Breakout Session 2 -Running and Traumatic Brain Injury

advertisement

Body Weight Supported Treadmill

Training and Underwater Treadmill

Training

Gabriele Moriello morieg@sage.edu

Objectives

By the end of this presentation, you should be able to:

 summarize findings from research to retrain running in those with TBI

 outline the differences between land and water treadmill training

 describe two intervention approaches used to retrain running in those with brain injury

 understand potential outcomes following completion of such programs

Running vs. walking

 Stance phase <50%, Swing phase >50%

↑ velocity

↓ time in stance

 No period of double support

↑ joint excursions and joint speed

↑ eccentric muscle strength

 Forward propulsion more dependent upon swing leg

Biomechanical deviations

↑ cadence with ↓ stride length

↓ self-selected speed

↓ stance time

↓ float phases

↑ BOS and lateral

COM displacement

↑ knee flexion at initial contact

↑ knee extension at midstance

↑ knee flexion at push off

↓ ankle power generation at push off

↑ hip extensor power in early stance

Gavin Williams

http://www.epworth.org.au/Our-Services/rehabilitation/Pages/High-Level-Mobility-Running-Group.aspx

“The Running Group” (Epworth Hospital)

 Higher level mobility program to facilitate participation in social, leisure, sporting and employment roles

 High level mobility training (2x/week)

 General strength and cardiovascular fitness (3-

4x/week)

Williams & Morris (2009)

Program evaluation of “The Running

Group” (n=28)

 HiMAT scores increased from an average of

20.3 to 29.2

 No adverse events

Walking Walk backward

Walk on toes Walk over obstacle

Run Skipping

Hop forward (affected leg) Bound (more affected leg)

Bound (landing on less-affected leg) Up 14 stairs

Down 14 stairs

Other options

Biomechanical deviations are potentially associated with detrimental forces and balance impairments place people with TBI at higher risk for falls……..

Body Weight Supported Treadmill

Training (BWSTT)

Underwater Treadmill

Training (UWTT)

BWSTT vs UWTT

Body weight support

Reduction in ground reaction forces

Joint angles while running

BWSTT

Provides partial body weight support

Yes

Similar to land

Angular velocities while running

Postural control

Cardiovascular response

Thermal stress

Resistance

Sensory stimulation

11-22% less than land

YES

Same as land

No

No

UWTT

Provides partial body weight support

Yes

Different than BWSTT and land, especially at ankle and knee

35%-89% less than land

Yes

Increases function

Decreased

Yes

Yes

An in-depth look into our running therapy protocol

(BWSTT and UWTT)

Intervention

 Phase I (6 weeks)

 preparation for running

 Phase II (6 weeks)

 treadmill training using BWSTT or UWTT

 Phase III (3 weeks)

 carry over training

Phase I: Preparation for running

 Warm up (10 minutes)

 Balance training (15-20 minutes)

 Agility training (15-20 minutes)

 Core and extremity strengthening (15-20 minutes)

 Passive stretching

Warm up (10 minutes)

A. Walking or stationary bike

B. Dynamic stretching

Dynamic lunges

Hip pendulums

Balance training (15-20 minutes)

Agility exercises (15-20 minutes)

Agility exercises

Strengthening (20 minutes)

Passive stretching

www.googleimages

Phase II: Treadmill training

First day of the week

Two speed trials

- 1 min-2 min-1 min

Warm Up

- 5 minute slow walk

Second day of the week

One distance trial

- at a self-selected speed

Cool down

- 5 minute slow walk

Over ground running

BWSTT or UWTT

Phase III: Carry over training

 Running over ground

 Return to sport activities/agility exercises

Outcomes

BWSTT and UWTT

Case descriptions (n=9)

 Average age: late 20s

 5 female

 6 presented with left hemiplegia

 On average 5-6 years post-injury

 Ranchos Scale: ranged from 5-8

 All had impaired standing balance

Outcomes: Speed (m/sec)

BWSTT UWTT

Outcomes: Distance (meters)

UWTT

^

^MDC value >4

Outcomes: HiMAT

UWTT BWSTT

^

^

^

Outcomes

Improvements in strength

BWSTT

 Knee flexors

UWTT

 Hip extensors and abductors

 Ankle dorsiflexors and plantarflexors  Knee flexors and extensors

 Ankle plantarflexors

(↓ ankle dorsiflexors)

Lessons learned

 People with brain injury CAN run/jog!!!!!

