Workshop on Fundamental Physics Using Atoms 7 - 9 August 2010, Osaka Search for an electric dipole moment in 129Xe atom using a nuclear spin oscillator T. Inoue,1 T. Nanao,1 M. Tsuchiya,1 H. Hayashi,1 T. Furukawa,1 A. Yoshimi,2 M. Uchida,1 H. Ueno,2 Y. Matsuo,2 T. Fukuyama,3 and K. Asahi1 1 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 2 RIKEN, 2-1 Horosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 3 Ritsumeikan University, Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan OUTLINE: 1. Introduction 2. "Optically coupled" spin oscillator 3. Present status 4. Summary 1. Introduction Electric Dipole Moment (Permanent) Electric Dipole Moment Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) d s + ++ -+ Eext = 0 +q -+ + + a = d ≡ qa -q - or, d particle or, (r )rd3r i L EDM d 5 F 2 Electric dipole moment (EDM) s d + ++ - - - s + ++ d time reversal spin : s → -s EDM : d→d - - - d ≠ 0 : Violation of T ⇒ Violation of CP (CPT theorem) ● The violation of CP is implemented in the Standard Model (SM), but ... ● CP violation in SM (K-M mechanism) is not sufficient to explain the matterantimatter asymmetry observed in the universe. Thus, ... ● An extra CP-violation is required. Electric dipole moment (EDM) s d + ++ - - - s + ++ d time reversal spin : s → -s EDM : d→d - - - d ≠ 0 : Violation of T ⇒ Violation of CP (CPT theorem) Sites of EDM searches • neutron • paramagnetic atoms (Tl, Fr, Cs, ...) • diamagnetic atoms (129Xe, 199Hg, Rn, Ra, ...) • molecules (TlF, YbF, PbO, ThO, ...) • charged particles (d, , ...) dN de S de dN, d ⇒ Probing different facets of anticipated new physics Electric dipole moment (EDM) s + ++ - - - s d + ++ d time reversal spin : s → -s EDM : d→d - - - d ≠ 0 : Violation of T ⇒ Violation of CP (CPT theorem) M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Annals of Phys. 318, (2005) 119-169 EDM in 129Xe atoms •stable particle •macroscopic number of particles •EDM generated by a nuclear Schiff moment •P,T-violating NN interaction Schiff moment Tl, Fr, Cs… 129Xe, 199Hg, Rn, Ra… How does the EDM appear in a diamagnetic atom? Point nucleus in an atom Nucleus with a finite size Nucleus Electrostatic F(r) due to a cloud of atomic electrons EDM d q q = + d = q EDM d q Dx = d/q q Atomic electrons do not "know" whether the nucleus has EDM. Atomic electrons feel a nontrivial charge distribution unside the nucleus. Electron cloud Nucleus Electron cloud Nucleus datom ≠0 Nontrivial charge distribution in the nucleus generates an EDM in atom: datom 2 0 Dˆ P P eSchiff 0 E0 EP P , where Dˆ e Ri i Schiff 4 S ( R) S 1 2 5 2 3 ( r ) r r r d r 10 nucleus 3 Schiff moment d(129Xe) = 3.8×105 fm2 ·S(129Xe) d(199Hg) = 2.8×104 fm2 ·S(199Hg) [Ginges & Flambaum, Phys. Rep. 397 (04) 63] What generates a Schiff moment ? --- (In language of nuclear physics) CP-violating components of the NN interaction generate S. ●Case of 199Hg S ( 199 Hg) 0.0010 g NN g(0)NN 0.074 g NN g(1)NN 0.018 g NN g(2)NN e fm3 with SkO' effective interaction, [J.H. de Jesus and J. Engel, Ann. Phys. 318 (05) 119] d d g(0)NN d u d d , g(1)NN u d ●Case of 129Xe Flambaum, Khriplovich, Sushkov, 1985 Dzuba, Flambaum, Porsev, 2009 Yoshinaga's group, consideration fro shell model in progress. Neutron EDM predicted values d = 1027 e·cm E = 10 kV/cm D = 10 nHz ( Dw 1°/day) d(199Hg) < 3.1×10-29 ecm Grifith et al., PRL 102 (2009) 101601 Standard Model (dn = 10-(31-33) ) d(129Xe) < 4.1×10-27 ecm Rosenberry and Chupp, PRL 86 (2001) 22 [Pendlebury and Hinds, NIM A 440 (00) 471] Detection of an EDM H μ B d E Energy shift upon an E-field reversal E // B E // B H B dE H B dE Shift in a precession