Chapter 6 Decision Making What Would You Do? Low gas prices lead to lower profits Lower profits lead to employee layoffs Exploration needs, however, continue How will you convince top management to approve the risky deepwater drilling? 2 Blast From The Past Rational decision making can be traced back to Benjamin Franklin’s “moral algebra” Frederick W. Taylor scientific study of work scientifically select, train, and develop workers cooperate with employees partnership between employees and management 3 Learning Objectives What Is Rational Decision Making? After discussing this section you should be able to: 1. 2. explain the steps to rational decision making discuss the limits to rational decision making. 4 Steps to Rational Decision Making Define the Problem Identify Decision Criteria Weight the Criteria Generate Alternative Course of Action Evaluate Each Alternative Compute the Optimal Decision Adapted from Exhibit 6.1 5 Define the Problem Problem exists when there is a gap between a desired state and an existing state To make decisions about problems, managers must: aware of the gap motivated to reduce the gap have the knowledge, skills, abilities, and resources to fix the problem 6 Weight the Criteria Absolute comparisons each criterion is compared to a standard or ranked on its own merits Relative comparisons each criterion is compared directly to every other criterion 7 Performance Characteristics 1. starting and acceleration 2. fuel economy 3. handling and steering 4. shifting/transmission 5. ride quality 6. braking 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Design Characteristics 1. overall design 2. interior ergonomics 3. seating 4. accessories and amenities 5. cargo space 6. fit and finish 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Adapted from Exhibit 6.2 8 Car Performance Characteristics starting/ acceleration starting/ acceleration fuel economy +1 handling and steering shifting/ transmission ride quality braking -1 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 +1 0 0 fuel economy -1 handling and steering +1 +1 shifting/ transmission +1 +1 0 ride quality +1 +1 0 0 braking 0 +1 -1 0 0 Total Weight +2 +5 -3 -2 -2 0 0 Adapted from Exhibit 6.3 9 Criteria Ratings Used to Evaluate the Best Locations for Insurance Companies Climate Accessibility Labor Living Environment Atlanta 3 5 4 6 4 4.35 Baltimore 5 4 2 4 5 4 Chicago 7 6 6 5 4 5.75 Des Moines 7 1 4 2 7 4.2 Kansas City 5 3 2 4 6 3.95 Milwaukee 6 2 4 3 5 4.05 Minneapolis 5 5 4 5 5 4.8 Seattle 4 4 3 6 4 4.2 St. Louis 3 5 1 4 5 3.5 Tampa 2 3 4 3 7 3.55 Regulatory City Adapted From Exhibit 5.4 Operating Costs Weighted Average Source: K. Galloway, “America's Best Insurance Cities,” Best's Review/Property-Casualty Insurance Edition, 1 November 1994, 38 10 Cities Ranked by Optimal Value and Optimal Values Average Ratings 1 Chicago 5.75 2 Minneapolis 3 Atlanta 4.35 4 Des Moines Seattle 4.2 6 Milwaukee 7 Baltimore 4.05 8 Kansas City 9 Tampa 3.95 10 St. Louis Adapted From Exhibit 6.5 4.8 4.2 4 3.55 3.5 Source: K. Galloway, “America's Best Insurance Cities,” Best's Review/Property-Casualty Insurance Edition, 1 November 1994, 38 11 Been There, Done That Making Better Decisions People often start to solve the wrong problem It is critical to pose the correct problem Your intuition and analysis should “fit” together 12 Limits to Rational Decision Making Bounded Rationality Risk & Risky Conditions Common Decision Making Mistakes 13 Bounded Rationality Managers try to be rational they are restricted by real-world constraints cannot be completely rational Four constraints on rational decision making 14 Four Constraints to Rational Decision Making Limited Resources Information Overload Expertise Memory Problems Problems 15 Choosing Solutions Maximizing decisions choosing the optimal solution requires fully rational decision conditions Satisficing decisions choosing the “good enough” solution maximization is not possible due to constraints fits with bounded rationality 16 Risk & Decision Making under Risky Conditions Rationality assumes a certain decision condition complete information and knowledge of all possible outcomes Most decisions made under conditions of risk there exists a real possibility of failure 17 A large car manufacturer has recently been hit with a number of economic difficulties, and it appears as if three plants need to be closed and 6,000 employees laid off. The vice-president of production has been exploring alternative ways to avoid this crisis. She has developed two plans: Plan A: This plan will save one of three plants and 2,000 jobs. Plan B: This plan has a 1/3 probability of saving all three plants and 6,000 jobs, but has a 2/3 probability of saving no plants and no jobs. 18 A large car manufacturer has recently been hit with a number of economic difficulties, and it appears as if three plants need to be closed and 6,000 employees laid off. The vice-president of production has been exploring alternative ways to avoid this crisis. She has developed two plans: Plan C: This plan will result in the loss of two of the three plants and 4,000 jobs. Plan D: This plan has a 2/3 probability of resulting in the loss of all three plants and all 6,000 jobs, but has a 1/3 probability of losing no plants and no jobs. 19 Framing Effects on Decision Making Positive Frame a problem presented as a gain become more risk-averse Negative Frame a problem presented as a loss become more risk-seeking + - 20 Conditions of Uncertainty The odds of winning or losing are unknown Risk propensity a person’s willingness to take risks a high risk propensity need by individuals in uncertain conditions 21 Common Decision-Making Mistakes Over Reliance on Intuition Availability Bias Representative Bias Anchoring and Adjustment Bias 22 Over Reliance on Intuition Intuition plays a part in many managerial decisions Intuition works best for experienced managers Over use, however, causes decision makers to ignore available data 23 Availability Bias The tendency of decision makers to give preference to recent information, vivid images that evoke emotions, and specific acts and behaviors that they personally observed May overlook “rational data” 24 Representative Bias When decision makers judge the likelihood of an event’s occurrence based on its similarity to previous events and their likelihood of occurrence We ignore objective data that does not fit our experiences 25 Anchoring & Adjustment Bias When judgment (good-bad, large-small, yesno, etc.) is “anchored” by an initial value Once the anchor is “dropped,” two things happen: all subsequent experiences are judged by their similarity to the anchor all possible decision alternatives tend to cluster around the anchor 26 Learning Objectives Improving Decision Making After discussing this section you should be able to: 3. 