Final Forms, 1/18/13

Section A: What Progress Have We Made? ............................... 1
Section B: What Changes Do We Suggest? ................................ 2
Required Appendices:
A: Budget History ......................................................................................... 3
B1: Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Schedule ................................. 4
B2: “Closing the Loop” Assessment Reflections ........................................... 5
C: Program Learning Outcomes .................................................................... 9
D: A Few Questions .................................................................................... 11
E: New Initiatives ....................................................................................... 12
F1: New Faculty Requests .......................................................................... 13
F2: Classified Staffing Requests ................................................................... 14
F3: FTEF Requests ...................................................................................... 15
F4: Academic Learning Support Requests .................................................. 16
F5: Supplies and Services Requests ............................................................ 17
F6: Conference/Travel Requests ................................................................ 18
F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests ........................................ 19
F8: Facilities Requests ................................................................................ 20

Complete Appendices A (Budget History), B1 and B2 (CLO's), C (PLO's), and D (A few questions) prior to writing your narrative. You should also review your most recent success, equity, course sequence, and enrollment data at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2012.cfm
.
In year one, you established goals and action plans for program improvement. This section asks you to reflect on the progress you have made toward those goals. This analysis will be used by the PRBC and Budget Committee to assess progress toward achievement of our Strategic Plan and to inform future budget decisions. It will also be used by the SLOAC and Basic Skills committees as input to their priority-setting process. In your narrative of two or less pages, address the following questions:


What were your year one Program Review goals?
Did you achieve those goals? Specifically describe your progress on the goals you set for


 student learning, program learning, and Strategic Plan achievement.
What are you most proud of?
What challenges did you face that may have prevented achieving your goals?
Cite relevant data in your narrative (e.g., efficiency, persistence, success, FT/PT faculty ratios, CLO/PLO assessment results, external accreditation demands, etc.).
What were your year one Program Review goals?
1.
Increase student retention
2.
Review at-risk students
3.
Replace Maternity Instructor
4.
Evaluate and update the merit admission criteria
5.
Evaluate existing curriculum-transfer to CSUEB streamlined
6.
Open house and BBQ for new students
7.
Use simulation lab as part of a community outreach for the hospitals and get funds to maintain equipment
8.
Provide counseling hours for students experiencing high levels of stress
Did you achieve those goals? Specifically describe your progress on the goals you set for student learning, program learning, and Strategic Plan achievement.
Goal 1: For the graduating class of 2012 we started with 61 students and graduated 37 for a
61% graduation rate. During this time we also admitted 5 LVN’s and 7 readmits (2 nd time through program) for a final rate of 49 or 80%. Still need to work on this goal.
Goal 2: At-risk students are now referred to E. Victoria (counseling) as case manager hired with grant money. He provides counseling within a 5 day referral time to our students. This is for help due to stress, or family/personal issues. This is working well and instructors referred 7 students last semester.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
1

Goal 3: We have not replaced the maternity instructor due to budget issues facing the college.
At this time, the nursing faculty is also down one Medical-Surgical Instructor.
Goal 4: The first Merit Based students were admitted in the fall of 2012. For ethnic groups the class has 28% of students identifying themselves as White and the other 72% identify as other races. We notice a high number of male students 15/50 or 33%. The class started with 50 students and at this time seven have withdrawn; due in part to family issues, clinical experience, and one student for failure of the math exam. We will continue to evaluate the criteria.
Goal 5: A roadmap for transfer to CSUEB was developed and is posted on our website to streamline this process for students. We have a great interest in this program and over 50% of last year’s class has enrolled in the CSUEB program. A speaker from CSUEB has met with the freshman class last October to promote this great opportunity to get a BSN in one year after graduation.
Goal 6: The Open House/BBQ has been held for the past 2 years and has been paid for with part of grant and co-curricular funds. We see positive evaluations from students for this event.
Goal 7: Simulation is up and running well in each large course in the program. We have hired a simulation technician and simulation helper to run the manikins and write scenarios. This is all paid for with grant money. Student evaluations of this experience are very positive and reflect that this clinical practicum is a critical part of their nursing education. There is a concern if the grant funding is not renewed the college will not have the resources to maintain the lab personal required to effectively ‘run’ a simulation.
Goal 8: Counseling with Ernesto Victoria (case manager) will continue with grant funding as long as possible.
What are you most proud of?
As the nursing program director I am most proud of the Merit Based Admission Criteria, the
Roadmap to CSUEB and the simulation lab. All these items allow Chabot College to have a 100% pass rate on the State licensing exams this past year.
What challenges did you face that may have prevented achieving your goals?
Currently we are short two full time nursing instructors. Our program has (7) full time and (9) part time instructors. The nursing program has mandated staffing levels by the Board of
Registered Nursing who will visit in 2014. This will most likely be an area of noncompliance if it is not addressed. Our pediatric instructor will go on semi-retirement in the spring of 2014. This will create another half time position.
With grant money we have been able to staff nursing clinical rotations with a second adjunct instructor for 2 hours each day to assist with medication administration. This has been
Nursing Program Review - 2013
2