frequency Energy levels for a spin 1/2 (for a case of > 0, d > 0) m B0 E0 m ⇒ signal of an EDM D 4dE h Desires long precession times => Spin maser B0 E // B B0 E // B h h 0 2 B 2dE 2 B 2dE (E // B ) (E // B) h h the difference 1 2 B0 E0 1 2 B hν B E s E s Key issue for a high-sensitivity EDM detection: Free precession Time Transverse spin Transverse spin ― Realization of a long precession time ‘Spin maser’ state Time [T.E. Chupp et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (94) 2363] [M.A. Rosenberry and T.E. Chupp, Phys. Re. Lett. 86 (2001) 22] Spin maser ● 129Xe polarization vector P = I/I ● Static field B0 = (Bx, By, B0) ● P follows the Bloch equations: 1 P B P P T1,2 B relaxation term or, dPx P Py B0 Pz By x , dt T2 dPy dt Pz Bx Px B0 Py T2 , dPz P Px By Py Bx z P0 Pz G. dt T1 Pumping term [T.E. Chupp et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (94) 2363] [M.A. Rosenberry and T.E. Chupp, Phys. Re. Lett. 86 (2001) 22] Spin maser ● If a capacitor C is connected to form a resonating circuit, the coil produces a transverse B field, B(t), Bx (t ) Py (t ) By (t ) Px (t ) B dPx P Py B0 Pz By x , dt T2 dPy dt Pz Bx Px B0 Py T2 , dPz P Px By Py Bx z P0 Pz G. dt T1 dPx P w0 Py Pz Px x , dt T2 dPy dt w0 Px Pz Py Py T2 (1) , (2) dPz P Px Px Py Py z P0 Pz G. dt T1 (3) B P x y B Px y w0 B0 Taking (1) + i (2) and setting Px (t ) iPy (t ) eiwt P (t ) dP 1 Pz i w w0 P , d t T2 2 dPz P P z P0 Pz G. dt T1 (4) (3') dP dPz 0 and 0 The steady state solutions . dt dt ・Trivial solution: ・Non-trivial solution: Peq 0, Pz eq P eq GT1 P0 GT1 1 1 1/ GT1 G 1 eq , with w =w0 . P0 , Pz T2 T2 Spin oscillator ● Now we devise the transverse part of the B field, B(t), to follow P Bx (t ) Py (t ) By (t ) Px (t ) B(t) B(t) Spin detection dPx P Py B0 Pz By x , dt T2 dPy dt Pz Bx Px B0 Py T2 , dPz P Px By Py Bx z P0 Pz G. dt T1 Maser oscillation transient steady oscillation Setup for the maser experiment Si photodiode ・Bandwidth : 0 ~ 500 kHz magnetic shield (4-layer) ・permalloy B0 Solenoid coil (static field) ・B0 = 30.6 mG (I = 7.354 mA) l/4 plate Heater T 70 C spin precession signal Pumping laser ・l = 794.76 nm (Rb D1line) ・Dl = 3 nm ・Power ~ 11 W PEM 129Xe gas cell 18 mm 129Xe : 230 torr N2 : 100 torr Rb : ~ 1 mg Pyrex glass SurfaSil coating Probe laser ・DFB laser ・l = 794.76 nm (Rb D1line) ・Dl = 8.4×10-6 nm ・Power : 15 mW Spin polarization of 129Xe and Optical detection of nuclear precession Spin polarization of 129Xe Detection of precession of 129Xe Transverse polarization transfer : 129Xe nuclei → Rb atoms (re-pol) Optical pumping Rb atom 5P1/ 2 D1 line: 794.7 nm ms 1 2 ms 1 2 Xe Xe 129Xe Rb Rb Xe Circular polarization (modulated by PEM) Spin-echange in Rb-Xe N2 129Xe Detector After half-period precession Rb I S Xe 129Xe 129Xe Rb N2 Xe B0 Probe laser beam : single mode diode laser (794.7nm) 5S1/ 2 Rb Xe Rb Rb Xe Spin oscillator “Optically coupled” spin maser with a feedback field generated according to optical spin detection Pumping and relaxation effect 0 B0 ①129Xe nuclear spin polarization by optical pumping Static magnetic field : B0 mG Feedback system Probe light Feedback torque P(t) Feedback coil Feedback circuit ② Optical detection of the spin precession Lock-in detection ③Generation of a feedback field precession signal ④Self-sustained spin precession Photo diode P(t) B(t) Pumping light Realization of maser oscillation at very low fields ( mG) Suppression of drifts in the B0 field => Suppression of drifts in Magnetic Shield Mirror Heater Fiber-coupled Laser Probe Laser (DL-DFB) PEM Array-type Laser Glan Laser prism Ookayama Campus, Tokyo Inst. of Technology, Tokyo, Japan