Soil Settlement By Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE Fall 2013 Soil Settlement: Total Soil Settlement = Elastic Settlement + Consolidation Settlement Stotal = Se + Sc Elastic Settlement or Immediate Settlement depends on Elastic Settlement { { Load Type (Rigid; Flexible) Settlement Location (Center or Corner) Theory of Elasticity Time Depended Elastic Settlement (Schmertman & Hartman Method (1978) Elastic settlement occurs in sandy, silty, and clayey soils. By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Consolidation Settlement (Time Dependent Settlement) * Consolidation settlement occurs in cohesive soils due to the expulsion of the water from the voids. * Because of the soil permeability the rate of settlement may varied from soil to another. * Also the variation in the rate of consolidation settlement depends on the boundary conditions. SConsolidation = Sprimary + Ssecondary Primary Consolidation Secondary Consolidation Volume change is due to reduction in pore water pressure Volume change is due to the rearrangement of the soil particles (No pore water pressure change, Δu = 0, occurs after the primary consolidation) Water Table (W.T.) Expulsion of the water Water Voids Solids When the water in the voids starts to flow out of the soil matrix due to consolidation of the clay layer. Consequently, the excess pore water pressure (Du) will reduce, and the void ratio (e) of the soil matrix will reduce too. Elastic Settlement Bqo Se = Es Bqo Se = Where α = Es 1 p 2 (1 - μs) α (corner of the flexible foundation) (1 - μs) α (center of the flexible foundation) 2 2 [ ln ( √1 + m2 + m / √1 + m2 - m ) + m. ln ( √1 + m2 + 1 / √1 + m2 - 1 ) m = B/L B = width of foundation L = length of foundation By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Se = Bqo (1 - μs) α Es 3.0 2.5 α αav αr α, αav, αr 2.0 1.5 For circular foundation α=1 αav = 0.85 αr = 0.88 1.0 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 L/B Values of α, αav, and αr By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Elastic Settlement of Foundation on Saturated Clay Janbu, Bjerrum, and Kjaernsli (1956) proposed an equation for evaluation of the average elastic settlement of flexible foundations on saturated clay soils (Poisson’s ratio, μs = 0.5). Referring to Figure 1 for notations, this equation can be written as Se = A1 A2 qoB/Es where A1 is a function H/B and L/B, and is a function of Df/B. Christian and Carrier (1978) have modified the values of A1 and A2 to some extent, and these are presented in Figure 2. 2.0 L/B = ∞ L/B = 10 1.0 1.5 A2 0.9 5 A1 1.0 2 Square Circle 0.5 0.8 0 5 10 Df/B 15 20 0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 H /B Values of A1 and A2 for elastic settlement calculation (after Christian and Carrier, 1978) By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Consolidation Settlement Consolidation Settlement (Primary Consolidation) = Sc = (Cc/1+e o) Hc . log [(Po + P)/Po] Qdesign = Column Load Normally Consolidated Clay Stressed Zone Sand B Caly Hc Hc/2 Overburden Pressure Po 2 1 2 1 Stress Distribution Sand By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Consolidation Settlement Loading Normally Consolidated Soil Unloading p Sand Sand H clay/2 Hsand 2 1 Dp p Hclay Void Ratio H