4. describe how rules and testing can improve decision making explain how group decisions and group decision making techniques can improve decision making 27 Improving Individual Decision Making Decision Multivariable Rules Testing Decision Escalation Software Of Commitment 28 Decision Rules A set of criteria that alternative solutions must meet to be acceptable Two types: dictionary minimum threshold 29 Multivariable Testing A much more systematic approach to analyzing and evaluating potential solutions Improves decision making by: forces decisions made based on data encouraging the simultaneous evaluation of several potential solutions 30 Multivariable Testing to Increase Amusement Park Attendance on Tuesdays Test Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Adapted from Exhibit 6.8 Free Free 2-for-1 Lunch Parking Profits $4,000 X $2,000 X $9,000 X X $5,000 X X 31 Decision Software Most decisions made in an unstructured manner PC software can help “walk” decision makers through decision process 32 Avoiding Escalation of Commitment The tendency to stick with a “wrong” decision Usually commit greater resources to this decision. Protecting against escalation Progress reports Outside auditors Change managers “Experimental” projects. 33 Using Groups to Improve Decision Making Advantages Structured and Pitfalls Nominal Group Technique Stepladder Technique Conflict Delphi Technique Electronic Brainstorming 34 Advantages of Group Decision Making Improved problem definition view problems from multiple perspectives find the cause of the problem Generate more alternative solutions have access to greater information than individuals involvement leads to greater decision commitment 35 Pitfalls of Group Decision Making Groupthink It takes more time One or two people dominate discussions 36 Groupthink Internal pressures prevent the group from openly evaluating all alternatives Most likely: the group is insulated from different ideas the group leader stifles discussions there is no established procedure for defining and exploring alternatives group members have similar backgrounds and experiences 37 Structured Conflict C-type conflict cognitive conflict focuses on problem-related differences of opinion A-type conflict affective conflict emotional reactions to disagreements 38 Devil’s Advocacy - 5 Steps Generate a potential solution Assign a devil’s advocate to criticize and question the solution Present the critique of the potential solution to key decision makers Gather additional relevant information Decide whether to use, change or not use the original proposed solution 39 Dialectical Inquiry Generate a potential solution Identify the assumptions underlying the potential solution Generate a conflicting counterproposal based on the opposite assumptions Have advocates of each position present their arguments and debate them Decide whether to use, change or not use the original proposed solution 40 What Really Works? Devil’s Advocacy & Dialectical Inquiry Devil’s Advocacy 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Probability of success 58% Dialectical Inquiry 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Probability of success 55% 41 Nominal Group Technique Decreases negative group behaviors by having group members work individually begin with “quiet time” members write out ideas Ideas are then posted to the group Advantages/disadvantages are discussed Members individually reflect on discussion Ideas are then ranked by the group 42 Delphi Technique Create a questionnaire of open-ended questions Select a panel of experts Compile and summarize expert responses into written report Experts list their reasons agreeing/disagreeing with report Repeat steps 3 & 4 until consensus is reached 43 Stepladder Technique Step 3 Group Member 4 Joins Group - Shares thoughts, ideas, recommendations Group Members 1, 2, & 3 Share previous thoughts, ideas, recommendations Discussion is Held and Tentative Group Decision is Made Step 2 Group Member 3 Joins Group - Shares thoughts, ideas, recommendations Group Members 1 & 2 Share previous thoughts, ideas, recommendations Discussion is Held and Tentative Group Decision is Made Step 1 Group Member 1 Shares thoughts, ideas, recommendations Group Member 2 Shares thoughts, ideas, recommendations Discussion is Held and Tentative Group Decision is Made Adapted From Exhibit 6.9 44 Electronic Brainstorming Four brainstorming rules: the more ideas, the better all ideas are acceptable use others’ ideas to create more ideas criticism or evaluation of ideas is not allowed A modification of traditional brainstorming use computers to manage the process 45 Advantages of Electronic Brainstorming Overcomes production blocking technology allows everyone to record their ideas as they are created no ideas lost “waiting your turn” to speak Overcomes evaluation apprehension anonymity creates free expression 46 Disadvantages of Electronic Brainstorming Greater expense No automatic acceptance of ideas because of one’s position Some find it difficult to express themselves in writing Lack of typing skills can frustrate participants 47 What Really Happened? Deepwater drilling was a risky, unproven method at the time Management’s high risk propensity led them to begin deepwater drilling The decision was a profitable one 48