Non-contact air-coupled velocity measurements in planar samples Qiang LIU1,2,Bogdan PIWAKOWSKI2,Zoubeir LAFHAJ1 1. Laboratoire de Mécanique de Lille (LML, UMR CNRS 8107), Ecole Centrale de Lille 2. Institut d’Electronique, Microélectronique et Nanotechnologies (IEMN UMR 8520), Ecole Centrale de Lille 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials OUTLINE I. II. III. IV. V. Context and goal Contact methods Non-contact methods Experimental results Conclusions 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 2 Context and goal 1. Necessity to mesure velocity. 2. Traditional methods are contact type. 3. We have developed a non-contact air-coupled system in order to: a) Avoid coupling medium; b) Avoid surface preparation; c) Enable the automation of measurement. Objective: To measure velocities by using non-contact air-coupled technique with good accuracy. 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 3 Contact methods 1. Pulse-echo: Transmitter/Receiver Need of coupling meduim Need of planar contact surface d 1st Nth Δt 2. Through-transmission: Δt Δt 1st Transmitter Nth V Receiver 2d t d 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 4 Immersion method Water Receiver Transmitter Water Receiver Transmitter d VL 16/03/2016 d t p tw d Vw d t pw d Vw The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 5 Non-contact air-coupled method Air Receiver Transmitter Air Receiver Transmitter 0.01% d 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 6 Two problems: The immersion solutions developed for water cannot be applied directly for air because: •The velocity in air is unstable, so it is better not to use velocity in air for the computation of velocity in sample. •The transmission coefficient is too small to allow the emitted energy penetrate into the sample, so it is necessary to apply techniques which improve the signal level. 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 7 « Chirp» signal A A Transmitter Receiver A t t T Correlation s (t ) A sin( 2ft ) sin[ 2f (t )t ] f (t ) f min at t (0, T ) 400 200 0 -200 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 time [s] 0.008 0.01 k (0) S A2 BT NB S 16/03/2016 N A2T The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 8 Experimental setup Power Amplifier PC Motor control Generator: Generation of chirp; Memory card: Acquisition of signal; LabView: Correlation. Movements in x, y ,z directions; Pre Amplifier Receiver Transmitter z Motor control z y y PC x x Amplifier 16/03/2016 Transmitter Receiver The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 9 Calibration Receiver Before calibration Transmitter Beam axis L y After calibration Receiver Transmitter Beam axis L y 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 10 Receiver Transmitter 2 1 ΔL L1 L2 y Vair The moving direction of receiver First step: Calculation of Vair L2 L1 L ta 2 ta1 ta (1) ta1 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 11 Receiver d Transmitter The moving direction of receiver Second step: Calculation of VL 1 2 3 y L 1 2 Δtp Δtp Δtp VL _ Multiple VL _ Direct tp1 16/03/2016 2d t p (2) d t p1 ta d Vair d t pa The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials d (3) Vair 12 Receiver d Transmitter The moving direction of receiver Second step: Calculation of VL 1 2 3 y L 1 2 Δtp Δtp Δtp VL _ Multiple VL _ Direct tp1 16/03/2016 2d t p (2) d t p1 ta d Vair d t pa The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials d (3) Vair 13 Third step : Calculation of VT Receiver Transmitter β α tan The incident angle should greater than the first critical angel and less than the second critical angle. Δy y 2 d cos αc1<α<αc2 y 1 2 Δy VT _ Mutiple Δts VT _ Direct 2d y tan (ts 2 ts1 ) cos Vair d d cos( ) / cos (ts1 ta ) cos Vair VT _ Shift Vair ts1 16/03/2016 ts2 sin sin (4) (5) (6) The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 14 Validation with Plexiglas plate Comparing with the velocity obtained by contact method we find: 1. For longitudinal velocity, the ‘Multiple’ approach is more precise than the ‘Direct’ approach, because the velocity in air isn’t used here. As well the standard error of ‘Multiple’ approach is smaller. 2. For shear velocity, the results of ‘Multiple’ and ‘Shift’ approaches are also more precise than the ‘Direct’ approach. 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 15 Results obtained with porous material : mortar sample Our conclusions are confirmed with a mortal sample. Comparing with contact approach: 1. For longitudinal velocity, our ‘Multiple’ approach produces only 0.7% error while the ‘Direct’ approach produces 43.8% error. 2. For shear velocity, our ‘Multiple’ approach provides only 26.5% error, Shift’ approach provides 2.3% error white the ‘Direct’ approach produces 38.3% error. 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 16 Conclusions 1. ‘Direct’ approach, comes from immersion method, and commonly used in non-contact air-coupled technique gives always a high error when compares it with contact method. 2. ‘Multiple’ approach for longitudinal velocity and ‘Shift’ approach for shear velocity provide higher accuracy which is comparable with the contact method. 3. Non-contact air-coupled method has great potential for the rapid measurements of velocity in ‘difficult’, porous, rough surface materials, such as concrete. 4. The proposed approach can be easily automated and used in high speed automatic NDT systems. 16/03/2016 The 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials 17 Thank you for you attention! 16/03/2016 18