Using the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

advertisement

Using the

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) as a

Strategic Tool for Business Success

May 20, 2009

2nd WIPO Seminar on Intellectual Property and Creative Small and Medium-Sized

Enterprises in the Digital Environment

Matthew R. Bryan - Director, Patent Cooperation Treaty Legal Division, WIPO

1) What is the PCT?

2) The advantages of the PCT

3) Recent and future developments

1) What is the PCT?

Using the traditional patent system to seek international patent protection

(months) 0

File application locally

12

File applications abroad

Local patent application followed within 12 months by multiple foreign applications claiming priority under Paris Convention:

- multiple formality requirements

- multiple searches

- multiple publications

- multiple examinations and prosecutions of applications

- translations and national fees required at 12 months

Some rationalization because of regional arrangements:

ARIPO, EAPO, EPO, OAPI

• A mainly procedural international treaty facilitating certain steps in the process of obtaining patents internationally

• More specifically, the PCT establishes a procedure for the filing and processing of a single application for a patent which has legal effect in the countries which are Treaty members

• Simplifies the procedure for obtaining patent protection in many countries, making it more efficient and economical for:

(1) users of the patent system (applicants and inventors); and

(2) patent Offices

141 PCT States

=PCT

Albania

Algeria

Angola

Antigua and Barbuda

Armenia

Australia

Austria

Azerbaijan

Bahrain

Barbados

Belarus

Belgium

Belize

Benin

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Botswana

Brazil

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Cameroon

Canada

Central African Republic

Chad

Chile (2 June 09)

China

Colombia

Comoros

Congo

Costa Rica

Côte d'Ivoire

Croatia

Cuba

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Democratic People's

Republic of Korea

Denmark

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

Egypt

El Salvador

Equatorial Guinea

Estonia

Finland

France ,

Gabon

Gambia

Georgia

Germany

Ghana

Greece

Grenada

Guatemala

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Honduras

Hungary

Iceland

India

Indonesia

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Japan

Kazakhstan

Kenya

Kyrgyzstan

Lao People’s Dem Rep.

Latvia

Lesotho

Liberia

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Madagascar

Malawi

Malaysia

Mali

Malta

Mauritania

Mexico

Monaco

Mongolia

Montenegro

Morocco

Mozambique

Namibia

Netherlands

New Zealand

Nicaragua

Niger

Nigeria

Norway

Oman

Papua New Guinea

Peru (6 June 09)

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Republic of Korea

Republic of Moldova

Romania

Russian Federation

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

San Marino

Sao Tomé e Principe

Senegal

Seychelles

Sierra Leone

Singapore

Slovakia

Slovenia

South Africa

Spain

Sri Lanka

Sudan

Swaziland

St. Kitts and Nevis

Sweden

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Tajikistan

The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia

Togo

Trinidad and Tobago

Tunisia

Turkey

Turkmenistan

Uganda

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United Republic of Tanzania

United States of America

Uzbekistan

Viet Nam

Yugoslavia

Zambia

Zimbabwe

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

(months)

0

File local application

Typically a national patent application in the home country of the applicant

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 22

International search report

& written opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Enter national phase

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

(months)

0 12 16

International publication

18

File local application

File PCT application

International search report

& written opinion

Typically filed in same national patent office--one set of fees, one language, one set of formality requirements--and legal effect in all PCT States

22

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Enter national phase

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

(months)

0

File local application

12 16

International publication

18 22

File PCT application

International search report

& written opinion

Report on state of the art (prior art documents and their relevance) + initial patentability opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Enter national phase

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

The PCT International Searching Authorities

• Today: the Patent Offices of

– Australia

– Austria

– Canada

– China

– Finland

– Japan

– Republic of Korea

– Russian Federation

– Spain

– Sweden

– United States of America

– European Patent Office

– Nordic Patent Institute

• Soon: the Patent Offices of India and Brazil

(months)

0

File local application

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

Disclosing to world content of application in standardized way

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 22

International search report

& written opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Enter national phase

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

(months)

0

File local application

Enter national phase

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 22

International search report

& written opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Request an additional patentability analysis on basis of amended application

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

(months)

0

File local application

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 22

International search report

& written opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

28

Enter national phase

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

Additional patentability analysis, designed to assist in national phase decisionmaking

The PCT System

--typical use, in more detail

Express intention and take steps to pursue to grant in various states

(months)

0

File local application

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 22

International search report

& written opinion

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

Enter national phase

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

10.02.05

General remarks on the PCT system (1)

• The PCT system is a patent “filing” system, not a patent

“granting” system. There is no “PCT patent” or “global patent”

• The decision on granting patents is made exclusively by national or regional Offices in the national phase

• Only inventions may be protected via the PCT by applying for patents, utility models and similar titles

