DIANA
THE ABDUCITON
RANIA ALAMMAR
2 – The Princess' Situation after the Accident:
Was the Princess in a dangerous condition and unconscious after the incident?
The Princess was in a dangerous condition:
In (2) p 384, the writer speaks about the state of the pulse and said that the first
doctor on the scene was Frederic Mailliez who said he noted that the pulse is
weak and fast and that he tried to help her breathe.
In (2) p 384, Paget report said that the Princess was barely conscious.
In (2) p 388, Dr. Jean-Marc Martino says in the ambulance he registered a decline
in blood pressure, which is a sign of internal bleeding.
In (2) p 389-390, Dr. Martino, the ambulance doctor, tells that Diana suffered a
heart attack when pulled out of the Mercedes.
The Princess was in poor but not dangerous condition:
In (2) p 384, Philip Boyer from the Fire Service said that "her pulse was normal
and strong" and "her breathing was normal."
In (2) p 384, Sebastian Dorzee a policeman who supported the Princess at the
scene said she was conscious, as well as his fellow Xavier Gourmelon and the
ambulance SAMU Dr. Jean-Marc Martino.
In (2) p 385, Diana was talking.
In (2) p 388, Philip Boyer of the Fire Service watched the vital functions and did
not see a decrease in blood pressure (if there was internal bleeding the blood
pressure supposed to be a sign since she was under Boyer's control and not only
upon receipt of Dr. Martino on her, knowing that Paget report did not interrogate
and ignored Philip Boyer).
In (2) p 389-390, the ambulance driver Michel Massebeuf in his testimony of the
Princess being taken out from the Mercedes, does not describe or mention
anything about cardiac arrest (Paget report ignored his testimony.)
Comment:
It is clear that doctors Jean-Marc Martino, Frederic Mailliez and Paget report
had a role in giving an exaggerated picture and inaccurate on the condition of the
Princess immediately after the incident, the evidence is that the testimonies of
others who said the opposite were ignored, while Paget report focused on the
negative image of the medical condition.
Page
2
The idea of the writer John Morgan and many writers and investigators is that
Diana was killed in a slow murder from the start on the hands of Dr. Mailliez,
Martino and those with them in the ambulance like Dr. Arnaud Derossi through
some of the measures that have contributed in her death.
The following points are about some of what happened immediately after the
incident, which shows a suspicious medical treatment on the Princess. They did
not revive her to a good condition, yes, but also did not kill her, and inevitably
they kept her alive in all the stages in which they could have killed her:
In (2) p 383, the writer says that the policeman Sebastian Dorzee, who
supported the Princess at the scene, was requested to keep the Princess in the
state of consciousness. So he talked with her and checked the pulse of the neck
until she was received by a specialist medical team.
The people in charge of the conspiracy who studied all the aspects of the crime
intended to be, why let the firefighters order the policeman Derozee to keep her
conscious?
In (2) p 394, the writer here accused the doctors of neglecting to notice the
internal bleeding signs, which the low blood pressure is one of them, especially
after the alleged cardiac arrest. Since the fact of the cardiac arrest, that occurred
in 12:48 when Diana was pulled out of the wreckage of the car is questionable,
for it is only claimed by Martino with a weak testimony from the driver of the
ambulance, who cannot remember if this happened here or in 1:20 while being
transported to the emergency vehicle, and because she was conscious and
talking, then why the writer at p. 394 accuses the doctors of neglecting her
suggesting that the cardiac arrest is the cause of death?
Here the author is trying to condemn the accused with something the accused
himself has lied about, and the accused is contradicted and known to be a liar for
his descriptions of the medical condition. Is it because these descriptions are not
truthful, and the internal bleeding was not deadly serious and that is why she
was alive that night?
The writer mentions an important information about the lack of any details on
the status of the wound in the pulmonary artery.
In (4) p 436, description from several witnesses, before the arrival of the
ambulance, of Diana as being good and was talking and moving a little. One of
them said, "I can see that she was only wounded because she was moving".
