National Senior Certificate - 2013 Portfolio Committee on Basic Education 18 February 2014 1 Presentation Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Introduction Purpose and design of ANA Verification process - ANA Results of ANA 2013 Plans for 2014 and beyond - ANA Overall systemic improvements - NSC Quality improvements - NSC Key Aea of concern Diagnostic subject analysis – NSC Progress - Sector Lessons learnt Priorities for 2014 and Focus areas Retention Rate District Support Value of Matric Certificate Conclusion 2 ANA 2013 INTRODUCTION 1. Improving the quality of basic education is the core mandate of the Department of Basic Education. 2. ANA 2013 presents opportunities to reflect on what has been achieved, lessons to be learnt and challenges that still need to be tackled towards achieving the goals specified in the Action Plan to 2014: Towards the Realisation of Schooling 2025 INTRODUCTION 3. ANA is uniquely a South African initiative designed to address the historical and socio-economic realities of the country 4. Currently ANA serves a two-fold purpose, viz. • a diagnostic tool to identify strengths and weaknesses down to learner level. • a systemic tool to monitor performance of the system and track trends over time. ANA VERIFICATION • For a sample of approximately 125 schools per province an independent agent:– Monitored testing administration. – Marked the test independently. – Captured and processed the marks – Reported the results • Verified results per province agreed closely with marks received directly from schools CREDIBILITY MEASURES - ANA 2013 • Tests were developed by panels of subject and assessment experts selected across the country. • The tests were to various quality assurance mechanisms: internal moderation, editing, a pilot run, external review. • A common test administration manual was utilised to ensure uniformity across all schools. • Administration of tests in schools was monitored by districts, provinces, independent monitors appointed by DBE, DBE officials and IQMS moderators. LIMITATIONS OF ANA 2013 • ANA is an evolving system and therefore there is much to be done in improving its reliability and validity. • ANA attempts to address two significantly different purposes and, therefore, this may limit the extent and comprehensiveness to which each purpose is fully served. • Test items were exposed and therefore different test items were designed in each of these three years. • ANA was administered in the third quarter and therefore it was based on selected coverage of the curriculum. ANA RESULTS 2013 MATHEMATICS – NATIONAL RESULTS GRADE 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK MATHEMATICS 2012 2013 68 60 57 59 41 53 37 37 30 33 27 39 13 14 LEARNERS OBTAINING 50% AND MORE OF THE MATHEMATICS MARKS 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 2012 40 2013 30 20 10 0 3 6 Grade 9 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE – NATIONAL RESULTS GRADE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK – FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE 2012 2013 4 34 39 5 30 37 6 36 46 9 35 33 LEARNERS OBTAINING 50% AND MORE OF THE FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE MARKS 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 2012 40 2013 30 20 10 0 6 9 Grade GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 40.5 FS 44.7 GP 46.9 KZN 42.2 LP 34.4 MP 35.6 NC 37.9 NW 34.1 WC 47.4 National 41.2 2013 50.6 54.9 58.9 55.5 45.5 47.8 50.5 49.1 57.4 53.1 GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 34.9 FS 41.8 GP 47.9 KZN 37.6 LP 23.7 MP 25 NC 31.2 NW 23.4 WC 48 National 36.3 2013 54.9 63.2 69.6 64 44.4 50.2 54 51.9 66 59.1 GRADE 3 LANGUAGE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 50.3 FS 56.3 GP 54.8 KZN 53.5 LP 47.9 MP 48 NC 49.4 NW 46.4 WC 57.1 National 52 2013 47 54.4 54.5 55.3 46.9 47 46.2 46.8 49.9 50.8 GRADE 3 LANGUAGE ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 52.7 FS 65.2 GP 61.7 KZN 59.2 LP 48.8 MP 48.9 NC 51.4 NW 46.3 WC 67.4 National 56.6 2013 50.2 65.7 63.1 64.5 49.9 51.4 48.6 50.1 54.9 57 GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 24.9 FS 28.4 GP 30.9 KZN 28.1 LP 21.4 MP 23.4 NC 23.8 NW 23.6 WC 32.7 National 26.7 2013 33 40 44.7 41.2 32.9 33.6 35.6 36.5 44.9 39 GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 8.1 FS 11.7 GP 16.4 KZN 11.8 LP 4.6 MP 5.7 NC 7.6 NW 7.1 WC 