Cognitive Enhancement By Group 11: Steve, Natalie, Mayank What is Cognitive Enhancement? Aspects of Cognition Perception, attention, understanding, memory Types of intervention Therapeutic to repair dysfunction Enhancement intervention in some way other than repairing a dysfunction Normal and Deficit Use Deficit and Normal use inseparable Cognitive Enhancement -positive change in cognitive skills or abilities Prescription or “Natural” Prescription enhancers viewed as “cheating” Beyond natural human endowment Herbal remedies perceived as natural enhancement within the bounds of self improvement Attention and Arousal Difference between arousal and attention Caffeine –arousal Ritalin- attention Mainly stimulants Caffeine Found in coffee bean and cola nut History In use since stone age Effects Reaction time prevents deterioration flat dose response prevents boredom Ritalin Use Treatment of ADHD Nonprescription use among college students History 1st synthesized in 1940 Effects Narrowing of attentional spotlight Excitation of inhibitory neurotransmitter Memory Demand for memory improving products Prevalence of Ahlzimer’s Ginkgo Biloba Uniqueness of self in memory Less adverse effects Memory: Mechanistic Details Overview Memory as a function of consciousness LTP Short-term potentiation Early LTP Induction Maintenance Late LTP Expression Cognitive Enhancement Drugs: Memory Memory and Consciousness Memory is our ability to be able to retain and recall past experiences Initiation occurs in the hippocampus, storage is considered to be distributed arbitrarily across the frontal cortical regions (Kemp et al. 2007) Usually broken down into declarative (explicit) and procedural (implicit)(Wikipedia: Memory, 2007) LTP is the main basis for memory initiation and consolidation LTP Long term potentiation Utilizes glutamatergic synaptic transmission AMPA and NMDA receptor mediated(Lisman et al., 2006) Glutamatergic release modulates genetic transcription factors such as CREB through a second messenger system, primarily involving cAMP and PKA LTP involves three phases Short-term phase Early phase Late phase Early and Late phase Broken down into: induction, maintenance, and expression Hebbian Synaptic Plasticity Images Courtesy of: Mann, 2004 Short-term Potentiation AMPA receptor mediation is required for LTP induction(Sweatt, 1999) AMPA receptors are excited on moment-tomoment activity EPSP, or excitatory postsynaptic potential, is a measure of the amount of electrical signal that results from the activity of the aforementioned receptors Magnitude and frequency are the main players in LTP: high frequency of EPSPs with sufficient electrical output are needed(Sweatt, 1999) Subsequent electrical stimuli need to give enough of electrical signals to prevent a previous EPSP response from dying(Sweatt, 1999) Early LTP E-LTP, a protein synthesis-independent pathway This phase of LTP is where the high frequency and sufficient electrical stimulus result in temporary changes to pre- and post-synaptic elements Not sure what causes E-LTP to lead to L-LTP (Late LTP) Insertion of AMPA receptors or increase in glutamatergic response(Wikipedia: Long-term Potentiation, 2007) Downstream cascading molecular events involve calmoldulin/calcium-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), protein kinase C (PKC), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and tyrosine kinases(Lledo et al., 1995), (Sweatt, 1999) Late LTP L-LTP, an exceedingly protein dependent pathway of potentiation Hebbian Synaptic Plasticity(Sweatt, 1999) The formation of new synapses in response to a repetitive and significant event/stimulus to certain neuronal cells Two phase system: protein synthesis occurs then protein synthesis with transcription modulation Calmoldulin/calcium-independent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) are two significant players in L-LTP(Sweatt, 1999) Protein Kinase A (PKA) activates second messenger system that involves cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) cAMP reacts to CREB modulating transcription factors and inducing protein synthesis that effectively results in the creation of new synapses Images Courtesy of: Mann, 2004 Ampakines Increase attention span, alertness, and memory. Lack side effects of many traditional stimulants. Potential treatment for Alzheimers, Parkinsons’s, and other neurodegenerative diseases. Could also treat normal age related deficits, or even augment the mental faculties of healthy individuals Mechanism Ampakines work by allosterically binding AMPA-type glutamate receptors. Facilitate glutamatergic signaling Increase levels of trophic factors BDNF. This promotes plasticity at the synapse, which could translate into better cognitive performance. Synaptic Mechanism • Potentiate induction of LTP, by facilitating AMPA mediated depolarization. •Allows endogenously released glutamate to bind AMPA and NMDA receptors. Lynch (2000) CX-516 Increases Recall • 24 subjects ages 65-76 • tested on recall of nonsense syllables after delay • Increased performance seen 75 min after ingestion • Greatest increase seen in 900 mg group • Dosage dependent increase in recall ability Lynch (1997) CX- 727 • Hippocampal slices exposed to neurotoxic TMT for 4 hrs • Treated with different levels of CX 727 for 24 hrs after exposure. • Slices exposed to higher dosage showed highest optical density for AMPA receptor subunit GluR. • Dose dependent neuroprotection. Munirathinam (2002) Altered State? • Yes. By increasing mental faculties above “normal,” Ampakines and other such drugs produce altered states. • Cognitive enhancement may have far reaching social implications and raises serious ethical questions. SUPER NORMAL ? Normal Relief From Anxiety Disinhibition Sedation Hypnosis General anesthesia Coma Death Bibliographic References Kemp A, & Manahan-Vaughan D. Hippocampal long-term depression: master or minion in declarative memory processes?. Trends in Neurosciences. 2007; 30(3):111-8. Mann MD. Learning and Memory. May 17, 2004, at 20:57 UTC. The Nervous System in Action. Available at: http://www.unmc.edu/Physiology/Mann/mann19.html. Accessed June 5, 2007. Lisman J, & Raghavachari S. A unified model of the presynaptic and postsynaptic changes during LTP at CA1 synapses. Science. 2006; 2006(356) Lledo PM, Hjelmstad GO, Mukherji S, Soderling TR, Malenka RC, et al. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II and long-term potentiation enhance synaptic transmission by the same mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995; 92(24):11175-9. Lynch, G., Granger, R., Ambros-Ingerson, J., Davis, C.M., Kessler, M., Schehr, R. (1997). Evidence That a Positive Modulator of AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors Improves Delayed Recall in Aged Humans. Experimental Neurology, 145, 89–92. Lynch, G. (2002). Memory enhancement: the search for mechanism-based drugs. Neuroscience, 5, 1035-1038. References (cont) Sweatt JD. Toward a molecular explanation for long-term potentiation. Learning & memory. 1999; 6(5):399-416. Wikipedia contributors. Memory. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. June 5, 2007, at 22:36 UTC. Available at: http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory. Accessed June 5, 2007. Wikipedia contributors. Long-Term Potentiation. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. May 23, 2007, at 23:42 UTC. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longterm_potentiation. Accessed June 5, 2007. Bostrom, Nick, and Sandberg, Anders. “Cognitive Enhancement :Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges." Science and Engineering Ethics, 2007. Smit, H.J., and Rogers, P.J. “Effects of Low Does of Caffeine on Cognitive Performance , mood and thirst in low and high Consumers.” Pharmacology. 28 July 2000. Carroll, Bronwen C., et al. ”Patterns and Knowledge of Nonmedical Use of Stimulants Among College Students.” Arch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. Vol 160, May 2007. Munirathinam,S., Rogers, G., Bahr, B.A. (2002) Positive Modulation of _-imino-3hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid-Type Glutamate Receptors Elicits Neuroprotection after Trimethyltin Exposure in hippocampus. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 185, 111–118