KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONS TM
Author Strategies for
Successful Publication
Jason HU 胡昌杰
Journal Publishing Manager, Asia Pacific
Wiley-Blackwell
Thursday, Dec 9 2010
University of Science & Technology of China,
Hefei, China
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
What we will cover
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Introduction
The Journal
Why publish?
Where to publish?
Tips on successful submission
Survive Peer Review
Publication Ethics
What happen after acceptance
Answer 10 Questions to win a book
2
John Wiley & Sons
•
•
•
•
Founded in 1807
Acquired Blackwell in Feb 2007
About 5,000 employees worldwide
Three core businesses
– Wiley-Blackwell (Scientific, Technical, Medical, &
Scholarly)
– Professional & Trade
– Higher Education
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
3
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
4
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 1
How many journals published by Wiley-Blackwell?
A: 800
B:1000
C: 1200
D: 1500
5
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Wiley-Blackwell
• One of the largest STM publishers
• > 1,470 peer reviewed journals
• Extensive collection of
–
–
–
–
Books
Major Reference Works
Databases
Laboratory Manuals
• World’s top society publisher
WileyBlackwell
I like it! Wiley
Wiley
Yeah!
Wiley
6
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
700+ Society Publications
7
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
7
Questions 2
What the highest Journal Impact Factor Today?
A: 30.125
B: 34.480
C: 50.017
D: 87.925
8
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
1000 + journals with Impact Factors
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 87.925
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
9
Wiley in China
• 2 offices (Beijing, Shanghai)
• 13 journals
10
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
www.wileychina.com
11
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
materialsviewschina.cn
12
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Who am I
胡昌杰, 期刊出版经理，亚太区
• Acquire or Launch new journals
• Manage a list of journals in Life Science and
Health Science
• Lead strategy to develop the journals to
further success
• Publisher’s main point of contact with
Editors and Societies
13
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Who are you?
• Post-doc or PhD？
• PhD candidate?
• Working toward a Masters?
• Undergraduate ?
• Have you ever published in an English
language journal?
14
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
The Journal-Definition
• A specialised periodical
– containing learned or scientific content
– written by the scholars or researchers of that content
themselves
– edited by an academic expert in the field
– its content peer reviewed by the community
• A forum for the exchange of ideas in a subject area
15
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 3
How many peer-reviewed scholarly journal in the
world today?
A: 20000-25000
B: 25000-30000
C: 30000-35000
D:35000-40000
16
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
The Journal-Publishing Circle
Finalized journal issues
出版的期刊
PUBLISHER
出版商
Copyediting / proofing
版面编辑/校对
Author
作者
Submission
投稿
Accepted
peer reviewed
Mss
被接受稿件
Decision/
Revision
决定/退修
Editor
主编
JOURNAL
Editorial 期刊
Info courtesy of Michael Mabe, CEO of STM
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
LIBRARY
图书馆
Access to E or Print journals
纸本/电子版
Reader
读者
office
Peer review process
同行评议过程
AGENT
代理商
Referee审
稿人
17
Questions 4
When was the first true scholarly English journal
born?
A: 1565
B: 1665
C: 1765
D:1865
18
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
The first true scholarly English journal
Henry Oldenburg
(1618-1677)
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
6th March 1665
19
Why publish?
REGISTRATION
DISSEMINATION
•
•
•
[We must be] very careful of registring as well the person and time
of any new matter.., as the matter itselfe; whereby the honor of ye
invention will be inviolably preserved to all posterity.
[Oldenburg, 24 November 1664]
all Ingenious men will be thereby incouraged to impart their
knowledge and discoveryes
[Oldenburg, 3 December 1664]
[I should not] neglect the opportunity of having some of my
Memoirs preserv’d, by being incorporated into a Collection, that is
like to be as lasting as usefull
[Boyle, 1665]
“[Phil. Trans. should be] licensed under the charter by the Council of
the Society, being first reviewed by some of the members of the
same.”
[R.Soc. Order in Council 1/3/1665]
ARCHIVE
CERTIFICATION
•
20
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Why Publish?
Publish
or
Perish
21
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Research & Writing
•
•
•
•
•
Do good research
Writer’s block – it’s common – just do it!
Read other papers in journals considering
Read journal instructions
Read writing books
Practice! Practice! Practice!