19.9 National 10.6 2013 16.2 26.5 38.4 30.4 15.3 16.1 20.5 20.8 37.7 26.5 GRADE 6 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 36.3 FS 37.3 GP 42.8 KZN 35.3 LP 31.7 MP 31.1 NC 36.4 NW 36.1 WC 38.3 National 35.6 2013 43.2 47.9 52.4 47.7 43.2 41.7 40.3 46.7 48.1 45.7 GRADE 6 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 25 FS 24.8 GP 38.9 KZN 23.5 LP 18.2 MP 17.6 NC 25.3 NW 24.9 WC 28.7 National 24.4 2013 36.2 45.2 56.6 44.7 35.4 34.9 29.2 42.6 46.4 41.2 GRADE 9 MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 14.6 FS 14 GP 14.7 KZN 12 LP 8.5 MP 11.9 NC 13.2 NW 11.2 WC 16.7 National 12.7 2013 15.8 15.3 15.9 14.4 9 13.7 12.6 13.3 17 13.9 GRADE 9 MATHEMATICS ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 2.6 FS 3.1 GP 3.7 KZN 1.9 LP 0.5 MP 1 NC 2 NW 1.4 WC 5 National 2.3 2013 3.3 4.1 5.2 3.4 0.9 1.8 2.4 2.3 7.2 3.4 GRADE 9 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 35 FS 37.2 GP 40.3 KZN 32.3 LP 29.8 MP 37.4 NC 37.9 NW 39.1 WC 37.2 National 34.6 2013 34.1 34.6 38.1 31.8 29.6 35.4 34.7 36.4 36 33.2 GRADE 9 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE ACCEPTABLE ACHIEVEMENT 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 EC 20.9 FS 22.9 GP 31 KZN 17.6 LP 13.7 MP 24.8 NC 26.2 NW 27 WC 22.9 National 20.8 2013 19.4 17.4 25.6 15.2 12.9 19.3 18.2 20.5 19.2 17.1 PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 3 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN MATHEMATICS 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement 50 Adequate achievement 40 Moderate achievement 30 Elementary achievement 20 Not Achieved 10 0 LP MP NC NW EC WC KZ FS GT National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 3 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN HOME LANGUAGE 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement 50 Adequate achievement Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement 30 Not Achieved 20 10 0 LP NC MP EC NW WC GT KZ FS National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 6 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN MATHEMATICS 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement 50 Adequate achievement Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement Not Achieved 30 20 10 0 LP EC MP NC NW FS KZ WC GT National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 6 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN HOME LANGUAGE 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement Adequate achievement 50 Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement Not Achieved 30 20 10 0 EC LP NC MP KZ NW GT WC FS National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 6 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement 50 Adequate achievement Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement Not Achieved 30 20 10 0 NC MP LP EC NW KZ FS WC GT National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 9 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN MATHEMATICS 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement 50 Adequate achievement Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement Not Achieved 30 20 10 0 LP NC MP NW KZ FS EC GT WC National PERCENTAGE OF GRADE 9 LEARNERS IN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS IN FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE 100 90 80 70 Outstanding achievement Meritorious achievement Percentage 60 Substantial Achievement Adequate achievement 50 Moderate achievement 40 Elementary achievement Not Achieved 30 20 10 0 LP KZ EC NC FS MP WC NW GT National GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS - GENDER 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FEMALE EC 52.6 FS 56.3 GP 60.7 KZN 57.4 LP 47.7 MP 49.7 NC 52.2 NW 51 WC 58.7 National 52.6 MALE 48.8 53.5 57.2 53.8 43.4 46 48.9 47.3 56.1 48.8 GRADE 3 LANGUAGE - GENDER 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FEMALE EC 50.9 FS 57.5 GP 58.1 KZN 59.2 LP 51.6 MP 51.2 NC 49.9 NW 50.7 WC 53.3 National 54.7 MALE 43.3 51.3 50.9 51.6 42.5 43.1 42.7 43.1 46.4 47 GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS - GENDER 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FEMALE EC 34.9 FS 41.4 GP 46.4 KZN 42.7 LP 34.5 MP 34.9 NC 36.4 NW 37.5 WC 45.8 National 40.4 MALE 32.1 38.6 43.1 39.9 31.4 32.4 34.7 35.5 44 37.6 GRADE 6 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE - GENDER 