A Uniform North American Cargo Securement Standard Overview of Proposed Model Regulation March 1999 © CCMTA, 1999 1 © CCMTA, 1999 2 A Uniform, North American Cargo Securement Standard Expectation: • a performance based cargo securement standard which can be uniformly implemented and applied throughout North America Process: • joint effort, open discussion and collaboration between governments and stakeholders from Canada and United States © CCMTA, 1999 3 Background • Research program to address problems with cargo securement developed by Ontario MTO in early ‘90’s • Research conducted under sponsorship and direction of joint Canada-U.S., public-private partnership • Research & testing completed in early 1997 • Findings delivered to joint Canada/United States committee to support development of new regulations © CCMTA, 1999 4 Standard Development - Organization Canada United States Mexico Council of Deputy Ministers of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Secretaria de Comunicaciones Y Transportes CCMTA CVSA North American Standard Harmonization Committee Membership: Open to all public & private stakeholders and other interested parties © CCMTA, 1999 5 Standards Harmonization Committee • open membership • eight meetings held from 1996 to fall 1998 • broad participation from both governments and industry – federal, state and provincial governments – trucking industry – shippers – equipment manufacturers © CCMTA, 1999 6 Meeting Results • Performance Criteria ~ the fundamental basis for cargo securement requirements • Format of standard ~ review of existing regulations and models used in other countries • Evolutionary process ~ variety of expectations – simple standard: clear, usable and enforceable – practical guide: advice based on research and testing results © CCMTA, 1999 7 Meeting Results Convergence to consensus – agreement on scope and application of standard – agreement on performance criteria – agreement on framework for standard: • general requirements which apply to all cargo • specific requirements for commodities which pose high risk or challenges to securement – agreement on list of specific commodities © CCMTA, 1999 8 North American Standard • development of a “model” regulation which can be implemented throughout North America • ultimate vision of standard in two parts: – “Model Regulation” ~ the regulatory aspects of the proposed standard – “The Guide” ~ elaboration on the regulations, what’s required, what’s good practice, basis for training programs © CCMTA, 1999 9 © CCMTA, 1999 10 Guiding Principle • public safety requires that cargo being transported on the highway system must remain on or within the transporting vehicle under all conditions which could reasonably be expected to occur in normal driving and when a driver is responding to emergency situations, short of a crash. © CCMTA, 1999 11 Performance Criteria Vertical (bumps, rough roads) Rearward (accelerating, braking in reverse) Forward (braking) Sideways (cornering) © CCMTA, 1999 12 Performance Criteria - Implications - the cargo must be secured in a manner which prevents it from falling from, or shifting on, the vehicle when subjected to the forces which would occur with the “performance criteria” - vehicle structures and attachments must be strong enough to supply the necessary restraining forces ~ bulkheads, walls, floors, anchor points etc - the securing equipment must be strong enough to supply the necessary restraining forces ~ tiedowns, chains, ratchets, binders, etc © CCMTA, 1999 13 Securement Approaches Contained Van Bodies, Tankers, Dump Boxes Blocked Direct Headboards, Sides, Tailgates, Blocking & Bracing Attached Twist locks, Direct Tiedowns Friction Indirect Weight of load + Tiedowns © CCMTA, 1999 14 Contained Cargo Cargo is contained and secured by the vehicle structure, additional securing devices not needed: ~ liquids in tankers, ~ bulk solids in tankers or dump boxes, ~ general freight in van trailers or containers © CCMTA, 1999 15 Blocked Cargo Cargo is restrained against movement in at least one direction by vehicle structures, such as headboards or bulkheads, or other cargo. © CCMTA, 1999 16 Attached