Perceptions of Personal Expertise in ICU Nurses

advertisement

Teresa D. Welch

The University of Alabama

Spring 2014

Problem:

To legitimize the definition of expert nursing practice, further research is need to explore the concepts of intuitive, clinical reasoning (Lyneham, Parkinson, &

Denholm, 2008).

 The purpose of this research is to build upon Patricia

Benner’s seminal work in the domain of skill acquisition to explore the personal perceptions of expertise in professional clinical nursing staff.

Empirical data that builds upon the current body of knowledge would serve to add rigor to that knowledge.

 If no one recognizes the value of your work, then the work is of no value.

 Professional nursing practice adds significant value to the healthcare system

 Promote the recognition of the value in expert clinical practice and the professional contributions of nursing

In a grounded theory study, concepts are generated from empirical data rather than from existing literature.

Like a detective who strives to explain what is actually happening, the GT-researcher strives to explain the main concern of participants in a specific situation/area and to find out how they resolve or process this main concern (Hallberg, 2010).

 The expert is defined in the literature as one who possesses both skill and knowledge where intuitive, highly skilled performance is the result of dedicated practice and years of experience. There are five core concepts that are consistently applied to expertise across disciplines: an intuitive grasp of the salient aspects of a situation, intuitive judgment and action, comprehensive understanding, with the flexibility, fluidity and ability to transfer knowledge from one situation to another, and knowledge gained through experience (Avis & Freshwater, 2006;

Benner, 2004; Christensen & Hewitt-Taylor, 2006; Ericsson, Whyte, &

Ward, 2007).

 Capturing the description of expert performance is difficult because the expert clinician works from a deep understanding of the global situation. Salient pieces of the situation are contextually grounded and grasped intuitively as the expert is immersed within and focused on the entirety of the situation. Individual details are lost to conscious thought and difficult to ascertain (Benner, 2001; National Research

Council, 2000).

 Further research into the concepts of intuitive, clinical reasoning would legitimize the definition of expert nursing practice (Benner, 2001;

Ericsson, 2007; Lyneham, Parkinson, & Denholm, 2008).

It is most suitable for addressing the ’why’ and the ‘how’ questions to explain and understand issues that describe processes or behaviors making grounded theory useful in nursing practice to produce an explanatory theory of human behavior within the social context (Hennink, Hutter, &

Bailey, 2011; Wuest, 2012).

Descriptive Qualitative Research

Grounded Theory

Sample

 Purposful sample

Purposeful sampling as data begins to reveal emergent concepts

Theoretical sampling as data collection becomes more refined seeking to clarify properties of emerging concepts and their relationships to one another. (Wuest,

2011, p. 234)

The process of theoretical sampling will continue until

data saturation is achieved, meaning that no new concepts or variations are emerging from the data being analyzed.

Sample Selection

Voluntary

Expertise will be defined and inclusion/ exclusion parameters for participation will be established based upon three factors:

Benner’s definition of expertise

Five core concepts of expertise as defined within the literature

 Intuitive judgment

Intuitive grasp of salience within a situation

Flexibility and transferability

Knowledge gained through experience

Certified Critical Care Nurses

Snowball effect

 Setting-

 Certified Critical Care nurses in the Southeastern

United States.

Contact American Association of Critical Care Nurses

(AACN) present the purpose of the dissertation and request contact list for participation

Attend/ advertise at the NTI conference hosted by AACN

 Interview

Protocol template

 Face to face, pre-arranged interviews in a mutually agreeable location

 Skype

Follow semi-structured format

Audio recorded

Interviews will consist of open-ended questions that focus on the personal perceptions of the expert nurse seeking to discover how they perceive their personal expertise.

 Data Collection

 Evolving analysis

Researcher must be fully engaged in the data

Collection and analysis

Interview Protocol

 Data Analysis

Open Coding

 Generate as many conceptual codes as possible

Axial Coding

 Core themes begin to develop

Selective Coding

 Relationships begin to develop

 Begins with first interview (inductive). Deductively data drivers further interview questions “closed loop” data collection continues until saturation

 Ethical Considerations

 IRB review and approval

Informed Consent

Self determination

Participants have the right to decline

Anonymity

Confidentiality

Under the guidance of the Dissertation Committee

June 2014 Prospectus

October 2014 Proposal to IRB

December 2014 Collect and Analyze Data

August 2015 Defense of Dissertation

Avis, M., & Freshwater, D. (2006). Evidence for practice, epistemology, and critical reflection. Nursing Philosophy, 7,

216-224.

Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice (Commemorative ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.

Benner, P. (2004). Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bulletin of Science

Technology & Society, 24 (3), 188-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265061

Christensen, M., & Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2006, December). From expert to tasks, expert nursing practice redefined? Issues in Clinical Nursing,

1531-1539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01601.x

Ericsson, K.A., (2007). An expert-performance perspective of research on medical expertise:

The study of clinical performance. Medical Education, 41, 1124-1130.

Ericsson, K.A., Whyte, J., & Ward, P. (2007, January). Expert performance in nursing: Reviewing research on expertise in nursing within the framework of expert-performance approach. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), E58-E71.

Hallberg, L.R., (2010). Some thought about the literature review in grounded theory studies. International Journal Qualitative Student Health Wellbeing, 5, doi: 10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5387

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. Los

Angeles, CA: Sage.

Lyneham, J., Parkinson, C., & Denholm, C. (2008). Explicating Benner’s concept of expert practice: Intuition in emergency nursing. The Journal of

Advanced Nursing, 64 (4), 380-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-

2648.200804799.x

National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Wuest, J. (2012). Grounded theory: The method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing

Research: A Qualitative Perspective (5th ed., pp. 225-256). Sudbury, MA:

Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Download