Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011 JLab Users Group Meeting June 8th, 2011 Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) Parton Distributions TMD PDFs link in DIS Nucleon -> Pancake Intrinsic motion of partons Parton spin Spin of the nucleon L ≠? 0 →Transverse motion Multi-Dimension structure Probes orbital motion of quarks A new phase of study, fast developing field Great advancement in theories (factorization, models, Lattice ...) Not systematically studied until recent years Semi-Inclusive DIS (SIDIS): HERMES, COMPASS, Jlab-6GeV, ... p-p(p_bar) process : FNAL, BNL, ... Additional details in X. Qian’s and A. Metz’s talks on June 7th. Leading-Twist TMD PDFs Quark polarization Unpolarized (U) Nucleon Polarization U Longitudinally Polarized (L) Transversely Polarized (T) h1 = f1 = Boer-Mulders h1L = g1 = L Helicity Worm Gear (Kotzinian-Mulders) h1 = T f 1T = Transversity g1T = Sivers Nucleon Spin Quark Spin Worm Gear h1T = Pretzelosity : Survive trans. Momentum integration Leading-Twist TMD PDFs Quark polarization Unpolarized (U) Nucleon Polarization U Longitudinally Polarized (L) Transversely Polarized (T) h1 = f1 = Boer-Mulders h1L = g1 = L Worm Gear (Kotzinian-Mulders) Helicity h1 = T f 1T = Transversity g1T = Sivers Nucleon Spin Quark Spin Worm Gear h1T = : Probed by E06-010 Pretzelosity Transversity Characteristics of transversity h1T = g1L for non-relativistic quarks No gluon transversity in nucleon Chiral-odd → difficult to access in inclusive DIS Soffer’s bound |h1T| <= (f1+g1L)/2 q Tensor Charge: Integration of transversity over x. An important quantity of nucleon. Calculable in LQCD q Helicity state N N Sivers Function • Left-right asymmetric quark distribution in a transversely polarized nucleon • Related to the angular momentum of quarks Lq • Final state interactions (FSI) can lead to non-zero asymmetries (Brodsky, Hwang, Schmidt, 2002) • Imaginary part of interference Lq=0 ✖ Lq=1 quark wave functions. • Gauge invariance of QCD requires Sivers function to flip sign between semi-inclusive DIS and Drell-Yan: f1Tq SIDIS f1Tq D Y “Worm-Gear” Functions g1T g1T = Leading twist TMD PDFs T-even, Chiral-even Dominated by real part of interference between L=0 (S) and L=1 (P) states Imaginary part -> Sivers effect No GPD correspondence a genuine sign of intrinsic transverse motion Worm Gear g1T (1) S-P int. TOT P-D int. First TMDs in Pioneer Lattice calculation arXiv:0908.1283 [hep-lat], arXiv:1011.1213 [hep-lat] Light-Cone CQM by B. Pasquini B.P., Cazzaniga, Boffi, PRD78, 2008 Access TMDs through SIDIS • Detect one hadron from fragmentation of the struck quark in coincidence with the scattered electron • Flavor tagging possible through fragmentation function • z = Eh/ν at least > 0.2 Access TMDs through SIDIS d 2 y2 2 2 dxdydS dzdh dPh xyQ 2(1 ) {FUU ,T ... Boer-Mulder cos( 2h ) UU cos(2h ) F ... Unpolarized S L [ sin( 2h ) FULsin( 2h ) ...] Transversity /Collins Sivers Pretzelosity ST [ sin(h S ) FUTsin(h S ) sin(h S ) ( FULsin(h S ) ...) Polarized Target sin(3h S ) FUTsin( 3h S ) ...] S L e [ 1 2 FLL ...] Worm Gear Polarized Beam and cos(h S ) 2 ST e [ 1 cos(h S ) FLT ...]} Target SL, ST: Target Polarization; e: Beam Polarization Separation of TMDs Separate different effects through angular dependence • Collins asymmetry: Collins AUT sin h s UT h1 H1 • Sivers asymmetry: Sivers AUT sin h s UT f1T D1 • “Pretzelosity”: Pretzelosity AUT sin 3h s UT h1T H1 • Double-spin asymmetry: cosh s ALT cosh s LT g1T D1 E06-010 Experiment Setup Success full data taking 2008-09 Polarized electron beam Luminosity Monitor ~80% polarization Fast Flipping at 30Hz Charge asymmetry: controlled by online feed back at PPM level Polarized 3He target BigBite at 30º as electron arm Dipole magnet, Pe = 0.7 ~ 2.2 GeV/c MWDC/shower-preshow/scintillator HRSL at 16º as hadron