22
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Resources on Writing
• Wiley-Blackwell Author Services
http://authorservices.wiley.com/
• Writing a Paper
by George Whitesides, Advanced
Materials (available on http://materalsviewschina.cn)
• Writing Scientific Research Articles:
Strategy and Steps by Margaret Cargill, Patrick
O'Connor, April 2009
• How to Write a Paper,
4th Edition edited by
George M. Hall (Editor), February 2008
23
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Where to Publish?
A survey: Reasons for choosing a journal (n=5,513)
Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. New Journal Publishing Models: An international survey of Senior Researchers. A CIBER
Report for the Publishers Association and International Association of STM Publishers. 2005
24
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Where to Publish?
The survey before this seminar : Reasons for choosing a journal
(n=118)
25
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Choosing the right journal
26
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Impact Factor (IF)
Impact Factor2009 =
Number_________________________________
of citations in 2009 to articles published in 2007 and 2008
Number of source items published in 2007 and 2008
Cited
window
Citing
window
2004
2004
2005
2005
2006
2006
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
Example
Journal of … publishes 75 articles in 2008 and
83 articles in 2007.
In 2009 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals.
The journal’s Impact Factor for 2009 is
344  (75 + 83) = 2.18
27
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 5
If a paper published in a top tier journal like
Nature/Cell/Science,
does it mean it will get high citation?
A: Yes, Sure!
B: No, no necessarily
28
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
IF: just Journal Level Metric
Nature, 868 articles published in 2008
250
231
212
No. of Articles
200
150
133
100
100
92
57
50
27
6
7
3
0
201-260 151-200 101-150 51-100
41-50
31-40
Cited Times in 2010
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
21-30
11-20
1-10
0
29
Data source: ISI Web of Science, Date: Dec 8 2010
IF may be skewed
• 2007 IF: 2.385
• 2008 IF: 2.051
• 2009 IF: 49.926
Acta Crystallographica Section A
G.M. Sheldrick, "A short history of
SHELX", Acta. Cryst. (2008) A64, 1
12-122
30
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
IF: Reflection of Past
• Listed journal may be suspended
• A journal’s IF may change dramatically
• Newly indexed journal has to wait
sometime for its first IF, which may benefit
you
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Accepted in 2008
indexed with 2007 content
First IF 2009: 1.791
31
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Going for high Impact Factor?
Prestige
Academic Advancement
High rejection rate
Papers triaged
idiosyncratic style
Delay before final rejection
32
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Choosing the right journal
• Seek advice from your advisors,
colleagues
• Abstract & Indexing Database
• Publishers’ Platform
33
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Choosing the right journal
• Read Author Guidelines
• Read Aim & Scope
• Keep the Journal and the intended audience
in mind as you write, or even before your
research
• Think about what the editor is looking for –
editorial policy, IF development etc, regional
development, etc
34
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Choosing the right journal
•
•
•
•
•
Don’t aim too high – go one level up.
Page charge
Color charge
Copyright terms?
Publication Speed:
Online ahead of issue pub, peer review
• More service beyond text and figure?
35
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Tips on submission
• Read the Author Guidelines
• Follow journal style guide
– Most manuscripts don’t meet form requirements
– Many are returned without review
• Know the preferred terminology
– Glance through index of previous years’ issues
• Avoid haste
– Proofread
– Test data for reproducibility
36
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Write a helpful cover letter
– Express your belief that the paper is within the
scope of the Journal
– Describe, very briefly, what you found and why
this is relevant to readers.
– Highlight the key points but don’t oversell
– Clarify any point that may raise question
– State the paper is new and original.
– Statement on Conflict of Interest
– A statement that the paper has been read and
approved by all the authors
37
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Get the Title Page correct
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
The title of the article.
Authors’ names and institutional affiliations.
Full Info of Corresponding author
Source(s) of support in the form of grants,
equipment, drugs, or all of these.
A running head, usually <=40 characters
Word counts for the text only
Word counts for Abstract only
The number of figures and tables.
Keep it separate with other text pages if
required, Why?
38
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Refine your Title, Abstract and Keywords
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Title
Abstract
Keyword
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Figures
39
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Why they are so important
• Busy editors may form an opinion from abstracts
and titles
• For busy readers the abstract may be the only
part of your paper they read
• It must convince them to take time to read the
whole paper
• In some cases electronic crawlers only look at
abstracts
• It may be the only information available in a
Medline/other search
40
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Improve your English
• Work with someone who is good at
English writing
• Enlist the help of a native English
speaker
• Use a professional service
41
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
http://authorservices.wiley.com
42
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Checklist before submission
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
the right journal (within scope)?
a realistic choice of journal?
followed the Author Guidelines?
materials complete?
all declarations complete?
