Environmental Scan - Santa Fe Community College
advertisement
SFCC ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Preface 2 This Environmental Scan has been completed in support of the Strategic Planning process for SFCC. The data used for our Environmental Scan came from a great deal of research from many sources, such as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Lumina Foundation, files prepared for the HED from SFCC data, the 2010 U.S. Census, the Public Education Department, CCSSE, SENSE, Noel-Levitz, the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, the SFCC Sustainability Plan, and countless other sources. We hope that you find this Environmental Scan helpful and informative. As always with institutional research, we know that this will answer some questions and raise many others. Thank you from the Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness. Table of Contents 3 Workforce/Economic Development New Mexico and Santa Fe Demographics Industry and Projected Growth Need for Middle Skills in NM Strategic Priorities for Our Community SFCC Employees High School to College Pipeline High School Graduation Poverty Santa Fe School District Developmental Education Continuing Education Adult Basic Education Credit Students Non-degree Seeking Dual Credit / High School Degree Seeking Financial Aid Retention Employee Demographics Employee Engagement Institutional Effectiveness Our Student Population SFCC Students Transferring Out Graduation Student Experience SFCC Organizations Previous Strategic Plan Institutional Finance Debt Management and Finance Plan Tax Base Information Historical Financials Funding Formula Bonds Campus Security Sustainability Higher Education Trends WORKFORCE / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Quick Facts: New Mexico & Santa Fe 5 Recession has impacted job creation over the past three years Unemployment rate (Jan, 2013): US = 7.9% NM = 6.2% Santa Fe = 5.4% Largest projected job growth in NM Health Care Educational Services 69.8% of existing jobs in NM only require high school diploma or short-term on-thejob training 88.7% of existing jobs in NM are in service-providing industries The proportion of government jobs in NM is high Source: Census 2010 Santa Fe County Demographics 6 By Age Range 14,000 12,401 11,624 12,000 11,854 10,727 10,000 8,531 8,387 8,217 8,275 8,000 6,000 4,000 7,526 8,059 8,569 8,838 9,358 8,088 5,297 3,648 2,519 2,252 2,000 0 Population = 144,170 Source: Census 2010 Santa Fe County Demographics 7 Gender Ethnicity Female Male American Indian 2.27% Asian 1.09% Black 0.66% Hispanic 51.3% 48.7% Native Hawaiian 50.64% 0.04% White 43.90% 2 or more 1.17% Unknown 0.23% 0.00% 15.00% 30.00% 45.00% 60.00% Population = 144,170 Source: Census 2010 8 Industry and Projected Growth 2012 November Regional Nonfarm Employment Growth 9 November 12 over November 11 – Not Seasonally Adjusted by States 3.1% 2.6% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% 1.4% 1.2% 0.5% UT TX OK AZ CO CA US NV WY NM -0.6% Source: NMDWS LASER New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions (NMDWS): 1st Quarter, 2011 10 Average Annual Wage $80,000 $68,848 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $44,824 $44,356 $43,680 $42,380 $40,612 $37,804 $40,000 $35,204 $34,840 Grant Hidalgo $33,384 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe 7th Source: NMDWS LASER Dona Ana st NMDWS:1 Quarter, 2011 11 Total Average Employment 350,000 307,657 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 68,178 59,989 47,430 50,000 16,557 24,168 29,342 27,196 9,030 1,556 Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe 3rd Source: NMDWS LASER Grant Hidalgo Dona Ana Quick Facts: cont’d from page 5 12 Education in Santa Fe High school graduate or higher (age 25+) 86.8% Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+) 39.6% Language in Santa Fe Percentage of other than English spoken at home 35.5% Largest Industry in Santa Fe (GDP) Real estate Government Retail Health Care & Social Assistance Source: NMDWS LASER Real Gross Domestic Product by Industry Santa Fe MSA 13 Source: NMDWS Major Employers 14 # of Employer Type Employees State of New Mexico Government 19,749 Los Alamos National Laboratory Government 10,086 Christus St. Vincent Hospital Health Care 2,021 Education 1,708 Government 1,513 Santa Fe School District City of Santa Fe Santa Fe Community College Education 943 County of Santa Fe Government 846 Peters Corporation Real Estate 730 Buffalo Thunder Casino 700 Santa Fe Opera Fine Arts 630 Total Top 10 Source: Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce, 2013 Source: RBC Capital Market 38,926 Labor Force 15 Labor Force and Percent Unemployed Year Santa Fe MSA Labor Percent Force Unemployed 2012 77,171 5.10% 938,982 6.50% 7.80% 2011 77,601 5.20% 944,552 6.40% 8.50% 2010 77,335 7.00% 959,513 8.20% 9.80% 2009 77,781 5.00% 950,757 5.70% 8.90% 2008 80,586 4.00% 961,145 4.70% 6.10% 2007 76,975 2.90% 934,099 3.50% 4.70% 2006 77,191 3.60% 951,287 4.10% 4.70% 2005 78,046 4.60% 934,667 5.80% 5.60% 2004 84,069 2.90% 910,502 4.80% 5.70% 2003 79,356 3.00% 878,749 6.10% 5.80% Source: New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions Source: RBC Capital Market State of New Mexico Labor Percent Force Unemployed United States Percent Unemployed 2012 Job Growth in Santa Fe 16 Santa Fe County 500 200 Public Sector -100 Source: NMDWS Leisure and hospitality Education and health service 100 100 Retail trade Financial activities NMDWS: rd 3 Quarter, 2011 17 Number of Employees by Industries Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 2,275 Administrative & Waste Services 2,430 Other Services 2,590 Professional, Scientific & Technical Svc 2,365 Construction 3,260 Education Services 4,275 Accommodation and Food Services 8,700 Retail Trade 8,645 Health Care and Social Assistance 9,380 Public Adminstration 9,845 - Source: NMDWS 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Industry for Santa Fe 18 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Public Administration Health Care and Social Assistance Retail Trade Accommodation and Food Services Education Services Construction Professional, Scientific and Tech Svc. Other Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Source: NMDWS LASER : 21% : 18% : 16% : 15% : 9% : 5% : 5% : 5% : 4% Projected Employment Change 19 Industry Government Health Care & Social Assistance Educational Services Accommodation & Food Services Administrative & Support Services Retail Trade Professional, Scientific & Technical Services Construction Other Services Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Finance & Insurance Transportation & Warehousing Real Estate, Rental & Leasing Source: NMDWS New Mexico 2009-2019 7,040 27,020 10,130 10,040 4,480 9,000 6,100 5,800 1,480 1,430 1,750 1,400 1,230 Santa Fe 2009-2019 2,000 1,840 1,640 1,180 930 690 660 390 260 190 110 90 40 Projected Industry Percent Change 20 Industry Administrative & Support Services Educational Services Health Care & Social Assistance Professional, Scientific & Technical Services Transportation & Warehousing Accommodation & Food Services Government Other Services Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Construction Retail Trade Finance & Insurance Real Estate, Rental & Leasing Source: NMDWS New Mexico 2009-2019 10.30% 12.50% 23.90% 10.90% 7.70% 12.30% 7.50% 13.20% 10.20% 11.10% 10.40% 7.90% 12.40% Santa Fe 2009-2019 41.00% 32.70% 23.60% 23.30% 17.80% 14.70% 14.10% 10.90% 9.80% 8.90% 7.50% 6.10% 4.30% Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018 21 Jobs that do not require Community College level of education or require education beyond Community College level Truck Drivers 107 Receptionists 109 Supervisors of Construction 120 Supervisors of Food Prep Workers 120 Cooks 134 Middle School Teachers 136 Carpenters 151 Cashiers 170 Janitors 208 Construction Laborers 229 Waiters and Waitresses 261 Elementary School Teachers 268 Home Health Aides 321 Retail Salespersons 456 Food Prep Workers 574 Personal and Home Care Aides 671 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 *Less than 40% of job openings require Community College level education or job openings require education beyond Community College Source: NMDWS LASER 700 800 Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018 22 * At least 40% of job openings require Community College level education Source: NMDWS LASER Emerging Industries to Watch as Defined by NMDWS 23 Solar Panel Manufacturing Wind Generation Plants Uranium Mining Film Source: NMDWS State of the Workforce 2012 24 The Need for Middle-Skills in NM A middle-skill job requires education or training past high school, but not a four-year degree. New Mexico’s Forgotten Middle-Skill Jobs Report (April 2010) 25 Middle-skill jobs represent the largest share of jobs in New Mexico 48% – and the largest share of future job openings. The demand for middle-skill workers in the state will remain high in the decade between 2006 and 2016 More than 133,000 middle-skill job openings in New Mexico 40% of all job openings in New Mexico 63% of the people who will be in New Mexico’s workforce in the year 2020 were already working adults in 2005 – long past the traditional high school-to-college pipeline. Source: Skills2Compete – New Mexico campaign NM Jobs and Total Job Openings by Skill Level, 2006-2016 26 Source: Calculated by National Skill Coalition from NMDWS data 27 However, the biggest challenge is… We need to prepare our students now for jobs that we do not know will exist in the future Future Skills Needed - Lumina 28 Higher learning has taken on new importance in today’s society. To succeed in the contemporary workplace, today’s students must prepare for jobs that are rapidly changing, use technologies that are still emerging, and work with colleagues from (and often in) all parts of the globe. The challenges that graduates face as citizens during their lives are similarly complex and also are affected by developments around the world. Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century Degree Qualifications Skills Profile 29 Specialized and Broad/Integrative Knowledge Apply existing knowledge and techniques Evidenced based decision making Broad multidiscipline approach and importance of Liberal Arts education Intellectual Skills/Analytical Inquiry Ability to approach a challenge from a multifaceted perspective Analytic inquiry Use of information resources Engaging diverse perspectives information resources Quantitative fluency Civic Learning Out-of-classroom experience Capacity for analysis and reflection Analytic inquiry Engagement with diverse perspectives Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century st 21 Century Skills Content 30 Collaboration Information Management Creating the capacity to identify and use technology efficiently, effectively and ethically as a tool to access, organize, evaluate and share information Career and Life Skills Accessing, analyzing, synthesizing, creating and sharing information from multiple sources. Effective Use of Technology Working with others respectfully and effectively to create, use and share knowledge, solutions and innovations. Developing skills for becoming self-directed, independent learners and workers who can adapt to change, manage projects, take responsibility for their work, lead others and produce results. Cultural Awareness Developing cultural competence in working with others by recognizing and respecting cultural differences and working with others from a wide range of cultural and social backgrounds. Source: Lumina Foundation - Qualifications Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century 31 Strategic Priorities for Our Community City of Santa Fe General Plan 32 COMMUNITY GOALS: The General Plan has 14 overall themes, or community goals, that reflect the results of the 1994 community survey. Each chapter contains at least one of these goals in the “Goals & Policies” section at the end of the chapter. The goals are not necessarily listed in order of priority. 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 8. CHARACTER 2. QUALITY OF LIFE 9. URBAN FORM 3. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES 10. COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DOWNTOWN 4. ECONOMIC DIVERSITY 11. COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT 5. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH 12. MIXED USE 6. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE 13. REVIEW PROCESS 7. WATER 14. IMPLEMENTATION Source: City of Santa Fe - General Plan Update 2005-2025 Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan 33 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES • • • • • • • • • • Funding Santa Fe County Health Programs Senior Service Program Operation New Judicial Complex Sustaining Operations Funding for Correctional Facilities Centralized Purchasing and Warehouse Citizen Survey Boards and Committee Project Succession Planning Automate Human Resources County Sponsored Daycare • • • • • • • • • • Job Description Analysis College Intern Program PERA Corrections Plan Enhance Supervisory Training Opportunities Develop Human Resources Staff Process Manual Timekeeping Software System In-House Finance Statement Recession Planning (SAVE Initiative) Sustainable Land Development Plan (DLDP) Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Source: Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan Update (Jan 2010 – Jan 2012) • • • • • • • • • • Affordable Housing Fire Funding County ReOrganization Conjunctive Water Plan Renewable Energy Financing Program County Building Permit Program Santa Fe Canyon Ranch Property Santa Fe Studios Public Information / Transparency Program County Code Rewrite Santa Fe Public Schools 34 GOALS 1. Create an environment that raises expectations and promotes high academic performance of all students at 100% of Santa Fe Public Schools. 2. Recruit and support highly qualified and effective personnel at every level and every function throughout Santa Fe Public School District. 3. Develop a culture of shared responsibility for student success by engaging families and the community 4. Promote a safe, sustainable, healthy and respectful school community 5. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning 6. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning. Source: SFPS Strategic Planning 2012 SFCC Adult Basic Education 35 KEY SYSTEM GOALS/OBJECTIVES 1. Leadership A. B. C. D. Build an efficient, creative team by using collaborative management Empower staff and create an environment that recognizes contribution Encourage staff to participate in regular professional development Increase student leadership opportunities 2. Administration and Data A. B. C. Improve staff training on administrative activities Reduce data bottleneck Educate appropriate staff on record-keeping responsibilities 3. Effective Teaching and Learning A. Develop ABE/ASE assessment processes to align assessments with curriculum, better demonstrate student learning, and support level gains on NRS tests Increase intensity of instruction by offering a variety of instructional delivery options Complete curriculum guidelines and exit standards for all levels of ESL Increase supplemental instruction in both workplace and computer literacy to enhance student learning and persistence B. C. D. 4. Intake A. B. C. D. Improve student persistence in literacy programs through a standardized orientation process Develop cohorts for students during ABE/ASE orientation to build community and encourage retention Improve individualized ABE/ASE student advising and placement process Improve and standardize the ESL orientation process Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) 36 KEY SYSTEM GOALS/OBJECTIVES 5. A. B. Integration and Transitions C. D. E. F. G. 6. Outreach A. B. C. D. Develop a continuous cycle of student goal setting and reporting More accurately survey entering students from all parts of ABE to gain a fuller understanding of their specific career interests (for Career Pathways planning) Develop a comprehensive framework for class, college, career advising among ABE staff directly involved in these tasks Develop a continuous cycle of advising/career counseling to increase students’ awareness of their own educational and career possibilities Expand contextualized learning experiences Expand use of Work keys testing Develop relationship with One-Stops to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their operations and to increase collaboration Conduct environmental scan of stakeholders: current and potential students, instructors, tutors, businesses, and community partners Convene ABE Advisory Board Develop at least one new funding source Create a waitlist system for students who cannot receive immediate services Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 HIGH SCHOOL TO COLLEGE PIPELINE High School Graduation 2012 38 Local High School graduation rate: 61.8% Academy for Tech 84.1% Capital High 60.7% Career Academy 35.8% Monte Del Sol 65.3% Santa Fe High 67.6% Tierra Encantada 0.0% 35.7% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% Source: NM Public Education Department – 4-Year Graduation Rates, Cohort of 2012 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 2010-2011 School Year 12th Grade Enrollment and Fall 2012 SFCC Enrollment 39 12th Grade SFCC Enrollment 300 244 250 200 187 150 98 100 50 0 95 51 26 22 MASTER PROGRAM 44 30 9 4 NM SCHOOL FOR ARTS SANTA FE HIGH CAPITAL HIGH CAREER ACADEMY 41 11 16 MONTE DEL SOL ACADEMY FOR TECH & CLASS *Private Schools and Santa Fe Indian School 12th Grade Data Unavailable Source: SFPS and HED DEAR data 13 10 TIERRA ENCANTADA Poverty and Education at a Glance 40 18.4 percent of New Mexicans and 15.6 percent of Santa Feans live below the poverty level. Twenty-two percent of children who have lived in poverty do not graduate from high school, compared to 6 percent of those who have never been poor. The gap in standardized test scores between affluent and low-income students has grown by about 40 percent since the 1960s Between the late 1970s and mid-1990s, the college graduation rate of American youth from families in the top quarter of the income distribution increased by 21 percentage points: from families in the bottom quarter of the income distribution increased by just 4 percent 33 percent to 54 percent 5 percent to 9 percent New Mexico ranked 46th in the nation in terms of child well-being in an overall ranking of the 2011 Kids Count report Source: http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/News/inthenews.PDFs/AprToJuly2012/us2010.news.2012.05.26.thenewmexican.pdf Poverty in SFPS High Schools 41 Santa Fe School District Free or Reduced Lunch 2010-2011 2011-2012 80% 68% 70% 72% 70% 60% 50% 48% 50% 39% 40% 31% 30% 27% 26% 20% 20% 10% N/A 0% Academy for Tech Capital High Source: SFPS 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 School Report Cards Career Academy Monte del Sol N/A Santa Fe High Tierra Encantada Santa Fe School District -2010 42 Developmental Rates 100% 90% 80% 72% 70% 69% 63% 60% 50% 55% 46% 42% 40% 30% 20% 10% N/A 0% Academy For Capital High Tech Source: Ready for College 2010 Career Academy Monte Del Sol Santa Fe High Tierra Encantada GED Statewide Developmental Education Rates 43 Percentage of NM Public High School Graduates Who Took Remedial Classes Only in Math or Only in Reading: 00-09 Math 45.0% 42.5% 43.0% 43.2% English 43.4% 40.7% 41.0% 39.0% 39.1% 40.3% 38.7% 39.0% 37.3% 37.2% 37.0% 35.0% 32.3% 33.0% 31.0% 30.6% 31.0% 32.9% 32.6% 31.5% 31.9% 31.3% 30.5% 29.2% 29.0% 27.0% 25.0% 2000 Source: Ready for College 2010 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Developmental Education Rate 44 100% 93% 87% 90% 80% 72% 70% 60% 63% 54% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Statewide: Public Source: Statewide: GED Statewide: Capital High FTF DS to SFCC FTF DS to SFCC 17-19 OUR STUDENT POPULATION About SFCC 46 Established in 1983, SFCC has been providing education to the community for 30 years. More than 15,000 students are served each year in its credit, non-credit, and adult basic education programs. 7,400 individual students in credit classes every year 5,828 students are degree seeking students 2,805 degree-seeking students receive financial aid More than 200 high school students in dual credit programs each term part-time students: 78% Over 100 degree and certificate programs offered. Approximately 258 full-time and 51 part-time staff. Approximately 69 regular faculty and 270 adjunct faculty. The SFCC District is identical to the Santa Fe Public School District and includes the outlying areas of Glorieta, Madrid, Cerrillos, Lamy, La Cienega, Galisteo and Tesuque. It covers most of Santa Fe County which has a population of more than 145,000 residents. SFCC is one of eighteen community colleges in NM. Source: Banner, IPEDS, HED DEAR data, Census 2010 47 Continuing Education (CE) Students CE Students by Age 48 25.00% 23.68% 20.60% 20.00% 17.53% 15.00% 12.44% 12.84% 10.00% 5.00% 4.95% 5.55% 2.41% 0.00% 17 AND < 18 TO 24 25 TO 34 35 TO 44 45 TO 54 Unduplicated Students = 1,495 Source: Banner 55 TO 64 65 AND > Not Reported CE Enrollment by Subject 49 Languages 346 OSHA 288 Health Care Professional 192 62 Home and Garden 54 Bus/Professional Skills 42 Computer- Inexperienced Fitness and Wellness 132 Computer Classes 34 Southwest Explorations 130 Computers/Digital Image 32 Crafts 129 Photography 31 Energy Audit 94 Computers/Web Design 29 Art 88 Lead Certification 24 Cooking 88 Music 23 Weatherization 83 Money Matters 23 Kids' Stuff 80 Dance 23 Sustainability Tech Cntr 68 Creative Writing 18 Leisure 67 Computes/Macintosh 17 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 Total Registration = 2,197 Source: Banner 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 Source: Banner 1 Total Courses = 216 3 2 3 88 days 121 days 6 50 days 7 43 days 13 36 days 40 31 days 29 days 5 7 22 days 15 days 1 12 days 1 11 days 7 10 days 9 days 7 8 days 1 7 days 0 1 6 days 5 5 days 10 4 days 20 3 days 70 2 days 1 day CE Number of Courses by Length 50 65 60 50 36 30 20 16 9 51 Adult Basic Education SFCC Adult Basic Education Key Data And Information 52 Student Data Total count of students with 12 hours or more: Students with 12 hours or More 1,929 Total contact hours for students with 12 hours or more: Average contact hours for students with 12 hours or more: Average contact hours for students experiencing level gains: Count of all GED graduates with 12 hours or more: 112,162 Count of GED en Español graduates with 12 hours or more: 26 Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 58.15 83.84 117 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) Key Data And Information 53 Student Data Students with less than 12 hours Total count of students with less than 12 hours: 112 Total contact hours for students with less than 12 hours: Count of all GED graduates with less than 12 hours: 505 Count of GED en Español graduates with less than 12 hours: Student Data Total student count: Number of total instructional hours: Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 2 0 All Students (regardless of hours) 2,041 112,667 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) Administrative and Fiscal 54 Cost Per Student (State dollars spent + Federal dollars spent) (number of students with 12 hours or more) State: $510,357.81 Federal: $222,887.00 EL/Civics: $ 38,428.00 Total: $771,672.81 = $400.04 $771,672.81 ÷ 1,929 fundable students = $400.04/student $771,672.81 ÷ 112,162 = $6.88 Cost Per Contact Hour Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) 55 Activities 2011-2012 Twelve students took the Work Keys exam, earning Career Readiness Certificates. Twelve ABE students participated in an Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST) program in the building trades area, working on college certificates in plumbing. The EL/Civics Coordinator advised, during the academic year, a total of 88 students on career/college choices and class placement within the ABE program, and provided an atmosphere of support with wrap-around services to assist students in their learning endeavors Seventy three ABE students participated in a series of digital literacy workshops in collaboration with Fast Forward New Mexico to prepare them for technological aspects of career readiness. Several of these workshops were bilingual presentations. Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) ESL Activities 2011-2012 56 GOAL ATTAINMENT AY 2011-2012 OUTCOME AY 2011-2012 Enroll at least 500 students per semester (at least 1000 students per year) in integrated ESL/Civics classes.