arm QQDQ config, Ph = 2.35 GeV/c Scintillator/drift chamber/Cherenkov/RICH/ lead glass Beam Polarimetry (Møller + Compton) Kinematic Coverage x bin 1 <Q2> ~ 2.0 GeV2 <W> ~ 2.8 GeV <z> ~ 0.5 2 3 4 Q2>1GeV2 W>2.3GeV z=0.4~0.6 W’>1.6GeV Angular Coverage color coded for each target spin direction: up, down, left and right. Collins: Sivers and Worm-Gear: Target spin orientations: up-down and left-right (increases angular coverage) HRS and BigBite Spectrometers Particle Identification Hadron Identification from HRS Electron Identification from BigBite Hadron Particle Identification Gas Cherenkov and lead glass: separate hadrons from electrons Aerogel Cherenkov: separates pions and other hadrons • Kaon and proton data can be cleaned up by coincidence/TOF and the RICH detector: both provide K/π ~ 4σ separation • Combined pion rejection 99.9% Particle Identification for Kaons Polarized 3He Target Effectively a polarized neutron target Improved figure of merit Rb+K hybrid mixture cell Narrow bandwidth lasers Compact size: No cryogenic support needed Beam ~90% ~1.5% ~8% Performance of 3He Target High luminosity: L(n) = 1036 cm-2 s-1 Record high steady ~ 60% polarization with 15 A beam with automatic spin flip every 20 minutes History of Figure of Merit of Polarized 3He Target Average 3He pol. = 55% 19 Analysis: Target Single-Spin Asymmetry Target single-spin asymmetry from normalized yields, need to consider : beam charge, target density, DAQ life time, detector efficiency etc. Automatic target spin flip once every 20 minutes. 2845 target spin “local pairs” Beam Charge + vs Beam Charge - Beam charges are well-balanced between the pairs 20 SSA check: HRS single-arm 3He SSA (Witness channels on 3He, not corrected for target polarization and dilution) K. Allada Univ. of Kentucky 2010. False asymmetry < 0.1% Analysis of Asymmetry Two teams carried out independent analysis Red Team: Maximum Likelihood Method Blue Team: Local Pair-Angular Bin-Fit Method Do not share any code. Many cross checks on intermediate results. Two team independent asymmetry analyses Many cross checks on intermediate asymmetries. Red team. Blue team. Blue team implemented Red team’s method. 3He Target Single-Spin Asymmetry in SIDIS 3 He-(e, e'h), h = p +, p - ~87% ~8% ~1.5% To extract information on neutron, one would assume : 3 He- = 0.865 × n- - 2 ´ 0.028 × p3He Collins SSA are not large (as expected). 3He Sivers SSA: negative sign for π+, consistent with zero for π- After correction of N2 dilution (dedicated reference cell data) Blue band: model (fitting) uncertainties Red band: other systematic uncertainties Results on Neutron Collins asymmetries are not large, except at x=0.34 Sivers agree with global fit, and light-cone quark model. Consistent with HERMES/COMPASS p + (ud ) favors negative Independent demonstration of negative d-quark Sivers function. Blue band: model (fitting) uncertainties Red band: other systematic uncertainties Radiative correction: bin migration + uncer. of asy. Spin-dependent FSI estimated <1% (Glauber rescattering + no correction) Diffractive rho: 3-10% Paper on the arXiv arXiv: 1106.0363, will submit in a few days. 3He ALT (DSA) Results First measurement with 3He target o o o Ph.D. thesis of J. Huang (MIT 2011). 30 Hz beam helicity flips Two independent analysis teams; cross checks Corrected for small component of long. target spin, SL Data suggest non-zero SIDIS ALT: π-, +2.8σ (sum all bins) g* ~7o 30o h+/e’ 3He Spin SL e BigBite Preliminary ST PT Higher twist contribution NOT included Neutron ALT Extraction Corrected for proton dilution, fp Predicted proton asymmetry contribution < 1.5% (π+), 0.6% (π-) n g1qT D1hq , sensitive to d quark ALT Dominated by L=0 (S) and L=1 (P) interference Consist w/ model in signs, suggest larger asymmetry Preliminary Summary “Neutron Transversity” experiment (E06-010) completed. First measurement of Collins and Sivers moments (AUT) on 3He AUT results on neutron: Collins: π+ are π- asymmetries consistent with zero except at x ~ 0.34 for π+ Sivers: π- is consistent with zero; however, π+ favor negative values Results to be submitted to PRL very soon First indication of a non-zero ALT: 3He→π-, +2.8σ ALT (sum all bins) Preliminary Kaon± Sivers and Collins moments are also available The neutron results combined with existing proton and deuteron data will aid in constraining the d-quark sivers function JLab-12 GeV: Precision SSA measurements in SIDIS will be one of the highlights as discussed in X. Qian’s thesis prize presentation. Jefferson Lab E06-010 Collaboration Institutions CMU, Cal-State LA, Duke, Florida International, Hampton, UIUC, JLab, Kharkov, Kentucky, Kent State, Kyungpook National South Korea, LANL, Lanzhou Univ. China, Longwood Univ. Umass, Mississippi State, MIT, UNH, ODU, Rutgers, Syracuse, Temple, UVa, William & Mary, Univ. Sciences & Tech China, Inst. of Atomic Energy China, Seoul National South Korea, Glasgow, INFN Roma and Univ. Bari Italy, Univ. Blaise Pascal France, Univ. of Ljubljana Slovenia, Yerevan Physics Institute Armenia. Collaboration members K. Allada, K. Aniol, J.R.M. Annand, T. Averett, F. Benmokhtar, W. Bertozzi, P.C. Bradshaw, P. Bosted, A. Camsonne, M. Canan, G.D. Cates, C. Chen, J.-P. Chen (Co-SP), W. Chen, K. Chirapatpimol, E. Chudakov, , E. Cisbani(Co-SP), J. C. Cornejo, F. Cusanno, M. Dalton, W. Deconinck, C. de Jager, R. De Leo, X. Deng, A. Deur, H. Ding, C. Dutta, D. Dutta, L. El Fassi, S. Frullani, H. Gao(Co-SP), F. Garibaldi, D. Gaskell, S. Gilad, R. Gilman, O. Glamazdin, S. Golge, L. Guo, D. Hamilton, O. Hansen, D.W. Higinbotham, T. Holmstrom, J. Huang, M. Huang, H. Ibrahim, M. Iodice, X. Jiang (Co-SP), G. Jin, M. Jones, J. Katich, A. Kelleher, A. Kolarkar, W. Korsch, J.J. LeRose, X. Li, Y. Li, R. Lindgren, N. Liyanage, E. Long, H.-J. Lu, D.J. Margaziotis, P. Markowitz, S. Marrone, D. McNulty, Z.-E. Meziani, R. Michaels, B. Moffit, C. Munoz Camacho, S. Nanda, A. Narayan, V. Nelyubin, B. Norum, Y. Oh, M. Osipenko, D. Parno, J. C. Peng(Co-SP), S. K. Phillips, M. Posik, A. Puckett, X. Qian, Y. Qiang, A. Rakhman, R. Ransome, S. Riordan, A. Saha, B. Sawatzky,E. Schulte, A. Shahinyan, M. Shabestari, S. Sirca, S. Stepanyan, R. Subedi, V. Sulkosky, L.-G. Tang, A. Tobias, G.M. Urciuoli, I. Vilardi, K. Wang, Y. Wang, B. Wojtsekhowski, X. Yan, H. Yao, Y. Ye, Z. Ye, L. Yuan, X. Zhan, Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Zhang, B. Zhao, X. Zheng, L. Zhu, X. Zhu, X. Zong. Experimental Extraction of g1T Extractable from Double Beam-Target Spin Asymmetry (DSA) in SIDIS with transversely polarized target: ALT e’ e n X π cos(h s ) ALT h cos(h s ) q d d d s h 2 g D 1T 1q h d d d s Existing ALT Results COMPASS COMPASS Proton arXiv:1012.0155 [hep-ex] Last Session, C. Schill Proton , Deuteron HERMES Last Session, L. Pappalardo Jlab E06-010 This talk Pol. 3He Target (eff. pol. n) Fast beam helicity flips Deuteron Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 162, 89–96 (2008) Transversity Data Analysis Flow Raw Data Run data base Spectrometer Detector Scalers optics calibration Target polarization Farm Production PID cuts Event Selection Reconstruction Cuts Beam Cuts Lumi Cuts … Two independent teams: Blue vs Red Witness Asymmetry Coincidence Asymmetry Physics Analysis Corrections: luminosity, DAQ deadtime, detector efficiency, …. N2 Dilution correction Background Separation of Collins vs Sivers 3He to neutron correction Correction for N2 Dilution Cross section ratios determined through reference cell N2 and 3He data. From 3He to Neutron very small (< 0.003) Cross section ratios determined through reference cell H2 and 3He data. DSA Consistency Checks • MLE vs Local Spin Pair Methods