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FEMALE MALE EC 47 FS 51.1 GP 56.6 KZN 51.6 LP 47.5 MP 45.1 NC 44.1 NW 50.1 WC 51.6 National 49.5 39.9 44.9 48.2 44.1 39.3 38.5 36.6 43.4 44.6 42.1 GRADE 9 MATHEMATICS - GENDER 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC National FEMALE 16.6 16 17.1 15.2 9.9 14.3 12.9 14.1 17 14.8 MALE 15.2 14.7 14.7 13.6 8.3 13.2 12.2 12.6 17 13.1 GRADE 9 FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE - GENDER 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC National FEMALE 36.7 36.8 41.8 35.1 33.2 38.2 37.6 39.3 38.2 36.4 MALE 31.6 32.5 34.9 28.8 26.7 32.7 32 33.7 33.5 30.4 GRADE 3 SUBJECTS BY QUINTILE 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 Mathematics Home Language 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 Quintile 4 5 GRADE 6 SUBJECTS BY QUINTILE 100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 Mathematics 50 Home Language 40 First Additional Language 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 Quintile 4 5 GRADE 9 SUBJECTS BY QUINTILE 100 90 80 Percentage 70 60 Mathematics 50 40 Home Language 30 First Additional Language 20 10 0 1 2 3 Quintile 4 5 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK FOR GRADE 3 IN SPECIAL SCHOOLS PROVINCE EC FS GP KZ LP MP NC NW WC National HOME LANGUAGE 54.1 38.6 46.5 52.9 32.1 * 50.7 39.8 52.4 48.6 MATHEMATICS 63.9 36.7 53.5 58 32.8 46.2 62.4 46.1 60.7 54.6 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARK FOR GRADE 6 IN SPECIAL SCHOOLS PROVINCE EC HOME LANGUAGE FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE MATHEMATICS 56.7 35.7 21.0 FS 63.7 28.4 35.2 GP 56.3 35.6 34.9 KZ 64.9 43.4 44.8 LP 33.7 * 26.6 MP * 26.7 17.7 NC 50.5 * 37.8 NW 63.4 52.3 50.2 WC 57.7 41.3 35.2 National 57.0 39.5 35.8 AVERAGE PERCENTAGE MARKS FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS SUBJECT GRADE PUBLIC INDEPENDENT MATHEMATICS 3 53.3 57.7 6 39 49.3 3 51 54.1 6 58.5 66.9 HOME LANGUAGE DISTRICT ACHIEVEMENT – GRADE 3 Average % in district Mathematics HL Higher than 60% 7 0 Between 40 and 60% 73 77 Lower than 40% 1 4 DISTRICT ACHIEVEMENT – GRADE 6 Average % in district Mathematics HL FAL Higher than 60% 0 30 1 Between 40 and 60% 37 46 69 Lower than 40% 44 5 11 DISTRICT ACHIEVEMENT – GRADE 9 Average % in district Mathematics HL FAL Higher than 60% 0 2 0 Between 40 and 60% 0 46 6 81 33 75 Lower than 40% WAY FORWARD • The national report is a first step of feedback on the assessment. • A diagnostic report on identified strengths and challenges for teaching and learning has been given to schools in January 2014. • DBE and PEDs are embarking on a focused intervention strategy to improve literacy and numeracy learning. WAY FORWARD • Greater & wider focus will be directed to Senior Phase to include Grades 7 & 8 in the assessment. • DBE and PEDs are mounting a concerted strategy to improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning of mathematics throughout the school system. NSC 2013 Significance of the NSC Exams a) b) The NSC examination results has emerged as a key indicator of the performance of the basic education system. The NSC results over the last five years, point to the attainment of stability in the system and gradual improvement in learner outcomes at exit level. c) In 2013, focus has been on consolidating the gains and improving teaching and learning across the system. d) e) Emphasis in 2013 on improvement in the quality of passes. Hence focus on: • • • increasing the number of bachelor passes. increasing the number of subject passes at 40% improvement in Mathematics and Physical Science and other gateway subjects. 51 Scope and Size of 2013 NSC Exams Total Candidates: Full Time Candidates: Part Time Candidates : Question Papers: Printed Question Papers: Scripts: Examination Centres: Invigilators: Markers: Marking Centres: 707 136 576 490 130 646 258 9.1 million 8.7 million 6676 65 000 35 000 118 52 Numbers of candidates who wrote, 2008 - 2013 53 53 Candidates who wrote the 2013 NSC examination Province 2013 Total wrote 72 138 27 105 97 897 145 278 82 483 50 053 29 140 10 403 47 615 562 112 Eastern Cape Free State Gauteng KwaZulu-Natal Limpopo Mpumalanga North West Northern Cape Western Cape National 54 Overall Systemic Improvements 55 STANDARDISATION OF NSC RESULTS: 2008-2013 Year Subjects 2008 56 2009 Raw marks Adjusted accepted downwards Adjusted upwards 58 31 (55%) 