clay/2 Sand Sand Void Ratio Void Ratio Hsand 2 1 Clay Sand Sand Dpp Hclay Dp P Dp P eo Cc Po Log P Po Po + Dp P Log P Po Dp Po + P Log P Cc H log(po +p) Sultimate = H = Po Cc H 1 + eo Po + DP DH = log ( ) P0 1 + eO Po = sand . Hsand + ( clay - water ) . Hclay/2 By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Re loading with Heavy Load p2 Hsand 2 1 H clay/2 1 p Dp 2 The soil become overconsolidated soil Dp P p2 Dp 2 H clay/2 Hclay V oid Ratio Hsand 2 Hclay Dp P22 V oid Ratio Dp eo Cs Cs Po Po + Dp P = Pc DH = Po Log P Pc Po + Dp P2 2 Log P CS H P Cs CHC H Cc H log Po + P2 2 log log (PPco + DP+ ( H C= ) + ) Sultimatelog = Po 1 +1e+ eO 1 + eO 1 + eo Pc Po PC o ( ) ( ) By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Re loading with light Load p2 Hsand 2 1 H clay/2 Dpp The soil become overconsolidated soil Void Ratio Dp P p2 Dp 2 H clay/2 Hclay 2 Hsand 2 1 Hclay Po + Dp P2 2 Void Ratio Dp P22 eo Cs Po Pc DH = Po Log P CS H 1 + eO Pc Cs H log S = H = ultimate P + DP2 1 + eo log ( o ) Po Log P ( Pc Po ) By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Determining The Preconsolidation Pressure (Pc) Cassagrande Graphical Method Void Ratio 5 6 3 1 4 2 7 Po OCR = Pc/Po OCR = 1 OCR > 1 OCR > 4 Pc Log P Normally Consolidated Over Consolidated Heavily Over Consolidated By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Figure 1 Example: 1. 2. 3. 4. gsand = 96 pcf Soil sample was obtained from the clay layer Conduct consolidation test [9 load increments ] Plot e vs. log (p) (Figure 2) Determine Compression Index (Cc ) & Swelling Index (Cs) 0.9 Sand Void Ratio (e) 0.7 0.6 Soil Sample eo = 0.795 Cc = 0.72 Cs = 0.1 In the lab and before the consolidation test the stresses on the sample = 0. During testing, the geostatic stress is gradually recovered 0.4 0.3 100 Determine Po 16 ft wc = 0.3 In the ground, the sample was subjected to geostatic stresses. 0.5 5. Clay gclay = 110 pcf 4 ft Dp1 Dp 2 0.8 In the lab the stresses are added to the soil sample 3 ft W.T. 1 In the lab and after removing the soil sample from the ground, the stresses on the soil sample = 0 Dp1 Dp Stress Dp7 Increments Dp Dp9 G.S. Po = 3.(96) + 4.(96-62.4) + 8.(110-62.4) = 803.2 lb/ft2 Cc Cs Dp9 Po 1000 Log (p) 10000 Figure 2 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Tangent to point 1 Example: 6. G.S. gsand = 96 pcf Using Casagrande’s Method to determine Pc 3 ft W.T. Sand gclay = 110 pcf Pc = 800 lb/ft2 4 ft Clay Po 16 ft wc = 0.3 Overconsolidation Ratio Pc Po 1 =1 The soil is Normally Consolidated N.C. soil 0.9 Dp1 2 6 0.8 Void Ratio (e) OCR = Point of maximum curvature X X 1 4 0.7 5 3 0.6 0.5 0.4 7 0.3 100 Po = Pc1000 Log (p) 10000 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Casagrande’s Method to Determine Preconsolidation Pressure (Pc) 1 Normally Consolidated Soil Point of maximum curvature 1 0.9 2 Horizontal line Void Ratio (e) 0.8 X X 1 0.7 3 0.6 0.5 0.4 7 0.3 Po = Pc1000 100 Log (p) Overconsolidation Ratio OCR = Pc Po =1 The soil is Normally Consolidated (N.C.) soil 10000 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 2 Casagrande’s Method to Determine Pc Overconsolidated Soil Point of maximum curvature 2 Horizontal line X X Void Ratio (e) 1 3 7 Po Overconsolidation Ratio OCR = Pc Po The soil is oversonsolidated (O.C.) soil >1 Pc Log (p) Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Building qdesign Example: gsand = 96 pcf A 150’ x 100’ building will be constructed at the site. The vertical stress due to the addition of the building qdesign =1000 lb/ft2 G.S. W.T. Sand Clay 3 ft 4 ft DP1 Po Po 16 ft The weight of the building Qdesign will be transferred to the mid height of the clay layer eo = wc . Gs = 0.3 x 2.65 = 0.795 1 Qdesign = 15,000,000 lb The added stress at 15’ from the ground surface is 0.9 Dp1 Dp = 15,000,000 lb (150+15) x (100+15) DP = 790.51 lb/ft2 Void Ratio (e) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 DP + Po = 790.51 + 803 = 1593.51 lb/ft2 0.4 0.3 100 Po1000 Log (p) 10000 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Building Example: qdesign DP + Po = 790.51 + 803 = 1593.51 lb/ft2 gsand = 96 pcf Consolidation Settlement DH = DH = Cc H 1 + eO log ( G.S. W.T. Sand Po + DP ) Po 0.72 x 16 1593.51 log ( ) 1 + 0.795 803 DH = 1.9 ft Clay 3 ft 4 ft DP1 Po Po 16 ft eo = wc . Gs = 0.3 x 2.65 = 0.795 1 0.9 Dp1 Void Ratio (e) 0.8 DP1 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 100 Po1000 Po + DP Log (p) 10000 Demolished When the building was removed, the soil has become an overconsolidated clay. qdesign gsand = 96 pcf The rebound has taken place through swelling from pint 1 to point 2 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 G.S. W.T. Sand Clay 3 ft 4 ft Po Po 16 ft eo = wc . Gs = 0.3 x 2.65 = 0.795 1 0.9 Dp1 Void Ratio (e) 0.8 DP1 0.7 2 0.6 1 0.5 0.4 0.3 100 Po1000 Po + DP Log (p) 10000 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Constructing a new building Scenario #1 The soil now is overconsolidated Soil: qdesign gsand = 96 pcf DH = W.T. Sand The new building is heavier in weight CS H 1 + eO G.S. Clay 3 ft 4 ft DP2 Po Po 16 ft P C CH P + DP log ( C ) + log ( o ) Po PC 1 + eO eo = wc . Gs = 0.3 x 2.65 = 0.795 1 eo = 0.61 0.9 DH = 0.1 x 16 1 + 0.61 log ( 1593.51 803 + 0.72 x 16 log ( 2100 1 + 0.61 1593.51 ) DP2 0.8 Void Ratio (e) Assume Po + Dp2 = 2100 psf Dp1 DP1 0.7 0.6 CS 0.5 CC ) 0.4 = 0.3 100 Po1000 Pc Log (p) Po + DP New Building 10000 Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Constructing a new building Scenario # 2 The soil now is overconsolidated Soil: qdesign gsand = 96 pcf G.S. W.T. Sand Clay The new building is lighter in weight 3 ft 4 ft DP2 Po Po 16 ft eo = wc . Gs = 0.3 x 2.65 = 0.795 CS H P + DP log ( o ) P0 1 + eO DH = 1 0.9 eo = 0.61 = log ( 1600 1593.51 ) Void Ratio (e) 0.1 x 16 1 + 0.61 DP2 0.8 Assume Po + Dp2 = 1600 psf DH = Dp1 DP1 0.7 0.6 CS 0.5 0.4 0.3 100 Po1000Po + DP Log (p) 10000 New Building Dr. Kamal Tawfiq - 2010 Example of Semi-log Scale 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Rate of Consolidation Settlement at any time = Stime Stime = Sultimate * U% Sultimate= (Cc/1+eo) Hc . log [(Po + P)/P o] U% = f (Tv) .... Tv = f (cv) ...... Tv = cv . t (Hdr)2 Qdesign = Column Load u =Excess Pore Water Pressure Sand Caly Overburden Pressure Po Hdr = Hc /2 P P Stress Distribution 2: 1 method Uo Hc = Layer Thickness Sand u =Excess Pore Water Pressure By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E. Once you determine Tv use the table shown on the page to determine U% Degree of Consolidation (U%) vs. Time Factor (Tv)