Cargo - Direct Tiedowns Cargo is restrained by tie-downs which are attached to both the vehicle and the cargo. © CCMTA, 1999 17 Attached Cargo - Direct Attachment Cargo is attached to vehicle by locking devices, twist locks other integral locking systems. Friction between the load and the loading deck is not relied upon for cargo restraint. © CCMTA, 1999 18 Restrained by Indirect Tiedowns Cargo is restrained against movement by friction. • Friction prevents the cargo from slipping forwards, rearwards and sideways. • Tie-downs increase the effective weight of the cargo and prevent it from moving vertically © CCMTA, 1999 19 Combined Restraint Friction + Blocking Friction + Direct Restraint © CCMTA, 1999 20 Forces on Cargo Forward Direction (eg. under braking): Friction 1000 lb Force 800 lb Travel Forces: Total forward = 800 lb. Restraint: Friction = Coefficient of Friction x Weight © CCMTA, 1999 21 Coefficient of Friction Friction Material 1000 lb. Dry Wet Greasy Wood on Wood 0.20 - 0.50 (200 to 500 lb) 0.20 - 0.25 (200 to 250 lb) 0.05 - 0.15 (50 to 150 lb) Metal on Wood 0.20 - 0.50 (200 to 500 lb) 0.20 - 0.25 (200 to 250 lb) 0.02 - 0.10 (20 to 100 lb) Metal on Metal 0.10 - 0.25 (100 to 250 lb) 0.10 - 0.20 (100 to 200 lb) 0.01 - 0.10 (10 to 100 lb) © CCMTA, 1999 22 Forces on Cargo Friction 10 to 500 lb 1000 lb Deceleration Force 800 lb Travel Deceleration Force: 800 lb. Restraint due to friction: 10 to 500 lb. © CCMTA, 1999 23 Forces on Cargo Tiedown - tension 500 lb Friction 20 to 1000 lb Deceleration Force 800 lb Travel Deceleration Force: 800 lb. Effective Weight of Cargo: 2000 lb (1000+500+500) Restraint due to friction: 20 to 1000 lb. © CCMTA, 1999 24 Indirect Tiedowns Objective: Increase the effective weight of the cargo increase the restraining effect of friction Concern: Angle of tiedown is important Example: Tension in tiedown = 500 lb ? 500 lb Angle = 90 degrees Downforce 1000 lb 60 degrees 45 degrees 30 degrees 707 lb 500 lb 866 lb © CCMTA, 1999 25 Indirect Tiedowns Effectiveness: - maintain tension - keep articles of cargo together or fill gaps to prevent shifting - maintain steep tiedown angles © CCMTA, 1999 26 Direct Tiedowns 1000 lb. Force 800 lb Tiedown attached to vehicle and to cargo: - tiedown must break for cargo to shift - tiedowns react directly to forces - shallow tiedown angles are more effective © CCMTA, 1999 27 Tipping Height Force Base If height is more than 2 times the base, tipping can occur at ~ 0.5 g acceleration. If height is more than 1.25 times the base, tipping can occur at ~ 0.8 g acceleration. © CCMTA, 1999 28 © CCMTA, 1999 29 Model Regulation - Outline Part 1 -Application and Objectives Part 2 - General Provisions and Requirements Part 3 - Specific Securement Requirements by Commodity Type Part 4 - Definitions Part 5 - Referenced Standards Part 6 - Default Working Load Limits © CCMTA, 1999 30 Part 1 - Application and Objectives • Applies to any motor vehicle in excess of 4500 kg (10,000 lb) • Cargo must be secured or contained so that it: – will not, leak, spill, blow, fall from, fall through or otherwise become dislodged from the vehicle; or – shift upon or shift within the vehicle to such an extent that the vehicle's stability is adversely affected. © CCMTA, 1999 31 Part 2 - General Provisions and Requirements Context: • Foundation of standard - requirements that apply to all cargo • Establishes basic principles for compliance with standard: – use appropriate equipment to transport and secure cargo – contain or immobilize cargo to prevent shifting or tipping © CCMTA, 1999 32 General Provisions • vehicle structures, floors, anchor points, headboards, bulkheads, stakes, posts, pockets must be strong enough • must use a securement method suited to the type, size and shape of cargo • tiedowns must be capable of being tightened by driver • tiedowns must be inside rub-rails • edge protection needed if tiedown could be cut or abraded © CCMTA, 1999 33 Working Load Limit • The maximum load that may be applied to a component of a cargo securement system during normal service, usually assigned by the manufacturer of the component. – WLL incorporates safety factor; typically ratio of 3 