Systems Integration - Stevens Institute of Technology

advertisement

SDOE 605 Systems Integration

Pre-Reading Assignments

Student Name:

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 1

SDOE 605 Pre-Reading Assignments

 There are four assignments for the SDOE 605 Pre-Reading Assignment:

1.

Boeing 787 systems integration practices based on lessons learned in the Boeing and Airbus aircraft projects

2.

Integration of Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) technologies

3.

Comparing Plan Driven and Agile approaches for integration and testing.

4.

Requirements Development, Verification, and Validation Exhibited in

Famous Failures (reading only)

 Be prepared to discuss the assignments on the first day of class.

 You may contact the professor by email if there are any questions about the assignments.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 2

SDOE 605 Pre-Reading Assignment #1

 Read the following papers on the Boeing and Airbus aircraft:

» Lapin, M. (1995). Testing Boeing’s 777: Aerospace giant leaves nothing to chance. Test and Measurement World, April, 1995.

» Pehrson, R.J. (1996). Software Development for the Boeing 777.

» Witwer, B. (1996).

Systems integration of the 777 airplane information management system (AIMS). Aerospace and Electronic

Systems Magazine, IEEE, April, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pages 17 -21.

» Wall Street Journal (April 1, 2005) “Streamlined Plane Making”.

 Based on your readings on the Boeing and Airbus aircraft:

» Identify 5 good SI practices that should be continued for the

Boeing 787 aircraft project

» Identify 5 areas for improvement that should be applied to the

Boeing 787 aircraft project.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 3

Case Study - Boeing 787

Good systems integration practices to use on the Boeing

787 aircraft project from Boeing 777 and Airbus aircraft:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 4

Case Study - Boeing 787

3.

4.

5.

Systems integration improvement opportunities from

Boeing 777 and Airbus aircraft that should be applied to the Boeing 787 aircraft project:

1.

2.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 5

Assignment #2

 Read the following papers on using Commercial Off-the-Shelf

(COTS) technologies:

» Boehm, B and Abts, C. (1999). COTS integration: Plug and pray?

IEEE Computer, 32(1), January 1999.

» Reifer, D.J.; Basili, V.R.; Boehm, B.W.; Clark, B. (2003). Eight lessons learned during COTS-based systems maintenance. Software,

IEEE, Volume: 20, Issue: 5, Sept.-Oct. 2003. Pages:94 – 96

» Sedigh-Ali, S., Ghafoor, A., Paul, R. (2001). Software Engineering

Metrics for COTS Based Systems. IEEE Computer, Vol. 34, No. 5,

May 2001, pp. 44-50.

 Based on your readings on COTS technologies:

» Identify 5 benefits to integrating Commercial-Off-The-Shelf

(COTS) technologies in development projects

» Identify 5 potential problems to integrating Commercial-Off-

The-Shelf (COTS) technologies in development projects.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 6

Assignment #2

Five benefits to integrating Commercial-Off-The-Shelf

(COTS) technologies in development projects:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 7

Assignment #2

Five potential problems to integrating Commercial-Off-The-

Shelf (COTS) technologies in development projects:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 8

Assignment #3

 Read the following paper:

» Pyhajarvi, M.; Rautiainen, K. (2004). Integrating Testing and

Integration into Development. Engineering Management Journal,

March 2004, 16, 1, page 33-39.

 Based on your reading of this paper:

» Identify advantages and issues associated with Plan Driven integration and testing

» Identify advantages and issues associated with Agile approaches to integration and testing.

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 9

Assignment #3

Plan Driven integration and testing:

Advantages

Issues

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 10

Assignment #3

Agile integration and testing:

Advantages

Issues

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 11

Assignment #4

 Read the following paper:

» Bahill, A.

Terry, and Henderson, Steven J., Requirements

Development, Verification, and Validation Exhibited in Famous

Failures (2004)

» Be prepared to discuss these programs and their issues related to integration, verification, and validation in class

© Copyright –Stevens Institute of Technology – Prof. William D. Miller wmiller@stevens.edu; 1.908.759.7110

Page 12

Download