Frequency determination B0 Xe Rb Xe ref VX Lock-in amplifier 35Hz out 0 ref Function Generator νref Reference frequency ν0 Xe precession freq. fitting function (t ) tan 1 Phase [rad] VX cos( 2 ( ref 0 )t (ref 0 )) ・Phase Time [s] Result ・Lock-in amplifier output signals VY sin( 2 ( ref 0 )t (ref 0 )) VY Signal [V] Xe X e Lock-in Amplifier output PhotoDiode detector 0 35.1Hz f ( x) 2 ax b Δa = 9.310-9 Hz freq. precision VY (t ) VX (t ) Time [rad] [From; T. Inoue et. al., Poster, INPC2010] Frequency Long term stability of the oscillation frequency Solenoid current Frequency time (0 - 30,000 sec) 129Xe cell temperature At present, there are a number of concerns: ・Do imperfections in spin detection, signal processing, feedback field generation, ... affect the oscillation frequency? ・Does the presence of Rb atoms interfere the measurement? ・Does the low frequency operation really help in reducing the spourious drifts? These should be tested and investigated by using actual setup. Frequency pulling effect ●A phase deviation D in the feedback field will induce a shift in the Maser frequency. Expt. 1 d PT (t ) i w w 0 iPz (t ) BT (t ) dt T2 BT t ie i PT t 1 i w w 0 e i Pz T2 w w0 tan T2 Simulation Ongoing developments ・Pumping laser [T. Inoue, ... ] [Inoue et al.] ・Double cell [M. Tsuchiya, ... ] ・B0 stabilization [T. Furukawa, ... ] [Tsuchiya et al.] NMOR magnetometry B|| [Furukawa et al.] φ ・Simulation study [Hayashi et al.] [H. Hayashi, T. Furukawa, ... ] Paraffin coating 0.6 0.4 ・Magnetometry [T. Nanao, A. Yoshimi, ... ] [Nanao, Yoshimi et al.] 0.2 0.0 z-0.2 fitting -0.4 -0.6 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 1 z 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 d 5 4 10 G dB B 0 B HV application system preparation [T. Inoue, ... ] Picoammeter Protection circuit for picoammeter High voltage R : 1 MW R : 1 MW A Cell Transparent electrode HV C : 2 nF Leakage current test - Cubic cell size : 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm Pyrex glass (corning 7740) - Transparent electrode : ITO (Indium Tin Oxide) transmittance ~ 85%@795 nm size : 30 mm × 30 mm × 1.75 mm resistance : ~ 30 W Leakage current [nA] Xe cell for an E-field a trial piece spark HV [kV] HV application system preparation Next step… - Smaller cell (10 mm gap) - Using 2 high voltage source (positive and negative) - N2 or SF6 gas atmosphere - Low pass filter for reducing the noise output by HV source … Magnetic field stabilization Current fluctuation 300nA, ~40ppm In magnetic shield: ~28 mG magnetic field with a solenoid coil & stabilized current source (applying 7mA current) Current instability = magnetic field fluctuation → Frequency instability 1.5mHz ~40ppm Fluctuation of Xe precession Frequency instability : mostly due to current fluctuation Previous current source - stabilized current source drift : <50nA in a few hour Current source ~ 7 mA - slow & large drift (up to 1uA) in long-term operation A new current supply system Feedback of current fluctuation (measured with Dig. Voltmeter) to correct the current drift Current source 1 ~ 6.5 mA Current source 2 ~ 0.5 mA Digital Voltmeter Feedback Two current sources are installed in parallel for setting resolutions Using an accurate voltmeter with a reference resistance to obtain high resolutions Performance of new current source Stability improved ! Fluctuation:<1/200 This fluctuation is mainly due to the accuracy of current measurement. Conclusion: The current stability is improved successfully (x200) with the feedback of current fluctuation. stability – limited by accuracies of current measurement