or 4 to 1 – limit which should not be exceeded,even with maximum forces from performance criteria • materials can be deformed or weakened • continued performance uncertain © CCMTA, 1999 34 Blocking • The aggregate working load limit of components used to block an article against forward movement must not be less than one-half the weight of the article © CCMTA, 1999 35 Securement System Strength Rating • The Working Load Limit (WLL) of a tiedown is the lowest WLL of: – any of its components – the anchor points © CCMTA, 1999 36 Securement System Strength Rating Working Load Limits • if marked by manufacturer with numeric limit; – WLL = limit • if marked by manufacturer in accordance with recognized standard (eg. code etc); – WLL = number provided by the standard • if unmarked by manufacturer; assigned default ratings – WLL = lowest grade or classification for the type and size of the component (Part 6 of standard) © CCMTA, 1999 37 Securement System Strength Rating Default WLL Values • Chain • Synthetic Webbing • Wire rope • Manila Rope • Synthetic Cordage • Steel Strapping • Friction Mats * – A friction mat shall be considered to provide resistance to horizontal movement equal to 50% of the weight of the cargo resting upon the mat. © CCMTA, 1999 38 Securement System Strength Rating Strength Rating • Longer Term ~ the strength and/or load carrying capacity of components of cargo securement system must be known: no default ratings • Current Proposal ~ provides default values for unmarked equipment – need time to phase in; work with manufacturers and carriers to develop implementation plan(s) © CCMTA, 1999 39 General Requirements • Applies to all types of cargo, included those specifically identified in Part 3 – if additional requirements are specified in Part 3, these take precedence • Need to satisfy one of three conditions: 1. fully contained by structures of adequate strength, or 2. immobilized by structures of adequate strength to prevent shifting or tipping, or 3. immobilized on or within a vehicle by appropriate means to prevent shifting or tipping © CCMTA, 1999 40 Condition 1: Fully Contained • cargo is fully contained by structures of adequate strength Dump bodies Tankers © CCMTA, 1999 41 Condition 2: Immobilized by Structures • cargo is immobilized by vehicle structures of adequate strength to prevent shifting or tipping © CCMTA, 1999 42 Condition 3: Immobilized by Other Means • immobilized on or within a vehicle by appropriate means to prevent shifting or tipping © CCMTA, 1999 43 Articles of Cargo Single articles: articles of cargo which can be secured individually “Unitized” loads: grouping of individual articles in a manner or with devices which renders the group suitable for securement as an individual article © CCMTA, 1999 44 Tiedowns • the aggregate Working Load Limit of all tiedowns used to secure an article(s) must not be less than one-half the weight of the article(s) © CCMTA, 1999 45 Direct Tiedowns Calculation of aggregate Working Load Limit; the sum of: • one half of the WLL of each direct tiedown that is connected between the vehicle and the article of cargo • the WLL of each direct tiedown that is attached to the vehicle, passes through or around and article, or is attached to it, and is again attached to the vehicle © CCMTA, 1999 46 Indirect Tiedowns • Calculation of aggregate Working Load Limit; – sum of WLL of each tiedown Each indirect tiedown which passes over an article will be considered to be one tiedown. © CCMTA, 1999 47 Tiedown Angles • Direct Tiedown – maximum 45 degrees • Indirect Tiedown – minimum 30 degrees © CCMTA, 1999 48 Indirect Tiedowns Minimum Number Required Case 1: Cargo Blocked against forward movement by a headboard, bulkhead, other cargo which is also immobilized, or other appropriate blocking device • one tiedown assembly for every 3.04 meters (10 feet) of article length, or fraction thereof. © CCMTA, 1999 49 Indirect Tiedowns Minimum Number Required Case 2: Cargo Not Blocked against forward movement One tiedown assembly for articles up to 1.52 m (5 ft) in length and up to 500 kg (1100 lb) in weight Two tiedown assemblies if the article is: - up to 1.52 m (5 ft) in