 Need intensity and repetition!!!!!!

 Plasticity (even years later)

 Importance of continued activity beyond traditional rehabilitation

 Important to monitor vital signs due to possible autonomic disruption (and they are most likely deconditioned)

Transferring this protocol to the clinical setting

 Remember this was a research protocol!

 It is very intense

 Physically

 Time

 Use the protocol as a basic guideline

 Individualize the program to your patient

 Matthew Frear

 Kristin Seaburg

 Michelle Haller

 Alexandra Adams

 Andrea Belanger

 Jeffrey Collins

 Dereck Silverman

Alyssa Ingegni

Lydia Cable

Katie Stone

Matthew Van Slyke

Shi Feng Lin

Kaitlyn Kohlenberger

Erin Henderson

References

Brain Injury Association of America. TBI Incidence . Available at http://www.biausa.org/BIAUSA.ORG/word.files.to.pdf/good.pdfs/factsheets/TBIincidence.pdf.

Accessed 9/24/07.

Dikmen SS, Machamer MA, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med . 2003;84(10):1449-1457.

Farley CT, Ferris DP. Biomechanics of walking and running: Center of mass movements to muscle action . 1998. Available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~ferrisdp/Farley&Ferris,1998.pdf .

Accessed 9/29/07.

Moriello G, Frear M, Seaburg K. The recovery of running ability in an adolescent male after traumatic brain injury: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther . 2009;33(2):111-120.

Moriello G, Haller M, Adams A, Cable L, Stone K, Ingegni A. Running outcomes following an intensive exercise program in those with brain injury. Clinical Kinesiology (in press).

Moriello G, Haller M, Henderson E, Kohlenberger K, Lin SF, VanSlyke M. Running outcomes following an intensive balance, agility, strengthening and underwater treadmill training program for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A case series.

Neurology and Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Sections of the American Physical Therapy Association.

Exercise & physical activity guidelines based on best available evidence for individuals post stroke. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association.

Park SE, Lee MJ, Yoon BC et al. Comparison of underwater and overground preadmill walking exercise to improve gait and physical function in people after stroke. J Int Acad Phys Ther Res.

2012;1:120-125.

Rinne BR, Pasanen ME, Vartiainen MV, Lehto TM, Sarajuuri JM, Alaranta HT. Motor performance in physically well recovered men with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med.

2006;38:224-229.

References

Stevens s, Morgan DW. Underwater treadmill training in adults with incomplete spinal cord injuries. J

Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(7):vii-xi.

Thordarsen DB. Running biomechanics. Clin Sports Med . 1997;16(2):239-247.

Williams G, Goldie P. Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury. Brain

Inj . 2001;15(9):831-841.

Williams DP, Morris ME. High level mobility outcomes following acquired brain injury: A preliminary evaluation. Brain Inj . 2009;23(4):307-312.

Williams G, Schache AG. Evaluation of a conceptual framework for retraining high-level mobility following traumatic brain injury: two case reports. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 ; 25(3):164-172.

Williams G, Schache AG, Morris ME. Mobility after traumatic brain injury: relationship with ankle joint power generation and motor skill level. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012

Williams G, Schache AG, Morris ME. Self selected walking speed predicts ability to run following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012

Williams G, Schache AG, Morris ME. Running abnormalities after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj.

2013;27(4):434-443.

Wing JE. Effect of aquatic and body weight supported exercise on physiological and kinematic measures. Thesis. Utah State University. 2011.

Download