43 (74%) 25 5 10 2010 58 39 (67%) 10 9 2011 56 45 (80%) 8 3 2012 58 41(71%) 12 5 2013 59 38(64%) 16 5 NSC Performance: 2008 to 2013 57 Overall performance of candidates in the 2013 NSC examinations 2013 Province Total Wrote Total Achieved Eastern Cape 72 138 46 840 % Achieved 64.9 Free State 27 105 23 689 87.4 Gauteng 97 897 85 122 87.0 KwaZulu-Natal 145 278 112 403 77.4 Limpopo 82 483 59 184 71.8 Mpumalanga 50 053 38 836 77.6 North West 29 140 25 414 87.2 Northern Cape 10 403 7 749 74.4 Western Cape 47 615 562 112 40 452 439 779 85.1 National 58 78.2 Quality Improvements 59 NSC Passes by Qualification Type 60 NSC passes by type of qualification, 2013 Bachelor Province Total Wrote Diploma Higher Certificate NSC No. Achieved % Achieved No. Achieved % Achieved No. Achieved % Achieved No. Achieved % Achieved Total Achieved % Achieved EC 72 138 13 686 19.0 19 179 26.6 13 950 19.3 25 0.0 46 840 64.9 FS 27 105 8 961 33.1 10 089 37.2 4 636 17.1 3 0.0 23 689 87.4 GP 97 897 38 104 38.9 33 716 34.4 13 295 13.6 7 0.0 85 122 87.0 KZN 145 278 47 202 32.5 42 760 29.4 22 328 15.4 113 0.1 112 403 77.4 LP 82 483 18 781 22.8 22 694 27.5 17 695 21.5 14 0.0 59 184 71.8 MP 50 053 12 954 25.9 16 366 32.7 9 507 19.0 9 0.0 38 836 77.6 NW 29 140 10 166 34.9 10 249 35.2 4 998 17.2 1 0.0 25 414 87.2 NC 10 403 2 424 23.3 3 207 30.8 2 118 20.4 0 0.0 7 749 74.5 WC 47 615 19 477 40.9 15 032 31.6 6 029 12.7 4 0.0 40 542 85.1 562 112 171 755 30.6 173 292 30.8 94 556 16.8 176 0.1 439 779 78.2 NATIONAL 61 Bachelors - Targets Prov. EC 2012 Target 2012 Pass 2013 Target 2013 Pass 2014 Target Difference in 2013 Target and Pass % of 2013 12 056 11 246 13 108 13686 14 159 578 (4.4%) FS 6 945 6 937 7 551 8961 8 157 1 410 (18.67%) GP 36 905 32 449 40 124 38104 43 343 2020 (5.03%) KZN 37 099 34 779 40 335 47202 43 571 6 867 (17.02%) LP 17 399 15 324 18 917 18781 20 436 -136(0.7%) MP 9 607 9 495 10 446 12954 11 285 2 508 (24%) NW 9 459 7 445 10 285 10166 11 111 -119 (1.15%) NC 2 538 2 055 2 760 2424 2 982 -336 (-12.17%) WC 16 992 16 317 18 474 19477 19 956 1 003 (5.42%) 149 000 136 047 162 000 171755 175 000 9755 (6.02%) NATIONAL 62 Bachelor Pass Trend (Percentage) : 2008 -2013 63 Bachelor Pass Trend (Numbers): 2008 -2013 64 NSC Passes by Type of Qualification per Quintile: 2013 2012 2013 Quintiles Q 1-3 Q 4-5 Q 1-3 Q 4-5 No. of Bachelors 61 300 65 292 78 407 81 406 65 School Performance within different Percentage Categories 66 Schools performance within different percentage categories, 2013 2012 School Intervals 0 - 19.9% 20 - 39.9% 40 to 59.9% 60 to 79.9% 80 to 100% Exactly 0% Exactly 100% Total Number of school 126 484 1 229 2 176 2 608 2 441 % of schools 1.9 7.3 18.6 32.9 39.4 0.0 6.7 67 2013 Total Number of school 82 334 991 1 999 3 270 9 551 % of schools 1.2 5.0 14.8 29.9 49.9 0.1 8.3 School Performance by Quintiles 68 School performance by Quintile - 2013 Quintiles 0 - 19.9% 20 - 39.9% 40 - 59.9% 60 - 79.9% 80 - 100% Total Quintile 1 31 138 327 532 631 1 659 Quintile 2 26 81 307 606 658 1 678 Quintile 3 14 70 215 477 543 1 319 Quintile 4 2 8 71 199 413 693 Quintile 5 1 12 23 84 620 740 74 309 943 1 898 2 865 6 089 Total 69 Subject Performance 70 Candidates’ performance in selected subjects, 2009 – 2013 (at 30% level) Subjects Accounting 2009 61.5 2010 62.8 2011 61.6 2012 65.6 2013 65.7 Agricultural Science 51.7 62.6 71.3 73.7 80.7 Business Studies 71.9 71.1 78.6 77.4 81.9 Economics Geography History 71.6 72.3 72.2 75.2 69.2 75.8 64 70 75.9 72.8 75.8 86 73.9 80 87.1 Life Orientation 99.6 99.6 99.6 99.7 99.8 Life Sciences 65.5 74.6 73.2 69.5 73.7 Mathematical Literacy 74.7 86.0 85.9 87.4 87.1 Mathematics 46.0 47.4 46.3 54 59.1 Physical Science 36.8 47.8 53.4 61.3 67.4 71 Candidates’ performance in selected subjects, 2009 – 2013 (at 40% level) Subjects Accounting 2009 36.0 2010 35.3 2011 35.8 2012 42.7 2013 41.5 Agricultural Science 21.9 32.1 39.5 41.0 49.9 Business Studies 46.7 45.9 55.4 52.9 58.2 Economics Geography History English FAL Life Sciences 31.2 39.2 46.9 72.4 39.9 46.3 40.6 52.5 71.3 51.7 33.1 42.2 52.7 76.1 46.2 45.8 46.7 65.0 82.9 43.4 45.2 53.4 67.1 88.7 47.8 Mathematical Literacy 51.0 64.7 65 61.4 62.4 Mathematics 29.4 30.9 30.1 35.7 40.5 Physical Science 20.6 29.7 33.8 39.1 42.7 72 Mathematics achieved at 30% & 40% level, 2009 - 2013 73 Physical Sciences achieved at 30% & 40% level, 2009 - 2013 74 Candidates performance in Home Languages, 2011-2013 