Master PP-5.2

advertisement

Geo 325 Land Use and Environmental Planning

Service Learning Project, Spring 2010

 Goals and Objectives

 Methods

 Background Information

 Biofuels Production

 Policy

 Stakeholders

- business

- government

 Wildlife Impacts

“The American economy depends on petroleum for transportation, which has created energy security concerns, contributions to climate change, and various other environmental hazards” –National Biofuels Action

Plan, Oct. 2008

2006- Advanced Energy Initiative (AEI): included increased research funding for cutting edge biofuel production processes.

Early 2007“Twenty-in-Ten” initiative: plan to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years.

Mid 2007- Energy Independence and Security Act

(EISA): signed in to law by George W. Bush

December 2007- Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS):

Congressional response to EISA, require 36 BGY of biofuels by 2022

Cellulosic ethanol and biomass based diesel

2007- Farm Bill: $1.6 B in renewable energy and energy efficiency-related spending at USDA

$210 M to support loan guarantees for cellulosic ethanol projects

 EPA Policy Act of 2005: Changed U.S. energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for alternative energy production

 Biomass Research and Development Board (R&D):

Maximize benefits deriving from Federal grants

Bring coherence to Federal strategic planning

Co-chaired by senior officials from: DOE, DOT, USDA,

DOD, EPA, NSF

The Kentucky 25 x 25 Roadmap

Goals:

Increase production of renewable energy

Deliver renewable energy to markets

Expand renewable energy markets

Improve energy efficiency and productivity

Strengthen conservation of natural resources and the environment

Purpose statement:

To establish a biomass energy crop in Kentucky that will be used for fuel production, striving to create a long-term, sustainable biofuel industry which will be economically profitable and lessen dependence on foreign oil.

ANDERSON

BATH

BOURBON

BOYLE

BRACKEN

BREATHITT

CASEY

CLARK

CLAY

ELLIOTT

ESTILL

FAYETTE

FLEMING

FRANKLIN

GARRARD

GRANT

HARRISON

HENRY

JACKSON

JESSAMINE

LAUREL

LEE

LEWIS

LINCOLN

MADISON

MASON

MENIFEE

MERCER

MONTGOMERY

MORGAN

NICHOLAS

OWEN

OWSLEY

PENDLETON

POWELL

PULASKI

ROBERTSON

ROCKCASTLE

ROWAN

SCOTT

SHELBY

WASHINGTON

WOLFE

WOODFORD

Target Counties Within 50 mi. Radius of

Winchester

Feedstock Production

 Switchgrass

What type of agriculture is established on the land through out the 50 m targeted radius?

• How much land is readily available for growing switchgrass?

• Who are the land owners?

 Harvesting

Late October till April.

Average yield-2500 tons.

 Storage

6 month average.

Stored under a cover or in old tobacco barn.

3 to 6 dollars per ton

 Delivery

50 mile radius from Winchester.

10 to 12 dollars per ton to transfer from field to refinery.

26 bales to truck (or 15 to 16 bales.)

160 loads daily to refinery.

14 loads per hour.

 Processing

Process to diesel in Irvine, KY.

EPA Policy Act of 2005

Changed U.S. energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for alternative energy production

The Energy Independence and Security Act of

2007 Created a more aggressive Renewable

Fuel Standard

•Federal Legislation

• 25x25 in Kentucky: renewable energy initiative backed by businesses, organizations and individuals united by a common interest in making America’s energy future more secure, affordable and environmentally sustainable.

• Includes: 2008 Farm Bill

• Positives?

•Incentives for farmers to produce/convert crops into biomass.

•Negatives?

•Current farmland is used for cattle production. Is switchgrass economically feasible?

Recovery Act of 2009: an unprecedented effort to jumpstart our economy, create or save millions of jobs, and focus on addressing long-neglected challenges so our country can thrive in the twenty-first century.

 Positives?

 Potential for a ‘green, clean’ environment, less dependence on foreign nations for our livelihood.

 Potential holes?

 Current research suggests only 30-40 jobs will be created through a switchgrass plant.

“Millions” might be a stretch…

•Policy Analysis

•Trends in Past Legislation

•Enacted or failed Legislation

•Is it a compelling need?

•Sponsorship of Legislation

•Effective Counties in a 50 mile radius

•TDR Law in Clark County

•Urban Service Boundary in Fayette County

•Who can we get to sponsor this bill?

•Strategic Alignment

•Does policy align with cultural/wants needs of

Kentucky/counties?

Agriculture

Farmers

Wildlife Conservation

Soil Conservation

Landowners

Fuels Market

Stock Holders

Fuel Producers

Gas Companies

Owners

Other Bio-fuel Producers

 Other

Trucking

Public Transportation

Contractors

Developers

Coal Industry

Feed Producers

Vehicle Inspection /

Repair

Local

County Officials

County Extension

Planning

 Zoning

 Commissions

Economic Development

Transportation Cabinet

State / Federal

Agencies

State Parks

Transportation

Energy

EPA

 Counties: 44 Counties

Including:

Madison

Fayette

Clark

Rockcastle

Woodford

Garrard

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

Population Household Avg. HH Income

Madison

Powell

Clark

Montgomery

Bourbon

Fayette

Estill

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

F,F,F S,O P,T,M Un-emp.