extremely successful in allowing more students to administer medication which is a large part of the RN’s job.
Many hospitals are now requiring that we have 8 instead of 10 students in each clinical group. It is becoming difficult to find acute care sites as hospitals are having financial difficulties, implementing the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and are running transition programs for new staff. The Board of Registered Nursing in their 2012 School Report states, “Reasons for lack of access to clinical space vary by program, although the predominant reason among all program levels remains competition from the increased number of nursing students. Staff nurse overload/insufficient qualified staff and a decrease in patient census was also a frequently cited reason.”
We continue to teleconference all theory courses to our Livermore extended campus site. The nursing program will have updated teleconferencing equipment installed in Hayward and
Livermore over the summer break. Our relationship with Valley Care Hospital continues to work extremely well and they hire many of our graduates.
The BRN 2012 School Report states, “Between 8/1/11 and 7/31/12, 128 of California’s 132 nursing schools reported using clinical simulations.” We are currently running the simulation lab with grant funding that will run out over the next school year. I hope to secure more grant money as we need to keep the simulation lab running efficiently.
In the future, the nursing program will need to purchase some type of electronic medical record to allow students to practice how to document on the computer chart while here on campus performing nursing skills.
To conclude we are using the over $700,000 in grant funds to increase our student retention, pay for simulation lab employees, provide a case manager for our struggling students, along with seven medication pass instructors and two tutors. We are updating the cement patio behind building 3100 to accommodate “study” patio tables to allow the students a place to meet and eat while on campus. We desperately need to replace the two full time nursing instructors as soon as possible to continue to run the program as successfully .
Review the Strategic Plan goal and key strategies at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/prbc/StrategicPlan/SPforPR.pdf
prior to completing your narrative. Please complete Appendices E (New Initiatives) and F1-8 (Resources Requested) to further detail your narrative. Limit your narrative to two pages, and be very specific about what you hope to achieve, why, and how.
Given your experiences and student achievement results over the past year, what changes do
you suggest to your course/program improvement plan?
In reviewing our 2010-2011 Two Year Class Success Study for our 4 core nursing courses
(N55,N60A, N59 and N60B) we have had an attrition rate of 85-96.4 percent in these courses.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
3

This seems like we are losing students pretty equally across the courses. We need to continue to have the medication pass instructors in the clinical area for 2 of the busy times on the shift.
This is working extremely well per instructor and student feedback.
What new initiatives might you begin to support the achievement of our Strategic Plan goal?
Do you have new ideas to improve student learning?
The single goal for PRBC to” Increase the number of students that achieve their educational goal in a reasonable time frame…” is met in the nursing program as our students complete in 2 years. It would be helpful if the students did follow a path for the prerequisites. Some take years to complete this and this could be streamlined. We have developed a roadmap to the BSN along with CSUEB. It is attached to this document. If students follow this path they can have a
BSN in nursing in 5 years.
What are your specific, measurable goals?
The comprehensive goal for the nursing program is the passing of the NCLEX-RN exam after graduation. The students that graduated in 2012 have had a 100% pass rate for all first time takers. This is well above the average for California of 85% for first time takers. After each course in the program students take a computerized exam developed by Assessment
Technology Institute. This exam is compared to all programs across the US. Our students must pass each exam with a score of level 2 (competent) or they must do a remediation exam. Scores in our program have been increasing with many students scoring level 2 or 3.
How will you achieve them?
See above.
Would any of these require collaboration with other disciplines or areas of the college?
I think it would be great if nursing faculty got together with the other instructors that teach the prerequisite courses annually to discuss what could be improved or deleted.
How will make that collaboration occur?
An annual meeting where a representative from science, English and Math came to a nursing faculty meeting to discuss best practices/student concerns.
Audience: Budget Committee, PRBC,and Administrators
Purpose: This analysis describes your history of budget requests from the previous two years and the impacts of funds received and needs that were not met. This history of documented need can both support your narrative in Section A and provide additional information for Budget
Committee recommendations.
Instructions: Please provide the requested information, and fully explain the impact of the budget decisions.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
4