Policeman Dorzee said "she moved, her eyes were open, speaking to me in a
foreign language, I think she said, my God" and also he said "Diana seemed in
better shape than the rest who were with her in the Mercedes."
Page
3
Diana was conscious, and all these witnesses and their words were ignored by
the judge Scott Baker in the case in 2008 and even in the Paget report in 2006
except for the Dr. Frederic Mailliez who testified that she was unconscious after
the incident, but Paget report did not interview him and only took his words
from the French investigation of 1997.
In (4) in 439_ 449, the writer is skeptical of all the words of Dr Mailliez, and
proved that he changes his testimonies most of the time. One of the things is that
Dr. Mailliez portrayed the medical condition of Diana much worse than in reality,
in terms of awareness and speech.
However, we must not forget that he also said that she seemed not hopeless and
have a chance to survive. Then why the writer focused on the negative aspects of
his words though suspicious?
Question: As the author asserts that Mailliez is suspicious and part of the
conspiracy himself, then why didn’t he kill Diana directly? By injection or
anything during his claimed treatment on her. Though a little, but does not what
he did like giving oxygen, contributed in making sure of her survival? And what
about the reason for his fast departure while she was still alive?
Was it not obvious that his role was to deliver her alive to the following parties,
at the same time gives the impression to the media of the Princess' serious
condition? Like putting poison in the honey.
In (4) p 451-453, the writer here wonders why neither Dr. Frederic Mailliez nor
the fire service after him, measured the blood pressure that was possible to give
a quick sign of internal bleeding?
Yet, we do not forget at the same time the policeman Sebastian Dorzee said that
he was requested to keep her awake and not let her fall asleep.
The writer wondered why doctors did not attend with the fire service though
they should be the first responders to the scene to rescue the injured? And why
there was a significant neglect in the initiative treatment of Diana? And why
pulling her out of the car wreckage took so much time? And why they stood
waiting for the SAMU ambulance?
In short, the author says that it is clear that there are orders not to treat Diana,
which suggests to us the intention of eliminating her.
Again like my question about Mailliez, Why did not they simply kill her at the
scene, while they were all gathered around her and had all the tools to do so in a
quiet and medical manner?
Page
4
Their concern and waiting for the SAMU because their intention was to kidnap
and not murder her. She is delivered to others as well to keep it low and save her
while appeared to be neglecters.
In (4) p 454-461, it is clear that Dr. Martino was tasked to control the
surrounded circumstances and was not actually very interested in remedying
Diana as required.
Doesn't that suggests the existence of a state of contentment about the medical
condition that she would not die at all?
If the writer wanted to say the reverse and the reason for the delayed treatment
is because they wanted to kill her, my thoughts goes to that all conditions were
available to kill her faster in the tunnel.
The writer also said that Martino lied when he contacted the center of SAMU to
give a report on the patient's condition where Martino said that the injury does
not exceed an injury in the arm, while in another statement to the French police
he gave a description that suggests more wounds and the possibility of an
internal injury.
I agree with the writer that Martino lied, but what he lied about may be the
contrary. I mean that the second description is kind of true but very much
exaggerated and the first is correct because she was really fine and didn't look in
a very bad condition. He lied more to the police than to the SAMU, and that
exaggerated description complies with the exaggeration of Dr. Mailliez about her
status, as the writer says that they both are suspicious. All this confirms my
belief that the slow process of treatment was because she did not really look in a
serious condition to such a degree.
Then why Martino requested additional ambulance car since the case given in
principle (injured arm) does not need another car? My answer about this action
is that it is a ratification to my opinion which says that all of this was just to give
an exaggerated picture of the Princess being in a very serious condition and
needed another ambulance.
The writer said that the initial report on the state of Diana about just an injury
in the arm does not make SAMU rush in a state of emergency, which gave
Martino the control over the atmosphere in the tunnel. This meaning of speech is
contrary to the fact that they already sent a SAMU after all in few minutes which
is true. I think that there is exaggeration in the reaction rate for the given medical
description.