* Enrolled 896 total students for the entire year (842 fundable 100% Pre-test rate 75% Post-test rate Students will achieve the following level gains: 100% Pre-test rate 73% Post-test rate Level Gains: Overall: 37.89% ESL 1 Literacy: 40% ESL 2 Low Beginning: 48% ESL 3 High Beginning: 48% ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 36% ESL 5 High Intermediate: 36% ESL 6 Advanced: 14% ESL 1 Literacy: 60.00% ESL 2 Low Beginning: 68.29% ESL 3 High Beginning: 55.24% ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 39.83% ESL 5 High Intermediate: 34.39% ESL 6 Advanced: 16.48% *Note that the figure for 1000 students enrolled was based on our original application for full funding of this grant. Our actual allocation was 66% of what was requested, and we served 90% of that original objective Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) 57 Success 2011-2012 Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study: SFCC ABE was highly engaged throughout this year in the HED Self Study process. All of the department’s administrative staff took on significant leadership activities as we worked through the requirements and goals of the Self Study. Continued High Levels of Student Performance: Despite reduced funding, the ESL Program has continued to significantly exceed state averages for level gains. Our students’ level gains at all NRS levels are higher than 2010-11 state averages, ranging from 3 percentage points higher at ESL Low Intermediate to 18 percentage points higher at ESL Low Beginning. Community Support of the ESL Program: This past year, two of our community partners, Santa Fe Civic Housing Authority and United Way, stepped in to provide financial support for classes at their sites. Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) Successes 2011-2012 58 Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study Continued High Levels of Student Performance Community Support of the ESL Program 424 students were served in the Literacy program by 143 volunteer tutors who provided 11,495 hours of instruction. Instructional Staff Implementing as new curriculum Expansion of an Independent Study Option for Students Continued offering student orientations and one on one advising Successfully utilized linked science and social studies classes for transition program Increased the Intensity of Study through managed enrollment I-BEST During the spring semester of FY 2011-12, SFCC ABE partnered with New Mexico Skill Up Network to offer an I-BEST project in SFCC’s School of Trades and Technology. Distance Education -During the 2011-12 Fiscal Year, SFCC ABE continued to provide Distance Learning in the ABE/ASE program. In 2011-2012, students were referred for potential Power Path screening and intervention if they scored a 12 or higher on their Learning Needs Assessments and also scored a 6.0 or below in at least one of the TABE areas. Increase from 65% in 2009-10 to 68% in 2010-11 to 77% of students gaining levels in 2011-12 Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.) 59 Challenges 2011-2012 Continue refining integrated ESL/Civics model across NRS levels Continue to increase integration between ESL program and EL/Civics program, Continue to revise and improve EL/Civics writing curriculum across NRS levels continue to improve assessment scoring guides to promote fairness in assessing both language skills and knowledge of content Increase activities and advisement of ABE students who want to transition to college and careers Support students on paths to U.S. Citizenship budget allocations for 2011-12 were again significantly reduced. As we face these continuing reductions, we are working creatively with our partners to continue services through cost-sharing and when we must make service cuts, we look for ways that will have the least impact on students. Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014 60 Looking at Credit Students • • • Non-degree Seeking Dual Credit / High School Degree Seeking Demographics of Credit Students 61 By Gender By Race/Ethnicity Female 50% Male 45% 40% 44% 40% 35% 30% 25% 37% 20% 15% 10% 63% 5% 10% 3% 0% Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students Source: HED DEAR data 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% Degree Seeking Status by Age Group 62 Degree Seeking Non-Degree Seeking 1,800 1,600 188 1,400 232 1,200 1,000 800 274 1,437 600 339 1,095 565 615 400 584 220 200 434 267 148 125 17 or younger 18-24 25-35 35-44 45-54 Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students Source: HED DEAR data 55-64 65 or older Student Characteristics 63 Student Level Credit Load 45% Non-Degree 40% 34% 39% 35% 30% Sophomore 25% Freshman 26% 25% 36% 61% Degree Seeking 18% 20% 15% 11% 10% 6% 5% High School 5% 0% >0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students Source: HED DEAR data >9 but <12 >=12 Student Experience 64 Student to Faculty ratio = 17:1 What are the courses like in a given academic year? Summer 2011 # of Courses Average Class Size % Taught by Adjunct Online Courses Source: HED DEAR data Fall 2011 Spring 2012 327 949 965 16 18 18 71.1% 61.7% 62.4% 49 = 15% 97 = 10% 102 = 11% Student Credit Hours by College 65 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 40,000 36,562 36,732 35,000 33,786 30,000 25,000 22,106 20,691 20,000 22,340 21,710 22,971 23,789 15,000 10,000 10,773 11,077 10,208 5,000 0 Source: HED DEAR data 4,329 Arts and Design Business, Education and Professional Studies Health and Sciences Liberal Arts and Core Studies 4,836 5,011 Trades and Technology 66 Credit Students: Non-degree Seeking Non-degree Seeking Students 67 Gender Breakdown by Semester Female FT/PT Breakdown by Semester Male Full-time Part-time 2500 3000 2500 2000 916 2000 931 1500 1500 1517 500 1517 891 0 Summer 2011 Source: HED DEAR data 2386 92 Fall 2011 62 Spring 2012 1000 549 1000 2341 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 1335 500 0 105 Summer 2011 Non-degree Seeking Students: Race/Ethnicity 68 American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White 2 or more Non-Resident Alien Unknown 1600 1418 1418 1400 1200 1000 838 800 616 604 600 351 400 269 266 177 200 24 31 13 6 0 Summer 2011 Source: HED DEAR data 0 62 38 19 23 3 Fall 2011 62 41 18 22 2 Spring 2012 Non-degree Seeking Students: Credit Load 69 LESS THAN 3 3 TO 5.9 6 TO 7.9 8 TO 11.9 12 OR MORE 1500 1314 1217 1250 1000 935 822 793 750 500 400 180 250 77 16 122 92 171 108 12 0 Summer 2011 Source: HED DEAR data Fall 2011 Spring 2012 62 Non-degree Seeking Students: Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment and Age Group Fall 2011 70 Ages 18 to 34 HPER Ages 35 to 54 1249 ENGL 1039 MATH 915 BIOL 403 HPER Ages 55 and older 847 HPER 1265 MATH 203 MART ENGL 192 WOOD 94 119 EXSC 154 CLAY 72 OFTC 332 EDUC 153 DRPT 68 MART 330 NURS 153 SCUL 62 NURS 306 BIOL 134 SPAN 62 READ 299 OFTC 115 MUSC 56 HUDV 287 MART 110 ENGL 56 PSYC 278 CULA 108 PHOT 55 0 Source: HED DEAR data 500 1000 1500 0 500 1000 Courses students enroll in are different between those that are 55 years or older and younger 0 500 1000 1500 71 Credit Students: Dual Credit / High School Students Dual Credit / High School Students 72 By Gender By Race/Ethnicity Female 45% Male 40% 39% 35% 33% 30% 25% 20% 49% 15% 51% 10% 5% 0% Fall 2011 – 342 students Source: HED DEAR data 12% 11% 2% 1% 1% 1% Dual Credit / High School Students: School of Origin 73 160 145 140 120 100 80 60 40 36 28 24 14 20 2 12 2 1 17 7 1 0 Fall 2011 – 342 students Source: HED DEAR data 41 5 1 1 2 3 Dual Credit / High School Students: Major Declaration Status 74 Declared Undeclared 140 120 100 93 80 55 60 40 31 20 33 23 37 18 0 >0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 Fall 2011 – 342 students Source: HED DEAR data 27 11 14 >9 but <12 >=12 Dual Credit / High School Students 75 Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment College Success Rates Remedial Success Non-Success Other 80 70 5 60 50 40 30 14.8% 16 70 14.7% 63 20 10 40 43 39 35 2 28 28 26 23 70.5% 0 Grade Definitions: Source: HED DEAR data Success (A, B, C, P, IP) Non-Success (D, F, I, PR) Other (AU, W, NR) 76 Credit Students: Degree Seeking Students 77 Degree Seeking Students: Demographics Fall 2011: Gender by Age Female 17 AND < Fall 2011: Ethnicity 60.0% Male 50.0% 48.0% 24-F, 17-M 851 18 TO 24 704 25 TO 34 404 35 TO 44 312 45 TO 54 40.0% 553 391 35.3% 30.0% 180 20.0% 122 10.0% 176 91 55 TO 64 3.5% 36% 0.0% 64% 80 68 65 AND > 2-F, 2-M Unknown - 500 1,000 1,500 Fall 2011 – 3,977 students Source: HED DEAR data 8.8% 2.0% 1.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1% Degree Seeking Students: Credit Load 78 45.0% Full-time: 1,604 40.3% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% Part-time: 2,373 25.0% 20.0% 19.5% 17.5% 14.7% 15.0% 8.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% >0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 Fall 2011 – 3,977 students Source: HED DEAR data >9 but <12 >=12 Degree Seeking Students: Credit Load for 18 to 24 year olds 79 Fall 2011 head count of 18 to 24 year olds by credit hours attempted 400 6 or less 7 to 11 12 13 14 15+ 338 350 300 246 250 22% 21% 200 53% 150 133 114 94 100 116 83 59 40 50 3 34 11 71 51 9% 61 40 19 19 3 1 3 1 1 0 <1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 25 Source: HED DEAR data 8% 25% 84 15% Full Time (12+ credit hours) Degree Seeking Students: Top 20 Declared Majors 80 700 600 599 500 455 400 314 300 200 100 0 Source: HED DEAR data 179 142 127 126 122 119 111 103 91 89 78 70 70 67 65 63 61 Degree Seeking Students: Top 20 Enrollments by Subject 81 450 400 400 350 308 300 295 250 208 207 200 150 100 50 0 Source: HED DEAR data 139 71 60 39 33 28 26 26 25 22 21 21 20 18 18 First-time Degree Seeking Students: School of Origin 82 Out of state HS NM HS GED or Home School Other 350 312 300 250 200 150 100 66 50 0 25 1 4 23 4 17 or younger Source: HED DEAR data 9 18 to 24 26 29 16 8 1912 10 2 9 9 4 3 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 3 1 1 55 to 64 5 1 65 or older First-time Degree Seeking Students: Math Enrollment 83 85% (143) College Level Developmental 45 40 35 30 25 41 20 15 33 31 10 15 5 7 0 MATH 100 MATH 100X MATH 101 MATH 102 4 4 MATH 102A MATH 102L 14 8 MATH 109 MATH 110 1 MATH 119 2 MATH 121 MATH 135 5 MATH 150 2 MATH 155 2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC Enrollment Source: HED DEAR data 1 MATH 162 1 MATH 180 First-time Degree Seeking Students: English Enrollment 84 College Level Developmental 90 80 60% (138) 70 60 50 40 77 30 53 20 40 35 10 0 4 6 ENGL 102L ENGL 105L 8 ENGL 107 ENGL 108 ENGL 109 ENGL 111 ENGL 112 2 ENGL 120 2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC Enrollment Source: HED DEAR data 5 ENGL 216 First-time Degree Seeking Students: Top 10 Courses by Student Enrollment 85 College Level Developmental 250 200 150 138 143 100 129 50 121 92 112 72 26 53 29 27 PSYC MART 0 ENGL Source: HED DEAR data MATH READ HPER HUDV SOAR OFTC 17 HLCR 86 Financial Aid Financial Aid Programs: Enrollments 87 Halftime Fulltime 1,600 1,464 1,400 1,200 1,039 1,000 826 800 698 600 489 400 287 237 200 202 86 22 0 Loan Lottery Halftime = 2,082 Source: Banner PELL Scholarship Fulltime = 3,268 (Includes duplicates as students may receive more than one type of aid) Work-study Total = 5,350 Financial Aid Programs: Awards 88 Halftime $3,470,939 Loan $4,836,407 $8,307,346 total loans $10,407 $194,904 total Lottery scholarships $184,497 Lottery $2,050,441 PELL $5,397,674 $129,663 Scholarship $416,690 $149,474 Work-study $488,920 $0 Source: Banner Fulltime $7,448,115 total PELL grants $546,353 total scholarships (excluding Lottery) $638,394 total work-study $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 Financial Aid Programs: Funding Source(s) 89 99.6% of loans are federally funded The remainder are state (0.3%) and private (0.1%) 100% of Lottery scholarships are state funded 100% of PELL grants are federally funded Other scholarships and work-study: (Below) External Federal Institutional Private State 1.5% 53.9% Scholarship 41.6% 1.5% Work-study 0.0% Source: Banner 1.5% 13.5% 10.0% 54.5% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 32.