Future : More accurate measurement of current drift → More stabilized magnetic field for EDM measurement Future Spherical cell ・good symmetry ・Reflection ⇒ lowering of the pumping efficiency? Taper Amplifier Optical Isolator Cubic cells Introduction of a narrow-line laser (TA DFB, TOPTICA) Power : ~ 430 mW line width : ~ 4MHz (cf. pressure broadening ~ 7.5 GHz) 20 times enhanced pumping efficiency ~ 107 sec -1 DFB Laser Diode => suppression of amplitude fluctuations Setup ポンピング レーザー Double cell for 129Xe gas 偏極度測定部分 ポンピング部分 pick-up (偏極生成部分) coil 保持磁場用 コイル 129Xe : 227torr N2 : 133torr Rb パイレックスガラス SurfaSil コーティング RF coil 偏極度測定装置 pick-up coil Cell test bench Current problems pick-up coil 固定されていない →測定の再現性が低い, 調整が困難, 振動に弱い pick-up coil が振動 →NMRシグナルと同じ周波数であるRFシグナルを検出 →ノイズの発生 material: PEEK New system ・ Incorporation of anti-vibration system ・ Orthogonality adjustment mechanism for pick-up coil High-precision, high-reproducibility assesment system for 129Xe cells trim coil Simulation study of the frequency precision Incorporate the phase and amplitude fluctuations of the maser signal. Vx A sin n n 1 2Dt fluc peri A : シグナル振幅 ε : 振幅のゆらぎ ν:測定周波数 φfluc:位相ゆらぎ φperi:周期変動 Phasedeviation[rad] A A0 (t ) Signal [V] Phase deviation[rad] Time [s] Time [s] Time [s] Simulation results Frequency Precision[Hz] Vx A sin A A0 (t ) n n 1 2Dt fluc peri Experiment Simulation A , , ≈ the experiment A ≈ the experiment, peri ≈ 0.5 A , , ≈ 1/10 2.3x10-10 Hz 6.7x10-11 Hz 2.0x10-11 Hz ←1.9x10-30 ecm (E=10kV) Time [s] Half a day 1day 12days Should reach a 10-10 Hz precision in a 2-day measurement !! Magnetometry; Non-linear MagnetoOptical Rotation (NMOR) on Rb atoms Field precision required in EDM measurements d A ~ 10 B +E -28 (NMOR; Nonlinear Magneto-Optical Rotation) ecm @ E=10kV/cm z Required frequency precision y Resonant optical rotation in Rb vapor Linear polarized light k Rb atom f 1 nHz w+ t B x Field B 1 pG D. Budker et al.,PRA 62 (2000) 043403. B ~ 1 pG/ Hz Optical Pumping magnetometers (Rb, Cs): 30 pG/ √Hz Advantages: Magnetometry with SQUID: 2-3 fT/ √Hz = 20-30 pG /√Hz @ He temp. 50-60 fT/ √Hz = 0.5 – 0.6 nG/ /√Hz @ liq. N2 temp. High-Q resonator → 0.08 fT/√Hz = 0.8 pG /√Hz Narrow width Operation at room temp. low field NMOR 原理 直線偏向光と原子の相互作用 1) 直線偏向光 により原子は alignment 状態になる → 原子集団の蒸気は linear dichroism を持つ (F’=0) + gB mF = -1 mF = 0 mF = +1 (F=1) 右・左円偏向成分に対する原子系屈折率 n w 1 20 Rotation angle (mrad) 0.6 0.4 0 2w w0 g F B Bz i 0 0.2 0.0 直線偏向面の回転 -0.2 -0.4 l 2 g F B Bz 0 n n 2 2 g F B Bz -0.6 2 2l0 2 g B -10 -5 0 1 5 F B 10 z 0 0 l 2) 原子 alignment が磁場の周りを歳差運動する → dichroism の軸が回転する 3) 回転する dichroic 軸を持つ原子と入射直線偏光ビームとの 相互作用で偏光面が回転する 基底状態 1 mF 1 mF 1 2 1 mF 1 mF 1 2 0 mF 0 Summary ● Precession of 129Xe spins is maintained for unlimitedly long times, by application of a feedback field generated from optically detected spins. The merit of this optically coupled spin maser as a scheme for the EDM search is the capability of operation at very low B0 fields, as mG or below. ● Frequency precision presently reached is 9.3 nHz, which corresponds to an EDM sensitivity of 910-28 ecm (E=10kV/cm). ● There still remain drifts/fluctuations in the maser frequency that are correlated with ambient temperature and noises. Improvements and further developments are under progress. ・Reinforcement of 129Xe polarization by introducing a narrow-line high-power TA-DFB pumping laser ・Stabilization of solenoid current ・Stabilization of cell temperature by means of a heat transfer fluid GALDEN ・Cell development for the E-field application ・Magnetometry with NMOR, aiming at detection of d(129Xe) in a 1028 -1029 ecm regime.