Study design appropriate?
chosen the right article type?
met all the ethical/registration requirements?
Survive Peer Review
Cartoon from community.acs.org
44
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Why Peer Review?
A methodological check
– soundness of argument
– supporting data and cited references
A learning and improvement
process
A filter for selection and a
quality control mechanism
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Photo on top: http://www.globalsearchnetwork.com/continuous-improvement.aspx
Photo on bottom: internet
45
Peer Review Types
•
•
•
•
Single Blind Review
Double Blind Review
Open Review
Post Review
• Reviewers chosen by Editors
• Author could also nominate or warn against
those with competing interest
46
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 6
Keep Title Page separate with other text pages if
required,
why?
47
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
The Peer Review Process
Rejection
before review
Paper submitted to
Editor
Editor sends paper to
referees
Referees return
comments
Rejection after
review
Editor makes decision
Rejection
after revision
Reject
Accept
Send back for
revision
48
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
EO uploads manuscript with all files and
copyright form to FTP (1 day)
Author answers query,
sign copyright form
(1 day)
EO mechanic edits, language polish, collects
files including copyright form(3 days)
AE final decision(3 days)
Reviewer comments
again if needed
(14 days)
First
Decision
within 33
days
Peer Review ProcessAn real Example
•Editor in Chief
•Associate Editor
•Co-Editor
•Reviewer
•Editorial Office
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
CE decision(2 days)
Author Minor Revision (30 days) or Major
Revision (60 days)
CE preliminary decision(3 days)
Reviewers response to invitation (7 days)
Reviewers give comments (14 days)
CE invites Reviewers(5 days)
AE assign to CE(3 days)
EO checks /assigns to AE(1 day)
Author Submit
49
What does a referee lookfor?
1. Is your article within scope for the journal?
2. Is it of sufficient quality e.g.
a) Is it novel and important work?
b) Are the research, analysis and conclusions valid?
c) Does it give a clear statement of aims and achievements?
d) Is the presentation of figures, tables correct?
e) Are calculations correct, do models work?
f) Is existing literature cited appropriately?
g) Is statistical analysis used appropriately?
3. Areas for improvement
4. Ethics – publishing or experimental
50
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Rules of Thumb
• It is rare that reviewer is completely
right, and the author completely wrong,
or vice versa.
• Understand that editors and reviewers
are trying to improve your paper, Accept
feedback as a learning experience
• Always show the editor you are doing
everything you can to improve the paper
• Rejection/Criticism don’t auto mean
51
your work is not good
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Before you respond
• Remember: Editors/Reviewers are just
trying to help
• It is a game, not personal!
• Don’t get angry
• Don’t respond immediately
• Seek advices from your supervisor or
colleagues.
52
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
How to Respond
• Persistence pays – answer questions and
address requests for revisions in a clear and
timely fashion
• Avoid personal attack and defensive
behavior
• Be polite but not obsequious
• Address each points/comments in order
• Explain which changes have been carried
out
53
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
How to Respond
• If suggestions/additional experiments were
not incorporated, explain why
• Argue with scientific evidence
• If you really don’t agree with making the
changes proposed, you need to argue with
editor
• Or withdraw your paper and submit to
another journal
54
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Nobody’s Perfect. Take heart!
• Did you have to revise your last paper? 91% Yes
• Did the review process improve the quality? 91% Yes
• How many journals rejected your last paper before it
was accepted? (pie chart)
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Peer Review Survey 2009:
Preliminary Findings
senseaboutscience.org.uk
55
Comments Example
Author preferred reviewer’s
The paper is really a good one. I strongly
recommended for publication with the following
correction
1. In the methodology the year of the study should
be specified. (Page 4; Line 27 to 30)
2. In the result section, after the table there should
be description of the result in details (like not only
the year of 2004) (Page 6; Line 13 to 30)
•Select someone who can really help your research
•Be careful when you select your colleagues or
friends.
•The Editor and readers can tell
56
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Comments Example
Editor selected Reviewer 1
Confidential Comments to the Editor
•
I am not sure whether you want to give these authors a chance in publishing their data.