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Financial Aid Programs: Is everyone receiving aid? 90 Fulltime Students Halftime Students Receiving FA No FA Receiving FA 120.0% 120.0% 1,709 students 1,616 students 44 students 100.0% 1,596 students 100.0% 21.9% 19.3% 80.0% 27.3% 40.0% 736 students 41.3% 56.5% 60.0% 78.1% 80.7% 72.7% 20.0% 40.0% 58.7% 20.0% 0.0% 43.0% 43.5% Fall 2011 Spring 2012 0.0% Fall 2011 Source: Banner 1,696 students 80.0% 57.0% 60.0% No FA Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Summer 2012 91 Retention Retention: Fall 2009 First-Time-Freshmen Full-Time Degree Seeking Students (323) 92 100% 100% 90% 80% 77% 70% 60% 56% 50% 51% 40% 42% 37% 30% 20% 10% 0% Fall 2009 Source: HED DEAR data Spring 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Retention: Fall to Fall Retention Rate: 2007-2011 AY 93 100% 90% 80% 70% 63% 60% 59% 56% 58% 08-09 09-10 10-11 53% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 07-08 Source: HED DEAR data 11-12 Retention Cohort Tracking Study 94 Cohort = 552 students First Time Freshman (FTF) Degree Seeking (DS) Full-time and Part-time Track 3 academic years (Fall 2010 – Spring 2013) Graduation numbers for Spring and Summer 2013 not included in this report Source: HED DEAR data Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Academic Year 2010-11 95 Semester 1 Full-time Semester 2 Part-time Graduated Transferred Gone Full-time Part-time Graduated Transferred 23.4% 34.6% 0.5% 2.9% 47.1% 65.4% 26.1% Fall 2010 Source: HED DEAR data Start Spring 2011 Gone Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Academic Year 2011-12 96 Semester 3 Full-time Semester 4 Part-time Graduated Transferred Gone Full-time Part-time Graduated Transferred 15.0% 16.0% 25.5% 31.5% 2.2% 2.2% 12.9% 11.2% 39.1% Fall 2011 Source: HED DEAR data 44.4% Spring 2012 Gone Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Academic Year 2012-13 97 Semester 5 Full-time Semester 6 Part-time Graduated 16.7% Transferred Gone Full-time Part-time Graduated 12.7% 13.4% Transferred 12.8% 4.0% 3.4% 12.7% 13.2% 53.3% Fall 2012 Source: HED DEAR data 57.8% Spring 2013 *Graduation numbers for Spring and Summer 2013 not included in this report Gone Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Status Change by Semester 98 Full-time to Part-time Part-time to Full-time 25% This is the average % of students who switched from FT to PT status (15.6%) 20% 15% 16% 15% This is the average % of students who switched from PT to FT status (13.5%) 22% 16% 15% 13% 11% 13% 12% 11% 10% 5% 0% Spring 2011 Source: HED DEAR data Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Students Who Left and Returned 99 Full-time Part-time 30 15.1% of semester enrollment 25 16.3% of semester enrollment 8.9% of semester enrollment 20 5.7% of semester enrollment 15 19 15 10 16 9 5 5 1 0 Gone Transferred Fall 2011 Source: HED DEAR data 3 Gone 5 1 Transferred Spring 2012 5 2 1 Gone Transferred 1 Gone Transferred Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Retention Cohort Tracking Study: Enrollment: SCH grouping by semester 100 >=12 600 >9 but <12 >6 but <=9 >3 but <=6 >0 but <=3 552 500 400 46 8.3% 49 8.9% 58 10.5% 389 38 6.9% 17 41 4.4% 10.5% 44 11.3% 27 6.9% 300 200 361 65.4% 260 100 262 13 25 30 20 5.0% 9.5% 11.5% 7.6% 66.9% 174 66.4% 224 40 13 3.6% 9.8% 17.9% 5.8% 141 62.9% 8 22 166 17 13 30 14 10.3% 7.8% 18.1% 8.4% 92 55.4% 141 17 16 23 15 12.1% 11.3% 16.3% 10.6% 70 49.7% 0 Fall 2010 Source: HED DEAR data Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013 101 SFCC Students Transferring Out Do Students Who Transfer From SFCC Stay at Their New 2-Year Institutions? 102 Stayed 450 Returned 422 400 350 300 250 200 150 134 110 100 68 40 50 28 41 27 38 18 31 5 20 33 18 34 5 7 3 3 0 CNM UNM Branch NMSU Branch Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse LCC ENMU Branch SJC CCC NMJC IAIA MCC Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 2-Year Institution Full- or Part-Time? 103 CNM 395 161 UNM Branch 126 24 NMSU Branch 63 33 LCC 51 17 ENMU Branch 8 CCC 5 NMJC 5 48 Part-time 48 Full-time 47 24 12 SJC IAIA 7 5 MCC 6 0 50 100 Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 What Happens to SFCC Students Who Transfer to 4-Year Institutions? 104 Stayed Returned 700 603 600 500 400 340 300 187 200 156 158 169 114 100 52 34 27 27 13 NM Tech ENMU 18 5 0 UNM NNMC Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse NMHU NMSU WNMU Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 4-Year Institution Full-or Part-Time? 105 428 UNM 515 272 NNMC 71 232 NMHU 95 55 NMSU Part-time 111 Full-time 25 36 NM Tech 29 ENMU 11 18 WNMU 5 0 100 Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse 200 300 400 500 600 Future for the Transfer Students: Higher Education Center (HEC) 106 HEC – a model higher education consortium focused on bringing affordable, accessible bachelor’s completion and graduate degrees to Santa Fe and surrounding communities Founding four-year partner institutions: University of New Mexico NM Highlands University Institute of American Indian Arts NM State University will become the fourth partner in Fall 2013 On-campus pilot program started in Fall 2011 Currently, bachelor’s and master’s degree programs in: business, communications, criminal justice, dental hygiene, education, medical laboratory sciences, nursing, radiologic sciences, social work, technology and training, university studies Facility to house the HEC at the former College of Santa Fe Campus is scheduled to open in Fall 2014 107 Graduation Graduation: What is Our Graduation Rate? 108 Overall Graduation Rate Hispanic Graduation Rate Transfer Rate 30% 25% 25% 22% 23% 20% 17% 15% 12% 10% 8% 11% 11% 9% 6% 7% 5% 5% 2% 0% 2007 Source: HED DEAR data 2008 2009 2010 2011 Graduation: How do we compare statewide? 109 Graduation Rate Transfer Rate 70% 60% 50% 40% 32% 28% 30% 25% 22% 20% 16% 12% 10% 8% 0% CNM 4% CCC ENMU ENMU LCC -R - Rui 15% 12% 7% 4% MCC NMJC NMMI NMSU NMSU NMSU NMSU SJC A C DA G 16th out of 19th Source: IPEDS data 14% 13% 6% 8% 9% 8% SFCC UNM UNM UNM T UNM V G LA Graduation: Number of Certificates and Associate Degrees Awarded 110 Hispanic Non-Hispanic 600 500 400 336 276 300 198 201 200 167 146 143 07-08 08-09 09-10 200 100 180 195 10-11 11-12 0 Source: HED DEAR data Graduation: Origin of Completers 111 39% Started at SFCC Transferred to SFCC 61% Source: HED DEAR data Graduation: Median Number of Semesters Enrolled Prior to Completion 112 12 10 10 8 6 7 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 FTF Transfer Certificate < 1 Source: HED DEAR data FTF Transfer Certificate 1+ FTF Transfer Associate's Graduation: Awards by College and Fiscal Year 113 Associate 300 272 Certificate 281 250 47% 200 189 150 42% 52% 149 98 100 50 0 31 23 29 13% 87% 41% 59% 23% FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 53% 40% 51% 41% 43 60% 49% 59% 77% Arts and Design Source: HED DEAR data 58% 48% 139 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 Business, Education, and Professional Studies FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 Health and Sciences 19% 51 16% 40 53 50 8% 28 51% 50% 81% 84% 93% 50% 50% 49% 50% FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 Liberal Arts and Core Studies Trades and Technology Why Graduation Matters 114 61% of our credit students say they want to earn a degree 58% of jobs in New Mexico will require some form of postsecondary education or training by 2018 87% of our students who fill out the FAFSA are Pell eligible Our average annual student loan amount is $6,500 Only 6% graduate within 3 years 115 Student Experience What do the students have to say? • Survey of Entering Student Engagement -SENSE • Community College Survey of Student Engagement – CCSSE • Student Satisfaction Inventory - Noel-Levitz SENSE and CCSSE 116 The more actively engaged students are early in their college experience, the more likely they are to learn and to achieve their academic goals. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Early Connections High Expectations and aspirations Clear academic plan and pathway Effective track to college readiness Engaged learning Academic and social support network SENSE Overview 117 Look at experiences reported by nearly 75,000 entering students Community colleges When is the survey administered? SENSE is administered as a pencil-and-paper survey in randomly selected classes drawn from a specific group of courses provided in the course schedule file (CSF). Could you give an example of what is meant by first college-level English and Math courses? Source: SENSE The survey is administered during the fourth and fifth class weeks of the fall academic term. How is the survey administered? 172 institutions 35 states First college-level English and Math courses are generally those offered to firsttime college-ready students that did not place into developmental courses. Examples include Comp I and Algebra I. SENSE: Benchmarks 118 60 58 56 56 53.5 54 52 51.6 50.6 50 50 51.2 50 50 51.2 51.1 50.9 49.9 50 50 50.3 50 49 48 48 46 44 42 Early Connections High Expectations and Aspirations Clear Academic Plan and Effective Track to College Pathway Readiness All Students Your College Source: SENSE Small Colleges 2010 Cohort Engaged Learning Academic and Social Support Network SENSE: Part time and full time students 119 48.5 49.1 48.7 Academic and Social Support Network 49.4 49 49.7 Effective Track to College Readiness 50.1 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 52.7 50.4 50.7 51 49.4 High Expectations and Aspirations 54.3 55.4 53.4 Engaged Learning Full-Time Students Part-Time Students 56.1 47.6 48.3 46.5 Engaged Learning 52.9 54 Academic and Social Support Network 50.7 51 Effective Track to College Readiness 55 51.9 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 54.5 53.8 49.1 49.5 47.9 High Expectations and Aspirations 50.3 Early Connections 53.5 54.5 Early Connections 58.2 55.8 50.5 42 2010 Cohort Source: SENSE Small Colleges 47 52 Your College 57 42 2010 Cohort Small Colleges 47 52 Your College 57 SENSE: Developmental and Non-Developmental 120 50.3 51.1 Academic and Social Support Network 54.5 46.5 51.8 52.4 52.5 55.8 55.7 Effective Track to College Readiness 59.7 52 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 54.4 57.2 50.1 50.4 49.8 High Expectations and Aspirations 46.8 48.5 43.6 Engaged Learning Non-Developmental Students Engaged Learning Developmental Students 50.1 51.5 Academic and Social Support Network 36.4 38.2 39.7 Effective Track to College Readiness 48.7 51.9 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 43.5 49.7 50.7 47.7 High Expectations and Aspirations 53.2 Early Connections 57.4 56.7 42 2010 Cohort Source: SENSE 48.5 Small Colleges 47 52 Your College Early Connections 54 45.7 57 35 2010 Cohort Small Colleges 40 45 50 Your College 55 60 SENSE: Male and Female Students 121 48.9 49.4 Academic and Social Support Network 43.2 56.3 48.8 50 45.6 Engaged Learning 49.1 49.4 Effective Track to College Readiness 44.9 51.5 54 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 51.3 52.1 50 Engaged Learning Female Students Male Students 51.6 52.8 Academic and Social Support Network 50.5 50.3 Effective Track to College Readiness 56 50.5 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 53.4 54.4 47.3 46.2 46.6 High Expectations and Aspirations 53.5 53.8 55.6 High Expectations and Aspirations 41.3 52.5 Early Connections 50.7 56.8 Early Connections 55.4 53.3 49.7 35 2010 Cohort Source: SENSE Small Colleges 40 45 50 Your College 55 60 42 2010 Cohort Small Colleges 47 52 Your College 57 SENSE: White and Hispanic Students 122 49.2 50.1 Academic and Social Support Network 47 48.4 32.1 46.3 48.1 Effective Track to College Readiness 29.9 51.1 54.9 60.5 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 46.4 47.2 48.1 High Expectations and Aspirations Male Hispanic, Latino, Spanish Students 26.1 Engaged Learning Male White Students 48.3 48.1 49.8 Academic and Social Support Network 47.9 48.9 51.5 Engaged Learning 53.1 53.1 48.6 Effective Track to College Readiness 51.5 54.2 Clear Academic Plan and Pathway 44.3 45.3 44.8 High Expectations and Aspirations 36.6 51.2 Early Connections 57.3 61.5 25 2010 Cohort Source: SENSE Small Colleges 35 45 Your College 53.4 58.1 Early Connections 48.3 55 25 2010 Cohort Small Colleges 35 45 Your College 55 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) 123 CCSSE asks questions that assess institutional practices and student behaviors that are correlated highly with student learning and student retention. Source: SENSE CCSSE: Benchmarks 124 Source: SENSE CCSSE: Aspects of Highest Student Engagement 125 Source: SENSE CCSSE: Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement 126 Source: SENSE Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory 127 SFCC All Students National Community Colleges 5.81 5.46 1 = Not satisfied at all 0% 1% 2 = Not very satisfied 1% 2% 3 = Somewhat dissatisfied 3% 5% 4 = Neutral 9% 11% 5 = Somewhat satisfied 12% 17% 6 = Satisfied 48% 41% 7 = Very satisfied 26% 19% Rate your overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far. Source: Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory SFCC EMPLOYEES 129 Employee Demographics Employee Demographics: Staff/Admin Diversity by Gender 130 Staff = 247 Administration = 20 Female Male Female Male 15.0% 38.5% 61.5% 85.0% Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 Employee Demographics: Faculty Diversity by Gender 131 Regular Faculty = 67 Female Adjunct Faculty = 276 Male Female Male 39.1% 52.2% 47.8% 60.9% Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 Employee Demographics: Staff Diversity by Ethnicity 132 Staff = 247 Administration = 20 American Indian 2.5% American Indian Asian 1.2% Asian Black 1.2% Black Hispanic Native Hawaiian Hispanic 51.8% Native Hawaiian 0.4% White White 40.9% 2 or more 1.6% 2 or more Unknown 0.4% Unknown 0.0% 15.0% 30.0% Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 60.0% 90.0% 0.0% 85.