length but over 500 kg (1100 lb) - longer than 1.52 m (5 ft) but less than or equal to 3.04 m (10 ft) in length Two tiedown assemblies if the article is longer than 3.04 m (10 ft), and one additional tiedown assembly for every additional 3.04 m (10 ft) of article length, or part thereof, beyond the first 3.04 m (10 ft) of length. © CCMTA, 1999 50 Indirect Tiedown Requirements Tiedowns with forward blocking: Tiedowns without forward blocking: © CCMTA, 1999 51 Indirect Tiedowns Example 1: One article - 5 feet long Up to 500 kg Over 500 kg 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Case 1: Not Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard Case 2: Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard © CCMTA, 1999 52 Indirect Tiedowns Example 2: One article - 10 feet long Case 1: Not Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard Case 2: Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard © CCMTA, 1999 2 1 1 1 1 1 53 Indirect Tiedowns Example 3: Two articles - each 10 feet long Case 1: Not Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard 3 2 2 Case 2: Blocked Against Forward Movement Proposed Standard Current NSC Standard Current FHWA Standard 2 2 2 © CCMTA, 1999 54 Inspection of Securement Systems • Driver must check cargo and securing devices: – within first 80 km (50 miles) of start of trip – periodically thereafter, • when duty status changes • after 3 hours or 240 km (150 miles) • Inspection not required by driver if: – vehicle is sealed and driver is not permitted to open it – inspection is impractical © CCMTA, 1999 55 © CCMTA, 1999 56 Part 3 - Specific Commodities Specific additional securement requirements which take precedence over the general requirements: • • • • • • • • • • • Logs Dressed Lumber Metal Coils Paper Rolls Concrete Pipe Intermodal Containers Automobiles, Light Trucks & Vans Heavy Vehicles, Equipment & Machinery Crushed Vehicles Roll-on/Roll-off Containers Large Boulders © CCMTA, 1999 57 Logs Applies to: • more than four fully processed logs • Shortwood: All logs typically up to 4.9 m (16 feet) long. • Longwood: All logs that are over 4.9 m (16 feet) long. (long logs or treelength). © CCMTA, 1999 58 Logs - General Requirements • must use suitable vehicle • vehicle must have bunks, bolsters, stakes or standards to prevent logs from rolling • all tiedowns must have WLL no less than 1800 kg (4000 lb.) © CCMTA, 1999 59 Logs - Securement Requirements Principles: • each outside log must touch at least two stakes, or be stabilized by other logs and extend beyond the end of the stake • highest outside log on each side must touch each stake (below the top of the stake) © CCMTA, 1999 60 Logs - Securement Requirements • load must be “crowned”; with top logs restrained by indirect tiedowns • tiedowns must be tensioned as tightly as possible; additional tiedowns needed if logs are slippery or in low friction conditions © CCMTA, 1999 61 Vehicle Types Section structured by vehicle type: • • • • frame trucks rail trucks and trailers flatbed trucks and trailers pole trailers © CCMTA, 1999 62 Shortwood • Crosswise - one stack: – bottom logs must be supported by vehicle structure to within 30 cm of each end – two tiedowns required for each stack – if trailer over 10 m long, must be divided into two stacks – automatic tensioning device requirement proposed for future © CCMTA, 1999 63 Shortwood • Crosswise - two stacks – two stacks side by side on deck: • no space between stacks • outside edge of stacks must be elevated (2.5 cm) • minimum one tiedown over each stack – automatic tensioning device requirement proposed for future © CCMTA, 1999 64 Longwood • must be be restrained against lateral movement at two or more points (stakes, bunks, standards) • each outside log must be secured by at least two indirect tiedowns • Pole Trailers: – at least one tiedown required at each bunk, or – at least two tiedown “wrappers” around entire load © CCMTA, 1999 65 Dressed Lumber Applies to: – bundles of dressed lumber, packaged lumber, building products such as plywood, gypsum board or other materials of similar shape • Two situations: – without protective wrapping – with protective