Old vs. New Left 1. Focus on Communism/ Soviet Union-> (Anti-Anticommunism, “Speaking American”) 2. Working Class/Unions as Agents of Social Change-> (Students as Agents of Social change, existing unions as part of “the system.”) 3. Economic Explanation of Society (Making values explicit, alienation as central problem) 4. Building Centralized Organizations the Key to Victory-> (Organization, bureaucracy as the problem) The Growth of SDS 1960 SDS Formed 1962 Port Huron Statement 1964 Berkeley FSM 1965 April SDS initiated Anti-War March attracts 25,000 Chapters 1960 3 1963 19 1966 172 1968 400 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Members 60 62 64 67 68 Collapse Summer 1969 SDS breaks apart at its annual convention Progressive Labor/ PL-SDS Weathermen/Weather Underground Rapid drift into irrelevance Organizational Dilemmas Explosive growth acculturating new members Having meetings open to all made SDS vulnerable to takeover by a determined minority willing to pack meetings and wait out opponents Lack of Control—or even communication with individual campuses Difficulty in planning mass actions and setting priorities Radicalization Nonviolence Violence From “Speaking American” denunciation of imperialist America (PIGS, support for the NLF) Student Agency –Third World/ Inner City Revolution (Black Panthers/Che/Mao) Reform Revolution (Fortune magazine/Chalmers Johnson) Weather Underground Days of Rage --Bombing at Haymarket --Destruction in the Gold Coast Turn to Violence: Bombings+ attempts on campus on 67-68 10, 68-69 125, 69-70 174 Targets: ROTC 197 attacks 19 buildings destroyed Govt. Buildings 232 in 69-70 alone (esp. selective service centers) Corporate offices: IBM, United Fruit, Standard Oil, GM March 1970 Greenwich Village Explosion Why Radicalization? Turbulence Influx of New Members Rapid Escalation of War Desperation Other methods have not stopped the war Assassination of King RFK Repression Couintelpro Panthers Assassinations The Sabotage and Explosives Workshop Backlash Reagan 66 Election Nixon/Wallace receive 58% together Spiro Agnew: A spirit of national masochism prevails, encouraged by an effete corps of impudent snobs who characterize themselves as “intellectuals”. 1972 election/class On the plus side… Breines… Vs. Classical Theorists Vs. Good 60s/Bad 60s Protest w/o SDS Cultural “revolution” New Movements Participatory Democracy to Cultural “Revolution” Rock and Roll Is a Weapon of Cultural Revolution by JOHN SINCLAIR "The duty of the revolutionary is to make the revolution." The duty of the musician is to make the music. But there is an equation that must not be missed: MUSIC IS REVOLUTION. Rock and roll music is one of the most vital revolutionary forces in the West-it blows people all the way back to their senses and makes them feel good, like they're alive again in the middle of this monstrous funeral parlor of western civilization. And that's what the revolution is all about-we have to establish a situation on this planet where all people can feel good all the time. And we "I not stop until that situation exists. Rock and roll music is a weapon of cultural revolution….If you engage yourself in a total revolutionary program of self-reliance and serving the people any way you can, you will have a guaranteed good time forever (except for when they lock you up from time to time) and will help other people get it together too. It isn't enough just to drop out though-you have to create new forms which will enable you to sustain yourselves while you're doing your work. The commune is the life-form of the future, it is the revolutionary organizational lifeform, and the communal relationship must be realized in everything you do. Rock and roll is the best example. That's why I said at the beginning of this rant, that MUSIC IS REVOLUTION-because it is immediate, total, fast-changing and on-going. Rock and roll not only is a weapon of cultural revolution, it is the model of the revolutionary future. At its best the music works to free people on all levels, and a rock and roll band is a working model of the post-revolutionary production unit “New” Social Movements New Social Movements: Environmental **Feminism--**Gay liberation-**Lesbian Feminism in Stein **anti-nuclear power and weapons movements. **peace movements--particularly those of the early 1980s Features: Middle class or unclear class basis Qualitative rather than material goals Vs. hierarchy Focus on Civil Society and Identity building