• Design and trademark protection cannot be obtained via the

PCT. There are separate international conventions dealing with these types of industrial property protection (the Hague

Agreement and the Madrid Agreement and Protocol, respectively)

General remarks on the PCT system (2)

• The PCT is administered by WIPO as are other international conventions in the field of industrial property, such as the Paris

Convention

• PCT signed in June 1970, in Washington, D.C., and became operational in June 1978 with 18 States

PCT Statistics

180000

160000

140000

120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0

78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

International applications received in 2008 by country of origin

60'000

50'000

40'000

30'000

20'000

10'000

0

US JP DE KR FR CN GB NL SE CH CA IT FI AU IL

WIPO’s Revenue 2008/09

76%

15%

1%2%

6%

Member States

PCT System

Madrid Sytem

Hague System

Other

(2) Why use the PCT?: its advantages

Most businesses worldwide which seek and use patents share objectives to:

1) control costs while preserving options

2) make informed business decisions

3) use the best tools available when seeking protection

The PCT responds to these objectives

The PCT, as the cornerstone of the international patent system, provides a worldwide system for simplified filing and processing of patent applications, which--

1. postpones the major costs associated with internationalizing a patent application

2. provides a strong basis for patenting decisions

3. harmonizes formal requirements

4. brings the world within reach

5. protects applicant from certain inadvertent errors

6. evolves to meet user needs

7. is used by the world’s major corporations, universities and research institutions when they seek international patent protection

8. allows applicants to apply securely and easily online, and to save money by doing so

1. Postpones the major costs associated with internationalizing a patent application

Traditional

(months)

0

File local application

PCT

(months)

0

File local application

Traditional patent system

Fees for:

--translations

--Office fees

--local agents vs.

PCT system

File applications abroad

12

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18

International search report & written opinion

22

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

28

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

30

Fees for:

--translations

--Office fees

--local agents

Enter national phase

PCT Costs--in perspective

According to IP Global Estimator, the total cost of hypothetical application

(RO/US, ISA/EP, 46 pages/12 claims w/3 independent, national phase in AU, CA, EPO, JP, MX, US, and EP validation in DE, FR, GB, IT, NL & SE, + maintenance fees--from filing until expiration of 12 national phase patents at 20 years from the filing date) would be USD $232,742

The PCT filing fees, including the international search by the EPO,

(total: USD $3,637) represented 1.6% of what the PCT applicant could expect to pay throughout the full life of this patent family

If the payment of annual maintenance fees is eliminated from the above calculation, the total amount that the applicant would expect to pay to see his/her patents granted is reduced to USD $86,398.

PCT filing fees would then represent 4.2% of this amount

[Estimate date: July 1, 2007]

2. Provides a strong basis for patenting decisions

The PCT International Searching Authorities

• The active ISAs are the following patent offices:

– Australia

– Austria

– Canada

– China

– Finland

– Japan

– Republic of Korea

– Russian Federation

– Spain

– Sweden

– United States of America

– European Patent Office

– Nordic Patent Institute

• Appointed but not yet acting are the Offices of India and Brazil

Example: international search report

Symbols indicating which aspect of patentability the document cited is relevant to (for example, novelty, inventive step, etc.)

Documents relevant to whether or not your invention may be patentable

The claim numbers in your application to which the document is relevant

Example: written opinion of the ISA

Reasoning supporting the assessment

Patentability assessment of claims

3. Harmonizes formal requirements

PCT Applicant’s Guide, paragraph 26: “There is a prescribed form for the international application. This form must be accepted by all designated Offices for the purposes of the national phase, so that there is no need to comply with a great variety of widely differing formal requirements in the many countries in which protection may be sought.”

PCT Article 27(1): “No national law shall require compliance with requirements relating to the form or contents of the international application different from or additional to those which are provided for in this Treaty and

Regulations.”

4. Brings the world within reach

How?

PCT application = Legal effect of a regular national patent application in all PCT States

5. protects applicants from certain inadvertent errors

• invited corrections of defects & fee payments

• non-competent receiving Office

• double formality review

• restoration of priority

• missing parts

• rectification of obvious mistakes

• excuse of national phase entry delay

6. Evolves to meet user needs

PCT Meetings

(1) MIA meeting —annual (usually first quarter)

(2) PCT Working Group —annual (usually second quarter)

(3) PCT Assembly —September/October

(4) Conferences —for example:

“PCT China”—Beijing, December 2007

“PCT Asia”—Singapore, April 2008

“PCT for the Americas”—Miami, November 2008

7. Is used by the world’s major corporations, universities and research institutions when they seek international patent protection

Top PCT Applicants (2008)

1.

Huawei

—CN (1737)

2.

Panasonic

—JP (1729)

3.

Philips

—NL (1551)

4.

Toyota

—JP (1364)

5.

Bosch

—DE (1273)

6.