It is a rather poor paper, and I have been trying to give some positive feedback, also by
not rejecting it instantaneously. I do understand that you may want to reject it,
however by giving these authors a chance we build on in the spirit of *****.
Comments to the Author
•
The first paragraph of the Introduction can almost be deleted, since it extensively discusses prevalence of diabetes in
severel countries, which is not the topic of this paper. This also saves us a lot of unnecessary references.
Why did the authors choose these age groups, and not age groups by decades. By default, most diabetic patients will be
between 45 and 75, therefore they will make the highest costs.
It remains unclear what cardiovascular complications are responsble for the admission rates: acute MI? cerebrovascular
accidents? angina? congestive heart failure? It would be very helpful when the authors could list the top ten of admission
reasons, including their ICD-9 or 10 codings.
It is difficult to extrapolate the results from this studies to the situation country-wide. Shortages in available beds or
admission policies may have their influence.
Also data will be influenced heavily by the quality of care outside the hospital. There are no data related to that.
The authors conclude: 'The optimal management of blood glucose, blood pressure, lipid concentrations and early detection
as well as management of complications may reduce the excess costs associated with hospitalization of individuals with
diabetes.' This can be doubted. Although multifactorial treatment may postpone complications, these will develop
eventually, but in a later age phase. So expenses will shift from the 44-75 to the > 75 years age group.
Please use proper '.' and ',' in depicting the amounts of money.
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
In the final paragraph the authors give some recomendations, like
* Establish and strengthen the national surveillance systems on behavioural risk factors ...............
* Strengthen the quality-control system of imported and locally produced food ...
* Interact with food industries .... .
* Control the advertising and marketing of “unhealthy” food products ...
57
Comments Example
Editor selected Reviewer 2
Confidential Comments to the Editor
•
This is an impossible manuscript to review - so poorly written and constructed that I
don't know what was done, or how. The results are based on who knows what and I
don't think can be trusted. For the benefit of your readers, PLEASE don't publish this...
Comments to the Author
•
My apologies to the authors for not being able to give more specific comments, but I found this manuscript extremely
difficult to review. The methods for the study and the costings are so vague it is impossible to determine what was actually
done here. The topic is perhaps one of interest given the likelihood of significant increases in diabetes prevalence in
Bangladesh, and it is therefore unfortunate that this manuscript cannot provide evidence based data on the costs
associated with hospitalization due to diabetes in Bangladesh. A few comments that may help the authors revise their work
follow:
- The introduction is all about diabetes prevalence, but that is not what this paper is interested in. More data on diabetes
hospitalization costs, particularly in developing countries, is required.
- The numbers of admissions reported is extremely confusing. Why is 330000 patients mentioned, and then suddenly there
are only 2000 admissions?
- There is no evidence of any genuine attempt to determine the excess costs involved. Basing this on "admission indexes
and the mean stay" is not a valid way of determining costs associated with hospitalisation. It is perhaps for this reason that
the treatment costs appear so inflated. Is it really possible that at this hospital (which should be named), over $14 million
USD was spent on patients with diabetes? My experience in ****is that you would have to work quite hard to spend this
amount of money on 2000 patients! The cost estimates provided, to my naive assessment, seem almost random.
- I would encourage the authors to examine other papers on this topic, to look at the rigour they have used in their
methods and then to reassess whether the data presented here are truly reliable.
- page 10 is not related to the content of the article and should be removed.
- What do the last 2 sentences have to do with this article? To comment on the lack of data in **** suggests to me that
not much thought has been put into the writing of this section! The last sentence of the Intro doesn't make any sense at
all.
58
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
神马都是浮云
Publication Ethics
克隆之父
民族英雄
问鼎诺贝尔
首席科学家
國家科技實力象徵
免费头等舱
59
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Publish
AND
Perish
60
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Background of Ethics
• Academic publishing depends on
trust.
• Transparency
• Research Integrity
• Ownership of idea and copyright
61
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Transparency
• Who funded the work?
• Who did the work?
• Has the work been published before?
• Any Conflicting Interest?
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Research Integrity
• Data shall be accurate, clear and
original
• Protecting the rights of research
participants/subjects
• Respecting cultures and heritage
63
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Ownership of Ideas and Copyright
• Editors and readers have a right to
expect that submitted work is the
author's own
• Copyright has not been breached (for
example, if figures or tables are
reproduced).