In (4) p 478 – 481, the writer here mentions the lies and exaggerations of
Martino. Martino said that when he took Diana out of the Mercedes she suffered
a heart attack, prompting him to perform a medical massage on the chest and the
Page
5
pulse did not beat again until more than 2 minutes. On the other hand, the writer
mentions certificates from two different experts that the situation was not as
described. these certificates shows that Diana’s heart was sound at that time, but
the pulse was not clear for seconds because of her position in the car, where her
legs were high for a long period of time, and that makes the blood circulation in
abnormal condition and affects the heart and its pump of blood. This requires
only modifying her position or make her lie down comfortably and clicking on
the chest.
The author says that when Martino contacted the ambulance center SAMU
describing only an arm injury, but later on he exaggerated in the description of a
heart attack and a medical massage, then her (Diana) coming back to life after
more than about two minutes. All this made Martino successful not to alert the
medical center in terms of sending more assistance and ambulances. Also, he has
succeeded in preparing the excuse from the beginning that if Diana dies then it is
because of the very bad condition of her heart.
My comment on this point is that they portrayed the situation as so bad in order
to draw a picture that death was not escapable while they actually kept her alive.
We notice that despite Martino's description of a simple injury the ambulance
center responded with more than one ambulance. In addition, the writer did not
mention that the initial report to the SAMU, which stated only that the patient
was wounded in the arm was made in 12:43 while the claim of a cardiac arrest
was at 1:00 when she was pulled out of the car. That means there is a difference
in time, and they already went on alert before even getting the information of the
cardiac arrest and sent her two ambulance cars with doctors, one of them is Dr.
Arnaud Derossi. I think this type of alert cannot be denied.
Then the second interpretation of the author of Martino being successful in
preparing the excuse from the beginning that if Diana died then it is because her
heart was in a very bad condition, is true Yes, but not to let her die as a fact,
otherwise they have had all the means and time to kill her quietly at the time, but
rather to draw a false picture of murder and death.
In (4) p 490-491, the writer says that the initial report Martino gave to the
ambulance base in which he described the situation of Diana to be just injured in
the arm, gave him a chance to control the conditions and assure the SAMU base
that Diana is not in a critical condition. In that way he wouldn’t be bothered by
constant communion and would have the opportunity not to update the contact
with them. The writer also says that in addition to the slow journey from Necker
hospital, which the ambulance came from, to the Alma tunnel scene. All of the
above enabled Martino to keep Diana in the position where she was being seated
in the car with her feet pulled up that led to the lack of clarity of the pulse. The
writer stresses that Martino did all this with a confirmed knowledge and thus all
Page
6
of the above excuses him to perform intubation and ventilation. In short, the
writer wants to say that all the above was a deliberate intention to kill Diana.
First, how is it possible the one who put the whole plan knew that Diana would
inevitably be seated in the harmful position described in the car and thus put all
those steps for Martino to act based on its method of treatment?
Moreover, the conspirators had many chances to kill Diana, but they did not do it.
On the contrary, as I said they took measures to Yes keep her silent and numb
but also for sure alive. I find that what Martino, Derossi and others did was
spontaneously and thoughtful at the same time. Spontaneous remedial measures
based on the reading of the situation in a timely manner and this exercise is full
of practices that run counter to the will of murder, and deliberate on the other
hand in order for the Princess to remain alive and taken later, which is exactly
what they have done by Keeping her alive after the accident. This precludes the
will of killing.
As for the fact that some people saw her conscious, why Dr. Mailliez at first said
she was conscious and then his words changed to she was not? What other
reason there could be for his direct presence after the incident, but to make sure
she stays alive? If the original target is only killing her then the intelligence will
not be providing a doctor, but rather would have left her until the ambulance
arrives. What he did is handing her over alive to the fire service who arrived
quickly.
