristic flow parameters (flow velocities, quality and void fraction) have been analyzed and discussed. Correlations describing the relation between velocities and VFM pressure drops have been proposed for the two pressure drops components. For both correlations the error is lower than 5%. HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 17 The analysis of the VFM irreversible pressure losses shows that important information can be derived concerning the effect of the liquid dispersed phase The proposed correlation describes the irreversible pressure loss change as a function of the flow rate of the two-phases, highlighting the effect of the dispersed phase. A model for the estimation of the mass flow rate of the two phases from the instrument signals has been developed: it allows the evaluation of the flow quality with an accuracy of 5% and the estimation of the mass flow rate of air and water with an error of 1% and 10% respectively HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 18 HEFAT2014 14 – 16 July 2014 - Orlando, Florida 19