64
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Ethical Issues
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Duplicate/Redundant publication
Disputed Authorship
Fabricated data
Falsification
Plagiarism
Figure Manipulation
Conflict of Interest
65
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Duplicate/Redudant publication
• Duplicate publication –publishing the
same paper or substantial parts of a paper
in more than one place
• Redundant publication – using
previously published text or data (usually
your own) in a new paper
66
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 7
If I publish a Abstract in a meeting proceeding, then
publish full text in another journal
Is it acceptable?
A: Yes, acceptable in most cases
B: No, unacceptable in most cases
67
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
What may not be seen as prior pub
• Abstracts and posters at conferences
• Results presented at meetings
• Results databases (data without
interpretation, discussion, context or
conclusions in the form of tables and text to
describe data/information where this is not
easily presented in tabular form)
68
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 8
If I published a paper in Chinese language journal
Then translate and submit it to a English journal but
without disclosure, is it acceptable?
A: Yes, acceptable in most cases
B: No, unacceptable in most cases
69
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Translated publication
• Journals may choose to accept (i.e.
consider 'not redundant') accurately
translation from an original publication in a
different language.
• Must have appropriate permission(s)
• Indicate clearly that the material has been
translated and re-published,
• Indicate clearly the original source of the
material.
70
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
What defines authorship?
1. Substantial contributions to conception
and design, or acquisition of data, or
analysis and interpretation of data
2. Drafting the article or revising it critically
for important intellectual content
3. Final approval of the version to be
published.
Authors should meet 1 AND 2 AND 3
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
International Committee of Medical
Journal Editors www.icmje.org
What defines authorship?
• All persons designated as authors should
qualify for authorship, and all those who
qualify should be listed.
Ghost Author
• Each author should have participated
sufficiently in the work to take public
responsibility for appropriate portions of
the content.
72
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
What not define authorship?
• Acquisition of funding
• Collection of data
• General supervision of the research group.
Guest Author
Gift Author
73
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Deciding on authorship
• Agree who will be listed as an author at
the beginning of your study
• Agree who is responsible for what work
• The corresponding author should be
aware of, and agree to, their
responsibility as the representative of the
authors
• Acknowledge those who assisted but do
not qualify for authorship, with permission
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Plagiarism
75
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Plagiarism
• Taking the work of another from a
published or unpublished paper
without attribution
•
•
•
•
Data
Figure
Table
Wording
76
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions 9
If I just copy some sentences from the Introduction of
another paper, is it acceptable?
A: Yes, acceptable in most cases
B: No, unacceptable in most cases
77
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
crosscheck
• Compare the paper in question with
publications in a database
• it identifies matching text in different
documents
• Then a knowledgeable person has to look at
the results as part of the editorial screening
process.
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Falsification and fabrication
• Changed or made up data to “improve” the
results
79
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Image modification
• Images cannot be modified to change the
overall appearance or appearance of any
specific feature
• Adjustments of brightness and contrast or
colour balance are acceptable but must be
applied to the entire image
• Features cannot be obscured and any
rearrangements must be explicitly indicated by
the insertion of dividing lines
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Lisa A. Hannan, PhD, Managing Editor, Traffic
The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla
Image modification
Images in Question
Contrast Enhanced
81
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Conflicts of interest
• Conflicts of Interest exist when an author(or
its inst), reviewer or editor has financial or
personal relationships that inappropriately
influence(bias) his/her actions.
ICMJE www.icmje.org
• Everyone has a responsibility to disclose
conflicts of Interest
82
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Conflicts of interest
• The Key is disclosure
• Authors should provide disclosure
statements from all authors
• All sources of funding
• potential sources of conflict (employment,
collaborations, affiliations)
• Personal relationship(family, marriage,
friend)
• If not sure whether to disclose, do it
83
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Ethics resources
Committee on Publication Ethics
www.publicationethics.org.uk/
http://authorservices.wiley.com
84
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
What happen after acceptance?