wrapping © CCMTA, 1999 66 Dressed Lumber - Without Protective Wrapping One tier: general tiedown requirements apply • Blocked: · one indirect tiedown for every 3.04 meters (10 feet) of length, or fraction thereof • Not blocked: · one indirect tiedown for bundles up to 1.52 m (5 ft) long and up to 500 kg (1100 lb) in weight · two indirect tiedowns for bundles up to 1.52 m (5 ft) long and over 500 kg (1100 lb), or up to 3.04 m long · two indirect tiedowns if longer than 3.04 m (10 ft), plus one additional tiedown for every additional 3.04 m (10 ft). © CCMTA, 1999 67 Multiple Tiers - No Protective Wrapping Options: a) blocked against lateral movement by stakes on the sides of the vehicle and secured by indirect tiedowns laid out over the top tier, as outlined in the general provisions of the standard (section 2.2.4), or b) restrained from lateral movement by blocking or high friction devices between tiers and secured by tiedowns laid out over the top tier, as outlined in the general provisions of the standard (section 2.2.4), or © CCMTA, 1999 68 Multiple Tiers - No Protective Wrapping c) placed directly on top of other bundles or on spacers. The stack of bundles must be: • secured by indirect tiedowns over the second tier of bundles, or at 1.85 m (6 ft) above the trailer deck, whichever is greater, or not over 1.85 m (6 ft) above the trailer deck for other multiple tiers in accordance with the general provisions of the standard (section 2.2.4), and • secured by indirect tiedowns over the top tier of bundles, in accordance with the general provisions of the standard (section 2.2.4) with a minimum of two tiedowns for bundle(s) longer than 1.52 m (5 ft), or © CCMTA, 1999 69 Multiple Tiers - No Protective Wrapping With lateral restraint Without lateral restraint © CCMTA, 1999 70 Multiple Tiers - No Protective Wrapping d) Secured by indirect tiedowns laid out over each tier of bundles, in accordance with the general provisions of the standard (section 2.2.4) with a minimum of two tiedowns over each top bundle(s) longer than 1.52 m (5 ft), in all other circumstances. © CCMTA, 1999 71 Multiple Tiers - With Protective Wrapping • If covering material provides friction levels equivalent to product being covered - same requirements as uncovered bundles. • If covering material is low friction, same requirements as uncovered bundles except: – at least one of the indirect tiedowns on each bundle on the top tier must be chain. © CCMTA, 1999 72 Metal Coils Applies to: – the transportation of one or more metal coils which, individually or together, weigh 2268 kg (5000 pounds) or more © CCMTA, 1999 73 Coil Orientation Eyes Vertical Eyes Crosswise Eyes Lengthwise © CCMTA, 1999 74 Eyes Vertical • Must prevent tipping in all directions – at least three indirect tiedowns across top of coil: • one directly across top • two diagonally across • Must prevent shifting on vehicle – blocking, bracing or direct tiedown to prevent forward movement © CCMTA, 1999 75 Eyes Crosswise • Must prevent rolling: – cradle, timbers, chocks or wedges • Restraint: – at least two direct tiedowns through the eye • one to resist forward movement • one to resist rearward movement © CCMTA, 1999 76 Eyes Lengthwise • Must prevent rolling - cradle, chocks, wedges etc • Must prevent forward movement by blocking, bracing or friction mats • Three restraining options: Option 1 - Two direct tiedowns through the eye of the coil, plus one indirect tiedown over the top of the coil © CCMTA, 1999 77 Eyes Lengthwise Option 2 - At least two direct tiedowns through the eye of the coil, plus one indirect tiedown over the top of the coil Option 3 - At least two indirect tiedowns over the top of the coil © CCMTA, 1999 78 Paper Rolls Applies to: – shipments of paper rolls which, individually or together, weigh 2268 kg (5000 lb) or more © CCMTA, 1999 79 Paper Rolls - Eyes Vertical • ideally, rolls should be placed up against trailer walls and against other rolls • blocking, friction mats, tiedowns or void fillers needed to prevent movement if rolls aren’t placed up against walls • need to prevent tipping by using bracing, banding with other rolls, or tiedowns if: – height is > 2 times