Category
2011-12
Budget
Requested
$10,500 0
2011-12
Budget
Received
2012-13
Budget
Requested
$12,000
2012-13
Budget
0
Received
Classified Staffing (# of positions)
1.
2 part-time simulation helpers and tutors
Supplies & Services
1.
Medication Pass instructors (6)
Technology/Equipment
1.
Computer testing room for
60 students
Other:
Outdoor study area for students replaced cement outside bld. 3100
TOTAL
$52,000
$30,000
$15,000
107,500
0
0
0
0
$52,000
$30,000 estimated
$15,000
$109,000
0
0
0
1.
How has your investment of the budget monies you did receive improved student learning? When you requested the funding, you provided a rationale. In this section, assess if the anticipated positive impacts you projected have, in fact, been realized.
The use of the simulation lab helps us meet the hospital standards of 8 out of 10 students in a clinical group. The use of the simulation lab enhances student learning, critical thinking and improves student abilities to respond in emergency or critical situations and provides safe competent nursing care on the clinical unit. Although the college did not fund the medication pass instructors, these were funded through grant monies. The clinical instructors were able to increase patient safety during bedside care and provided more individualized attention to each student. When grant funds are depleted the college should absorb the cost to maintain the level of safety and care.
2.
What has been the impact of not receiving some of your requested funding? How has student learning been impacted, or safety compromised, or enrollment or retention negatively impacted?
The nursing program has received grant money to provide the medication pass instructor for 2 additional hours during the clinical rotations. We have this additional help in 5 out of 8 clinical groups at this time. The medication pass instructor provides a direct 1 to 1 instruction for patient safety. It allows the instructor to provide individualized evaluations of students to meet Joint Commission standards.
All courses must be assessed at least once every three years. Please complete this chart that defines your assessment schedule.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
5

Courses:
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE:
Spring Fall
2013
N60A/B/C
2013
N55/
N59/
N69/N60A
Full
Assmt
Discuss results
Group 1:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Spring
2014
N60A/B/C
Report
Results
Full Assmt Discuss results & report
Full
Assmt
Fall
2014
N55/
N59/
N69/N60A
Discuss results
Spring
2015
N60A/B/C
Report
Results
Full Assmt Discuss results & report
C ONSIDER T HE C OURSE -L EVEL O UTCOMES I NDIVIDUALLY ( THE
N UMBER OF CLO S WILL DIFFER BY COURSE
 )
Fall
2015
N55/
N59/
N69/N60A
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Spring
2016
N60A/B/C
Full
Assmt
Fall
2016
N55/
N59/
N69/N60A
Discuss results
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester

Nursing Program Core Courses
2
5 (2012) 6(2010-2011)
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
5
100%
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion 7
Form Instructions:

Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.

Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole.
P
I: C
-L
O
– D
R
Actual Scores**
(Program Data)
Spring
2017
N60A/B/C
Report
Results
Nursing Program Review - 2013
6

C
N
ONSIDER T
UMBER OF
HE C
CLO
OURSE -L EVEL O UTCOMES
S WILL DIFFER BY COURSE
I NDIVIDUALLY

)
( THE
(CLO) 1: N55
Demonstration of fundamental concepts and practices utilizing the nursing process across the life span.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
100%
Actual Scores**
(Program Data)
86%
(CLO) 3: N59
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice in the nursing care of the childbearing and child rearing families .
(CLO) 2: N60A
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice in the care of adults experiencing selected conditions requiring treatment in medical-surgical and psychiatric care settings.
100%
100%
97%
92%
(CLO) 4: N60 B
Application and analysis of the nursing process utilizing evidence based practice for groups of clients in the medical-surgical and critical care setting.
100% 90%
(CLO) 5: N60C
Application, synthesis, delegation, critical thinking and analysis of the nursing process utilizing evidence based practice for groups of clients in the medical-surgical and critical care setting.
100% 100%
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO?
(Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
P
II: C
-
O
R
A.
C OURSE -L EVEL O UTCOME (CLO) 1: Nurisng 55 Fundamentals
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Theory must be passed at 73%. 86% score at or above 73%. We are satisfied with this rate as some students leave the program for various personal reasons.
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
NA
Nursing Program Review - 2013
7

Although we have lost 14% over the past two year, we understand some students do not have the dedication to complete the rigors for the program. Some students discover the profession of nursing does not meet their personal expectations and conflict with unexpected life events.
B.
C OURSE -L EVEL O UTCOME (CLO) 2:N59 N URSING C ARE OF C HILDBEARING FAMILY
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Excellent at 97%.
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We will continue to utilize the course methodology in teaching this course and enhancing the student learning. We conduct a content review as required by the Board of
Registered Nursing.
C.
C
OURSE
-L
EVEL
O
UTCOME
(CLO) 3: N60A A
DULT
H
EALTH
I
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Very good at 92%.
1.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continued enhancement of student clinical experiences including open lab time, simulations and tutoring. Utilize medication passing instructors to individualize the education of students.
D.
C OURSE -L EVEL O UTCOME (CLO) 4:N60B – A DULT H EALTH II
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Very good at 90%.
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This is the final core course in the nursing program requiring the culmination of all nursing program education. It is the most rigorous course offered and the last step to their individual preceptorship. It is a predicator for the success of our students in taking and passing their licensing exam (NLCEX). Last year 100% of the students who passed this class also passed the NCLEX. Over the past five years the program has had a first time pass rate of 96% -100%. The California Board of Registered Nursing requires nursing programs to
Nursing Program Review - 2013
8

have a pass rate of 85% for accreditation. We exceed these standards.
E.
C
OURSE
-L
EVEL
O
UTCOME
(CLO) 5: N60C A
DULT
H
EALTH
III.
P
III: C
R
F
P
1.
What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
Outstanding at 100%
2.
Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Last year 100% of the students who passed this class also passed the NCLEX. Over the past five years the program has had a first time pass rate of 96% -100%. The California Board of
Registered Nursing requires nursing programs to have a pass rate of 85% for accreditation.
We exceed these standards.
Preceptorships are becoming extremely difficult to arrange. In the future we may need to increase simulation experiences and as a substitute for preceptorships. This will require a enlargement of our simulation lab to accommodate the 40-50 students along with a simulation director. Other possibilities in clinical health care are being explored.
3.
What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
 Other:_Simulation___________________________________________________
Nursing Program Review - 2013
9

Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Nursing Program
PLO #1: Incorporate the core of knowledge unique to the nursing profession in the delivery of health care in acute, chronic, or community health settings;
PLO#2: Utilize the nursing process to provide care for clients, families and significant others with diverse health needs and practices;
PLO #3: Respond to the demands of rapidly changing information technology by incorporating computer literacy in health care delivery and utilizing the internet for research;
PLO#4: Use critical thinking skills in decisions related to managing care for groups of clients;
PLO#5: Practice within the profession‘s ethical and legal framework;
PLO#6: Respond to the unique health needs of the culturally diverse and aging population.
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
Explain: The nursing program is pleased with the current PLO’s
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Strengths revealed: At this time the Chabot Nursing program is one of top 10 nursing programs in California with a 100% pass rate on the licensing exam (NCLEX). Fall 2013, we have received over 600 applications for the 50 spaces available.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program?
Actions planned: Continued use of case manager through counseling, additional tutors, medication pass instructors and increased hours in the skills lab using adjunct instructors all paid through grant funds. The grant funds are through June 2013. I am currently trying to get an extension to cover until the spring 2014. We are looking to replace two full time instructors we no longer have in medical surgical and obstetrics to meet Board of Registered Nursing full time instructor requirements.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
10

