WOUNDS AND SCARS IN AMPUTEES AN OVERVIEW SANZIDA HOQUE SENIOR INPATIENT REHABILITATION PHYSIOTHERAPIST NEPEAN HOSPITAL AIM Improve understanding of wound healing and scar formation Improve knowledge of possible complications in amputee wound healing and better recognition and management of these Learn and clarify the best practices for wound healing and scar management in amputee care OVERVIEW Pathophysiology of wound healing and scar formation Complications with wound healing Wound management in amputees Scar management in the amputee population WOUND HEALING Complex process Basic outline in 3 phases 1 = Inflammatory Usually 2- 5 days Hemostasis achieved through vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation and clot formation by the thromboplastin Vasodilation and phagocytosis leads to inflammation WOUND HEALING contd 2 = Proliferative phase Varies 2 days to 3 weeks Granulation occurs with formation of new collagen and capillaries and the cicatrix reddens during this period Wound edges pull together/ contraction occurs Epithelialization occurs as the epithelial cells crosses the moist surface and forms a barrier between the wound and environment WOUND HEALING contd 3 = Remodelling phase 3 weeks to 2 years Collagen remodels to better resist strain Reduction in vascularisation with the cicatrix whitening WOUND HEALING contd 2 types of healing primary and secondary Primary healing usually seen in surgical wounds causes minimum tissue damage with minimal inflammation and demand on tissue Secondary healing is when an open area remodels with granulation tissue and a thin layer of epithelium. Usually slower and forms scars with high risk of infection and adherences SCAR FORMATION 13% of BKA and 2% of AKA have adherent scars Scars are influenced by 3 factors: Surgical technique Post op care Skin type SCAR FORMATION contd Scar formation is a normal part of the healing process Composed of fibrous tissue In the remodelling phase a scar thins by the process of collagen lysis exceeding the rate of collagen deposition Hypertrophic or keloid scars formed when this alters SCAR FORMATION contd HYPERTROPHIC SCAR Raised, thick, rough, red and irregular, remains within the limits of the original wound. More in dark skin and deeper wounds KELOID SCARS Thick, puckered, itchy cluster of scar tissue that grows beyond the edges of the wound. The scar can also be very nodular Keloid scarring occurs due to the continuous multiplication of fibroblasts even after the wound is closed WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS Factors that influence wound healing in amputees are nutrition, age, smoking, old grafts, co morbidities (diabetes, anaemia, renal failure), inappropriate level selection, inadequate post op management, infection and the technical precision of the surgeon WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd Common complications include: 70% poor healing/ infection 20% poorly fashioned stump 10% phantom limb pain Types of complications include: Infection Tissue necrosis Pain Dehiscence Surrounding skin problems Bone erosion/ osteomyelitis Haematoma oedema WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd INFECTION MRSA Cellulitis Increases amount of exudate → breakdown of suture line → wound dehiscence and tissue necrosis RX: antibiotic, control BSL, debridement, wound cleansing, frequent dressing changes, silver/ iodine dressings WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd TISSUE NECROSIS Caused by poor tissue perfusion Dusky, purple, gangrene, sloughy tissue, cold and painful RX: Debridement (larval therapy vs. surgery) WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd PAIN Incisional stump pain vs. phantom pain Can be caused by infection, depression, increased pressure in cast, necrosis RX: opiates, NSAIDs, local anaesthetics, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, TENS, massage/ touch WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd DEHISCENCE Can be caused by trauma, too early removal of sutures, stump swelling increasing tension on wound RX: VAC system, absorbent hydro fibre/ alginate dressings, surgery to explore, excise and close wound WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd SURROUNDING SKIN PROBLEMS Blistering is caused by reduced elasticity in dressing and increased oedema dermatitis RX: Use non adhesive/ low adhesive dressing, do not use tape WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd BONE EROSION/ OSTEOMYELITIS Bone erosion can occur if the mm retracts over the stump or if wound is dehisced and increases the risk of osteomyelitis Infected sinuses RX: Surgical intervention, antibiotics, alginate/ hydro fibre dressings WOUND HEALING COMPLICATIONS contd HAEMATOMA Collection of blood increases tension in wounds RX: Surgical debridement, often automatic drainage STUMP OEDEMA Common due to vascular insufficiency and fluid retention RX: Elevate, stump supports, VAC, elastic stump socks, plaster casts (RD/ RRD) WOUND MANAGEMENT No overall consensus about wound dressing to optimise healing Primary goal should be to protect the wound, promote healing and reduce complications (eg. Infection) Wounds