Syllabus for 1102OMDE6019041 Faculty Contact Information Instructor: Lisa Marie Blaschke, LBlaschke@faculty.umuc.edu Teaching Assistant : Allison Kipta, akipta@polaris.umuc.edu Writing Coach: Brenda Ledford, brenda_ledford@hotmail.com Course Introduction This is a 3-credit graduate course. Semester covers 12 weeks. The course consists of consisting of units of study, covered over a 12 week term. The course officially begins on January 27 and ends on April 24, 2011. The last date for withdrawal without penalty is: April 10, 2011. Students are encouraged to contact their instructor as needed. Course Description (Developed by Ulrich Bernath of Germany and Eugene Rubin of the United States, in collaboration with Borje Holmberg of Sweden and Otto Peters of Germany.) An overview of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are required by a competent practitioner of distance education. Critical concepts and issues identified in the distance education literature are explored and the history and theories of the field are critically examined. Course Goals/Objectives The goals of the course are to provide the student with a foundation of knowledge, skills and attitudes that are required by a competent practitioner of distance education. Students will learn to: identify the characteristics of distance education; outline the history of distance education from its early beginnings to today's IT-based practices; specify a series of methodological issues relevant to distance education; understand the pedagogic structure of distance education and its relevant elements; reflect on institutional aspects in distance education; analyze the impact of digitization on the pedagogical structure of distance education. Course Materials Click here to view the required and recommended materials to be purchased and to access ordering information. Graduate School's Read Me First Document Additional Readings/Materials MDE601 REQUIRED TEXTBOOKS: These books can be purchased via the University of Maryland - University College Virtual Bookstore. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington , D.C. : APA. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont , CA : Wadsworth . Peters, O. (2001). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective (2nd ed.). London : Kogan Page. The following books are available as free e-books (PDF files) from http://www.mde.unioldenburg.de/40574.html : Bernath, U., & Rubin, E. (Eds.). (2003). Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program: A case study (Volume 6) . Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education (Volume 11) .Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition - New trends and challenges (4th ed., Volume 5) . Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. To access the e-books, click on the above link, and then choose the textbook you would like to download. Once the correct textbook is displayed, then choose the PDF download button to download the textbook and save it to your computer. You may also order bound versions of the textbook (at a fee), using this form: http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/publikationen/oform.htm. Please keep in mind that shipping may take up to 3-4 weeks. Grading Information and Criteria Grades will be determined as follows: Assignment 1: By the end of Module 1, students must submit an essay, which contributes 25% to the final grade. Assignment 2: By the end of Module 2, students must submit an essay, which contributes 25% to the final grade. Assignment 3: In Module 3, students will first work collaboratively on a project to define a classification scheme for DE institutions. In Assignment 3 students will use this classification scheme to research and categorize institutions. This assignment will contribute 25% to the final grade. Participation in the modules and in the collaborative projects contributes 10% to the final grade. A reflective learning journal, posted to throughout the course and submitted during the last week of class, contributes 15% to the final grade. Please Note: It is expected that the work you submit for assessment purposes to this class is original. This means that you are the single author of your individual assignments and that you have not used this work in any other class, in this or any other academic program. (You can cite your own work as you can with any other source and this is a common practice in academia when building a body of knowledge in a particular area.) Plagiarism offences, including failure to cite your own work that was already used for another purpose, will result in a failing grade. Please carefully read the information below about the Policy on Academic Honesty and Plagiarism and the help available to you in learning how to properly cite sources in your assignments and papers. Project Descriptions COURSE OUTLINE & READINGS MODULE 1: History and Principles of Distance Education (with Torstein Rekkedal) Objectives: Introduction to course set-up participants to each other online Masters program Foundation course definitions in distance education (DE) Students will learn about the two constituent elements of DE reflect on the evolution of DE outline the history of DE from its early beginnings to today's practices discuss some common reasons why students choose DE specify methodological issues relevant to both course development and student-tutor interaction Topics: Overall picture of DE Background of DE Planning DE Course development - fundamental considerations Structures and media of DE Courses Interaction between students and the supporting organization Special applications of distance education Required Readings: Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 9-94] Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. [pp. 1-99; 140-145; 161-179] Peters, O.(2001). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analysis and interpretations from an international perspective (2nd ed.). London : Kogan Page. [pp. 8-17] Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition: New trends and challenges (4th ed.) .Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 13-23] Recommended Readings: Beaudoin, M. (2003). Learning or lurking? Tracking the 'invisible' online student. In U. Bernath, & E. Rubin (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program (pp. 121130). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Bernath, U., & Rubin, E. (2003). The online master of distance education (MDE) - Its history and realization. In U. Bernath, & E. Rubin (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program - A case study (pp. 9-50). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education . Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 95-98; 125136] Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. [pp. 323-331] Walti, C. (2003). Experiencing a new paradigm - Elements, aspects, and structure of selected courses in the MDE program. In U. Bernath, & E. Rubin (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program - A case study (pp. 227-245). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Assignment: By the end of Module 1, students must submit an essay, which contributes to 25% of the final grade. Students should also begin design and development of an online learning journal (wiki) as an ongoing class activity. MODULE 2: Pedagogy of Distance Education and Theoretical Approaches to DE (with Otto Peters) Objectives: Students analyze the pedagogic structure of DE in the light of distinct models of DE learn about DE in terms of distinct pedagogical categories explain pedagogical advantages and disadvantages inherent to DE explain the deep-rooted changes of the pedagogical structure of DE caused by increasing digitization distinguish different theoretical approaches worldwide and relate them to cultural differences Topics: Distance and proximity Three constitutive concepts o o o Dialogue Structure Autonomy Modifying concepts Open learning Lifelong learning Industrialized learning and teaching Post modern learning Transactional distance Digital information and communication Required Readings: Bernath, B., & Vidal, M. (2007). The theories and the theorists: Why theory is important for research. Distance et savoirs, 5 (3),427-458. (See Course Content ) Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education . Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 107-124] Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth . [pp. 219-235] Peters, O. (1994). Distance education and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Otto Peters on distance education. The industrialization of teaching and learning (pp. 107-127). London: Routledge. Peters, O. (2001). Learning and teaching in distance education - Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London: Kogan Page. [pp. 18-182] Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition - New trends and challenges (4th ed.) .Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 25-105; 203214] Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education. A new discussion . The American Journal of Distance Education, 13 (1), 60-75. Recommended Readings: Hülsmann, T. (2003). Texts that talk back - Asynchronous conferencing: A possible form of academic discourse? In U. Bernath, & E. Rubin (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program - A case study (pp. 75-120). Oldenburg : Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth . [pp. 59-77; 100-122; 236-256] Moore , M.G. (2006). Evolution of theory and transactional distance. Presentation at the Fourth EDEN Research Workshop , 25-28 October, 2006, Castelldefels, Spain. (See Course Content ) Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition - New trends and challenges (4th ed.) .Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 129-175] Assignment: By the end of Module 2, students must submit an essay, which will contribute 25% to the final grade. Students should also continue contributing to the reflective learning journal. MODULE 3: Institutional Aspects of Distance Education Objectives: Students will be able to identify the primary types of institutional structures that support DE identify top DE institutions worldwide, their size, type of institutional structure and unique characteristics; analyze the critical characteristics of each institutional structure give examples of institutions in 1) North & South America 2) Europe and 3) Australia/Asia/Africa critically examine the differences among the various institutional types and discuss the probable effects on functions such as course development, student services, instructional design, and pedagogy select, research, analyze, and discuss the critical aspects of a distance education institution reflect on the knowledge and experience gained during the course Topics: Teaching and learning models specific to institutions Models of open and distance learning Global perspectives of DE Pedagogical flexibility, change and transformation Required Readings: Holmberg, B. (2005). The evolution, principles and practices of distance education . Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [ pp. 99-106] Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont , CA : Wadsworth . [pp. 257-287] Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education - Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London : Kogan Page. [pp. 183-246] Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition - New trends and challenges (4th Ed.) . Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 37-45] Shea, P., & Armitage, S. (2003). Beyond the administrative core: Creating web-based student services for online learners . Resources Guidelines. WCET - the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications. (See Course Content ) Recommended Reading: Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23 (2), 93-104. (See Course Content ) Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2009a). Distance education in the digital age: Common misconceptions and challenging tasks. Journal of Distance Education, 23 (2), 105-122. (See Course Content ) Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2009b). Diverse models of distance teaching universities. Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, 2, 727-733. (See Course Content ) Miller, G. (1987, November). Distance education in the United States: Collaboration a mid diversity . Open Learning , 23-27. Moore, M. (1995). American distance education: A short literature review . In F. Lockwood (Ed.), Open and distance learning today, (pp. 32-41). London/New York: Routledge. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. [pp. 288-305; 307-322 Peters, O. (2004). Distance education in transition - New trends and challenges (4th Ed.) . Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informations system der Universität Oldenburg. [pp. 215-233] Assignment: In Module 3, students will first work collaboratively on a project to define a classification scheme for DE institutions. In Assignment 3, students will use this classification scheme to research and categorize DE institutions. This assignment will contribute 25% to the final grade. Participation throughout the course and in the study group project contributes 10% to the final grade. Submitting a reflective learning journal contributes 15% to the final grade. It is expected that the work you submit for assessment purposes to this class is original and authentic. This means that you are the single author of your individual assignments and that you have not used this work in any other class, in this or any other academic program. Offenses will result in a failing grade. Please note: For correct APA formatting of the readings please see the course outline and course content . Instructors are available for questions until 72 hours after the official end of the course. Additional Information TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND WEBTYCHO SUPPORT Understanding and navigating through WebTycho is critical to successfully completing this course. All students are encouraged to complete UMUC's Orientation to Distance Education and WebTycho Tour at http://www.umuc.edu/distance/de_orien. UMUC 