And why there is no medical record of what happened before the arrival of the
fire service? Except to hide their work, because it would reveal that the medical
condition was not bad.
Also the evidence of Philip Boyer who worked with the fire service in (20) p
384, which was quite the opposite to the words of Mailliez, especially in regard
the pulse and respiration as well, is quite enough.
Did Diana had internal bleeding? Or was it non-fatal?
Since we now believe that Diana was conscious after the accident, the question
is whether it is possible for a person whose heart was bleeding to be conscious,
speaking, though little, and moves and wraps his head left and right and acting
disturbed, as these descriptions are listed in the books, after a period of internal
bleeding? I mean, isn't it supposed be that over time and with increasing
bleeding the status of the person should be the opposite?
In (2) p 388, Why low blood pressure, which is a sign of internal bleeding, was
not mentioned except by Dr. Martino in the ambulance? And why Philip Boyer
the Fire Service man who observed Diana did not notice such a critical sign at all,
Page
7
saying that the Princess was sound? It is noteworthy that Philip Boyer was
ignored by Paget report.
In (2) p 390, the writer condemns Dr. Martino for just thinking to do a massage
of the heart under the pretext of cardiac arrest despite knowing that there is
internal bleeding, which is a harmless thing to do, and considers it an intention
to kill.
My comment here is that if Martino knows that this harmful option is going to
kill the princess, why did not he do it? Isn't this an appropriate opportunity to
kill her with a medical excuse?
Also since she was left throughout this period since the accident until reaching
the hospital, isn't this an evidence of a non-fatal bleeding? And an evidence of the
exaggeration and the lies of the medical condition of the Princess by Martino?
Who, as stated previously, suddenly claimed in the ambulance a significant
reduction of pressure as a sign of a deadly bleeding, where as mentioned before
that other witnesses said that her vital functions were fine which mark that the
blood pressure was ok? And moreover, the Princess was very conscious that he
injected her with a drug because she refused the treatment. Should an anesthetic
be given to a patient in a cardiac arrest?
Is the picture now formed that the woman was wounded yes, but not in mortal
danger, and was drugged?
In (3) p 297, Philip Boyer from the Fire Service said that problems did not occur
when Diana was being pulled out of the car. This contradicts Dr. Martino in the
previous book (2) that a cardiac arrest happened to her at that moment. Also
contradicts with Martino's description in this book (3) in page 300 that he found
it difficult to remove her from the car and that her setting position was difficult.
In (3) p 329, we see the picture of the ambulance report. This report is actually
made up of several pages but was not delivered to the jury to study in 2008
except the first page of it. There were also two persons in the ambulance,
Barbara Kapfer and someone named Fadi, whom have never been questioned.
Why the jury was prevented from seeing the full report of the ambulance? Was
it hiding something about the medical state of the Princess? For example she was
not in a fatal state?
In (4) p 485, the writer says that the reason for the intubation, ventilation and
drugging Diana , which was proved to be an improper procedure to the health
status of the princess since she was breathing normally but an exaggerated
procedure , is that Dr. Martino assisted by Dr. Derossi wanted to silence Diana
completely.
Page
8
My comment is, why silencing her while it is possible even to kill her at this
moment by anesthesia? And there are many cases in which the patient died
because of the anesthetic.
Why the effort to take strange measures and exaggerated Yes, but do not lead to
a certain death? Yet they kept her alive and surly in a state where she could not
move? Everyone says to kill her, but I see a processing case of kidnapping.
In (4) p 487, the book presents a picture of the only document that was
displayed in the investigation of a report by the SAMU ambulance about Diana's
state directly after the incident in the tunnel. The writer refers to the existence of
a lot of non complemented blanks and non-signatories. Therefore, the fact that
Martino is the one who wrote it is questionable and only a possibility for the
absence of a signature. Was it none complemented only to hide the true medical
condition?
In (4) p 496, the writer says that Dr. Arnaud Derossi came in another
ambulance after Martino when the latter sent to the ambulance center about the
injured arm.