75 Number and percentage of distinctions in the 12 Key Subjects: 2012 and 2013 Subject Accounting Afrikaans First Add Language Agricultural Science 2012 Achieved Wrote with distinction 134 978 6 550 4.9 145 427 2013 Achieved with distinction (80% -100%) 7 789 % with Distinction Wrote % with Distinction 5.4 76 038 4 126 5.4 87 930 7 215 8.2 78 148 176 0.2 83 437 442 0.5 Business Studies 195 507 4 529 2.3 218 914 6 791 3.1 Economics English First Add Language Geography 134 369 2 294 1.7 150 114 2 682 1.8 420 039 6 047 1.4 454 666 7 847 1.7 213 735 2 967 1.4 239 657 4 135 1.7 94 489 3 294 3.5 109 046 3 559 3.3 Life Sciences 278 412 6 230 2.2 301 718 7 590 2.5 Mathematical Literacy 291 341 7 189 2.5 324 097 5 972 1.8 Mathematics 225 874 6 591 2.9 241 509 8 217 3.4 Physical Sciences 179 194 5 657 3.2 184 383 5 616 3 History 76 District Performance 77 District performance by achievement interval and province: 2013 Province Total number of Below 50% Districts 2013 50% to 59.9% 60% to 70% 70% to 80% 80% and above EC 23 0 7 11 5 0 FS 5 0 0 0 0 5 GP 15 0 0 0 0 15 KZN 12 0 0 0 10 2 LP 5 0 0 2 2 1 MP 4 0 0 0 3 1 NW 4 0 0 0 0 4 NC 5 0 0 0 4 1 WC 8 0 0 0 0 8 Total 81 0 7 13 24 37 78 District Performance by achievement interval: 2012 - 2013 40 35 Number 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2012 2013 Below 50% 3 0 50% to 59.9% 7 7 60% to 70% 18 13 70% to 80% 25 24 80% and above 28 37 79 Diagnostic subject Analysis Generic Improvements • Improvement in the quality of answers provided, which confirms that improvement strategies are making a difference. • Gradual consistent improvement in the pass rate in each of the subjects analysed both at the 30% and 40% achievement levels. • Fewer candidates scoring between 0-29% in most of the subjects. • Improved performance in a number of gateway subjects which suggests interventions in these subjects are bearing fruit Generic Shortcomings • Inadequate linguistic skills which are required to interpret questions and write proper paragraphs. • Inadequate numerical/mathematical skills resulting in poor performance in questions that required Mathematical skills. • Failure to interpret questions accurately, or apply knowledge and skills appropriately. Mathematics Website: www.education.gov.za Call Centre: 0800 202 933 | callcentre@dbe.gov.za Twitter: @DBE_SA | Facebook: DBE SA Mathematics P1:Avarage% performance per question Question Topic/Section Max Marks Average % 1 Equations, inequalities and Algebraic Manipulation 22 67.7 2 Number Patterns & Sequences 18 50.1 3 Number Patterns & Sequences 18 42.6 4 Functions and Graphs – Parabola 10 68.0 5 Functions and Graphs – Exponential and Log Graphs 11 31.2 6 Functions and Graphs – Hyperbola and Exponential 11 40.1 7 Annuities and Finance 12 48.2 8 Calculus – 1st Principle and using the rule 17 49.6 9 Calculus – Applications in cubic graphs 11 27.6 10 Calculus – Applications in rates of change 6 28.3 11 Linear Programming 14 37.7 84 Mathematics P1:Avarage% performance per question Graph showing average (%) performance per question 80.0 70.0 Percentage 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 85 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Mathematics Key area of concern Possible Cause Remedial Action Learners lack basic knowledge of algebra Learners algebraic skills are poor. They struggle with Mathematics in grade 11 and 12 because they cannot do the basic mathematics of Grade 8; 9 and 10. If this problem can be rectified learners will perform much better in the Grade 12 examination. Solving inequality equations an area of concern. Learners to be exposed to number system and how to represent them graphically. Set notation needs to be emphasised. Learners are still copying the quadratic formula incorrectly from the information sheet. Either they have copied it incorrectly or they have learnt it incorrectly and not used the formula sheet. Learners need to master different methods of solving problems. Mathematics Key area of concern Possible Cause Remedial Action Learners are failing to apply the Most learners do not understand first principle. or copy the formula incorrectly Many notation from the formula sheet. errors occur every year Teachers need to stress the importance of notation in answering a first principles question. Drill and practice the rules of differentiation using the first principle. Learners do not understand