360 Support is accessible directly in the WebTycho classroom. Technical support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year via self-help, phone, and chat at http://support.umuc.edu or toll-free 888-360-UMUC (8682), or 301-985-6710. LIBRARY SUPPORT Extensive library resources and services are available online, 24 hours a day, seven days a week at http://www.umuc.edu/library. Information and Library Services provides research assistance in creating search strategies, selecting relevant databases, and evaluating and citing resources in a variety of formats via its Ask a Librarian service (http://www.umuc.edu/library/help/ask.shtml), which includes 24/7 chat and e-mail. The Search by Subject area of the library's Web site (http://www.umuc.edu/library/subjects.shtml) provides a listing of resource guides for each subject area, with each guide containing relevant databases, Web sites, books, and other resources along with technical and citation assistance. A guide to using UMUC's library databases is available at http://www.umuc.edu/library/tutorials/research/mod6.shtml. Academic Policies Graduate School of Management and Technology's Academic Policies (GSMT) GRADING GUIDELINES According to the Graduate School of Management and Technology's grading policy, the following marks are used: A (90-100) = Excellent B (80-89) = Good C (70-79) = Below standards F (69 or below) = Failure FN = Failure for nonattendance G = Grade pending P = Passing S = Satisfactory U = Unsatisfactory I = Incomplete AU = Audit W = Withdrew The grade of "B" represents the benchmark for the Graduate School of Management and Technology. It indicates that the student has demonstrated competency in the subject matter of the course, e.g., has fulfilled all course requirements on time, has a clear grasp of the full range of course materials and concepts, and is able to present and apply these materials and concepts in clear, well-reasoned, wellorganized, and grammatically correct responses, whether written or oral. Only students who fully meet this standard and, in addition, demonstrate exceptional comprehension and application of the course subject matter earn a grade of "A." Students who do not meet the benchmark standard of competency fall within the "C" range or lower. They, in effect, have not met graduate level standards. Where this failure is substantial, they can earn an "F." The "FN" grade means a failure in the course because the student has ceased to attend and participate in course assignments and activities but has not officially withdrawn. ACADEMIC STANDARDS Graduate students are expected to maintain a 3.0 or higher grade point average (GPA) at all times, with no grade of F. An assessment of academic standing is made of each student at the end of every semester. Each student's GPA is computed for all UMUC graduate-level graded coursework to make a determination of academic standing as described in the policy below. UMUC policy on academic levels of progress (exclusive of doctoral level) UMUC Doctoral program policies WITHDRAWAL Students who officially withdraw from a course receive a mark of W (Withdrawal). The grade of W will appear on the official transcript but will not be used in calculating the grade point average (GPA). Students must follow the withdrawal procedures as outlined in the catalog, schedule of classes, or Web site. Graduate students must officially withdraw at least two weeks (14 calendar days) before the final class. Students who do not officially withdraw by the deadline receive the grade earned for the course. WRITING STANDARDS Effective managers, leaders, and teachers are also effective communicators. Written communication is an important element of the total communication process. The Graduate School of Management and Technology recognizes and expects exemplary writing to be the norm for course work. To this end, all papers, individual and group, must demonstrate graduate level writing and comply with the format requirements of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edition. Careful attention should be given to spelling, punctuation, source citations, references, and the presentation of tables and figures. It is expected that all course work will be presented on time and error free. POLICY ON ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PLAGIARISM UMUC policy on academic dishonesty and plagiarism Tutorial: UMUC offers the VAIL Tutor, a tutorial covering academic integrity and strategies to help students avoid academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Turnitin.com: The University has a license agreement with Turnitin.com, a service that helps prevent plagiarism from internet resources. Your instructor may be using this service in this class by either requiring students to submit their papers electronically to Turnitin.com or by submitting questionable text on behalf of a student. If you or your instructor submit part or all of your paper, it will be stored by Turnitin.com in their database throughout the term of the University's contract with Turnitin.com. If you object to this temporary storage of your paper, you must let your instructor know no later than two weeks after the start of this class. Please Note: If you object to the storage of your paper on Turnitin.com, your instructor may utilize other services to check your work for plagiarism. COURSE EVALUATION FORM UMUC values its students' feedback. You will be asked to complete a mandatory online evaluation toward the end of the semester. The primary purpose of this evaluation is to assess the effectiveness of classroom instruction. UMUC requires all students to complete this evaluation. Your individual responses are kept confidential. The evaluation notice will appear on your class screen about 21 days before the end of the semester. You will have approximately one week to complete the evaluation. If, within this 21-day period, you do not open the file and either respond to the questions or click on "no response," you will be "locked out" of the class until you do complete the evaluation. This means that you will not be able to enter the classroom. Once you have completed the evaluation, you will regain access to the classroom. If you have any problem getting back in your classroom, you should immediately contact UMUC 360 support by phone toll-free, 888-360-UMUC (8682), or 301-985-6710 or via chat. The Graduate School of Management and Technology takes students' evaluations seriously, and in order to provide the best learning experience possible, information provided is used to make continuous improvements to every class. Please take full advantage of this opportunity to provide constructive recommendations and comments about potential areas of improvement. STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Students with disabilities who want to request and register for services should contact UMUC's technical director for veteran and disabled student services at least four to six weeks in advance of registration each semester. Please email disabilityservices@umuc.edu or call 240-684-2287 or 240-684-2277 (TTY).