85
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
EO uploads manuscript with
all files and copyright form
to FTP (1 day)
Author
answers query,
sign copyright
form
(1 day)
EO mechanic edits,
language polish, collects
files including copyright
form
(3 days)
Wiley PE get
Mss/copyright form
File checking,
Assigning DOI
(1 Day)
Signed copyright
form must be
supplied
Typesetters send
SSSed files to
copyeditor
(5 days)
Copyeditor edits /
typesetters (10 days)
AE final decision
(3 days)
Reviewer
comments
again if needed
(14 days)
CE decision
(2 days)
Author Minor Revision (30
days) or Major Revision (60
days)
First
Decision
within 33
days
CE invites Reviewers
(5 days)
AE assign to CE
(3 days)
EO checks /assigns to AE
(1 day)
Author Submit
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
•Respond quickly
•Revise minor errors only
•Don’t change house style
Paper published in
an Issue
Paper published
online as Early View
(1 day)
Final Version
online/Print
within an Issue
Final Version
online without
Issue(39 days)
PE final approval
(1 day)
Typesetter uploads
to QA(1 day)
Typesetter to publish
AA(1 Day)
Peer-viewed
Version online(5
days)
Author answer
questions(3 days)
Typesetter sends 1st
Proof to
EO/Author/PE
(5 days)
Authors correction
/to PE(2 day)
CE preliminary decision
(3 days)
Reviewers response to
invitation (7 days)
Reviewers give comments
(14 days)
Manuscripts to
Typesetter(1 Day)
EO approves (ideally no
further correction allowed)
(1 day)
EO corrections and
to PE(3 day)
PE consolidates
corrections/tallo typesetters
for first revision
( 2 days)
Typesetter revises/sends
2nd Proof to EO /PE
(2 days)
EO corrections /to
PE(2 day)
Typesetter revises/sends
3rd(final) proof to PE/EO
for approval
(2 days)
86
EO uploads manuscript with
all files and copyright form
to FTP (1 day)
Author
answers query,
sign copyright
form
(1 day)
File checking,
Assigning DOI
(1 Day)
Typesetters send
SSSed files to
copyeditor
(5 days)
Versions
of
Manuscript
CE decision
(2 days)
Copyeditor edits /
typesetters (10 days)
CE preliminary decision
(3 days)
Reviewers response to
invitation (7 days)
Reviewers give comments
(14 days)
CE invites Reviewers
(5 days)
AE assign to CE
(3 days)
Author Manuscript
EO checks /assigns to AE
(1 day)
1
Author Submit
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
2
Typesetter to publish
AA(1 Day)
Peer-viewed
Version online(5
days)
Authors correction
/to PE(2 day)
45
Paper published in
an Issue
Author answer
questions(3 days)
Typesetter sends 1st
Proof to
EO/Author/PE
(5 days)
Author Minor Revision (30
days) or Major Revision (60
days)
First
Decision
within 33
days
Manuscripts to
Typesetter(1 Day)
Accepted Articles
EO mechanic edits,
language polish, collects
files including copyright
form
(3 days)
AE final decision
(3 days)
Reviewer
comments
again if needed
(14 days)
Wiley PE get
Mss/copyright form
Print/Online
Final Version
in a Issue
online/Print
EO corrections and
to PE(3 day)
PE consolidates
corrections/tallo typesetters
for first revision
( 2 days)
within an Issue
3
Paper published
online as Early View
(1 day)
Final Version
online without
Issue(39 days)
Early View
PE final approval
(1 day)
Typesetter uploads
to QA(1 day)
EO approves (ideally no
further correction allowed)
(1 day)
Typesetter revises/sends
2nd Proof to EO /PE
(2 days)
EO corrections /to
PE(2 day)
Typesetter revises/sends
3rd(final) proof to PE/EO
for approval
(2 days)
87
Questions 10
Which Version can be treated as Version of Record?
A: 1-Author Manuscripts
B: 2-peer reviewed Manuscrpts
C:3 edited/formated manuscripts
D: Online version in a issue
E: Print version in a issue
88
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Online ahead of Issue Publication
Early View
89
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Keep track with your submission
90
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Cheer for your publication!
91
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Maximize the visibility of your paper
• Wiley Author Service allows you to share
your works with up to 10 colleagues
http://authorservices.wiley.com
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
92
Who will win the book?
93
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM
Questions?
Jason HU 胡昌杰
亚太区期刊出版经理
Journal Publishing Manager, Asia Pacific
Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons
Tel: +86-21-51163201, Fax: +86-21-63912077
Email: jhu@wiley.com
94
KNOWLEDGE FOR GENERATIONSTM