Siemens

—DE (1089)

7.

Nokia

—FI (1005)

8.

LG Electronics

—KR (992)

9.

Ericsson

—SE (984)

10.

Fujitsu

—JP (983)

11.

Qualcomm

—US (907)

12.

NEC

—JP (825)

13.

Sharp

—JP (814)

14.

Microsoft

—US (805)

15.

Motorola — US (778)

16.

BASF —DE (721)

17.

IBM —US (664)

18.

3M —US (663)

19.

Samsung —KR (639)

20.

Dupont

—US (517)

Of the top 100 companies using the PCT system in

2008, 38 were from the United States,

28 from Japan and

13 from Germany

Other PCT users

Hitachi (JP)

British Telecom (GB)

MCI (US)

AT&T (US)

Boeing (US)

Nestle (CH) Shell (NL)

Novartis (CH)

Colgate Palmolive (US)

L’Oreal (FR) Salomon (FR)

Rhone Poulenc (FR)

Elf (FR)

CNRS (FR) Hoechst (US y DE)

Glaxo (GB)

Leica (CH)

McDonnell Douglas (US)

MIT (US)

University of Texas (US)

CalTech (US)

Johns Hopkins(US)

Daimler Benz (DE)

Volvo (SE)

Ford (US)

Nissan (JP)

Renault (FR)

Honda (JP)

Kawasaki (JP)

University of Michigan (US)

Columbia University (US)

Wisconsin Alumni Research

Foundation (US)

University of Florida (US)

Stanford University (US)

8. apply securely and easily online, and save money by doing so

PCT Electronic filing overview

1. Prepare application body: in XML using the

PCT-SAFE Editor or in PDF

2. Prepare Request using free, WIPO-produced PCT-

SAFE software

5. Receive a receipt (for online filings)

010101

0

101010

1

Signat

010101

0 ure

3. Electronically sign: WIPO

Customer digital certificate or other

4. Transmit (online or on CD-R)

PCT E-filing fee reductions

100 Swiss francs: paper filings request printout created with PCT-SAFE diskette prepared with PCT- SAFE

100 Swiss francs: electronic filings request not in character coded format (for ex., PDF)

200 Swiss francs: electronic filings text of application not in character coded format (for example, PDF)

300 Swiss francs: electronic filings text of application in character coded format (for example, XML)

(3) Recent and future developments

2009 PCT Developments

• SIS (Supplementary International Search) effective January 1,

2009

The PCT System:

Supplementary International Search

(months)

0

File local application

12

File PCT application

16

International publication

18 19

22

Supplementary

Search Reports established

28

Enter national phase

30

International search report

& written opinion

Request for

Supplementary

International

Search

(optional)

File demand for

International preliminary examination

(optional)

International preliminary report on patentability

Supplementary International Search: Objectives

• give applicants option to request one or more supplementary (language-based) searches from participating ISAs in addition to the main PCT search

• help users by reducing likelihood of new prior art in national phase

• takes into account the growing linguistic diversity in the prior art

2009 PCT Developments

• SIS (Supplementary International Search) effective January 1,

2009

– First requests have been filed

– 3 offices participating thus far

Supplementary International Search: Authorities

• Participation of ISAs

– NPI—Jan. 1, 2009

– RU—Jan. 1, 2009

– SE—Jan. 1, 2009—limitation to 1000 Supp. Searches/year

– AT—sometime in 2009

– AU—under consideration, but not as of Jan. 1, 2009

– BR—not yet decided

– CA—no intention to offer in near future

– CN—under consideration

– EPO—planned for Jan. 1, 2010, limited ìnitially to several 100s/year and increased if needed up to several 1000s/year by 2013

– ES—no intention

– FI—planned for Jan. 1, 2010

– IN—unknown

– JPO—no intention

– KR—under consideration

– US—no intention in near future due to workload

Recent PCT developments

• SIS (Supplementary International Search) effective January

1, 2009

• 1 July 2009 Rule changes

– new practice on furnishing claim amendments (“complete set”)

– Administrative Instruction/practice changes on sequence listings

Things we’re working on

• Private file inspection

– Document upload system pilot

• Furnishing priority documents via digital libraries

– Digital Access Service for priority documents

• Email of IB notifications to applicants

• PCT distance learning course

• PCT webinars for the user community

• New resources for PCT applicants

• Multilingual terminology resources

• PatentScope ® enhancements

– Full file contents will be available for IAs filed on or after 1

Jan. 2009

– National phase entry data now for 34 countries

Where to get help

• For further information about the PCT, see http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/

• For general questions about the PCT, contact the PCT

Information Service at:

Telephone: (+41-22) 338 83 38

Facsimile: (+41-22) 338 83 39

E-mail: pct.infoline@wipo.int

PatentScope

®

Questions?

Download