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0% Employee Demographics: Faculty Diversity by Ethnicity 133 Regular Faculty = 67 Adjunct Faculty = 276 American Indian 0.0% American Indian 1.5% Asian 0.0% Asian 1.5% Black 1.5% Black 0.7% Hispanic Native Hawaiian Hispanic 20.9% Native Hawaiian 0.0% White 77.6% 0.0% 2 or more Unknown 0.0% Unknown 30.0% Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 60.0% 90.0% 0.3% White 2 or more 0.0% 16.3% 75.0% 0.7% 0.0% 4.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0% Employee Demographics: Staff Counts by Position and Status 134 Full-time Part-time 38 2 Business and Financial Operations 19 7 Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media 17 1 Computer, Engineering, and Science 34 7 Library and Instructional Support Management 0 Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance 0 46 8 55 8 Offica and Administrative Support 0 1 1 Production, Transportation, and Material Moving Sales and Related 3 0 Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 46 21 Service 10 20 30 40 50 60 Employee Demographics: Average Salary: Full-Time Staff 135 Overall average salary = $46,958 Business and Financial Operations $47,108 Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media $43,792 Computer, Engineering, and Science $48,822 Libraray and Instructional Support $45,801 Management $84,854 Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance $38,353 Office and Administrative Support $33,645 Production, Transportation, and Material Moving $36,114 Sales and Related $22,880 Service $29,058 $0 Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 Employee Demographics: Regular Faculty Salary Schedule 136 REGULAR STATUS FACULTY (9 months) STEPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bachelor 40,484 41,293 42,120 42,962 Masters 42,103 42,946 43,804 44,681 MA + 45 43,788 44,663 45,556 46,468 Doctorate 45,539 46,450 47,379 48,327 43,821 44,698 45,591 45,574 46,486 47,415 47,397 48,345 49,312 49,293 50,279 51,285 Maximum of seven years related experience will be given to determine entry salary. Current faculty will advance one step at the completion of each contract to a maximum of 7 steps. It is the responsibility of the faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at the Bachelor level. Faculty members are responsible to providing official transcripts to the Office of Human Resources when there is a change in degree. All adjustments to pay will only affect the contract subsequent to the one in which proof is supplied. Source: Human Resources Employee Demographics: Average Salary: Regular Faculty 137 Overall average salary = $50,260 Professor $53,808 4 regular faculty Associate Professor 22 regular faculty Assistant Professor 41 regular faculty $44,000 Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013 $52,354 $48,790 $48,000 $52,000 $56,000 Employee Demographics: Adjunct Faculty Salary Schedule 138 SFCC Teaching Experience Baccalaureate Degree Attainment Master's Masters +45 Doctorate Level I (0-24 Pay Hrs) $659 $669 $678 $690 Level II (25-48 Pay Hrs) $699 $709 $719 $731 Level III (49-72 Pay Hrs) $740 $752 $762 $775 Level IV ( 73+ Pay Hrs) $784 $795 $809 $820 Adjunct Faculty are hired on a semester-by-semester basis and have “temporary” status. Pay hours equal the combination of lecture and lab/studio hours included in the course credit hours taught. Lecture hours are compensated at a rate of 1 pay hour per scheduled lecture hour. Lab hours are compensated at a rate of .75 pay hours per scheduled lab/studio hour. Nursing clinical lab courses are compensated at a rate of 3 pay hours per scheduled lab hour. It is the responsibility of the adjunct faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at Level I, Baccalaureate. Adjunct Faculty members are responsible for providing official transcripts to the Human Resources department when there is a change in degree level. All adjustments to pay levels will only affect the semesters subsequent to the one in which proof is supplied. Accumulated pay hours which result in a move to the next highest pay level will be used to calculate the rate of pay for subsequent semester Adjunct Faculty Contracts. Full-time faculty teaching summer or overloads begin at Level II unless a higher level has been attained in an Adjunct capacity, in which case, compensation will be at that level held; movement to Level IV will occur after three years of full time instructor employment at SFCC. Only adjunct teaching hours earned at Santa Fe Community College count toward the determination of an adjunct faculty member’s salary schedule pay level. Source: Human Resources Employee Demographics: Highest Degree Level: Faculty 139 Regular Faculty Adjunct Faculty 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 96 91 56 46 40 40 20 4 0 Source: Banner 1 11 7 0 0 0 19 20 0 0 5 1 2 140 Employee Engagement Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction 141 208-239 Respondents Comparable to Responses of Previous 2 Years 45% of All Full-Time Employees 18% of All Part-Time Employees 43% Faculty 49% Staff 7.6% Administrators Compared with 23 2-Yr Institutions 16 Different States Largely Western and Mid-Western With Employees of Similar Years of Service and Faculty/Staff/Admin. Makeup Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 142 Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty 3.19 3.38 3.70 3.02 3.12 The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its adjunct faculty 2.92 3.00 2.91 2.79 n/a The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff 3.09 3.15 3.21 3.09 3.14 The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators 3.61 3.63 4.58 3.56 3.79 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 143 Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Faculty take pride in their work 3.89 3.81 3.91 3.84 3.94 Staff take pride in their work 3.68 3.59 3.52 3.65 3.75 Administrators take pride in their work 3.58 3.52 3.63 3.54 3.69 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 144 Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution 2.96 2.98 3.14 2.80 3.01 There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution 3.10 3.06 3.09 2.90 3.08 I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills 3.49 3.27 3.20 3.11 3.01 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 145 Question (scale 1-5) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty 4.40 3.38 4.42 3.70 4.53 3.02 4.40 3.12 The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its Adjunct faculty 4.34 3.00 4.26 2.91 4.52 2.79 NA NA The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff 4.43 3.15 4.40 3.21 4.48 3.09 4.35 3.14 The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators 4.21 3.63 4.04 4.58 4.09 3.56 4.18 3.79 Importance Relative To Satisfaction Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 146 Question (scale 1-5) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Faculty take pride in their work 4.66 3.81 4.65 3.91 4.74 3.84 4.68 3.94 Staff take pride in their work 4.59 3.59 4.61 3.52 4.65 3.65 4.68 3.94 Administrators take pride in their work 4.61 3.52 4.79 3.63 4.64 3.54 4.62 3.44 Importance Relative To Satisfaction Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 147 Question (scale 1-5) 2008 2009 2010 2011 Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Importance Satisfaction Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution 4.19 2.98 4.29 3.14 4.27 2.80 4.27 3.01 There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution 4.47 3.06 4.71 3.09 4.59 2.90 4.56 3.08 I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills 4.44 3.27 4.15 3.20 4.36 3.11 4.38 3.01 Importance Relative To Satisfaction Source: NMDWS LASER Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 148 Gap Between Importance and Satisfaction CAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 Importance Satisfaction GAP 2010 Importance Satisfaction GAP 2011 Importance Satisfaction GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP Effective Lines of Communications 4.45 2.56 1.89 4.78 2.74 2.04 4.54 2.55 1.99 4.41 2.82 1.59 Following Clear Processes 4.44 2.91 1.53 4.38 2.73 1.65 4.47 2.74 1.73 4.39 2.94 1.44 Teamwork and Cooperation 4.47 3.06 1.41 4.71 3.09 1.62 4.59 2.90 1.69 4.51 3.08 1.43 Consistency in Training New Employees 4.41 3.05 1.36 4.48 2.77 1.71 4.41 2.92 1.49 4.38 2.93 1.45 Good Communication Between Staff and Faculty 4.38 2.96 1.42 4.54 3.00 1.54 4.48 3.00 1.48 4.45 3.07 1.37 Planning Effectively 4.57 2.97 1.60 4.72 3.42 1.30 4.63 3.09 1.54 4.39 3.18 1.20 Sharing of Information Between Administrators and Staff 4.45 3.03 1.42 4.74 3.26 1.48 4.43 3.00 1.42 4.45 3.08 1.37 Good Communication Between Faculty and Administration 4.40 3.05 1.35 4.48 3.13 1.35 4.54 2.94 1.60 4.40 3.04 1.36 Clearly Written Procedures 4.34 2.91 1.43 4.35 2.95 1.40 4.36 2.95 1.41 4.29 3.04 1.24 Clear Processes for Recognition of Achievement 4.27 2.88 1.38 4.13 2.91 1.22 4.27 2.67 1.61 4.28 2.97 1.31 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 149 Gap Between Importance and Satisfaction CAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 Importance Satisfaction 2010 GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP 2011 Importance Satisfaction GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP Employee Involvement in Planning 4.35 3.04 1.31 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 2.86 1.60 4.22 3.00 1.22 Leadership Displaying a Clear Sense of Purpose 4.68 3.44 1.24 4.88 3.46 1.42 4.63 3.21 1.42 4.51 3.43 1.08 Sufficiently Utilizing Budetary Resources 4.52 3.09 1.43 4.58 3.46 1.12 4.51 3.14 1.38 4.42 3.29 1.14 Doing a Good Job Meeting Staff Needs 4.43 3.15 1.28 4.40 3.21 1.19 4.48 3.09 1.39 4.35 3.14 1.22 Utilizing Employee Suggestions for Improvements 4.19 2.98 1.21 4.29 3.14 1.15 4.27 2.80 1.48 4.27 3.01 1.26 Meeting the Needs of Students 4.80 3.51 1.29 4.80 3.54 1.26 4.76 3.52 1.24 4.63 3.69 0.94 Utilizing Staff Resources Appropriately 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 3.46 1.00 4.40 2.98 1.42 4.31 3.20 1.11 Treating Students as a Top Priority 4.78 3.52 1.26 4.80 3.63 1.17 4.75 3.62 1.14 4.64 3.68 0.96 Taking Pride in Administrative Work 4.61 3.52 1.09 4.79 3.63 1.16 4.64 3.54 1.10 4.60 3.69 0.91 Meeting the Needs of Faculty 4.40 3.38 1.02 4.42 3.70 0.72 4.53 3.02 1.51 4.40 3.12 1.28 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued) 150 Gap Between Importance and Satisfaction CAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011 Importance Satisfaction GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP Importance Satisfaction GAP Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Understood 4.38 3.35 1.03 4.44 3.38 1.06 