FE 537 Plot scale Oregon State University What this section will address FE 537 A B Plot scale C Hillslope scale Catchment scale Oregon State University Outline FE 537 From core to plot Quick review of flow and transport in porous media Problems with the notion of linear upscaling of soil core information Plot scale changes with depth Some experimental data Preferential flow changes with depth Some experimental data Summary Plot scale conceptualization and how this links to the hillslope scale Oregon State University FE 537 From core to plot Oregon State University FE 537 Our so-called subgrid parameterization Jan Hopmans, UC Davis Oregon State University FE 537 The steps How does measurement uncertainty in these steps affect estimation of K(h)? Sherlock et al., 2000 Oregon State University FE 537 Oregon State University What’s important conceptually FE 537 How we define this quantitatively Source: Mike O’Kane Oregon State University FE 537 Source: Mike O’Kane Oregon State University Just to be clear So for unsaturated conductivity… Hydraulic conductivity mm/hr FE 537 1000 Water is the conducting medium! 100 10 1 0 -100 -200 Water potential cmH2O Oregon State University FE 537 Photo by Jim Kirchner But wait, structure trumps texture! Intact field soil very different to admixtures of sand/silt/clay Water content [-] 0.5 Sand 0.4 Loess Clay 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 Oregon State University 10 100 [cm] 1000 10000 FE 537 Oregon State University Preferential flow FE 537 If Darcy were alive today… Merde! H q K z Oregon State University FE 537 Two common strategies to deal with this Oregon State University Source: Brent Clothier, WISPAS Newsletter 2008 Darcy revisited FE 537 It’s not that Darcy does not apply (almost all of the time) It’s just that a different physics kicks in during brief windows in time Days or weeks of Darcian bordom, punctuated by all (macropore) hell breaking loose! Think of it as a struggle between the Newtonian vs Darwinian world views read John Harte’s 2002 paper in Physics Today (on merging the Newtonian and Darwinian world views) Oregon State University The plot scale paradox FE 537 surface, topsoil matrix While large pore space makes up only a small percent of the total porosity, they control almost all the flow at or near saturation soil soil pipes soil base permeable layers Almost all our theory is for the matrix We‘ve learned about as much as we ever will for pure textural mixtures and re-packed field soilshighly Peter Kienzler, ETH Zurich Oregon State University Not a new idea FE 537 The curse of preferential flow 1898 - Some 104 years ago Oregon State University Courtesy Brent Clothier FE 537 Plot scale changes with depth Oregon State University At depth FE 537 Evaporation Transpiration Infiltration Lateral flow Deep percolation Oregon State University Photo: Markus Weiler UBC Hydrology’s most basic equation FE 537 nZr ds/dt = I(s, t) - E(s, t) - L(s, t) Where: n is porosity, Z is soil depth, s is the relative soil moisture content, I is infiltration, E is evaporation and L is leakage Rodriguez-Iturbe (2000, WRR) notes that “although apparently simple, this presents serious challenges when the terms in the RHS are considered dependent on the state s. Oregon State University Changes with depth FE 537 Oregon State University one of your benchmark papers FE 537 Some data from the same site Data from WS10, HJA, Kevin McGuire Oregon State University FE 537 Ksat changes with depth! Saturated hydraulic conductivity with exponential curve fits. The dashed lines indicate the envelope for most data observations. Data from WS10, HJA, Kevin McGuire Oregon State University FE 537 Drainable porosity Drainable porosity = saturated water content – water content at field capacity Change in drainable porosity will directly alter the depth function of drainable storage in the soil Relates to ground water table fluctuations Data from WS10, HJA, Kevin McGuire Oregon State University FE 537 Why such changes with depth? Knocks / 5 cm 0 0 20 Soil depth (cm) 40 60 80 100 120 140 Oregon State University 5 10 15 20 .. and for many nutrients FE 537 Also distinct depth distributions Oregon State University Data from forest soils (Hagedorn et al., 2001) FE 537 The preferential flow – matrix link Soil matrix changes with depth conspire with vertical preferential flow: Drainable porosity Bulk density z Hydraulic conductivity Pore size distribution Oregon State University ? Peter Kienzler, ETH Zurich A now common mechanism FE 537 Storm Rainfall Sd18O 10o/oo dq/dZ <0 <0 d18O 4.5o/oo Oregon State University New water bypass flow to depth Transient saturation at soil-bedrock interface Lateral pipeflow of old water due to limited storage and head Bedrock surface control of mobile water Rapid recession after rainfall ends Important coupling of unsaturated and transient saturated zones. d18O 5o/oo FE 537 Why this is important for runoff generation? Water cannot enter the pipe drain when it is placed above the level of the water table (i.e. water will not flow from a position of low potential in the soil to a position of higher potential). Water will only enter the drain when it is placed within the saturated zone (below the water table) and if there is