Why did Derossi lie when he sent his already late report, which was at 1:20 to
the ambulance center, where he described the case of a head injury as if it is very
important and there is a need for a neurologist to be in La Petit Hospital, and said
the chest had no injury while it is totally the opposite?
Derossi lied to the extent that Martino in the investigation, who said that the
injury was in the chest, tried to justify Derossi's several lies, including that he
was not in the ambulance. The writer says that this led to delaying the
attendance of the heart surgeon after the arrival of Diana to the hospital thus
delaying her treatment, and that suggests the intent to kill Diana.
My comment here is even if we assume that the words of the writer are true
because he has a strong argument here, yet this does not negate the fact that she
was alive and a surgery was done after all. Why was she rescued albeit slowly,
and reached the hospital alive? Weren't all the conditions again ripe to kill her
before they reach the hospital?
In (4) p 499, the writer mentions the blood pressure conditions and shows that
the SAMU Center's Dr. Marc Lejay, when he knew from Derossi that the blood
pressure was low, said that this is because of the intubation and ventilation, a
violent procedure as he described it, which is inappropriate because Diana's
state was fine, as he did not know from Derossi here about the Chest injury.
My comment is that the issue of low blood pressure, which is a sign of internal
bleeding, is already doubted .While here as said that the possible reasons of the
Page
9
low blood pressure were the anesthesia and the intubation, indicates that the
state of her bleeding was not fatal.
I mean that the writer wants to say that the real reason behind the low blood
pressure is actually internal bleeding while the acts of Martino in the treatment
show that he did not care much about internal bleeding. The author says that this
shows the intention to kill. While I say that Martino, given his previous
exaggerations to portray the situation as hazardous, did the same here. It means
the bleeding was not fatal and this is only part of the exaggerations.
Then his conduct of a therapeutic procedure different from what should be in
the case of hemorrhage, indicates that he has taken the right action as she
arrived alive to the hospital after all, and I think she was not in mortal danger,
but she was drugged as I said, and the procedures of anesthesia and intubation
were evidence of the intention of putting her in complete anesthesia and not the
intention of killing.
In (4) p 499-500, according to the word of Dr. Andre Lienhart (a suspicious
character with Dr. Dominique Lecomte who conducted the alleged autopsy and
embalming on Diana and Henri Paul) he said Martino injected Diana with
Dopamine (leads to high blood pressure), which in fact In the case of internal
bleeding is a bad choice and does not improve it. And because Lienhart only
depends on the words of Martino and there is no documentation or evidence on
the amount of Dopamine, then how can we trust that the quantity really caused
increasing risk? Isn't it possible that Martino is exaggerating here, and that is
why he does not give the document of the amount? Or maybe even he did not
give this medicine to her at all.
Of course this is only possible if the consideration of the case is kidnapping,
otherwise not denying the originally doubtful Martino's testimony lead to believe
the words of the writer that there is a clear intention to kill in this work. The
writer also says that this procedure may be good but only if the patient was
taken in speed to the hospital while they did not do this. His words are true, but
in any case she arrived alive.
And then who can ensure us that they really gave her Dopamine in the absence
of proper documentation? And all what we have right now are just the words of
Martino, a dubious character. At this point some people may see that the
interpretation of the writer stronger than my words, but his words based on
sources of questionable origin, this is what I want to say and the evidence in the
following:
In (4) p 573, the writer says what is most dangerous, namely that what if the
material is said to be Dopamine is not Dopamine, but other material led to her
death? My comment is that this is 100% true, but not necessarily that the
Page
10
material was replaced by a lethal material, otherwise Dopamine benefits in this
case and there is no need to be replaced as long as it is going to hurt her and lead
to her death, as originally has been said, but rather I believe it's an Anesthetic.
In (2) p 393, under the title of the nature of Diana's injury is another sign of
trying to give the impression of inevitable death, that the two doctors Lecomte
and Lienhart who supervised the alleged anatomy and embalming of Diana, have
always insisted that her condition was completely hopeless from the start,
although other testimonies say this is not true, including the American Dr. John
Ochsner's from his experience, As well as the state of consciousness that the
Princess was in after the accident.