the essence of functions Teachers should train learners on how to sketch a graph and vice versa to derive its equation if it is drawn. Teachers are encouraged to use various methods to find the turning point and the axis of symmetry. Functions are not addressed in full in Grade 10. This content is not mastered by learners Physical Sciences Physical Sc P1: Avarage% performance per question Graph showing average (%) performance per question 60.0 50.0 52.8 49.0 43.0 40.0 36.2 30.0 30.0 31.2 36.9 34.0 32.9 34.2 20.0 15.5 10.0 0.0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 89 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Physical Sc P1: Average% performance per question Average Performance (%) Content Question Q1 One-word items – all topics 49.0 Q2 Multiple choice questions – all topics 36.2 Q3 Vertical projectile motion 30.0 Q4 Momentum 31.2 Q5 Work, energy and power 32.9 Q6 Doppler effect 43.0 Q7 2D and 3D wave motion 52.8 Q8 Electrostatics 34.0 Q9 Electric circuits 15.5 Q10 Motors, generators & alternating current 36.9 Q11 Photo-electric effect 90 34.2 Physical Sciences Key Area of concern What teachers should do Inability to use and/or no access to scientific calculators Provide scientific calculators to learners and teach them calculator usage skills Inability to draw, interpret and analyse graphs. •Teachers should include the interpretation and drawing of straight line graphs, parabola and hyperbola in all the knowledge areas in Physical Sciences •Expose learners at least once a week to problems that include graph drawing and interpretation Poor understanding of basic concepts like wavelength, frequency, emf, internal resistance, terminal potential difference, work and energy and electrochemistry and organic chemistry due to a lack of practical work. •Learners must do practical work. •Ensure that you have the equipment for practical work. •Do frequent informal testing on basic concepts •Integrate basic concepts in all topics throughout the year Physical Sciences Key Area of concern What teachers should do Poor mathematical skills and knowledge, i.e. conversions to correct units, solving equations (linear, quadratic, fractions); •Teachers should highlight and emphasise the mathematical skills required in the context of all the knowledge areas in Physical Sciences. Include science problems that require these skills in daily assessment. •Provide each learner with a booklet of past examination papers from NSC and other examining bodies Inability to do multi-step problem solving, i.e. inability to grapple with problems. •Learners must be given daily exercises that include multi-step problem solving from past examination papers, textbooks and Item Banks •Learners should be exposed to questions that integrate different knowledge areas, e.g. momentum & electrostatics, momentum & Newton’s Laws, etc. •Conduct class quizzes and contests on both basic concepts and high cognitive level problem solving. This could be done at school, inter-school, etc levels. Inability to answer questions that integrate different concepts, knowledge areas and skills WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE IN THE SECTOR? PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE COMPARISON (ANA & NSC 2013) DISTRICT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON (ANA & NSC) PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE COMPARISON (ANA & NSC): 2012 & 2013 2012 2013 60 GP WC 55 WC GP ANA ( %) 50 FS KZN KZN 45 FS EC NC 40 EC MP NW MP NC LP 35 LP NW 30 60 65 70 75 NSC (%) 80 85 90 NUMBER OF DISTRICTS (ABOVE 50% PERFORMANCE) IN ANA 2013 (AVERAGE MATHEMATICS & LANGUAGES (HL&FAL) AND NSC 2013 Province Performing at 50% Performing and above in both below 50% in NSC and ANA both NSC and ANA EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 0 0 13 4 0 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Performing at 50% and above in NSC but below 50% in ANA Performing at 50% Total and above in ANA but below 50% in NSC 23 5 2 8 10 4 4 4 0 60 Please note: In Limpopo we used 10 districts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 5 15 12 10 4 5 4 8 86 WHAT ARE THE LESSONS LEARNT IN 2013 WHAT WORKED Good raw marks in the majority of subjects in the NSC The classroom as the centre-piece of all what we do Strong PED’s, districts and school’s interventions Strong parental and broader civil society support “Last push” initiatives in some provinces Provision of LTSM’s especially study guides. What worked in 2013 Strong Public Private partnership Strong and consistent message to deal with under performance. Implementation of the NSLA, PIPs, DIPs and SIPs Commitment by learners, teachers, SMT’s and officials. Commitment by learners, teachers, SMT’s and officials. Lessons shared through Minister’s forum with districts Strong focus on under performing districts, schools and subjects Increased accountability at all levels of system REFLECTING ON ACHIEVEMENTS AND WEAKNESSES “Our achievements, however, we know full well, must not be used as an excuse for exaggerating our successes for ignoring errors committed and weaknesses that require urgent attention” From: Nelson Mandela 100 WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES FOR 2014? STRATEGIC DIRECTION NDP Action Plan draws from previous Action Plan, with some additions from NDP. MTSF Action Plan and basic education chapter of MTSF produced in tandem. Strategic plan draws selectively and carefully from e.g. Action Plan. DBE Strategic plan Action Plan Key points from Action Plan. Delivery agreement 102 PRIORITIES INFRASTRUCTURE WORK BOOKS ANA CAPS 103 FOCUS AREAS Early Childhood Development Curriculum Assessment and Policy Statement (CAPS) Languages, Maths, Science and Technology (LMST) National Strategy for Learner Attainment(NSLA) 104 2014 INTERVENTIONS CAPS, Curriculum Coverage & School Based Assessment Teacher Text and Time ANA & NSC Road Shows Languages, Mathematics, Science & Technology (MST) ICT, Teacher development & Support 2014 NSLA Improve accountability, consistency, quality, excellence & communication Classroom is the centre piece English Across the Curriculum (EAC) Inclusivity & Learner retention Target setting, tracking learner performance & measuring impact Improve quality in ECD Subject, Grades, phase & district specific interventions 2014 GET FOCUS AREAS CAPS & Curriculum coverage SBA 2014 GET FOCUS AREAS Languages and MST Reading 106 2014 ECD FOCUS AREAS CAPS & Curriculum implementation Curriculum for 0-4 years 2014 ECD FOCUS AREAS Conditions of Service Improved Qualifications 107 2014 SP FOCUS AREAS CAPS & Curriculum coverage SBA 2014 SP FOCUS AREAS Career and Subject Choices Languages Mathematics 108 2014 FET FOCUS AREAS CAPS & Curriculum coverage High Enrolment subjects 2014 FET FOCUS AREAS English Across the Curriculum Languages and MST SBA 109 WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE ON RETENTION? PRINCIPLES USUALLY USED TO ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF AN EDUCATION SYSTEM • Access • Redress • Equity • Quality • Efficiency FACTORS DETERMINING LEARNER RETENTION IN THE SECTOR • Available subjects/streams and pathways of for selections. • The quality of teaching and learning • Implementation of remedial and support programmes • Culling of learners • Repetition • Dropout FACTORS INFLUENCING LEARNER RETENTION Website: www.education.gov.za Call Centre: 0800 202 933 | callcentre@dbe.gov.za Twitter: @DBE_SA | Facebook: DBE SA CONCERNS EXPRESSED ABOUT SCHOOLING, 2008 - 2011 Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Lack of books 22.5 20.5 15.7 16.8 14.8 11.4 11.0 6.6 6.4 6.0 Fees too high 17.8 16.7 14.4 13.6 11.8 7.0 7.7 4.4 4.8 4.8 Facilities in bad condition 10.5 9.9 8.3 7.5 8.0 5.4 5.3 3.6 4.1 4.4 Classes too large 6.6 6.6 7.0 6.5 7.4 4.9 4.8 3.3 5.0 5.0 Poor Lack of teachers teaching 4.4 5.1 3.7 4.2 2.8 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.4 4.0 6.0 8.5 3.5 3.8 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.8 2.5 Source: Statistics South Africa, General Household Survey, 2009 2011, DBE own analysis PUBLIC SATISFACTION INDICATORS 16 Percentage of learners 14 12 Lack of books 10 Poor quality of teaching Lack of teachers 8 Facilities in bad condition 6 Fees too high 4 Classes too large/too many learners 2 0 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 School Household Survey 2012 PERCENTAGE OF REPEATERS BY GRADE 2009 TO 2012 116 Data source: Statistics TRENDS IN REPETITION 2009-2012 117 DROP OUT RATES DECLINING BUT QUALITY PROBLEMS MANIFEST IN SECONDARY SCHOOLING Drop out rates declining - negligible in foundation phase. Percentage of those who are not enrolled at the time of the survey (2008 and 2010) and had not completed grade 12 by their grade in the preceding year 16 14 