UNIVERSITY LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE Quality Enhancement Report Version 1 00 [edit version number as necessary] The following template should be used by the designated team to prepare the analysis of the relevant Quality Enhancement Report (QER). The analysis should take the form of action plans which indicate clearly where action must be taken by the faculty and where action must be taken by ULTAC. The initial version – to be labelled Version 1 00 – should be agreed by the team and then be used as the basis for discussion with the faculty. The final version – Version 2 00 – should incorporate any amendments arising from the meeting, including any correction of factual inaccuracy. The final version of the analysis must be submitted to the University Learning, Teaching and Assessment Committee in time for its May meeting. The objectives of the analysis, as agreed by ULTAC, are: to assist the faculty in identifying strengths, examples of good practice or innovation, to ensure dissemination within the faculty and across the University to ensure that areas for development have been identified and appropriate action identified to make appropriate recommendations to the faculty and/or ULTAC in the light of the above. In considering the QER, reference should be made to the previous year’s report and analysis, and action taken by the faculty in response. Reference should also be made to any internal or external reviews having taken place in that period which appear relevant. Faculty Date QER received by UQO QER Panel University Quality Officer Date of Meeting to agree Version 1 Date of meeting with Faculty Date of Version 2 (final analysis) to ULTAC Date final report sent to Faculty QER Team Analysis Action Plan <Faculty name insert here> Version 1 00 [Secretary: Edit Version number from 1 00 to 2 00 as necessary] ACTIONS RELATING TO AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS RELATING TO STRENGTHS, GOOD PRACTICE IDENTIFIED Faculty ULTAC The University team once again appreciated the collegiate and informative meeting (edit as necessary). Section 1 – Quality Enhancement 1a: Enhancement Indicators 2014/15 and current intended actions 1b: Enhancement theme 2014/15: methods of managing Quality and Standards ACTIONS RELATING TO AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS RELATING TO STRENGTHS, GOOD PRACTICE IDENTIFIED Faculty ULTAC Section 2: Assurance of quality and standards 2ai: QER monitoring 2aii: Periodic Review Monitoring 2aiii: NSS and Data Monitoring 2b: External Examiner reports 2bi: Good Practice 2bii: Areas for Development 2biii: Faculty comment on external examiner reports QER Team Analysis Action Plan <Faculty name insert here> Version 1 00 [Secretary: Edit Version number from 1 00 to 2 00 as necessary] 2c: Professional Statutory and Regulatory Bodies 2di: Unfair Means 2dii: Academic Appeals 2e: Student complaints 2f: Progression data and cohort analysis 2g: New and amended Codes of Practice 2h: Movement of provision from Scarborough to Hull campus ACTIONS RELATING TO AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS RELATING TO STRENGTHS, GOOD PRACTICE IDENTIFIED Faculty ULTAC Annexe 1: Updated Periodic Review Action Plans Annexe 2: Combined External Examiner Response Grids Annexe 3: PSRB Annexe 4: Unfair Means cases Annexe 5: Academic Appeals Annexe 6: Student Complaints Annexe 7: Annual Summaries of Issues Arising from JBoS QER Team Analysis Action Plan <Faculty name insert here> Version 1 00 [Secretary: Edit Version number from 1 00 to 2 00 as necessary] Any other annexe QER Team Analysis Action Plan <Faculty name insert here> Version 1 00 [Secretary: Edit Version number from 1 00 to 2 00 as necessary]