4.36 3.14 1.22 4.34 3.34 1.00 Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Supported 4.44 3.46 0.98 4.60 3.42 1.18 4.44 3.31 1.13 4.30 3.48 0.83 Promoting Excellent Student Employee Relationships 4.66 3.56 1.09 4.76 3.67 1.09 4.64 3.57 1.07 4.59 3.68 0.91 Making Certain the Staff Takes Pride in Their Work 4.59 3.59 1.00 4.61 3.52 1.09 4.65 3.65 1.00 4.62 3.75 0.86 Insuring Efforts to Improve Quality are Paying Off 4.45 3.45 1.00 4.50 3.64 0.86 4.41 3.27 1.14 4.45 3.47 0.98 Insuring the Goals of the Institution are Consistent With the Mission 4.53 3.48 1.06 4.56 3.71 0.85 4.51 3.42 1.09 4.39 3.49 0.90 Insuring the Faculty Takes Pride in Their Work 4.66 3.81 0.85 4.65 3.91 0.74 4.74 3.84 0.90 4.68 3.94 0.74 Insuring the Reputation of the Institution Continues to Improve 4.49 3.62 0.87 4.63 4.00 0.63 4.57 3.65 0.92 4.48 3.85 0.63 Insuring the Institution is Well-Respected in the Community 4.63 3.74 0.89 4.67 4.00 0.67 4.70 3.88 0.82 4.63 4.08 0.55 Insuring the Institution Does a Good Job of Meeting the Needs of Administrators 4.21 3.63 0.57 4.04 4.58 0.54 4.09 3.56 0.53 4.18 3.79 0.39 Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary) 151 SFCC is statistically above the comparison group in 2011 in five areas: This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators The reputation of this institution continues to improve SFCC = 3.79 vs. Comparison Group = 3.66* SFCC = 3.85 vs. Comparison Group = 3.52* This institution is well-respected in the community SFCC = 4.08 vs. Comparison Group = 3.67* *Statistically Significant Source: Noel Levitz Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary) 152 SFCC is statistically below the comparison group in 2011 in five areas: I am paid fairly for the work I do: The employee benefits available to me are valuable: SFCC = 2.66 vs. Comparison Group = 3.12* I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills: SFCC = 3.45 vs. Comparison Group = 3.85* I have adequate opportunities for advancement: SFCC = 2.67 vs. Comparison Group = 3.24* SFCC = 3.01 vs. Comparison Group = 3.44* I have adequate opportunities for professional development: SFCC = 3.03 vs. Comparison Group = 3.45* *Statistically Significant Source: Noel Levitz INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS 154 SFCC Organizations Current SFCC Organizational Chart 155 Proposed Reorganization: Academic Affairs 156 Quality Councils 157 Technology Institutional Advancement Marketing and PR Administrative and College Services Societal Responsibi lity Student Success & Academic Affairs Institutional Effectiveness Social Responsibility Service to the Community 158 Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations 159 Previous Strategic Plan Previous Strategic Plan: Institutional Goals 160 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Develop Students’ Potential through Highly Effective Learning Systems Identify & Meet the Community’s Learning Needs Engage Employees in Workplace Success Provide Effective Internal Organizational Support Promote External Support for the College Promote Institutional Accountability Previous Strategic Plan: Accomplishments 161 Passed $35 million bond The Higher Education Center was begun on campus New construction and renovations Health and Sciences Center was completed in 2010 Trades and Advanced Technology Center was completed in 2011 More than 25 new certificate and degree programs developed since 2005 Credit Hour Enrollment increased 40.7% (2007-2011) Degree completion has increased: All completers by 45.5% (2007-2011) Hispanic completers by 16.8% (2007-2011) 162 Institutional Finance SFCC Proposed Budget FY 2013-2014 163 Revenues Expenditures 60.0% 50% $14,317,762 45% $15,900,000 50.0% 40% 35% 40.0% 30% $9,177,900 30.0% 25% 50.0% $6,575,300 20% 20.0% 15% 29.0% 10.0% $6,329,470 47% 20.0% 1.0% $295,000 0.0% $3,785,955 10% $2,488,363 5% 8% $3,733,504 21% 12% 12% 0% Tuition & Fees State Local Other Sources Appropriations Appropriations Instruction Academic Support 79% of funding comes from taxes Source: Finance and Administration – Instruction & General Budget FY 12-13 and FY 13-14 Student Services Institutional Plant Support Operation Tuition and Fees 164 Full-time tuition for 12 credit hours per semester In District Out of District Out of State $1,400.00 $1,176.00 $1,200.00 $930.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $600.00 $576.00 $618.09 $516.00 $400.00 $312.00 $474.00 $387.60 $200.00 $0.00 Source: Banner $240.00 Tuition Statewide: By Academic Year 165 $4,500 $4,030 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Source: IPEDS $1,896 $1,782 $1,704 $1,704 $1,608 $1,561 $1,560 $1,536 $1,507 $1,329 $1,310 $1,224 $1,176 $1,176 $1,036 $886 $852 Instruction and General 166 2008-2014 SFCC Instruction and General 2008 to Budgeted 2014 2008 2009 2010 2011 Beginning Balance $ Revenues Exenditures Net 28,182,950 25,865,718 $ 2,317,232 28,380,598 27,374,563 $ 1,006,035 28,994,287 26,905,952 $ 2,088,335 30,271,016 27,777,887 $ 2,493,129 1,621,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 1,800,000 Transfers Ending Balance $ 3,124,785 3,820,502 15% Source: SFCC Finance and Administration $ $ 3,820,502 2,750,801 10% $ $ 2,750,801 3,439,136 13% $ $ Projected 2013 2012* 3,439,136 4,132,265 15% $ 4,962,743 31,860,462 29,159,917 $ 2,700,545 $ 31,218,900 30,665,206 $ 553,694 $ 7,663,288 26% 7,663,288 Prelim.Budget 2014 $ 4,616,982 $ 32,082,900 30,913,966 1,168,934 3,600,000 $ 4,616,982 15% 2,100,000 $ 3,685,916 12% Instructional Cost per Student 167 $2,500 $2,240 $2,250 $2,131 $2,105 $2,000 $1,770 $1,750 $1,740 $1,500 2007-08 Source: Balanced Scorecard 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Statement of Net Assets – 2008 to 2012 168 2008 Current Assets 2009 2010 2011 2012 $38,426,511 $36,426,472 $39,801,371 $42,530,782 $29,084,797 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873 Total Assets $93,495,589 $93,367,566 $108,168,776 $121,249,630 $119,641,670 Current Liabilities $12,877,569 $9,379,047 $14,947,627 $12,530,972 $13,167,482 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,154 31,542,599 25,281,108 $32,892,631 $27,229,349 $32,072,141 $44,073,571 $38,448,590 $60,602,958 $66,138,217 $76,096,635 $77,176,059 $81,193,080 Non-Current Assets Non-Current Liabilities Total Liabilities NET ASSETS Source: Moody Presentation Unrestricted Cash and Expendable Net Assets 169 Source: SFCC Finance and Administration Unrestricted Net Assets (Fund Balance) to I&G Expenditures 170 Target 30% Source: SFCC Finance and Administration Unrestricted Cash to I&G Expenditures 171 Target Range 35% to 39% Target range Source: Moody Presentation Key I&G Revenue Streams 172 Source: Moody Presentation I&G Total Revenues 173 Source: SFCC Finance and Administration I&G Revenues/Expenditures 174 Source: SFCC Finance and Administration 175 DEBT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE PLAN 2013 Plan of Finance 176 District held an election in February 2010 to authorize $35 million of general obligation bonds. Constitution limits amount of bonds outstanding to 3%. The 2012 Assessed Valuation is as follows: $6,357,470,139 x .03 = $190,724,104. After issuance of the 2013 Bonds, the College will be 21% bonded to capacity. Declining debt service to permit new bonds in future without tax increase. 12 year final maturity. Retire debt as quickly as $0.93 levy will permit. Actively manage debt service cash and principal maturities to maintain a stable debt service tax rate and retire debt as quickly as possible. Source: SFCC Finance and Administration Total Debt Service Requirements 177 PRESENT REQUIREMENTS Interest SERIES 2013 BONDS Total 8/1 Principal Interest (1) TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Total Principal Interest Principal Year 8/1 Principal 2013 $5,430,000 $303,344 $5,733,344 $600,000 $109,896 $709,896 $6,030,000 $413,240 Total $6,443,240 Retired $6,030,000 Cumulative 15.0% 2014 2,000,000 444,275 2,444,275 3,300,000 509,500 3,809,500 5,300,000 953,775 6,253,775 5,300,000 28.3% 2015 3,340,000 406,525 3,746,525 1,300,000 410,500 1,710,500 4,640,000 817,025 5,457,025 4,640,000 39.8% 2016 3,900,000 339,725 4,239,725 1,000,000 371,500 1,371,500 4,900,000 711,225 5,611,225 4,900,000 52.1% 2017 3,580,000 261,725 3,841,725 1,000,000 341,500 1,341,500 4,580,000 603,225 5,183,225 4,580,000 63.5% 2018 1,700,000 181,175 1,881,175 1,000,000 311,500 1,311,500 2,700,000 492,675 3,192,675 2,700,000 70.2% 2019 2,650,000 140,800 2,790,800 1,000,000 281,500 1,281,500 3,650,000 422,300 4,072,300 3,650,000 79.3% 2020 2,485,000 74,550 2,559,550 1,000,000 251,500 1,251,500 3,485,000 326,050 3,811,050 3,485,000 88.0% 2021 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 90.5% 2022 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 93.6% 2023 2024 1,250,000 1,300,000 89,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 1,300,000 89,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 1,300,000 96.8% 100.0% $15,000,000 $3,068,396 $18,068,396 $40,085,000 $5,220,515 $45,305,515 $40,085,000 $25,085,000 $2,152,119 $27,237,119 (1) For illustrational purposes only. Interest calculated using a coupon rate of 3.58%. Source: SFCC Finance and Administration 178 TAX BASE INFORMATION Assessed Valuation 179 Tax Year Residential 2003 $2,685,374,933 $1,013,674,395 $3,699,049,328 2004 2,967,074,813 1,053,732,235 4,020,807,048 8.70% Total Bond Authorization Approved by Voters in 2010 $ 35,000,000 2005 3,362,985,020 1,154,730,472 4,517,715,492 12.36% 2012 Assessed Valuation $ 6,357,470,139 2006 3,737,819,975 1,270,886,417 5,008,706,392 10.87% Constitutional Debt Limitation (3% of Assessed Valuation) $ 190,724,104 2007 4,152,258,777 1,454,265,011 5,606,523,788 11.94% Less Current Outstanding Debt (100% Fixed Rate) 25,085,000 2008 4,430,810,953 1,629,371,871 6,060,182,824 8.09% Less Series 2013 Bonds 15,000,000 2009 4,661,806,059 1,546,352,421 6,208,158,480 2.44% Debt Outstanding After Issuance of Series 2013 Bonds $ 40,085,000 2010 4,828,230,438 1,545,455,467 6,373,685,905 2.67% Available Debt Capacity $ 150,639,104 2011 4,832,906,555 1,550,015,250 6,382,921,805 0.14% % Bonded to Capacity 2012 4,880,347,416 1,477,122,723 6,357,470,139 -0.40% Non-Residential Growth Over Previous Year Total As of 3/25/2013 7.32% 21.02% Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration. History of Assessed Valuation $7,000,000,000 15.00% $6,500,000,000 13.00% $6,000,000,000 11.00% $5,500,000,000 9.00% $5,000,000,000 7.00% $4,500,000,000 5.00% $4,000,000,000 3.00% $3,500,000,000 1.00% $3,000,000,000 -1.00% 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total AV Source: RBC Capital Markets 2007 2008 % Growth 2009 2010 3.00% 2011 Average Growth 2012 New vs. Re-Appraisal 180 SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SANTA FE COUNTY NEW vs. RE-APPRAISAL New (1) 2011 Re-Appraisal (1) 2012 Santa Fe - C In $ 2,667,575,697 $ 15,176,491 0.57% $ 17,321,210 0.65% $ 2,700,073,398 1.22% Santa Fe - C Out $ 2,165,330,858 $ 20,113,278 0.93% $ 8,134,875 0.38% $ 2,193,579,011 1.30% $ 4,832,906,555 $ 35,289,769 0.73% $ 25,456,085 0.53% $ 4,893,652,409 1.26% Santa Fe - C In $ 979,632,876 $ 16,927,938 1.73% $ (74,440,388) -7.60% $ 922,120,426 -5.87% Santa Fe - C Out $ 474,262,221 $ 18,620,947 3.93% $ (67,001,426) -14.13% $ 425,881,742 -10.20% $ 1,453,895,097 $ 35,548,885 2.45% $ (141,441,814) -9.73% $ 1,348,002,168 -7.28% Total Assessor's Valuation $ 6,286,801,652 $ 70,838,654 1.13% $ (115,985,729) -1.84% $ 6,241,654,577 -0.72% Central Assesment $ 96,120,153 97,430,826 1.36% TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION $ 6,382,921,805 Total Residential Total Non-Residential $ 70,838,654 1) Numbers taken from Santa Fe County PTD-03 Report dated 6/15/2012. 