13.4 12.3 12 11 10.6 10 11.4 9.3 8 6.5 6 5.4 2007-2008 5.7 2009-2010 3.6 4 3.1 2.1 2 0.9 0.4 0 1.4 0.9 0.8 0 0.3 0 0 1.2 0 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 118 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 FACTORS AFFECTING THE THROUGHPUT RATE • The use of Grade 1 enrolment which is unreliable (Grade 2 will be more appropriate to use) • Repetition rate • Learners who continue their studies with FET colleges and SETA’s and are not properly accounted for in our information. PROGRESS IN GRADE 12 THROUGHPUT RATE YEAR 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 % PROGRESS 28.0% 34.2% 37.7% 38.2% 40.4% PROGRESS ON GRADE 12 LEARNERS PASSES LONG TERM VIEWS YEAR NO. OF GR. 12 PASSES 1970 43 000 1990 191 000 2000 283 294 2013 439 779 COMPARISION OF GR 12 THROUGHPUT RATE WITH SOME OF THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES COUNTRY SOUTH AFRICA TURKEY BRAZIL THROUGHPUT RATE IN GR 12 40% 53% 67% COUNTRIES SUPPORTING AUTOMATIC PROMOTION & PROGRESSION • • • • • • • • Britain Japan Korea Ireland Finland Sweden Norway and Denmark NB. Such countries seldom use repetition and support automatic promotion with strong additional support to weaker learners. HOW CAN WE IMPROVE RETENTION AND THROUGHPUT RATE? • Ensure compliance with policy on admission of learners and promotion and progression • Increase available options for subjects/streams and pathways • Improve the quality of teaching and learning • Implement strong remedial and support programmes for weaker learners. HOW CAN WE IMPROVE RETENTION AND THROUGHPUT RATE? • Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support (SIAS) should benefit all learners especially at lower grades and entry level. • Strengthen our information systems to afford us accurate data on a yearly basis • Commission a research WHERE SHOULD WE FOCUS TO TURN THE SECTOR AROUND? THE ROLE OF DISTRICTS “Districts should provide targeted support to improve practices within schools and ensure communication and information sharing between authorities and schools. Schools need to share best practices. This requires teachers to carry out assessment practices that enable learners to compare their performance with their counterparts in other schools in the district.” National Planning Commission: Diagnostic Report, November 2011 127 DISTRICT MONITORING AND SUPPORT “It needs to be easy to identifiable areas where improvements in teaching and learning are required. This means policy-makers and districts need to be able to access information that helps them determine the rate and extent of progress, including the reasons for under performance and schools requiring intervention. Most importantly it requires that adequate and appropriate capacity exists to support schools that are performing poorly” National Planning Commission: Diagnostic Report, November 2011. 128 DISTRICT SUPPORT Satisfaction by province EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC SA % not satisfied % somewhat satisfied 32 12 9 17 20 9 13 29 4 19 11 10 10 15 10 13 13 10 12 11 % satisfied % very satisfied Total 52 63 67 60 60 65 68 55 67 60 5 15 14 8 10 13 6 6 17 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 129 WHAT IS THE VALUE OF THE MATRIC CERTIFICATE IN THE LABOUR MARKET? Clare Hofmeyr, Nicola Branson, Murray Leibbrandt, Cally Ardington, David Lam (14/10/13), UCT CHARACTERISTICS BY BIRTH COHORT (MEN) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS • Educational attainment has risen steadily over the last five decades. • More recent cohorts having larger proportions of post-primary graduates than their predecessors. • A greater proportion of these men (with a growing proportion of matric graduates among them) became economically active in the labour market. CONCLUSION • Increasing levels of youth unemployment and learners’ poor performance at school have led to claims that the matric certificate no longer has much value in the labour market. • However, the evidence does not support this claim. • While the labour market conditions facing secondary school graduates have indeed worsened with time, the value of a matric certificate relative to that of grade 10 and 11 has remained positive both in terms of earnings and the likelihood of finding employment. THANK YOU Website: www.education.gov.za Call Centre: 0800 202 933 | callcentre@dbe.gov.za Twitter: @DBE_SA | Facebook: DBE SA