Please answer the following questions with "yes" or "no". For any questions answered "no", please provide an explanation. No explanation is required for "yes" answers :-)
1.
Have all of your course outlines been updated within the past five years? If no, identify the course outlines you will update in the next curriculum cycle. Ed Code requires all course outlines to be updated every six years. YES
2.
Have all of your courses been offered within the past five years? If no, why should those courses remain in our college catalog? NO, we are not offering foreign trained nursing individual courses due to lack of available full time instructors and clinical placements.
3.
Do all of your courses have the required number of CLOs completed, with corresponding rubrics? If no, identify the CLO work you still need to complete, and your timeline for completing that work this semester. Yes, on our core nursing program courses.
4.
Have you assessed all of your courses and completed "closing the loop" forms for all of your courses within the past three years? If no, identify which courses still require this work, and your timeline for completing that work this semester. Yes
5.
Have you developed and assessed PLOs for all of your programs? If no, identify programs which still require this work, and your timeline to complete that work this semester. Y es
6.
If you have course sequences, is success in the first course a good predictor of success in the subsequent course(s)? Yes
7.
Does successful completion of College-level Math and/or English correlate positively with success in your courses? If not, explain why you think this may be. Yes
Nursing Program Review - 2013
11

Audience: Deans/Unit Administrators, PRBC, Foundation, Grants Committee, College Budget Committee
Purpose: A “New Initiative” is a new project or expansion of a current project that supports our Strategic
Plan. The project will require the support of additional and/or outside funding. The information you provide will facilitate and focus the research and development process for finding both internal and external funding.
How does your initiative address the college's Strategic Plan goal, or significantly improve student learning?
The nursing program needs a designated computer lab that will be available for testing (all courses use
Blackboard for exams), electronic charting, and student learning activities (60 computers)
What is your specific goal and measurable outcome?
Enhance and maintain student learning, virtual clinical experiences and achieve student individual educational goals.
Measureable outcomes are to include but are not limited to passing ATI computerized assessments at the end of each course with a composite score of level 2 or above. NCLEX exam is a computerized test and data suggests that each student should do at least 6000 computerized practice questions to be successful.
What is your action plan to achieve your goal?
Activity (brief description)
Rewire room 2256 with a new internet server.
Target
Completion
Date
August
2014
Required Budget (Split out personnel, supplies, other categories)
Approximately $50,000 wiring and server
Request combining room 2256 and 2254 to a large computer room for nursing, dental and medical assisting students. Place a door between rooms or remove wall.
An IPAD for each clinical rotation that students can use to access up to date information on line. 10 IPADs with at least
32 megabytes
August
2015
August
2013
Additional 40 computers
=$45,000
Tables = $ 85,000
Construction = $50,000
$10,000
How will you manage the personnel needs?
New Hires: Faculty of positions Classified staff # of positions
Reassigning existing employee(s) to the project; employee(s) current workload will be:
Covered by overload or part-time employee(s)
Covered by hiring temporary replacement(s)
X Other, explain This is equipment and construction costs
Nursing Program Review - 2013
12

At the end of the project period, the proposed project will:
X Be completed (onetime only effort)
X Require additional funding to continue and/or institutionalize the project (obtained by/from):IT will need to update and maintain as needed.
Will the proposed project require facility modifications, additional space, or program relocation?
No X Yes, explain: See above
Will the proposed project involve subcontractors, collaborative partners, or cooperative agreements?
No X Construction work
Do you know of any grant funding sources that would meet the needs of the proposed project?
X No Yes, list potential funding sources:
Yes, explain:
Nursing Program Review - 2013
13