sufficient hydraulic head. (McLaren and Cameron, 1994) Oregon State University Remember this when we move to the hillslope scale… FE 537 Kitihara-san’s Lab at FFPRI in Japan R Oregon State University FE 537 More detail on preferential flow changes with depth Oregon State University FE 537 It’s network-like and it’s ubiquitous A network of connected macropores and fissures that rapidly transmits water & solutes through the rootzone Oregon State University Courtesy Brent Clothier FE 537 A quick case study to illustrate this Sprinkling experiments on undisturbed soils: the work of Weiler and Naef electric linear actuator nozzles covered dry plot wind protection gutter tensiometer and TDR probes Oregon State University overland flow measurement pump and control FE 537 Oregon State University Sprinkling and dye tracing experiments Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Mapping FE 537 0 High rainfall intensity Dry soil 8 cm 50 cm Horizontal dye pattern Depth 15 cm Legend unstained stones macropores 57 cm Stained areas with low concentration medium concentration Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University high concentration FE 537 Soil water content and preferential flow Soil water content measurement Vertical dye pattern Depth (m) Flow process 1.0 Legend High rainfall intensity Dry soil Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Surface initiation Stained areas with (water repellency) unstained low concentration stones medium concentration high concentration High interaction (permeable matrix) macropores An animation FE 537 High rainfall intensity Depth (m) Dry soil Dye pattern Water content change 1.0 Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Matric potential and preferential flow FE 537 Recall Weyman, Burt and others from your reader…. Matric potential measurement Vertical dye pattern Depth (m) Duration of sprinkling experiment 82 cm 5 Matric potential (kPa) 0 -5 98 cm 30 cm -10 -15 -20 0 Flow process 18 cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (min) Oregon State University 1.0 Subsurface initiation Legend (saturated matrix) Stained areas with unstained low concentration Low stones interaction medium concentration high concentration macropores (saturated matrix) Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Other sites FE 537 High rainfall intensity Depth (m) Dry soil Dye pattern Water content change 1.0 Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Other sites FE 537 Low rainfall intensity Depth (m) Dry soil Dye pattern Water content change 1.0 Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University Other sites FE 537 Low rainfall intensity Depth (m) Wet soil Dye pattern Water content change 1.0 Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University FE 537 Infiltration in macroporous soils Macropore Flow Initiation Water supply to the macropores Interaction Water transfer between macropores and the surrounding soil matrix Oregon State University Markus Weiler, Freiburg University How do macropores influence runoff processes? FE 537 Activated macropore rapid infiltration Runoff reaction Storage Oregon State University Fast Subsurface Flow Overland Flow Markus Weiler, Freiburg University FE 537 The preferential flow – matrix link revisited Soil matrix changes with depth conspire with vertical preferential flow: Drainable porosity Bulk density z Hydraulic conductivity Pore size distribution Oregon State University ? Peter Kienzler, ETH Zurich A now common mechanism FE 537 Storm Rainfall Sd18O 10o/oo dq/dZ <0 <0 d18O 4.5o/oo Oregon State University New water bypass flow to depth Transient saturation at soil-bedrock interface Lateral pipeflow of old water due to limited storage and head Bedrock surface control of mobile water Rapid recession after rainfall ends Important coupling of unsaturated and transient saturated zones. d18O 5o/oo Implications for modeling FE 537 Traditional conceptual runoff models Unsaturated storage Saturated storage What undergraduate textbooks will state Oregon State University FE 537 Implications for modeling A process prerequisite Unsaturated storage Saturated storage Oregon State University FE 537 The use of qualitative, conceptual models can overcome the shortcomings of quantitative models. Conceptual models consider the sum interaction of all processes, even if not known, that result in a particular phenomenon (Pilkey and Pilkey-Jarvis, 2007). Oregon State University One example FE 537 z nd ( z ) n0 exp b Weiler and McD, 2004 JoH Oregon State University z K ( z ) K o 1 D m 1 qSSF (t ) T (t ) w FE 537 Conclusions Oregon State University FE 537 Peter Kienzler, ETH Zurich Oregon State University This section From core to plot Quick review of flow and transport in porous media Problems with the notion of linear upscaling of soil core information Plot scale changes with depth Some experimental data Preferential flow changes with depth Some experimental data Summary Plot scale conceptualization and how this links to the hillslope scale Next section From vertical to lateral flow FE 537 Q Q Qs Often an impeding horizon or soil-bedrock contact z Saturated vertical hydraulic conductivity Oregon State University % Saturation Downward percolation Lateral subsurface flow