May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Project: IEEE 802.15 Study Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband Channel Model for Farm/Open-Area Applications] Date Submitted: [11 May, 2004] Source: [Shahriar Emami, Celestino A. Corral, Gregg Rasor]: Company1 [Freescale Semiconductor], Address [8000 W. Sunrise Blvd., Plantation, FL 33322], Voice:[(954) 723-3854], FAX: [(954) 723-3883] Re: [Channel Model Submission] Abstract: [An ultra-wideband channel model for open area/farm applications is submitted. The channel model is based on ray tracing that captures signal descriptors including frequencies. The rationale behind the channel model is developed and presented in support of the presentation.] Purpose: [An understanding of the open area outdoor environment for ultra-wideband (UWB) signal coverage is needed for 802.15 TG4a. This channel model should assist in predicting UWB range and proper signal design for open area applications.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Contribution Slide 1 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Ultra-Wideband Channel Model for Farm/Open-Area Applications Understanding UWB Propagation in Open Areas Subject to Selected Environmental Factors Shahriar Emami, Celestino A. Corral, Gregg Rasor Freescale Semiconductor The presenters wish to acknowledge the support and contributions of: • Glafkos Stratis/Motorola • Salvador Sibecas/Motorola Contribution Slide 2 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Outline • Ultra-wideband Outdoor Channel Model Status • Special Considerations – Approach – Frequency Selection – Simulation Setup • Simulation Results – Ground conditions – Channel Impulse Response and Ray Statistics – Coverage • Summary and Conclusions • Proposed Continuing Investigations Contribution Slide 3 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Channel Model Status We shall show this in simulation • Prior Efforts: – Two-ray UWB path loss model: • S. Sato and T. Kobayashi, “Path-loss exponents of ultra wideband signals in line-of-sight environments,” IEEE802.15-04-0111-00-004a, March 2004. – Deterministic UWB channel model based on ray tracing approach: • B. Uguen, E. Plouhinec, Y. Lostanlen, and G. Chassay, “A deterministic ultra wideband channel modeling,” 2002 IEEE Conf. Ultra Wideband Syst. Tech. We use approach considered here Contribution Slide 4 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Special Considerations • Farm areas feature isolated clusters of scatterers • Material properties may change with frequency. (For our simulations, we assume material properties constant over frequency.) In addition, the outdoor channel is subject to environmental changes – Seasonal changes (snow, ice, etc. in some regions) – Rain/wet conditions Contribution Slide 5 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Different Absorption Regions Frequency Range Of Interest Conduction Dipole and We assume no dielectric changes over frequency Ionic Relaxation Space Charge Polarization -6 -4 Log frequency (Hz) -2 0 Atomic Electronic Absorption 2 4 6 8 10 60Hz R. C. Dorf (Ed.), The Electrical Engineering Handbook, 2nd Ed., Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1997. Contribution Slide 6 12 14 16 18 Dielectric practically constant over frequency range of interest. Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Approach • Use deterministic 3-D ray tracing simulator - Employs – geometric optics – uniform theory of diffraction (UTD) – Generates • Received signal strength • Ray statistics (path length/delay) • Signal descriptors include frequency, polarization, etc. • UWB channel sounding is achieved by superposition of NB channel sounding - Conventional channel sounding - FCC emissions mask scaled channel sounding M. F. Iskander and Z. Yun, “Propagation prediction models for wireless communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 50, pp. 662—673, March 2002. Contribution Slide 7 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Frequency Selection Energy of band concentrated in high band frequency 0 dBm -11.2 -11.4 -12.8 -13.8 -14.8 3.10 4.24 5.34 6.72 8.64 10.6 3.10 4.24 6.72 8.64 10.6 “High-Pass” Sounding Channel Sounding Energy of band concentrated in geometric center frequency -13.8 -14.8 3.62 Contribution 5.34 Slide 8 -12.8 -11.4 -11.2 4.76 5.99 7.62 9.57 “Band-Pass” Sounding Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Set-Up 3-D omni antenna pattern used Omni pattern assumed at all frequencies omni antenna above house Provides worst-case delay modeling omni antenna near ground Farm area consists of two-story wood home and metal grain silo. Ground is not flat; has slight variations in height. Contribution • Receiver grid placed around home, 200m X 200m • Receiver spacing was 4m X 4m • Receiver height was at 1.3m • For omni antenna above house, antenna was at 12.5m height • For omni antenna near ground, antenna was at 1.5m height. Slide 9 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Coverage Results Lowest Frequency – 4.24 GHz Dry soil Wet soil and wet roof 200 m 200 m Contribution TX power = 0 dBm TX power = 0 dBm • Highest level -64.4 dBm • Highest level -66.5 dBm • Shadowing due to metal silo evident • Smoother ripple closer to antenna • Ripple due to two-ray phenomenon evident • Impact of roof more significant Slide 10 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Coverage Results Full Frequencies -- Channel Sounding Dry soil Wet soil TX power = 0 dBm Contribution TX power = 0 dBm • Highest level -64.4 dBm • Highest level -66.5 dBm • Some deep fades are eliminated, others softened • Higher signals closer to antenna • • Ripple due to two-ray phenomenon still evident, although smooth ripple closer Shadowing due to silo and roof still significant Dry/wet conditions are fairly similar Slide 11 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Coverage “High-pass” and “Band-pass” Sounding Dry soil Dry soil TX antenna placed at 1.5m height and at the side of the house • High-pass sounding • Band-pass sounding • Highest level -61.8 dBm • Highest level -60.2 dBm • Significant shading by house as well as silo • Range for -75 dBm sensitivity is quite low, on the