Audience: Faculty Prioritization Committee and Administrators
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time faculty and adjuncts
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan goal. Cite evidence and data to support your request, including enrollment management data (EM Summary by Term) for the most recent three years, student success and retention data, and any other pertinent information. Data is available at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2012.cfm
.
1.
Number of new faculty requested in this discipline: __3_
2.
If you are requesting more than one position, please rank order the positions.
Position
1.
Full time tenure tract faculty
2.
Full time tenure tract faculty
3.
Full time tenure tract faculty
Description
Medical-Surgical Instructor
Obstetrical Instructor
Pediatric instructor/Simulation Coordinator
3.
Rationale for your proposal. Please use the enrollment management data. Additional data that will strengthen your rationale include FTES trends over the last 5 years, persistence, FT/PT faculty ratios,
CLO and PLO assessment results and external accreditation demands.
We are short the M/S position since the resignation of the MS instructor in spring 2012. The Obstetrics instructor is now the program director (BRN guidelines suggest 100% release time). This position has been vacant since spring 2010.Pediatric instructor will go on semi-retirement in the spring 2014.
4.
Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and your student learning goals are required. Indicate here any information from advisory committees or outside accreditation reviews that is pertinent to the proposal.
Program must meet BRN requirements to maintain accreditation. Program is currently in non-
compliance with this mandate. A scheduled BRN visit is to occur in March 2014.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
14

Audience: Administrators, PRBC
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time and part-time regular (permanent) classified professional positions (new, augmented and replacement positions).Remember, student assistants are not to replace Classified Professional staff.
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan goal, safety, mandates, and accreditation issues. Please cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded, include and designate the funding source of new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent upon available funding.
1.
Number of positions requested: __2___
2.
If you are requesting more than one position, please rank order the positions.
Position
1.
9 month full time classified
2.
9 month full time classified
3.
Rationale for your proposal.
Description
Simulation lab technician
Simulation lab coordinator
1.
This position is necessary to run and maintain the manikins in the simulation lab. It is currently funded with grant monies for only 8 hours per week. This limits the use of the simulation lab.
2.
This position would require an RN license and medical knowledge to create and implement nursing simulation scenarios.
4.
Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and program review are required. Indicate here any information from advisory committees or outside accreditation reviews that is pertinent to the proposal.
Advisory committee members from area hospitals have advised the program that alternative clinical sites will be required in the future to accommodate the number of nursing students per unit. Simulation lab will be a viable/acceptable alternative as per BRN guidelines.
Nursing Program Review - 2013
15

Audience: Administrators, CEMC, PRBC
Purpose: To recommend changes in FTEF allocations for subsequent academic year and guide Deans and
CEMC in the allocation of FTEF to disciplines. For more information, see Article 29 (CEMC) of the Faculty
Contract.
Instructions: In the area below, please list your requested changes in course offerings (and corresponding request in FTEF) and provide your rationale for these changes. Be sure to analyze enrollment trends and other relevant data at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2012.cfm
.
We are requesting full time faculty to replace the deficiencies from 2 faculty reassigned /resignations.
Audience: Administrators, PRBC, Learning Connection
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement student assistants (tutors, learning assistants, lab assistants, supplemental instruction, etc.).
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan goal. Please cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded, include and designate the funding source of new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent upon available funding.
1.
Number of positions requested: _1_____
2.
If you are requesting more than one position, please rank order the positions.
Position
1.
Counseling part-time
Description
Case manager for retention grant
2.
3.
4.
3.
Rationale for your proposal based on your program review conclusions. Include anticipated impact on student learning outcomes and alignment with the strategic plan goal. Indicate if this request is for the same, more, or fewer academic learning support positions.
Due to the high stress nature of the nursing program we need a case manager to support student success. This is the plan to increase retention and decrease attrition. Currently this is funded with grant monies.
16

Audience: Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for supplies and service, and to guide the Budget Committee in allocation of funds.
Instructions: In the area below, please list both your current and requested budgets for categories 4000 and 5000 in priority order. Do NOT include conferences and travel, which are submitted on Appendix
M6. Justify your request and explain in detail any requested funds beyond those you received this year.
Please also look for opportunities to reduce spending, as funds are very limited.
Project or Items
Requested
IV pumps (2)
2012-13 Budget
Requested Received
$15,600
$1200
0
0
2013-14
Request
Rationale
Purchased with grant money
Purchased with grant money Enteral feeding pumps (2)
Low fidelity manikins (2)
$15,000 0 Purchased with grant money
$5,000 0 Purchased with grant money Patio study tables
(5)
Gurney
CCPS
ATI TEAS V
$2393
1000
$35/student
X 120
0
0
$1000
$4200
Purchased with grant money
Required for getting clinical sites/annual fee
Purchased with grant money. Since we use this as an admission criteria the CC must pay the fee
17

