Icons: Venerable or Vulnerable

advertisement
New Paradigms for Teaching Structural
Geology in the 21st Century
David D. Pollard
Stanford University
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Research Opportunities, New Frontiers, and the
Questioning of Paradigms in Structural Geology
and Tectonics: SG&T 25th Anniversary
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Acknowledgements
• Stanford students: Laurent Maerten,
Frantz Maerten, Phil Resor, Stephan
Bergbauer, Tricia Fiore, Ian Mynatt
• Colleagues: Ray Fletcher, George Hilley
• NSF Tectonics Program, NSF
Collaborations in Mathematical
Geosciences Program
• Symposium organizers
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Icons of Structural Geology: Are
they venerable or vulnerable ?
• Stereographic
projection
• Mohr’s circle
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Icons: Venerable or Vulnerable ?
• compass /
clinometer
• topographic map
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Icons: Venerable or Vulnerable ?
• descriptive
geometry
• stress and strain
analysis
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Can we do better than the
stereonet?
Chimney Rock, Utah: Maerten (2000)
Data: (ad, fd, qr) for 47 stations
Normal faults, slip down dip
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Stereonets ignore locations
Data: (x, y, z, ad, fd, qr) for 47 stations obtained
using GPS and a compass/clinometer (Maerten, 2000).
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Spatial data reveals fault mechanics
(Maerten, 2000)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Can we improve upon Mohr’s
Circle?
1999 Hector mine earthquake (Mw 7.1), southern California
(Treiman et al., 2002)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Deformation is not homogeneous
Descending & ascending radar interferograms (Jonsson et al., 2002):
Color cycle = 10 cm displacement. Data size = 1.5 x 106. Pixel size = 80 x 80m.
Number of Mohr’s circles to represent strain ~843 and ~452.
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Deformation is not homogeneous
Campaign GPS displacement vectors (Agnew et al., 2002)
Greatest displacement = 2.2 m 3 km east of fault. Data size = 55.
Number of Mohr’s circles to represent strain ~ 50.
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Spatial data reveals fault mechanics
Inverting for slip on 3D fault surfaces (Maerten, Resor et al., 2005)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Can we surpass the compass?
(Bergbauer & Pollard, 2004)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Given the compass, one produces:
(Bergbauer & Pollard, 2004)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
GPS enables one to describe and
analyze the fold shape in 3D
(Bergbauer & Pollard, 2004)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Is the topo map adequate for the
modern structural geologist?
(Hilley, Mynatt, et al., 2005)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
(NCALM, NSF-CMG)
GSA Salt Lake City
Lidar provides (x, y, z) and
spectacular resolution
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
High resolution data enables a
quantitative study of fold shape
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Can we improve upon descriptive
geometry?
(Bellahsen,
Fiore, et al.,
2005)
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Differential geometry provides arc
lengths and areas of folded surfaces
s  u, v   s x e x  s y e y  s z e z
I  Edu 2  Fdudv  Gdv 2
s s
E

u u
s s
F

u v
s s
G 
v v
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Differential geometry provides measures
of the shapes of folded surfaces
s  u, v   s x e x  s y e y  s z e z
II  Ldu 2  Mdudv  Ndv 2
 2s
L  N 2
u
 2s
M  N
uv
 2s
N  N 2
v
GSA Salt Lake City
(Forster et al., 1996)
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
There are four possible shapes at
any point on a folded surface
 n  II I
 1 cos 2 a   1 sin 2 a
m 
1
2
 1   2 
1 EN  2 FM  GL

2
EG  F 2
 g  1 2
LN  M 2

EG  F 2
GSA Salt Lake City
Traditional structural analysis focuses
only on the cylindrical surface, g=0.
(Bergbauer & Pollard, 2003)
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
The folded surface from Sheep Mt. is
made up of all possible shapes
Differential geometry
enables one to actually
describe the surface, not
simply approximate it as
cylindrical (Mynatt,
Bergbauer, et al., 2006).
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Chapter 3:
Characterizing
structures using
differential
geometry
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
http://pangea.stanford.edu/projects/structural_geology/
Oct. 18, 2005
Can we go beyond stress and strain
analysis?
• commonly taught as
independent topics
• not linked through
constitutive laws
• not put in a fundamental
context of conservation of
mass and momentum
Newton points the way…
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Conservation of linear & angular
momentum
Cauchy’s Laws of Motion
Dvi  ji
*


  gi
Dt
x j
 ij   ji , i  j
A. L. Cauchy
These laws are independent of material properties.
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
A constitutive law for ductile
deformation
Navier-Stokes Equations
 vi v j 
 ij   p ij   

 x j xi 


Dvi
p
 2vi



  gi*
Dt
xi
xk xk
G. G. Stokes
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
A constitutive law for brittle
deformation
Navier’s Equations of Motion
 ij  2G ij   kk ij
2
2ui
2ui

  u
k   g*
 2 G
 G   
i
X k X k 
t
 X X
i k
C.L.M.H. Navier
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Chapter 7:
Conservation
of mass and
momentum
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
http://pangea.stanford.edu/projects/structural_geology/
Oct. 18, 2005
The logical thread leading to an
understanding of tectonic processes
and their structural products
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Conservation laws of mass & momentum
Cauchy’s equations of motion
Selection of constitutive laws
Specialized equations of motion
Selection of initial and boundary conditions
Solutions to boundary value problems
Comparisons of results to geological data
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Thought-provoking questions
• Should we continue to emphasize
stereonets and Mohr’s circles or teach
students how to investigate nonhomogeneous fabrics/structures and
stress/strain fields using calculus?
• Should we continue to emphasize the
compass and topographic map or teach
students about GPS, Lidar, and other
modern technologies?
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Thought-provoking questions
• How can we expect students to
understand the 3D geometry of geological
structures without the fundamental
concepts of differential geometry?
• Isn’t it about time for geologists to adopt a
complete mechanics for the investigation
of tectonic processes and their structural
products?
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
Oct. 18, 2005
Teachers who adopt the techniques and
technology described here, and who add
differential geometry and a complete
mechanics to their curriculum will discover a
fascinating new perspective on structural
geology that prepares their students
for the challenges of the 21st century.
GSA Salt Lake City
Pardee Keynote Symposium
http://pangea.stanford.edu/projects/structural_geology/
Oct. 18, 2005
Download