Groundwater Andy Sawyer Rob Sawyer State Water Resources Control Board Remy Moose Manley LLP Sierra Water Workgroup Workshop August 10, 2015 Photo: UC Div. of Ag. & Nat. Res. 1 2 3 The Nature of California’s Aquifers • • • Valley Fill Aquifers – Most of California’s Aquifers Loose or Semi-consolidated Sediments Filling Valleys between Mountains or Hills Bounded by Less Permeable Rock Groundwater (Water-saturated Sediments) Valley Fill Sediments Underlying Bedrock 5 Groundwater – Surface Water Connection “Gaining Stream” High Groundwater Levels Groundwater Maintains Stream Flow Groundwater – Surface Water Connection “Losing Stream” Pumping Lowers Groundwater Levels Stream Loses Flow to Groundwater Groundwater – Surface Water Connection “Losing Stream” Groundwater Levels Below Stream Channel Pumping Lowers Groundwater Levels Stream Loses Flow to Groundwater Groundwater – Surface Water Connection Dry Stream Seepage to Groundwater Exceeds Stream Flow Dry Stream Channel (Intermittently or Year-round) Pumping Lowers Groundwater Levels Stream Loses Flow to Groundwater Supply About 15 MAF pumped per year A third of California’s total supply in average year, greater during drought 80% of Californians rely on groundwater CA pumps more groundwater in a single year than the rest of the nation combined Net Stream Gain or Loss by Central Valley Region Historical and Status Quo Future Conditions Change in Central Valley Groundwater Storage 12 Photos: USGS Seawater Intrusion Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems Image: Groundwater Rights Source: USGS 16 English Common Law—Absolute Ownership “Each owner has an equal and complete right to the use of his land, and to the water which is in it. . . . [Groundwater] influences “are so secret, changeable and uncontroulable [sic], we cannot subject them to the regulations of law, nor build upon them a system of rules, as has been done with streams upon the surface.” (Roath v. Driscoll (1850) 20 Conn. 532, 540 [emphasis in original].) “The rule is well established that the principles of law which govern the right to waters flowing upon the surface of the earth are inapplicable to waters which are beneath its surface and percolate through the soil. The water which is held by the soil is a portion of the soil itself, and belongs to the owner of the land.” (Gould v. Eaton (1896) 111 Cal. 639, 644.) 17 Katz v. Walkinshaw (1903) 141 Cal. 116 Recognizing common law overlying and appropriative water rights Justice Lucien Shaw. Photo: Los Angeles County Bar Association 18 Hudson v. Dailey (1909) 156 Cal. 617, 627 Adopting the “common source” doctrine Justice Lucien Shaw. Photo: Los Angeles County Bar Association 19 20 Images: NASA 21 Paso Robles Groundwater Conflict Change in Paso Robles Groundwater Levels 1997 - 2013 Source: Paso Robles Groundwater Management Plan USGS, 2013 Poland, 1977 CWF, 2014 24 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Requires local basin plans for high- and mediumpriority basins Provides local management tools Allows state review and intervention Sets goals and deadlines 25 Bulletin 118 Groundwater Basins 26 High- and MediumPriority Basins 27 Establishing Groundwater Sustainability Agencies Local agency, or combination of agencies with coordination agreement Local agency election: Listed agencies with groundwater management powers get first dibs, but can elect not to. Counties are presumptively the agencies for “white spot” areas not within the area of another local agency that elects to manage, but the county may opt out CEQA applies to local agency formation New Local Management Tools Aligns local groundwater agencies with basin boundaries Authorizes agencies to: Register wells Measure extractions Require reports Manage extractions Assess Fees Local plans are exempt from CEQA Monetization • Authorizes agencies to: • Regulate and limit pumping allocations • Authorize leasing of pumping rights • Authorize sales of pumping rights • (Provided leases and sales are consistent with the sustainability plan.) • Water Code § 10726.4(a)(3) 30 Key dates for local agencies What is sustainable groundwater management? Managing groundwater during the 50-year planning horizon without causing “significant and unreasonable”: •Chronic lowering of groundwater levels •Reductions in storage •Seawater intrusion •Degradation of groundwater quality •Land subsidence •Surface water depletions The State Role 33 34 35 State Intervention 36 37 Follow-up Legislation? o o o o S.B. 13; A.B. 617 S.B. 20; S.B. 83 Adjudication Reform S.B. 220; A.B. 1390 Underground Storage A.B. 647 38 What About Areas Not Subject to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act? 39 Groundwater Andy Sawyer Rob Sawyer State Water Resources Control Board Remy Moose Manley LLP Sierra Water Workgroup Workshop August 10, 2015 Photo: UC Div. of Ag. & Nat. Res. 40 Questions? 41 Pumped Groundwater Basin Initial Level of Use High Capacity Wells Domestic Wells Ground Surface River Groundwater Level Recharge/Leakage from River Pumped Groundwater Basin Increased Level of Use New High Capacity Wells Stranded Domestic Wells Ground Surface River Increased Leakage from River Groundwater Level Pumped Groundwater Basin Increased Level of Use New Domestic Wells Must be Deeper Ground Surface River Increased Leakage from River Groundwater Level Pumped Groundwater Basin Even More Use More New Wells Ground Surface River Even More Leakage from River Groundwater Level Does the Public Trust Apply to Groundwate 46 Source: UCD 47 Scott River ELF v. State Water Board 49 In the Matter of the Water Use Permit Applications, Petitions for Interim Instream Flow Standard Amendments, and Petitions for Water Reservations for the Waiāhole Ditch Combined Contested Case Hearing (2000) 94 Hawai’i 97 [9 P.3d 409]. Waiāhole Stream Photo: Hawai’I Commission on Water Resource Management 50 Santa Teresa Citizen Action Group v. City of San Jose (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 689, 709 [The public trust doctrine has no application to groundwater where there is no threat to surface waterways.] Metcalf Energy Center. Photo: Calpine 51 National Audubon Society v. Superior Court (1983) 33 Cal.3d 419 Justice Allen E. Broussard. Photo: California Supreme Court Historical Society 52 A variant of the public trust doctrine applies to fish in non-navigable streams (California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control Board (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 585) Fishing in lower Rush Creek (1948) Photo: Elden Vestel 53