Madison

Powell

Clark

Montgomery

Bourbon

Fayette

Estill

Urban Growth

Population Growth

Labor Forces

Recreation

Non-Profits

Residents

Landowners

Healthcare Services

Emergency Services

 Environmental

Environmental Lobbyist

Environmental Groups

 Kentuckians for the

Commonwealth

 Sierra Club

 Watershed Watch

Pollution

 Air

 Water

 Land

Weather Hazards

CRAFT Biofuels Production Project

Target Area Land Use

Determine likely environmental harms

Determine ways to harvest the land to benefit the wildlife.

Determine ways to produce bio fuels without harming land/water/air quality.

 Determine the effects that would occur with the change from corn, or agricultural animals to the production of switch grass

 Take into affect, the endangered animals that surround the farmland that could be effected by the production of switch grass

SOIL/ NUTRIENTS

Switch grass provides all of the necessary requirements for the quail to survive with benefits such as nesting, shelter, roosting, summer and winter cover, cover from birds of prey, and food.

 Switch grass contains nutrients that enhance soil.

MAMMAL HABITAT

Some animals that would be effected from the production of switch grass would be widely distributed.

Animals such as small mammals, and many varieties of song birds, and game birds.

Switchgrass also provides the same necessities for mammals as it does land dwelling birds such as cover, food opportunities, and rearing offspring.

It also provides hunting grounds for some land dwelling animals such as the Red Fox and Coyote.

BIRD HABITAT

Provides important habitat for a variety of birds (ground dwelling birds), such as Bobwhite Quail

HARVEST SEASON

According to Iowa State Universities Department of

Agronomy, Single harvest of switch grass that taken four to six weeks or more after its above-ground growth, is killed by frost, and removes less nutrients and reduces fertility needs.

Determine the best times during the season to harvest the switch grass so it does not interfere with the nesting times for the birds that inhabit the land.

Determine the migratory patterns, with relation to switch grass harvest.

Determine waterways, creeks, and rivers that would be effected

Determine the impact on different species that inhabit the local water ways.

As animals graze, they alter the vegetative cover and soils physical properties of pastureland.

These alterations may decrease infiltration of water through the soil which, in turn, increases the amount of surface runoff.

 The figure on slide 3 of this presentation was attributed by the Chariton Valley Biomass Project, under farmrelated local environmental benefits. http://www.iowaswitchgrass.com/benefits~onfarmbenefit s.html

The figure found on slide 4 was found on the “Highlights of Agricultural Research; (Runoff, Erosion, And Water

Quality Detriment Evaluated In Grazing Studies. www.ag.auburn.edu/.../fall97/runoff.htm

 We attended the annual Wildlife society meeting, ky chapter

 94 members attended

 Groups were made of 6-8 individuals

 Individuals were asked the following 10 questions and their input was recorded as a general group concensus

1. What habitats, ecosystems, or species do you think would most likely benefit from the growing of biofuels switchgrass? (S)

2. What habitats, ecosystems, or species do you think would have the greatest chance of being negatively impacted by the growing of biofuels switchgrass? (W)

3. What concerns you about the seasonal growing and harvesting of biofuels switchgrass that may affect wildlife in and around these areas? (W)

4. If you had an opportunity to recommend a policy or regulation that could minimize the impact on wildlife by biofuels switchgrass production, what would it be?

5. How might your experience and / or knowledge of environmental systems benefit this project?

(O)

6. How might your job change by an increase in biofuels switchgrass production? (S)

7. Potash is considered to be one of the major byproducts of biofuels production that could have environmental impacts. What recommendations do you have to address this threat? (T)

8. Thinking now specifically about the proposed biofuel plant itself, what do you see as the greatest threats to the natural environment in and around the facility? (T)

9. What information sources or other resources to you think is most important that we consult for input into our environmental and habitat assessment? (O)

10. What groups or individuals do you think are most important that we contact for input into our environmental and habitat assessment?

 The following concerns and suggestions were the most important answers given by the Wildlife

Society.

 They are listed in descending order from most mentioned to the least.

 Harvest Times:

Loss of Wildlife Habitat

Lack of job dependence (seasonal harvest)

 Monoculture

Only One species of grass

Potential for pests to wipe out an entire crop

Lack of diversity for inhabitants/ food source

 Potash

Opportunity to use as fertilizer

 Chemical Run-Off

Mass Fertilizers entering the water table

Pollution into streams and soil

◦ Some chemicals used aren’t legal in some states

 Request for more research

Transportation of biomass (Is it economically feasible?)

Download