the diameter (sideways) – height is > 1.25 times diameter (forward) © CCMTA, 1999 80 Paper Rolls - Eyes Vertical • Full load – blocked at front by bulkhead – blocked laterally by walls – blocking required at rear © CCMTA, 1999 81 Paper Rolls - Eyes Vertical • Split Loads: – prevent forward movement by blocking, friction mats, tiedowns or void fillers © CCMTA, 1999 82 Paper Rolls - Eyes Vertical • Stacked Loads: – bottom layer must extend to front of vehicle – must prevent second and higher layers from shifting • place against walls, void fillers, blocking, bracing, friction mats • can also use “blocking” roll from lower layer if protrudes at least 50 mm (2 in) © CCMTA, 1999 83 Paper Rolls - Eyes Horizontal Loaded Crosswise: • prevent rolling (forward & rearward) by placing against walls or by using chocks, wedges, blocking, or tiedowns • prevent sliding (sideways) by void fillers, friction mats, blocking, tiedowns Stacked Loads: • bottom row must extend to front of vehicle • front and rear rolls on upper rows must be secured by banding to other rolls © CCMTA, 1999 84 Paper Rolls - Eyes Horizontal • Loaded Lengthwise – each roll must be blocked against movement: • forward: vehicle structure, other cargo, blocking or tiedowns • rearward: other cargo, blocking, friction mats or tiedowns – prevent rolling (sideways) by placing against walls or by using chocks, wedges, blocking • Stacked Loads: • bottom row must be completely filled first • rolls on upper rows must also be secured against forward and rearward movement © CCMTA, 1999 85 Concrete Pipe Applies to: – the transportation of concrete pipe on a platform trailer or vehicle © CCMTA, 1999 86 Concrete Pipe • Blocking to prevent rolling: • Arranging the load: – pipe of different diameter - group same size pipes together © CCMTA, 1999 87 Concrete Pipe – Bottom tier: • cover full length of vehicle, or • arrange partial tier in one or two groups © CCMTA, 1999 88 Concrete Pipe – Upper tiers and top tier: • pipes placed in wells formed by tier below, no new tiers until all wells are filled © CCMTA, 1999 89 Concrete Pipe • Bell Pipe: – must be loaded on longitudinal spacers to raise bell above vehicle floor – one tier: bell ends must alternate – multiple tiers: bell ends must be on the same side in each row, and alternate between rows © CCMTA, 1999 90 Concrete Pipe Pipe Diameter Up to 1143 mm (45 in) • stabilizing the bottom tier – must be contained longitudinally by vehicle structure, stakes, blocking, a locked pipe unloader or other means – chain direct tiedowns must be used through the first and last pipes © CCMTA, 1999 91 Concrete Pipe Pipe Diameter Up to 1143 mm (45 in) Tiedowns: • if each pipe is not secured with a tiedown: – two indirect tiedowns must be used lengthwise over the group of pipes – one transverse tiedown must be used for every 3.0 m of load length © CCMTA, 1999 92 Concrete Pipe Pipe Diameter Up to 1143 mm (45 in) © CCMTA, 1999 93 Concrete Pipe Pipe Diameter Over 1143 mm (45 in) • front and rear pipes must be secured by blocking • each pipe must be secured by direct tiedowns through the pipe • two direct tiedowns must be used in the front and/or rear pipe if they are not in contact with vehicle end structure, stakes, a locked pipe loader or other appropriate blocking © CCMTA, 1999 94 Intermodal Containers Applies to: – the transportation of intermodal containers – cargo inside container must also meet securement requirements of standard © CCMTA, 1999 95 Intermodal Containers On Container Chassis: • must be secured to the container chassis with securement devices or integral locking devices that cannot unintentionally become unfastened while the vehicle is in transit. The securement devices must restrain the container from moving more than 1.27 cm (1/2 in) forward, more than 1.27 cm (1/2 in) aft, more than 1.27 cm (1/2 in) to the right, more than 1.27 cm (1/2 in) to the left, or more than 2.54 cm (1 in) vertically. • the front and rear of the container must be secured independently © CCMTA, 1999 96 Intermodal Containers On Flatdeck Vehicles (ie. not chassis) • All lower corners of the intermodal container must rest upon the vehicle, or the corners