January 23, 2013
Outcomes
 Participants will collaborate on plans for
implementation of the Common Core State Standards
for Literacy in Science.
 Participants will collaborate on plans for exploring
implementation of the Next Generation Science
Standards.
 Participants will form work groups that will build
products to be shared across the network.
Agenda
 Introductions
 Group goals
 CCSS experience
 Workgroup conversation
 Science versus engineering?
 Planning for the future
Introductions
 Who are we?
 What would you like to get our of your participation in
this network?
 Personal gains?
 Products that you could share in your building/district?
 Share
 Norms
Apples
 Describe your apple
 What do you think each part is for?
 Other models
 Put a check mark if the observation no longer applies.
Apple
Apples
 Arguing from evidence
 Article:
 Read the text
 What technology is used to bring the apple from the
tree to the table?

What is your evidence?
 Standards?
 CCSS Anchor Standards
 Practices
 Cross-cutting concepts
CCSS
 Now: Beginning implementation, pilot of SBAC items
 2013-2014: Continued implementation, field test of
SBAC
 2014-2015: Full implementation, operational
assessment
CCSS and Science?
 CCSS-ELA Literacy in Science
 Math practices
 Alignment to NGSS
CCSS and Science?
 What is your implementation plan for CCSS-Literacy
in Science?
 What have you done already?
 What are you planning on doing?
 What resources could this group help provide?
NGSS
 Final draft in March
 Adoption this spring?
 Assessment in 2016-2017 (earliest)
 WA State plan will be developed in March
 Framework PD
 Alignment of practice
 Alignment of materials
Workgroups?
 RSC Network
 Products
 Group up
 Highest priorities
 Products
How does the
work of
scientists and
engineers
compare?
THE BOX
&
T-CHART
Similarities
Pencil
Differences
Betsy Rupp Fulwiler
Marker
The Engineering
Design
THE STEM DESIGN
PROCESS Process
IDENTIFY A HUMAN PROBLEM
LITERATURE SEARCH AND
INITIAL DATA COLLECTION
DESIGN
BUILD
TEST &
EVALUATE
REDESIGN
No
Design Meet
Criteria?
Yes
COMMUNICATE SOLUTION TO OTHERS
You need to get across the river!
 Criteria:
 Must be able to get across the river without additional forces
added
 Constraints:
 Limited materials

2 index cards, 2 plastic cups, duct tape, 3 washers, 2 wooden skewers,
4 straws, 5 rubber bands, 2 paper clips, 2 sheets of waxed paper.
 Limited time (30 minutes)
 May only be powered by a rubber band
 Record your design and think about when and how you use
science, math, and technology.
Time to test and share!
Take Another Look at the
Box & T Diagram
Is there anything you wish to add or
revise about the work of scientists and
engineers?
Article
 What science or engineering practices did you use
when building your device?
 How will the practices play out in your classroom or
instructional role?
 What questions might you have?
NGSS and you
 What might your implementation plan for NGSS look
like?
 What have you done already?
 What are you planning on doing?
 What resources could this group help provide?
Future
 Workgroup time
 What might be your action plan?

Short term product? (this year…)
 Webinars?
 What would you like to know about?
 Next meeting
Reflection
Gots and Needs
Index card:
What did you get out of today- what worked well for
you?
What do you need- what would you like to see different
from next time?