does not mean NWB. WB can help control oedema and facilitate healing Repeated inspection and modification of treatment is important and decisions should be made based on the progression/ lack of progression/ worsening of the wound Type of dressing influences wound healing. Dressings with better pain management, oedema control improves healing WOUND MANAGEMENT contd Non adhesive Silver coated Alginate Hydro fibre WOUND MANAGEMENT contd OVERVIEW OF EACH TYPE OF DRESSING RD/ RRD WOUND MANAGEMENT contd RD/ RRD ADVANTAGES Limits/ reduces oedema May attach a foot/ pylon allowing early WB and gait training Earlier time to prosthetic fitting with better wound healing and volume control Wound inspection possible with RRD Knee flexion contracture prevention in RD Stump protection from trauma (falls) DISADVANTAGES Specialist skill/ therapist required for application Close monitoring required and often not possible with RD Can be heavy and affect bed mobility WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SEMI-RIGID DRESSINGS WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SEMI RIGID DRESSINGS Air splint Paste (zinc oxide and calamine) Thermoplastic E.g. polyethylene (figure above) ADVANTAGES e.g. Unna Boot Better volume control than soft dressings Can be used with pylon and foot for early mobilisation (IPOP and EPOP) DISADVANTAGES Off the shelf, may become loose does not protect from trauma as not rigid Air splint does not completely conform like RDs WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SILICONE LINERS WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SILICONE LINERS ADVANTAGES Provides compression Smooths scar Can allow early prosthetic use with the liner DISADVANTAGES Sweat Needs to be washed daily Minimal protection against trauma WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SOFT DRESSINGS WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SOFT DRESSINGS SHRINKERS, ELASTIC BANDAGES ADVANTAGES Low cost Washable Easy to don/ doff Easy to monitor wound DISADVANTAGES May slip off Slower healing, longer hospital stay Elastic bandage can be inconsistent with application causing pressure problems WOUND MANAGEMENT contd SCAR MANAGAMENT Prevention is better than treatment Limited literature Only RCT/ CT on silicone and corticosteroids Not specific to the amputee population Other recommendations are low level expert advice SCAR MANAGEMENT SURGICAL CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION Ultrasound, hot packs, wax, to increases tissue extensibility SILICONE GEL SHEETING Stretches tight collagen, results inconclusive, used in burns HEAT THERAPY Liquid nitrogen to affect cell microvasculature, flattens scars in 51- 74% of cases COMPRESSION Flattening of scars seen in 57- 83% of cases CRYOTHERAPY Inhibits protein synthesis, diminishes tissue deposition and softens scars LASER THERAPY Tension releasing or excision, has a high risk of reoccurrence when not used in conjunction with corticosteroid and silicon gel sheeting Good evidence with 8 RCTs PHARMACOLOGICAL NSAIDs, Antihistamines, Interferons SCAR MANAGEMENT contd MASSAGE Commonly used with amputees no RCT/ CT found Recommended 5- 10 min 3-4 times/ day Decreases oedema Breaks down scar tissue blocks Increases capillary proliferation and healing Assists desensitisation Re hydrates scar tissue (use of vitamin E cream is mentioned but no evidence) REFERENCES “Wound healing complications associated with lower limb amputation” Harker J. (2006) “Phases of wound healing” Fishman T. D. (1995) “Stump management after trans-tibial amputation: A systematic review” Nawijn et al. (2005) Prosthetics and orthotics international “Early treatment of trans-tibial amputees: Retrospective analysis of early fitting and elastic bandaging” Van Velzen et al. (2005) Prosthetics and orthotics international “Silicon gel sheeting for preventing and treating hypertrophic and keloid scars” O’Brien L. and Pandit A. (2007) Cochrane database of systematic reviews “Musculoskeletal complications in amputees: Their prevention and management” Bovvker et al. chapter 25, Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles “A clinical evaluation of stumps in lower limb amputees” Pohjolainen T. (1991) Prosthetics and orthotics international REFERENCES contd “Adherent cicatrix after below-knee amputation” Lilja M and Johansson T. (1993) Journal of prosthetics and orthotics “The use of silicone liners in early prosthetic rehabilitation. A pilot trial” Anandan P. (2003) orthotic and prosthetic services Tasmania “Stump ulcers and continued prosthetic limb use” Salawu et al. (2006) Prosthetics and orthotics international “A primer on ace wrapping and other compressive and protective dressings for the amputated residual limb” Highsmith J. “Healing of open stump wounds after vascular below-knee amputation: plaster cast socket with silicone sleeve vs. elastic compression” Vigier et al. (1999) American congress of rehabilitation medicine…. “International clinical recommendations on scar management” Mustoe et al. (2001) http://www.amputee-coalition.org/military-instep/wound-skincare.html “Scar management” Naude L. (2006) Wound Care