Influence of Nozzle Type and Spray Pressure on Droplet Size Robert Wolf Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept. Cathy Minihan and Dallas Peterson Department of Agronomy Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Nozzles Types? Nozzles designed to reduce drift Improved ‘Droplet Spectrum’ Emphasis on ‘Spray Quality’ How should each be used???? Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department EPA Requested Changes Coming!!!! New Label languageEPA ‘PR Notice’ Out Match the crop protection product to the target Adhere to label guidelines based on an industry standard – ASAE S-572 Buffer Zones or No Spray Zones Maximize Efficacy Minimize Drift E x a m p l e R e f e r e n c e G r a p h 9 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 v e r y f i n e / f i n e f i n e / m e d i u m m e d i u m / c o a r s e c o a r s e / v e r y c o a r s e v e r y c o a r s e / e x t r e m e l y c o a r s e 6 0 0 X C 5 0 0 C V C 4 0 0 DropSize(microns) 3 0 0 M 2 0 0 F V F 1 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 . 5 0 . 9 C u m u l a t i v e V o l u m e F r a c t i o n Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department EPA Pesticide Registration Notice: PR Notice issued in the Federal Register on August 22, 2001 – Pages 44141-44143 – www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/ » Click on date – look for document – 90-day public comment period » Original date - Nov. 20, 2001 » Extended until Jan. 19, 2002 Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Objective of this study: Field measure the spray droplet characteristics of venturi flat-fan nozzles at 345 kPa (50 PSI) compared to extended range flatfan nozzles at 173 kPa (25 PSI), and turbo flat-fan and DR flat-fan nozzles at 242 kPa (35 PSI). Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Materials and Methods: Experiments: Exp. 1 and 2 - Early and Late Postemergence Grass Location: Ashland Bottoms, Manhattan, KS Exp. Design: 2 x 2 x 4 split-split plot with 4 reps Drop Collectors: Placed in 2 reps with 3 cards per rep (192 cards) Plot Size: 3 x 9 m with 1.5 m buffer Crop Oats ‘Don’ Visual Ratings: 1, 2, and 4 weeks after treatment Herbicides (2): Paraquat, 878 ml/ha, NIS @ .25% Glyphosate, 878 ml/ha Application Conditions: Exp. 1 Date: April 25, 2001 Oat Size: 15 cm Temperature: 26 C R. H.: 20% Wind: S-SW@ 4-5 km/h Exp. 2 May 2, 2001 51 cm 23 C 65% SE 3-6 km/h Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Materials and Methods cont.: Spray Tips (4):Extended Range Flat-fan (XR) Turbo Flat-fan (TT) Combo-Jet DR Air Induction Flat-fan (AI) Spray Volumes (2): 47 L/ha (110015 orifice tips) 94 L/ha (110025 orifice tips) 94 L/ha (11003 orifice tips) Application Ground Speed: 7.6 – 8.8 km/h Spray Pressure: 173, 242, 345 kPa Spray Tip Spacing: 76 cm Canopy Boom Height: 51 cm Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department DropletScan used to analyze droplets: System Components Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department What is DropletScan ? A software program that will allow accurate and rapid measure of spray droplet impressions on water-sensitive paper. Developed at K-State by Devore Systems - modeled after ‘Crumbscan’, a software program to determine hole sizes in slices of bread. Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Important Droplet Statistics: Dv0.1 (µm) - 10% of the spray volume in drops < number reported Dv0.5 (µm) - 50% of the spray volume in drops < number reported (also is VMD- volume median diameter) Dv0.9 (µm) - 90% of the spray volume in drops < number reported Number of droplets under 200 microns Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Important Droplet Statistics: Operational Area Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Collection Procedure: Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Results and Discussion Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Sample cards: XR TT DR 47 L/ha AI XR TT DR AI 94 L/ha Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Spray Droplet Size – Tip * Volume 47 L/ha VMD Means - by Tip and Volume 591 595 700 523 Microns 600 370 440 500 400 483 531 328 300 XR TT DR AI 200 100 47 L/ha 173 kPa XR 94 L/ha 242 kPa TT 242 kPa DR 345 kPa AI 94 L/ha Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Drift Potential – Tip * Volume 47 L/ha Droplets <200 by Tip and Volume 1000 900 773 720 800 Microns 700 600 500 422 374 XR 400 300 152 105 200 TT DR AI 139 68 100 0 47 L/ha 173 kPa XR 94 L/ha 242 kPa TT 242 kPa DR 345 kPa AI 94 L/ha Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Efficacy – Tip * Volume 47 L/ha Percent Control Tip by Volume - Early (2 WAT) 100 90 80 70 89 87 81 84 79 80 78 74 60 50 40 30 XR TT DR AI 20 10 0 47 L/ha LSD=2 173 kPa XR 94 L/ha 242 kPa TT 242 kPa DR 345 kPa AI 94 L/ha Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Summary of findings Dv0.5 (µm) (VMD): As the spray volume increased the Dv0.5 (µm) (VMD) also increased. The venturi flat-fan tips produced the largest droplets (VMD) with the Combo-Jet next smallest in size. The turbo flat-fans produced the next smallest droplets and the extended range flat-fan tips produced the smallest droplets. This trend was present for both application volumes. Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Summary of Findings – Drift Potential: At 47 L/ha the extended range flat-fan produced approximately 70% more droplets under 200 microns than the turbo flat-fan, 580% more than the Combo-Jet and 960% more than the venturi flat-fan. At 94 L/ha the extended range flat-fan produced approximately 100% more droplets under 200 microns than the turbo flat-fan, 400% more than the Combo-Jet and 450% more than the venturi flat-fan. Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Summary of findings for the Efficacy: At 47 L/ha efficacy data collected indicates that the extended range flat-fan tips slightly out performed the turbo flatfan tips which slightly out performed the Combo-jet tips, which slightly outperformed the venturi flat-fan tips. At 94 L/ha a similar trend was shown with each nozzle while overall performance for each nozzle was less than at 47 L/ha. Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Take Away Message: Even though the extended range tips slightly outperformed the other nozzles for oat control, these other nozzles had significantly less drift potential and should be considered when conditions for drift are present. Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Thanks Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department