Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman The size and shape of the crosssection of the piece of material used For timber, usually a rectangle For steel, various formed sections are more efficient For concrete, either rectangular, or often a Tee A timber and plywood I-beam University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 1/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman What shapes are possible in the material? What shapes are efficient for the purpose? Obviously, bigger is stronger, but less economical University of Sydney – Structures Some hot-rolled steel sections SECTIONS 2/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Beams are oriented one way Depth around the X-axis is the strong way Some lateral stiffness is also needed Columns need to be stiff both ways (X and Y) Y X Timber beam X Cold-formed Timber steel post University of Sydney – Structures Hot-rolled steel Y Steel tube SECTIONS 3/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman ‘Stress is proportional to strain’ Parts further from the centre strain more The outer layers receive greatest stress Unchanged length Most shortened Most lengthened University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 4/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman The stresses developed resist bending Equilibrium happens when the resistance equals the applied bending moment All the compressive stresses add up to form a compressive force C C a T MR = Ca = Ta Internal Moment of Resistance All the tensile stresses add up to form a tensile force T University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 5/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Simple solutions for rectangular sections b Doing the maths (in the Notes) gives the Moment of Inertia d For a rectangular section 3 bd I= 12 University of Sydney – Structures mm4 SECTIONS 6/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman The bigger the Moment of Inertia, the stiffer the section It is also called Second Moment of Area Contains d3, so depth is important The bigger the Modulus of Elasticity of the material, the stiffer the section A stiffer section develops its Moment of Resistance with less curvature University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 7/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Simple solutions for rectangular sections b Doing the maths (in the Notes) gives the Section Modulus d For a rectangular section bd Z= 6 University of Sydney – Structures 2 mm3 SECTIONS 8/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman The bigger the Section Modulus, the stronger the section Contains d2, so depth is important University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 9/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Strength --> Failure of Element Stiffness --> Amount of Deflection depth is important University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 10/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman The area tells how much stuff there is ● used for columns and ties ● directly affects weight and cost A = bd The radius of gyration is a derivative of I Y b ● used in slenderness ratio rx = d/√12 ry = b/√12 X X d Y University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 11/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Can be calculated, with a little extra work Manufacturers publish tables of properties University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 12/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 12/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Checking Beams ● given the beam section ● check that the stresses & deflection are within the allowable limits Designing Beams ● find the Bending Moment and Shear Force ● select a suitable section University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 13/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Go back to the bending moment diagrams Maximum stress occurs where bending moment is a maximum M is maximum here Bending Moment Stress = Section Modulus University of Sydney – Structures M f= Z SECTIONS 14/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman b d Given the beam size and material Find the maximum Bending Moment Use Stress = Moment/Section Modulus Compare this stress to the Code allowable stress M = max BM Z = bd2 / 6 Actual Stress = M / Z Allowable Stress (from Code) Actual < Allowable? University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 15/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Given a softwood timber beam 250 x 50mm Given maximum Bending Moment = 4kNm Given Code allowable stress = 8MPa 250 50 4 kNm Section Modulus Z = bd2 / 6 = 50 x 2502 / 6 = 0.52 x 106 mm3 Actual Stress f=M/Z = 4 x 103 x 103 / 0.52 x 106 = 7.69 MPa < 8MPa Actual Stress < Allowable Stress University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 16/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Given the maximum Bending Moment Given the Code allowable stress for the material Use Section Modulus = Moment / Stress Look up a table to find a suitable section M = max BM Allowable Stress (from Code) b? required Z = M / Allowable Stress a) choose b and d to give Z >= than required Z or d? b) look up Tables of Properties University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 17/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Given the maximum Bending Moment = 4 kNm b? Given the Code allowable stress for structural steel = 165 MPa d? required Z = 4 x 106 / 165 = 24 x 103 mm3 (steel handbooks give Z values in 103 mm3) looking up a catalogue of steel purlins we find C15020 - C-section 150 deep, 2.0mm thickness has a Z = 27.89 x 103 mm3 University of Sydney – Structures (smallest section Z >= reqd Z) SECTIONS 18/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Both E and I come into the deflection formula (Material and Section properties) The load, W, and span, L3 Note that I has a d3 factor Span-to-depth ratios (L/d) are often used as a guide W Depth, d Span, L University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 19/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman W Central point load 3 L 8d Total load = W (w per metre length) L 5d where W is the TOTAL load University of Sydney – Structures WL = 48EI Uniformly Distributed Load 3 5WL = 384EI SECTIONS 20/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Central point load W L 128d Total load = W (w per metre length) WL = 3EI Uniformly Distributed Load 48d L where W is the TOTAL load University of Sydney – Structures 3 3 WL = 8EI SECTIONS 21/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Uniformly Distributed Load Total load = W (w per metre length) L d 3 WL = 384EI where W is the TOTAL load The deflection is only one-fifth of a simply supported beam Continuous beams are generally stiffer than simply supported beam University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 22/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Given the beam size and material Given the loading conditions Use formula for maximum deflection Compare this deflection to the Code allowable deflection Given load, W, and span, L Given Modulus of Elasticity, E, and Moment of Inertia, I Use deflection formula to find deflection Be careful with units (work in N and mm) Compare to Code limit (usually given as L/500, L/250 etc) University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 23/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman W = 8kN Check the deflection of the steel channel previously designed for strength The maximum deflection <= L / 500 Section = C15020 E = 200 000 MPa d = (5/384) x WL3/EI mm L = 4m Loading Diagram I = 2.119 x 106 mm4 ( Let us work in N and mm ) d = (5/384) x 8000 x 40003 / (200000 x 2.119 x 106) = 16 mm Maximum allowable deflection = 4000 / 500 = 8 mm deflects too much - need to chose stiffer section University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 24/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman 65 Need twice as much I 150 Could use same section back to back 100% more material 75 A channel C20020 (200 deep 2mm thick) has twice the I but only 27% more material 200 design for strength check for deflection strategy for heavily loaded beams University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 25/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Given the loading conditions Given the Code allowable deflection Use deflection formula to find I Look up a table to find a suitable section Given load, W, span, L, and Modulus of Elasticity, E Use the Code limit — e.g., turn L/500 into millimetres Use deflection formula to find minimum value of I Look up tables or use I = bd3/12 and choose b and d University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 26/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman = better sections for beams Beams need large I and Z in direction of bending Need stiffness in other direction to resist lateral buckling Columns usually need large value of r in both directions Some sections useful for both University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 27/28 Peter Smith & Mike Rosenman Deep beams are economical but subject to lateral buckling University of Sydney – Structures SECTIONS 28/28