must be supported by a structure capable of bearing the weight of the container and that support structure must be independently secured to the motor vehicle. • All lower corners of intermodal containers must be secured to the vehicle by chains, wire ropes, or integral locking devices. The front and rear of the container must be secured independently. • Each chain, wire rope, or integral locking device must be attached to the container in a manner that prevents it from being unintentionally unfastened while the vehicle is in transit. © CCMTA, 1999 97 Automobiles, Light Trucks & Vans Applies to: – the transportation of automobiles, light trucks, and vans which individually weigh 4500 kg. (10,000 lb) or less © CCMTA, 1999 98 Automobiles, Light Trucks & Vans • must be restrained at both the front and rear in the lateral, forward, rearward, and vertical direction using a minimum of two direct tiedowns. • direct tiedowns that are designed to be affixed to the structure of the automobile, light truck, or van shall use the mounting points on those vehicles that have been specifically designed for that purpose. • direct tiedowns that are designed to fit over or around the wheels of an automobile, light truck, or van shall provide restraint in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. Edge protectors are not required for synthetic webbing at points where the webbing comes in contact with the tires © CCMTA, 1999 99 Heavy Vehicles, Equipment & Machinery Applies to: – the transportation of heavy vehicles, equipment and machinery which operate on wheels or tracks, such as front end loaders, bulldozers, tractors, and power shovels and which individually weigh 4500 kg. (10,000 lb) or more © CCMTA, 1999 100 Heavy Vehicles, Equipment & Machinery With crawler tracks or wheels: • restrained in the lateral, forward, rearward, and vertical direction using a minimum of four direct tiedowns each having a working load limit of at least 2268 kg. (5000 pounds); and, • blocked against forward movement. • The direct tiedowns shall be affixed at the front and rear of the vehicle, or mounting points on the vehicle that have been specifically designed for that purpose. • The tiedowns shall be pretensioned in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. © CCMTA, 1999 101 Flattened or Crushed Cars Applies to: – the transportation of vehicles such as automobiles, light trucks, and vans which have been flattened or crushed © CCMTA, 1999 102 Flattened or Crushed Cars • Flattened or crushed vehicles must be transported in such a manner that: the cargo does not shift upon the transport vehicle while in transit, and loose parts from the flattened vehicles do not become dislodged and fall from the transport vehicle. • The use of synthetic webbing to secure flattened or crushed vehicles is prohibited. © CCMTA, 1999 103 Flattened or Crushed Cars Securement options: 1. have structural walls on four sides which extend to the full height of the load which extend to the height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the forward, rearward and lateral directions; or, 2. have structural walls on three sides which extend to the full height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the forward, rearward and one lateral direction. In addition a minimum of two indirect tiedowns are required per vehicle stack with every tiedown having a minimum working load limit 2268 kg (5000 pounds); or, © CCMTA, 1999 104 Flattened or Crushed Cars 3. have structural walls on two sides which extend to the full height of the load and which block against movement of the cargo in the forward and rearward directions. In addition a minimum of three indirect tiedowns are required per vehicle stack with every tiedown having a minimum working load limit 2268 kg (5000 pounds); or, 4. which employ a minimum of four indirect tiedowns per vehicle stack with every tiedown having a minimum working load limit 2268 kg (5000 pounds) © CCMTA, 1999 105 Flattened or Crushed Cars Containment of loose parts: • must employ a containment system which prevents loose parts from falling from all four sides of the vehicle and which extends to the full height of the