Does a sports team's name really matter?
Experts weigh in on the difference a name and logo can make
By Sean Davidson , CBC News Posted: Jun 05, 2013 5:49 AM ET Last Updated: Jun 05, 2013 9:47 AM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/does-a-sports-team-s-name-really-matter-1.1328868
The RedBlacks rumour originated from a website that last week claimed to have early word on
the nascent team’s name and logo. The R will be inside a buzzsaw symbol, according to
sportslogos.net, on a black background with red highlights.
There are rumours that when Ottawa’s new CFL team hits the gridiron in 2014 the players will
have big white Rs on their jerseys and answer to "the RedBlacks." The reaction to that name has
been lukewarm, but it also has some asking how important branding is to the success of a
modern sports franchise.
The RedBlacks rumour originated from a website that last week claimed to have early word on
the nascent team’s name and logo. The R will be inside a buzzsaw symbol, according to
sportslogos.net, on a black background with red highlights.
Ottawa has been without a CFL team since the short-lived Renegades folded in 2006. Before
that, the city had the more accomplished Rough Riders.
Logos are 'a very important factor,' particularly for a team's merchandising,
says Richard Powers, an expert in sports marketing with the Rotman School
of Management at the University of Toronto.
Nothing will be official until June 8 when the bosses say they will "confirm"
the details but – as is often the case when sports teams get new names – early response has been
less than glowing.
1|Page
Does a sports team's name really matter?
An online poll attached to that same story showed at one point only 14 per cent approval for
"RedBlacks" and their supposed buzzsaws. A full 76 per cent were opposed. "I could not have
imagined a dumber name," wrote one CBC reader in response to the recent news story.
How much does public approval for a sports brand matter in the long run? It depends who you
ask.
On one hand, there are a lot of sports teams with boring names. Or names that don’t make any
sense, or are borderline offensive, or which probably offered only a modicum of appeal when
they were introduced sometime early in the last century.
The Oakland Athletics spring to mind. Also the Cleveland Browns, the Green Bay Packers, the
Utah Jazz and the Anaheim Mighty Ducks.
On the other hand, a team’s name and logo are key ingredients in generating fan interest and
those oh-so-important merchandise sales.
Unflattering comparisons were made between the Raptor's logo
and children’s TV sensation Barney the Dinosaur, while others
deemed it a too-obvious attempt to cash in on the popularity of
Jurassic Park, which had arrived in theatres a few years before
the team’s debut in 1995. (Courtesy Toronto Raptors)
They are "a very important factor," says Richard Powers, an
expert in sports marketing with the Rotman School of
Management at the University of Toronto.
"Usually what you’re looking for in a name and logo is something that gives the fan, the target
market, a clear connection to the team. So it can’t be anything too contentious. It can’t be
anything too abstract. There has to be a direct connection," he says.
In marketer lingo, the name and logo have to be "grabby." Names are more important than logos
because they get more exposure (think of radio broadcasts) and are harder to change.
They should also suggest something positive about the team and generate "emotional appeal" –
often by invoking the hometown’s history or character. Thus, Edmonton has its Oilers, Ottawa
its Senators.
Powers says all of this is especially important during a team’s uncertain start-up phase when it
will have no star players or other means of goosing ticket or bobblehead sales.
2|Page
Does a sports team's name really matter?
Exact figures are hard to find, but he estimates an average team makes at least 20 per cent of its
revenue from merchandise these days.
But in the long run, say experts, a team will ultimately live or die by its performance on the field
and in the community. Even the lamest names will be overlooked if a team is chalking up wins.
Initially there was some blowback, to the Raptors' original purple outfits and dinosaur logo,
recalls Brian Cooper, the club's first vice-president of operations.
"Branding takes time, and it’s all about the quality of the experience," says Jim Kyte, a former
NHL player and current chair of marketing and management at Algonquin College in Ottawa.
"Look at the Senators," he says, citing a team for which he once played. "I don’t think that’s a
great name to start with, but look at what they’ve done in the community and on the ice.
"They’re a first-class organization," he says, though building that reputation took the better part
of a generation.
People even got used to saying "the Anaheim Mighty Ducks" and "the Toronto Raptors" —
names which both drew sneers when they were introduced to the NHL and NBA, respectively, in
the 1990s.
"Initially there was some blowback," to the Raptors’ original purple outfits and dinosaur logo,
recalls Brian Cooper, the club’s first vice-president of operations. Unflattering comparisons were
made to children’s TV sensation Barney the Dinosaur, while others deemed it a too-obvious
attempt to cash in on the popularity of Jurassic Park, which had arrived in theatres a few years
before the team’s debut in 1995.
Cooper admits the name was a "pure merchandising play" – not his preferred approach, but it
worked.
"You can go with what’s hot in pop culture at the time," or have a name that taps into local
history, he says. (Cooper was once president of the Toronto Argonauts, which lifted its unlikely
name from a local rowing club.)
"But no matter where it comes from, [the team] is about how you grow the culture around it,"
Cooper adds.
"The brand isn’t just the visual. If we were talking about Heinz beans it would be what’s in the
can that matters most. The product is the team and how it works in the community, how they’re
perceived by the local media and what they give back," he says.
3|Page