order of 15 m. High-pass and bandpass sounding are similar Contribution Slide 12 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation--Validation UWB Path Loss -50 -60 • Powers in the different frequency bands are summed together • Received power profile in agreement with the work of Sato and Kobayashi Power (dBm) -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 0 10 1 2 10 10 Transmitter-Receiver Separation (m) 3 10 40 P a th lo ss [dB ] 60 80 100 120 140 160 10 100 1000 D is tan ce m [ ] TX antenna placed at 1.5m height and at the side of the house Contribution Slide 13 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results—Ground Conditions Contribution Constrained Channel Sounding 1 0.9 Dry Wet 0.8 0.7 Probability (X < Xo) • Ground conditions (wet or dry) has almost no impact on received signal power or delay spread. • Subsequent simulations were assuming dry conditions 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -180 Slide 14 -160 -140 -120 Power (dBm) -100 -80 -60 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results— Channel Impulse Response • CIR is similar to two-ray model. -7 5 CIR of Real Part of the received signal x 10 -8 6 4 4 3 Received Amplitude (V) Received Amplitude (V) CIR of Imaginary Part of the received signal x 10 2 1 2 0 -2 -4 0 -6 -1 0 20 Contribution 40 60 80 100 t (ns) 120 140 160 -8 180 Slide 15 0 20 40 60 80 100 t (ns) 120 140 160 180 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results— Channel RF Parameters Table I. 90 percentile received power Scenario Received Power (dBm) Table II. 90 percentile delay spread Scenario Scenario A B Scenario A B -83 -74 Mean Excess Delay (ns) RMS Delay (ns) 380 365 19 26 - Scenario A: transmit antenna is placed on the top of farm house - Scenario B: transmit antenna is placed along the side of the house Contribution Slide 16 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results—Ray Statistics • Statistics of the two rays are found to be Rayleigh distributed. Histogram of I of the Largest Component Histogram of I of the Second Largest Component 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 -6 Histogram of Q of the Largest Component -7 x 10 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0.5 1 1.5 -6 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 -7 x 10 Contribution x 10 Histogram of Q of the Second Largest Component 400 0 4.5 x 10 Slide 17 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results—Channel Sounding Constrained Channel Sounding 1 Dry Wet 0.9 • Channel (uniform) sounding leads to larger received power as compared to constrained channel (FCC-mask compliant) sounding. 0.8 FCC-mask complaint Probability (X < Xo) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -180 -160 -140 -120 Power (dBm) -100 -80 -60 -80 -60 Channel Sounding 1 0.9 Dry Wet 0.8 Probability (X < Xo) 0.7 Uniform sounding 0.6 0.5 0.4 Over 10dB difference 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -180 Contribution Slide 18 -160 -140 -120 Power (dBm) -100 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results— “High-pass” or “Band-pass” Sounding 1 0.9 High Pass Channel Sounding Band Pass Channel Sounding 0.8 0.7 Probability (X < Xo) • “Band-pass” sounding results in +1 dB higher received power compared to “highpass” sounding. 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -160 High-pass Contribution -140 -120 -100 Power (dBm) -80 -60 -40 High-pass and bandpass sounding are similar Band-pass Slide 19 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results—Coverage Table III. % grid Coverage, if the receiver sensitivity is -90 dBm. 100x100 Coverage (%) 85 85 Constrained Channel Sounding (30mx30m) 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 Contribution Probability (X < Xo) Probability (X < Xo) Constrained Channel Sounding 1 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 -120 -110 -100 -90 -80 Power (dBm) 30x30 -70 -60 0 -120 -50 Slide 20 -110 -100 -90 -80 Power (dBm) -70 -60 -50 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Simulation Results—Channel Model CM1* CM2* CM3* I mean 1.4092e-007 3.1052e-008 -5.8368e-009 Q mean -1.8287e-008 5.9910e-009 -4.2345e-009 MED (ns) RMS Delay (ns) 22.654 20 35.491 251.53 3.5565 5.0733 * The transmitter receiver separation distances are 5, 15 and 75 meters in CM1, CM2 and CM3, respectively. Contribution Slide 21 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Summary and Conclusions UWB Ray Tracing: • Ray tracing with realistic antennas and appropriate material properties was implemented. • Analyses included all ray statistics/parameters (ray physics). • CIR of UWB channel is found by superposition of CIR of individual bands with appropriate power weighting. Channel Modeling Results: • 5-band approach is adequate for predicting outdoor coverage in farm scenario as verified by prior two-ray modeling. • “High-pass” sounding yields most conservative results. • RF parameters appear almost insensitive to ground material/conditions. • 100m range achievable with -90dBm RX sensitivity. • CIR is similar to that of two-ray model. RMS delay depends on location of antenna and statistics of the rays. • Two-ray statistics are verified to have Rayleigh distribution. Contribution Slide 22 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Ongoing Investigations • Incorporate uplink simulations. • Alternative frequency domain based approach. • Measurement and verification. Contribution Slide 23 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Back-up Slides Contribution Slide 24 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor May 7, 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0215-00-004a Material Properties Pellat-Debye Equations for loss at single relaxation time. Real permittivity exhibits lowpass frequency response. Imaginary part exhibits bandpass response. Regions can be separated for different relaxation times. Temperature effects are not modeled, but only affected by change in density of dielectric material. Reference Data for Engineers: Radio, Electronics, Computer & Communications, 8th Ed., Carmel, Indiana: SAMS, Prentice-Hall Computer Pub., 1993. Contribution Slide 25 Shahriar Emami, Freescale Semiconductor