cargo. This system can be based on use of structural walls, sides or sideboards, or suitable covering material, alone or in combinations. • the use of synthetic material for containment of loose parts is permitted. © CCMTA, 1999 106 Roll-on/Roll-off Containers Applies to: – the transportation of roll-on/roll-off and hook lift containers © CCMTA, 1999 107 Roll-on/Roll-off Containers Securement requirements: Front: lifting device and stops Rear: within two metres of rear of container, one of: one indirect tiedown that secures the side rails of the vehicle chassis and the container chassis at the same time; or two tiedowns installed lengthwise, each securing one side of the container to one of the vehicle's side rails; or two hooks, or an equivalent mechanism, securing both sides of the container to the vehicle chassis at least as effectively as the tiedowns in the two previous items. © CCMTA, 1999 108 Large Boulders Applies to: – the transport of large piece(s) of rock weighing in excess of 5 000 kg (11,000 lb.) or with a volume in excess of 2 cubicmeters on an open vehicle, or in a vehicle whose sides are not designed and rated to contain such cargo. • must be supported on at least two pieces of hard wood blocking (at least 10 cm x 10 cm (4' x 4") nominal side dimensions) extending the full width of the boulder. • if no flat side, must be placed in a crib to prevent rolling. © CCMTA, 1999 109 Cubic Shaped Boulders • secured individually with at least two chain tiedowns used transversely across the vehicle. • aggregate WLL of the tiedowns must be at least half the weight of the boulder. © CCMTA, 1999 110 Irregular Shaped - Stable Base • secured individually with at least two chain tiedowns used transversely across the vehicle. • aggregate WLL of the tiedowns must be at least half the weight of the boulder. • tiedowns must pass over the center of the boulder and must be attached to the center © CCMTA, 1999 111 Irregular Shaped - Unstable Base Combination of chains required: One chain must be used to surround the top of the boulder (between 1/2 and 2/3 of the height). The WLL of the chain must be at least half the weight of the boulder. • Four chain tiedowns must be attached to the surrounding chain and the platform to form a blocking mechanism which prevents any horizontal movement. Each chain must have a WLL of at least 1/4 the weight of the boulder. The angle of the chain must not exceed 45 degrees from the horizontal. © CCMTA, 1999 112 Part 4 - Definitions • common definitions seen as critical to uniform implementation and interpretation • attempt to include all key terms included in proposed model regulation © CCMTA, 1999 113 Part 5 - Referenced Standards References: • • • • • • • • • • • Vehicle Structure Anchor Points Platform Bodies (Flatdecks) Van, Sided & Dump Bodies Tiedowns Webbing Assemblies Chain Assemblies Wire Rope and Attachments Synthetic Rope and Attachments Strapping Clamps and Latches © CCMTA, 1999 114 Part 6: Default Working Load Limits Example - Unmarked Chain Size 7 mm (1/4 in) 8 mm (5/16 in) 10 mm (3/8 in) 11 mm (7/16 in) 13 mm (1/2 in) Working Load Limit 590 kg (1300 lb) 860 kg (1900 lb) 1200 kg (2650 lb) 1590 kg (3500 lb) 2040 kg (4500 lb) 16 mm (5/8 in) 3130 kg (6900 lb) © CCMTA, 1999 115 Part 6: Default Working Load Limits Example - Unmarked Synthetic Webbing Width 45 mm (1-3/4 in) 50 mm (2 in) 75 mm (3 in) 100 mm (4 in) WLL 790 kg (1750 lb) 910 kg (2000 lb) 1360 kg (3000 lb) 1810 kg (4000 lb) © CCMTA, 1999 116 Conclusions • Proposed standard represents significant departure from format of most current requirements: – broader scope – greater precision – less interpretation required • Proposed requirements do not imply major changes for most commodities: – clarification of general requirements © CCMTA, 1999 117 Current Process Validation: – consultation on proposed standard – seek reaction of Canadian jurisdictions and stakeholders to proposal: • acceptability as new standard • outstanding issues which require resolution – consolidate reaction, reconvene to address concerns Prospect: – Uniform standard throughout North America • adopted by reference, maintained jointly © CCMTA, 1999 118