2) Preliminary, does not include protested property. Final assessed value will differ. Source: RBC Capital Markets 1.13% $ (115,985,729) -1.84% $ 6,339,085,403 (2) -0.69% Major Taxpayers 181 Name Business Public Service Company of NM Electric Utility CenturyLink 2012 A.V. % of A.V. $43,485,485 0.68% Telephone Utility 15,094,348 0.24% Eldorado Partnership Hotel 14,372,973 0.23% La Posada Inc Hotel 10,236,788 0.16% Santa Fe Mall LLC Shopping Center 10,120,197 0.16% Gas Company of New Mexico Gas Utility 9,888,964 0.16% Santa Fe Railyard Community Co Real Estate 9,398,069 0.15% Canyon Encantado Real Estate 8,941,923 0.14% Corporation de la Fonda Hotel 8,640,232 0.14% New Mexico Hotels Ltd. Hotel 8,098,894 0.13% $138,277,873 2.18% Total Source: Santa Fe County Assessor's Office 2.18% Major Taxpayers 97.82% Source: RBC Capital Markets Direct and Overlapping Debt 182 Municipal Entity State of New Mexico Assessed Valuation G/O Debt Outstanding Percent Applicable Amount $54,490,961,619 $372,700,000 11.67% $43,482,975 Santa Fe County 6,896,495,216 114,445,000 92.18% 105,500,062 City of Santa Fe 3,710,979,288 26,510,000 100.00% 26,510,000 Santa Fe Community College 6,357,470,139 40,085,000 100.00% 40,085,000 Santa Fe Public Schools 6,357,470,139 178,075,000 100.00% 178,075,000 Total Direct & Overlapping Debt $393,653,037 Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Assessed Valuation: 6.19% Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Actual Valuation: 2.03% Per Capita Direct & Overlapping Debt: Est. Population: Source: RBC Capital Markets $3,149.22 125,000 Historical Tax Rates: City of Santa Fe 183 RESIDENTIAL TAX RATES - Per $1,000 Assessed Valuation Within 20 Mill Limit for General Purposes State of New Mexico Santa Fe County Santa Fe Community College City of Santa Fe Santa Fe Schools Total 2012-13 $0.000 5.022 2.362 1.165 0.128 $8.677 2011-12 $0.000 4.891 2.299 1.135 0.125 $8.450 2010-11 $0.000 4.697 2.205 1.093 0.120 $8.115 2009-10 $0.000 4.670 2.190 1.097 0.119 $8.076 2008-09 $0.000 4.507 2.114 1.055 0.115 $7.791 2010-11 $1.530 1.873 1.015 0.679 6.920 $12.017 2009-10 $1.150 1.930 1.046 0.498 6.919 $11.543 2008-09 $1.250 1.969 1.046 0.461 6.867 $11.593 Over 20 Mill Limit - Interest, Principal, Judgment, etc. State of New Mexico Santa Fe County Santa Fe Community College City of Santa Fe Santa Fe Schools Total 2012-13 $1.360 1.640 0.930 0.564 6.920 $11.414 2011-12 $1.362 1.851 1.015 0.743 6.995 $11.966 Total Levy 2012-13 $1.360 6.662 3.292 1.729 7.048 2011-12 $1.362 6.742 3.314 1.878 7.120 2010-11 $1.530 6.570 3.220 1.772 7.040 2009-10 $1.150 6.600 3.236 1.595 7.038 2008-09 $1.250 6.476 3.160 1.516 6.982 Total Residential in City of Santa Fe $20.091 $20.416 $20.132 $19.619 $19.384 Total Non-Residential in City of Santa Fe $29.581 $30.123 $29.865 $29.142 $27.502 Total Residential in Unincorporated County $18.362 $18.538 $18.360 $18.024 $17.868 Total Non-Residential in Unincorporated County $26.200 $26.563 $26.618 $26.286 $25.043 State of New Mexico Santa Fe County Santa Fe Community College City of Santa Fe Santa Fe Schools Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration Source: NM Department of Finance & Administration 184 Historical Financials Revenues & Expenses – Unrestricted (Budgetary Basis) 185 Budget Comparison - Unrestricted FY2008 Unrestricted Revenues: Tuition and Fees Miscellaneous Fees State Government Appropriations Local Government Appropriations Private Government Contracts/Grants Sales and Services Other Total Unrestricted Revenues Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural Public Service Student Aid, Grants & Stipends Auxiliary Services Capital Outlay Renewal & Replacement Retirement of indebtedness Instruction Academic Support Student Services Institutional Support Operation and Maintenance of Plant Total Unrestricted Expenditures FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 $ 4,673,400 2,924,689 23,776,259 $ 7,010,030 6,053,699 3,252,986 868,041 $ 99,701 11,805,998 6,404,776 137,956 3,505,955 8,082,951 $ 4,840,809 1,424,399 8,564,500 15,266,308 175,000 $ 5,179,171 1,341,221 8,203,400 16,730,563 144,239 261,868 $ 31,374,348 $ 17,184,756 $ 30,037,337 $ 30,271,016 $ 31,860,462 $ 68,585 6,235,074 213,843 1,878,164 3,323,331 1,187,864 4,799,417 - $ 57,355 6,807,116 241,502 1,951,141 3,920,585 874,796 5,236,172 - $ 143,235 6,550,109 402,979 2,099,224 14,192,670 633,318 5,961,301 - $ 14,276,050 2,632,074 2,395,320 5,513,937 2,960,506 $ 14,402,925 2,744,907 3,022,200 5,959,902 3,029,983 $ 17,706,278 $ 19,088,667 $ 29,982,836 $ 27,777,887 $ 29,159,917 Net Transfers 3,288,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 Change in Net Assets 16,956,585 171,825 1,454,501 693,129 2,700,545 Beginning, Net Assets 11,897,418 28,528,919 28,700,743 3,439,137 4,962,743 Ending, Net Assets Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements $ 28,854,003 $ 28,700,744 $ 30,155,244 (1,800,000) $ 4,132,266 - $ 7,663,288 Revenues & Expenses – Restricted (Budgetary Basis) 186 Budget Comparison - Restricted FY2008 Unrestricted Revenues: Federal Government Contracts/Grants State Government Contracts/Grants Local Government Contracts/Grants Private Government Contract/Grants Sales and Services Total Unrestricted Revenues Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural Public Service Internal Services Student Aid, Grants & Stipends Instruction Academic Support Student Services Operation and Maintenance of Plant Total Unrestricted Expenditures FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 $ 1,904,678 602,379 273,810 1,800,112 $ 3,843,483 1,248,788 124,615 21,236 - $ 6,998,650 1,101,396 118,171 118,485 - $ 2,521,128 1,525,479 110,384 452,650 - $ 2,602,223 980,536 11,926 743,130 - $ 4,580,979 $ 5,238,122 $ 8,336,702 $ 4,609,641 $ 4,337,815 $ 1,955,465 196,358 2,429,156 - $ 1,790,104 3,448,018 - $ 1,854,174 6,482,528 - $ 3,053,102 1,397,275 159,264 - $ 2,812,298 1,275,030 260,487 (10,000) $ 4,580,979 $ 5,238,122 $ 8,336,702 $ 4,609,641 $ 4,337,815 Net Transfers - - - - Change in Net Assets - - - - - Beginning, Net Assets - - - - - Ending, Net Assets Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenues & Expenditures - Audited 187 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets (Primary Institution) FY2008 Operating Revenues: Tuition and Fees Government Grants/Contracts Non-Government Grants/Contracts Sales and Services Auxiliary Enterprises Gain/Loss on Disposal Assets Total Unrestricted Revenues Operating Expenses: Instruction Academic Support Student Services Institutional Support Operation and Maintenance of Plant Student Activities Student Aid Public Services Auxiliary Enterprises Building Renewal and Replacements Capital Outlay Independent operations Depreciation and amortization Total Unrestricted Expenditures FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 $ 3,269,608 6,971,179 860,510 1,058,484 1,866,205 - $ 3,452,731 9,431,362 519,545 1,300,142 1,993,396 - $ 4,150,500 11,543,384 523,956 1,264,895 2,270,211 3,523 $ 4,876,173 12,819,871 674,395 1,227,492 2,485,265 7,640 $ 3,627,481 6,776,591 1,007,130 828,029 2,713,734 - $ 14,025,986 $ 16,697,176 $ 19,756,469 $ 22,090,836 $ 14,952,965 $ 14,562,153 3,487,522 2,835,791 5,028,923 2,821,367 103,585 1,500,545 8,363,825 1,878,164 834,899 401,296 199,844 2,822,478 $ 15,318,036 4,571,262 2,793,355 5,725,648 2,825,823 57,355 2,414,479 8,565,549 1,951,141 539,404 75,187 319,032 2,854,258 $ 14,924,903 4,569,549 3,005,261 5,275,671 2,728,968 143,235 5,221,524 8,404,283 2,099,224 633,318 84,369 249,278 3,334,720 $ 17,394,268 3,964,233 2,545,204 5,513,937 2,969,886 94,344 6,398,579 7,529,909 2,220,157 185,737 3,574,655 304,483 2,987,433 $ 17,215,223 4,019,937 3,282,687 5,959,902 3,019,983 108,650 6,219,074 7,865,839 2,753,916 807,479 2,339,221 262,068 3,476,468 $ 44,840,392 $ 48,010,529 $ 50,674,303 $ 55,682,825 $ 57,330,447 Operating (loss) Income Non-operating revenues (expenses) Federal Pell Grant State Appropriations Local Appropriations - Operating Local Appropriations - Debt Service General Obligation Bonds Investment Income Interest expense and other related debt Other Income Other Expense Loss on Disposal of Assets Net Non-Operating Revenues (30,814,406) (31,313,353) (30,917,834) (33,591,989) (42,377,482) 15,756,280 12,495,770 5,727,140 81,990 697,494 (609,660) 370,722 34,519,736 17,097,080 13,460,020 6,053,699 344,541 256,827 (788,784) 425,229 36,848,612 17,142,678 14,559,901 6,404,776 3,087,087 40,267 (684,895) 331,195 (4,757) 13,209,476 15,266,308 6,494,343 56,023 (642,088) 293,503 (6,152) 34,671,413 7,811,788 12,324,428 17,364,014 7,139,250 (7,401) (759,032) 345,993 (26,621) 44,192,419 40,876,252 Increase in Net Assets 3,705,330 5,535,259 9,958,418 1,079,424 1,814,937 Beginning, Net Assets 56,897,628 60,602,958 66,138,217 76,096,635 79,378,143 Ending, Net Assets Source: Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements SFCC Audited Financial Statements $ 60,602,958 $ 66,138,217 $ 76,096,635 $ 77,176,059 $ 81,193,080 Statement of Net Assets – Assets 188 Assets: Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents - restricted Investments Accounts receivable students, net Grants and contracts receivable Mill levy receivable Other receivables, net Due from component unit Inventories Prepaid expenses Total Current Assets Non-Current Assets: Assets held in escrow Mill levy receivable Capital assets, net Total Non-Current Assets Total Assets Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 7,124,878 6,792,783 20,398,273 749,709 1,504,329 40,252 545,795 458,681 345,055 466,756 6,059,183 7,902,123 16,903,018 208,307 2,333,778 34,161 1,759,187 431,050 367,476 428,189 9,446,021 8,684,866 16,328,457 238,457 1,626,347 90,882 1,990,702 446,420 426,109 523,110 6,142,334 6,872,177 23,391,799 1,050,834 2,810,737 150,493 1,110,715 484,492 434,955 82,246 7,057,482 5,057,113 9,544,890 1,322,304 2,759,177 1,661,012 268,323 612,079 467,085 335,332 38,426,511 36,426,472 39,801,371 42,530,782 29,084,797 127,543 54,941,535 127,543 56,813,551 127,543 68,239,862 127,543 78,591,305 127,543 1,214,664 89,214,666 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670 FY2012 Statement of Net Assets – Liabilities 189 FY2008 Liabilities: Current Liabilities: Accounts payable Contractors payable Accrued liabilities Accrued interest payable Deferred revenue Dure to primary institution Accured compensated absences - Current Bonds payable - Current Other liabilities FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 2,948,539 1,356,195 425,231 1,153,312 746,905 6,247,387 - 2,429,400 1,075,675 303,833 787,019 776,714 4,006,406 - 2,059,011 2,336,981 860,692 265,656 893,244 148,690 8,067,018 316,335 2,740,071 998,481 484,797 2,071,304 185,189 5,658,939 392,191 2,823,502 991,318 265,019 2,328,853 846,761 5,627,122 284,907 12,877,569 9,379,047 14,947,627 12,530,972 13,167,482 137,186 19,877,876 161,260 17,689,042 754,918 16,369,596 830,477 30,712,122 196,108 25,085,000 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,514 31,542,599 25,281,108 Total Liabilities 32,892,631 27,229,349 32,072,141 44,073,571 38,448,590 Net Assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted, scholarship and programs Restricted, debt service Restricted, capital projects Other Unrestricted Total Net Assets 28,816,272 1,956,096 6,792,783 17,354,173 5,683,634 60,602,958 35,118,103 7,598,290 13,822,724 9,599,100 66,138,217 43,803,246 8,508,070 13,742,326 10,042,993 76,096,635 42,220,244 6,537,873 19,979,026 8,438,916 77,176,059 58,502,544 6,474,118 5,680,173 223,046 10,313,199 81,193,080 Total Net Assets and Liabilities 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670 Total Current Liabilities Non-Current Liabilities: Accrued compensated absences Bonds payable Total Non-Current Liabilities Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements 190 Funding Formula State Funding Formula Performance Based Formula 191 What is the Base? 192 Inputs and Variables 193 Last Year’s Weighting Executive Weighting Legislative Weighting FY 13 FY 14 FY 14 82.25% 5% SCH Completion 48% 1.15% 5% Degrees Awarded 8% 0.95% 3% At- Risk Students 12% 2.15% 2% Workforce Incentive 8% Included Not Included Mill Levy % is not reallocated Source: LFC FY 2014 Budget Recommendations Volume III Reallocated 100% of Last Year’s Performanc e Base Included Reallocated 15% of Last Year’s Performanc e Other Funding Considerations: • ERB • Compensation GROW and Grants 195 The GROW Foundation supports SFCC by acquiring financial resources outside of the regular SFCC revenue sources through fund-raising and grants. Grants received in previous academic years: 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 $4,941,471 $5,607,033 $5,470,771 $5,322,256 $6,467,148 Grants received 7/1/2012 to 12/31/2012: Total grants reported through 3/31/2013: $736,808.00 $1,384,432.67 Instruction 196 197 Bonds Summary of 2013 Bonds 198 Issues Size: $15,000,000 Sale Date: April 24, 2013 Closing Date: May 16, 2013 Maturity: 2013 - 2024 Current Tax Rate: $0. 