Why insisting that the condition cannot be survived? What is the purpose of the
denial of medical certificates of others? Especially that Lecomte and Lienhart did
not attend the surgery which Diana has gone under. And all this in the light of the
unique description of Frederic Mailliez, the first doctor in the tunnel, in some of
his words he said her heart was removed from its place? Is it possible to live for a
moment with a displaced or a ripped heart?
In (4) p 503-504, the writer says that Martino contradicts everything and claims
that Diana's blood pressure and her heart's beats became good after being in the
ambulance in the tunnel at 1:00 because he treated her. Here Martino said the
same descriptions of blood pressure and the heart's beat, as which Derossi had
described in a contact with the SAMU Center at 1:20, which means her condition
improved well.
The writer asks, why was she not transferred directly to the hospital since the
movement of the car is no longer harmful to her? Because usually they argue that
they were slow in their movement by the car because of the issue of low blood
pressure. But the writer says that Diana's state deteriorated significantly since
she was taken over by Martino in 12:40 until they reached the hospital.
My comment is how if her condition improved said to have deteriorated? Where
is the document and proof of the truth of this speech? All this talk is supported
only by descriptions of Martino and co-conspirators in the case. But in general it
seems to me from the outset that the condition was stable. If the author wanted
to say that in fact it deteriorated after a while he would be giving the right to
Martino not to move the ambulance car in the tunnel and gave him an excuse to
the delay of getting her to the hospital. And if the writer did not give him the
right (the excuse of deteriorating), and it was a must to move quickly, then the
writer should believe that her condition has improved allowing them to move.
However, if the answer here is that her blood pressure was not at high risk so
the condition was stable, and the claim of Martino that her condition improved
after treatment, is only a lie to suggest that before this she was in imminent
Page
11
danger, therefore he did not move the car because she was in immediate danger.
Then Martino here followed French law that allows him to do so as if the patient
is at risk requires treatment on-site.
The issue of the delay means two things. First, gaining control over Diana and
drugging her without killing her. Secondly, it is a suggestive process such as the
issue of pregnancy in order for people to be preoccupied with this controversy
away from the fact and the nature of the crime, namely abduction.
In (4) p 517, Doctors Martino, Lecomte and Lienhart, also Judge Scott Baker and
police lawyer Duncan McLeod, whom they are all suspicious characters
according to the writer, say that Diana's state worsened and dropped her blood
pressure disastrously before reaching the hospital for 5 minutes and thus
Martino stopped the car. The author says that there is no clarification on this
strange issue. Of course as the writer wrote everything on the grounds that
behind their actions was the intention to kill, it makes sense here to say that
since they did not kill her there is also exaggerated description of the medical
condition which is not trusted since it is by the words of Martino. I mean the
disastrous low blood pressure and that the reason the car was stopped is
completely different and I will write about it. Therefore the thesis that this is
exaggerated in the context of other exaggerations to suggest that Diana's
condition was fatal is acceptable here.
From all of the above it is clear that the issues of blood pressure and internal
bleeding were much exaggerated and run counter to other testimonies that the
condition was not to this degree. If the intention was pure murder they could in
this opportunity to kill her inevitably, because whatever they do as attempts to
make the condition worse under the intent to kill, inevitable death cannot be for
sure. I do not think they would have risked leaving her alive after all this effort in
planning the murder, and I think it is an acceptable hypothesis that the slow
treatment is indeed to show the image of death and murder, yet no one ever will
feel it was a kidnapping, because the public opinion is preoccupied with these
issues, as has been to the issue of pregnancy, and deviate it from observing the
truth.
TO BE CONTINUED
Rania Alammar
22-7-2015
thequeendiana97@gmail.com
Please watch the film I made in 2014 here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFZu_PbOiL0
Page
12