Audience: Staff Development Committee, Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for conference attendance, and to guide the Budget and Staff Development
Committees in allocation of funds.
Instructions: Please list specific conferences/training programs, including specific information on the name of the conference and location. Note that the Staff Development Committee currently has no budget, so this data is primarily intended to identify areas of need that could perhaps be fulfilled on campus, and to establish a historical record of need. Your rationale should discuss student learning goals and/or connection to the Strategic Plan goal.
2013-14 Request Rationale Conference/Training
Program
Asilomar $500 per faculty =
$5,000
All full time faculty should attend for new teaching ideas and alternative clinical settings.
Magic in Teaching
Directors conference
QSEN Conference
$500 per faculty All full time faculty should attend
$1500 Director must attend to learn new updates
$300 each Nursing program must integrate into Quality and
Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN) curriculum
Audience: Budget Committee, Technology Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Budget Committee and to inform priorities of the Technology
Committee.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests. If you're requesting classroom technology, see http://www.chabotcollege.edu/audiovisual/Chabot%20College%20Standard.pdf
for the brands/model numbers that are our current standards. If requesting multiple pieces of equipment, please rank order those requests. Include shipping cost and taxes in your request.
Please note: Equipment requests are for equipment whose unit cost exceeds $200. Items which are less expensive should be requested as supplies. Software licenses should also be requested as supplies.
Project or Items
Requested
Teleconferencing equipment (Hayward and Livermore)
IPADS (10)
2012-13 Budget
Requested Received 2013-14
Request
$100,000
(paid for with bond money)
$10,000
Rationale*
Installation for summer 2013 paid with bond money
$40,000 $40,000
Student access to up to date information while in the clinical area
Grant money Electronic Medical
Record
PC Computers (40) and workstations
Estimated
$135,000
All nursing exams on computers
18

Internet server All nursing exams on computers
* Rationale should include discussion of impact on student learning, connection to our strategic plan goal, impact on student enrollment, safety improvements, whether the equipment is new or replacement, potential ongoing cost savings that the equipment may provide, ongoing costs of equipment maintenance, associated training costs, and any other relevant information that you believe the Budget Committee should consider.
Estimated
$50,000
Audience: Facilities Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Facilities Committee.
Background: Following the completion of the 2012 Chabot College Facility Master Plan, the Facilities
Committee (FC) has begun the task of re-prioritizing Measure B Bond budgets to better align with current needs. The FC has identified approximately $18M in budgets to be used to meet capital improvement needs on the Chabot College campus. Discussion in the FC includes holding some funds for a year or two to be used as match if and when the State again funds capital projects, and to fund smaller projects that will directly assist our strategic goal. The FC has determined that although some of the college's greatest needs involving new facilities cannot be met with this limited amount of funding, there are many smaller pressing needs that could be addressed. The kinds of projects that can be legally funded with bond dollars include the "repairing, constructing, acquiring, equipping of classrooms, labs, sites and facilities."
Do NOT use this form for equipment or supply requests.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests .If requesting more than one facilities project, please rank order your requests.
Brief Title of Request (Project Name): Remodel 2200 room 2 nd floor
Building/Location: 2200
Description of the facility project. Please be as specific as possible.
Revision of room 2256 and 2254 into a computer lab that will accommodate 65 students.
What educational programs or institutional purposes does this equipment support?
Nursing program, dental and medical assisting program students and other courses that need a computer lab for blackboard testing. Allows for better item analysis of testing, immediate feedback for test results and review for students. We currently test at two different locations (sometimes three).
Allowing students to combine our extended campus (20) with home campus (40) for more active interaction with each other.
Briefly describe how your request relates specifically to meeting the Strategic Plan Goal and to enhancing student learning?
Increase the number of students that will achieve their educational goal within a reasonable time.
Please see the roadmap for our students to transfer to CSUEB.
19