93 / $1,000 of A.V. Future Tax Rate: Maintain tax rate at current level 2012 Assessed Valuation: $6,357,470,139 Overview of Series 2013 Bonds 199 Issues Size: $15,000,000 Maturity Dates: 2013 - 2024 Average Life (Years): 4.662 Ratings – Moody’s: Aa1 Total Interest: $2,227,333.33 Premium: $1,186,105.00 Net Interest: $1,041,228.33 True Interest Cost (“TIC”): 1.410% All-In TIC: 1.524% Purchaser: Robert W. Baird & Co., Incorporated Red Bank, New Jersey Operations and Facilities 200 Operations Maintenance Staff: 20 Grounds Staff: 15 Total Operations managed: 367 acres, 645,000 square footage, 7 boiler systems, 76 air conditioning units Facilities Health & Sciences Center West Wing Bookstore Fine Arts Studios and Labs Witter Fitness Ed. Center Trades & Advanced Technology Center Campus Center and Food Services Culinary Classrooms Jemez Meeting Rooms Wastewater Plant 201 Campus Security Campus Safety & Security 202 Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires SFCC to: Publish an Annual Security Report (ASR) To have a public crime log Disclose crime statistics Issue timely warnings about Clery Act crimes Devise an emergency response, notification and testing policy Compile and report fire data to the federal government Enact policies and procedures to handle reports of missing students Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT) 203 Mission Statement To train selected SFCC staff and faculty members as a Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT), which will work in cooperation with the SFCC Safety and Security team, local emergency response agencies and law enforcement, either as first responders or as backup resources, as directed by the Incident Commander. C-CERT is here to assist with: Disaster Preparedness Fire Safety Evacuation Disaster Medical Operations Light Search & Rescue Service to the Community 204 Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations 205 Sustainability What is Sustainability? 206 The design and implementation of systems that emulate the optimization from millions of years of evolution seen in ecosystems and the natural world. Application of this approach results in ... Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the future Balance the use and availability of renewable and non-renewable resources. Reduce, re-use, and recycle human-made waste streams as a resource and manage the by-products of human endeavor. Source: NMDWS LASER Sustainability: Why should we care? 207 1. 2. 3. People Planet Learning Sustainability Plans: State and City 208 State Goal – The Renewable Energy State Support National Economic and Security Issues Cultivating Santa Fe’s Future Economy, Economic Development Strategy (April 2004) 4. Develop curricula that helps Santa Fe become a water and energy conservation role model for other cities. Sustainable Santa Fe Plan – adopted October 29, 2008 In addition to degree accreditation, continuing education opportunities at Santa Fe Community College are a valuable resource. The Center for Community Sustainability at Santa Fe Community College offers trades skills education that serves both workforce as well as individual needs for sustainable housing, water conservation, and design. In spite of the existing programs, there is considerable room for additional programs and activities. 209 Sustainability: Legislation and Ordinance In 2010 the NM State Senate enacted energy efficiency and conservation measures for all State-funded building projects of significant size. Green Building Council http://www.sfahba.com/index.php/green/ Residential Green Building Code http://www.santafenm.gov/index.aspx?NID=1297 City of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Ordinance No. 2009-9 www.santafenm.gov/archives/169/2009-09.pdf Sustainable Santa Fe Plan City of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Resolution 2008-93 http://www.santafenm.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/702 Community Involvement 210 Development of Santa Fe Green Building Codes Joint City/County Energy Task Force Regional Economic Development Initiatives Statewide Biofuels Plan New Mexico Green Collaborative New Mexico Green Chamber of Commerce Sustainability Recognition 211 The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards ceremony was held April 27, 2013. The winning categories included: 1. Renewable Energy or Energy Conservation Project 2. Water Conservation Project 3. Low-Carbon Transportation Project 4. Green Building Project 5. Ecological or Other Climate Change Adaptation Project 6. Solid Waste Reduction Project 7. Food System Project 8. Youth-led Project 9. Community Outreach Project 10. Sustainability Journalism Project 11. Environmental Justice Project 12. Green Economic Development Project 13. Other (An outstanding project that is not covered under one of the other categories) The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards are sponsored by the City of Santa Fe’s Sustainable Santa Fe Commission, Earth Care, the Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce and the Green Fire Times. Sustainability at SFCC 212 Santa Fe Community College has strategically sought to develop the opportunity to be the hub of sustainability learning, green campus operations and workforce training for green industry in the northern New Mexico region. Structure/Areas of Focus Reduce Natural Resource Depletion Reduce Pollution Ensure Healthy Indoor Environments Model and Teach Sustainable Concepts and Practices Sustainability Steering Committee Linked to Internal and External Groups Tied to Curriculum SFCC Sustainability Plan Goals 213 1. 2. Reduce Natural Resource Depletion 3. Ensure Healthy Indoor Environments A. Non-renewable fuels A. Air quality B. Fresh water reserves B. Nutrition C. Non-renewable materials D. Land and soil Reduce Pollution 4. Model and Teach Sustainable Concepts A. Air pollution B. Water pollution A. Institutional commitment C. Land pollution B. Organizational structure D. Light pollution C. Model and teach sustainability SFCC’s History of Sustainability 214 2006 2007 2008 - Developed a Sustainability Plan (revised 2009) - Signed the American College & University President’s Climate Commitment - Held the Green Jobs Forum - Biomass Heating System 2009 - Built the Sustainable Technology Center considered to be the leading green instructional facility in the United States. - Institutional Master Plan (inclusion of sustainability plan) 2010 - Passage of bond for infrastructure improvement - LEED certification* for the Health & Sciences building 2011 - Achieved LEED Gold rating for Trades and Advanced Technology Center 2012-13 - Developed curricula to teach sustainability for careers in green industry 2013-14 - 1.6 MV Solar array installation (approximately 15 acres) * Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a comprehensive green building rating system 215 Sustainability: We are doing our part SFCC has created internal programs and key practices to reduce natural resource depletion, reduce pollution and ensure healthy indoor environments: Encouraging use of reusable bottles Going paperless in key areas Replacing wastebasket liners only when needed Turning off lights in the cafeteria unless really needed Turning off lights and computers in offices when not in use Introducing solar energy Carpooling and Ride Sharing underway Use of Solar (Trades and Advanced Technology Center) Water Treatment Plant – Graywater irrigation Biomass Boiler Bicycle Trail Connection Recycling Campus Composting Lighting Design and Retrofits Ride-share parking incentive Standard LEED Checklist for new buildings Replaced 2 - 300 ton chillers with efficient ones 216 Sustainability: Green Programs at SFCC SFCC is recognized in ACUPCC’s 2009 Annual Report as one of three schools focusing on sustainability in the curriculum in innovative ways. Associate in Applied Science Solar Energy Sustainable Technologies (Revision) Sustainable Agriculture (in development) Building Science & Construction Technologies (New) Water Treatment Operator Certificate Programs Non-Credit Offerings New Mexico Energy $mart Academy Biofuels Building Performance Institute (BPI) Environmental Technologies Healthy Air Facilities Technologies Home Energy Rater Systems (HERS) Green Building Construction Skills Weatherization Green Building Systems Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Lead Abatement Radon Mitigation 217 Sustainability: SFCC Greenhouse Gas by Source Percentage by source in 2007/08 (baseline) Sustainability: Proposed Project 218 2013 1.7 MW solar PV installation Per year will TATC solar thermal Per year will Generate 3,441 mWh Save an additional 725 therms Save 11,734 MMBtu Reduce GHG by 920 metric tons Reduce GHG by an additional 4 metric tons For 1/2 of 2013 Save 725 therms (73 MMBtu) Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons TATC adsorption chiller 2014 TATC solar thermal Per year will Save 14 mWh (47 MMBtu) Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons 219 Sustainability: Potential Projects 2014 - 2016 Convert lighting to LED from T8 fluorescent Incrementally over three years - per year will Save 316 MWh (1,078 MMBtu) Reduce GHG by 85 metric tons 2016 Create Per electric shuttle fleet year will Save 5% total VMT Reduce GHG by 252 metric tons Sustainability: Campus Greenhouse Gases 220 Per year, energy only* 6,000 5,688 27% reduction in 2016/17 from 2007/08 baseline 5,671 5,233 5,200 5,000 4,877 4,549 5,557 4,860 4750 4,841 4,414 4,403 4,099 4038 4,128 4,128 4,128 3325 3325 3325 4,000 Natural Gas Electricity 3,000 Wood Total GHG 2,000 1,139 797 763 805 790 786 782 782 782 782 - - 15 14 21 21 21 21 21 21 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 1,000 1 MMbtu gas = .0529 metric tonnes 1 MMbtu electricity = .2006 metric tonnes 1 MMbtu wood = .0046 metric tonnes Source: - *Does not include T&D losses Sustainability Challenges 221 Resource Allocation Funding Staffing Changing Technology Accountability Align performance measures with goals Data collection Assign responsibility Annual review and update Sustainability Future Goals 222 Optimization of building resources Micro grid project Sustainable agriculture Zero-waste Platinum LEED certifications Update sustainability plan Expand curriculum support 223 Higher Education Trends Challenges Opportunities Higher Education Trends & Issues 224 Focus on increasing graduation rates and degree production Funding formula shift from access to success Assessment of student learning College readiness Developmental education Accelerate progress to completion Competency-based education Credit for prior learning Online and hybrid learning Economic and workforce development STEM-H Green job training Challenges For SFCC 225 Aging population in Santa Fe High school graduates projected to flat line Geographic Area of Responsibility Limited opportunities in New Mexico Pockets of poverty Lack of academic preparedness Funding formula changing to degree completion Emerging technologies Opportunities – Degree Completion 226 Change how we teach developmental education With the SCH portion of the funding diminishing we do not have to be restricted in how we tackle developmental education classes Addresses Funding formula Lack of academic preparedness Opportunities – Degree Completion 227 Expand Programs in Health Care High growth in jobs creation High wage jobs High state funding Serves the community’s aging population Emerging technologies Addresses Aging population Brain drain Funding formula Pockets of poverty Opportunities – Degree Completion 228 Expand night and weekend degree programs Target working adults Our tuition is lower than private colleges Our quality of program is better than private colleges Addresses Flat line high school graduates Expanded Room market utilization issues Opportunities – Degree Completion 229 Expand fully-online programs to out-of-state and outof-country Our out-of-state tuition is lower than most instate tuition Our in-state tuition is lower than most institutions in NM Funding formula has changed Technology has changed Geographic Area of Responsibility does not apply Partnership with LANL Partnership with other countries Addresses Funding formula Flat line high school graduates
