2009-2010 Update to Perkins IV Local 5-Year Plan
Local Improvement Plan
Annual Application
April 30, 2009
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Changes Happen

Feedback about the structure




We need to tell our story



Too complicated
Confusing
Results did not reflect the great work that we
know is happening
Gather models of effective practices
Federal accountability has increased
Identify technical assistance & professional
development needs
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Are we asking for too much?
Everything we’re asking for now is based on
what we asked for in the 5-year plans!
There are no new expectations
Improvement planning is required
Not having an improvement planning process
is an unsupportable position
It is no longer assumed, it must be explicit
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Update-at-a-Glance


Introduction
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan

Program Design Performance



Standards and Content
Alignment and Articulation
Accountability and Evaluation







Student Support Services
Professional Development
B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund


Student Performance/Local Improvement Plan
R1. Technical Skill Assessments
R2. Professional Development
D. Improvement Planning Process
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Appendices
Introduction
Overview RESPONSE REQUIRED
What
is the vision for CTE students in your region as a
result of the implementation of CTE Programs of
Study?
Briefly
describe the work of your school, district, or
consortium in developing and implementing CTE
Programs of Study.
Identify
major opportunities and challenges that will
be addressed in this plan.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Update-at-a-Glance

A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
o
Program Design Performance



Standards and Content
Alignment and Articulation
Accountability and Evaluation
•




Student Performance/Local Improvement Plan
Student Support Services
Professional Development
B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium
Funds
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund
R1. Technical Skill Assessments
Oregon Department of Education 2009
R2. Professional Development
Update-at-a-Glance




A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV
Consortium Funds
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund
D. Improvement Planning Process
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan)
By 2012-2013:
a. 100% of Perkins-eligible programs of study
align with Oregon Skill Sets [Oregon Skill
Sets] or other industry-based standards;
b.
95% of Perkins-eligible programs of study use
relevant technology that directly supports
increasing student academic knowledge and
technical skill attainment.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan)
Please respond with an explicit description of
activities to be planned and implemented that will
lead toward the attainment of each indicator for this
benchmark. Describe what evidence or
documentation [progress markers] you will gather to
indicate progress toward meeting the 2012-2013
level.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan)
Explicit
description of activities to be planned
and implemented
Describe
what evidence or documentation
[progress markers] you will gather to indicate
progress
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan)
Activities
Progress Markers
2008-2009
a.
b.
a.
b.
2009-2010
a.
b.
a.
b.
2010-2011
a.
b.
a.
b.
2011-2012
a.
b.
a.
b.
2012-2013
a.
b.
a.
b.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Overview
Short

and Measurement Process Narrative
term Narrative Plan for 2009-2010
Long term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Overview



and Measurement Process Narrative
What is the context (overview) for this goal?
Include rationale, strategies, and activities that you
plan to use to increase performance.
How will you measure progress? (What process will
you use?)
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Short

What will you do to improve the program?
Strategies, Activities, etc.
Long


term Narrative Plan for 2009-2010
term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013
Brief descriptions of how the activities in 09-10
affect your long term plan
What adjustments are necessary?
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Goal

3c Action Plan
An Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan is
required for each Performance Measure that
does not meet the 90% threshold.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Goal

3c Action Plan
It is highly recommended that an Action
Plan/Local Improvement Plan be included for
goals that do not meet the current
performance target. Recipients should plan
strategies/activities to meet increased
performance levels in the future.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Goal

3c Action Plan
If all Performance Measures have been met,
identify those Performance Measures that will
be used to focus your work and expenditures
for next year; include a complete Action
Plan/Local Improvement Plan for each of
those goals.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Performance Measure
Specific Activity
Person Responsible
Timeline for the Activity
Perkins or Local $$$ Investment
How the Implementation of the Activity Will Be
Monitored
What You Will Monitor for Evidence of Success of the
Activity (Include criteria for “success”)
Oregon Department of Education 2009
A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan
(2009-2010 Update)
Long term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013
Oregon Department of Education 2009
B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV
Consortium Funds
 Describe:

How the regional eligible recipient for the consortium
will distribute Perkins IV funds
 Include

The rationale for such allocation
 Attach


A signed copy (all members) of the consortium’s
operational agreement
The job descriptions of staff supported by Perkins
funded consortium dollars.
Oregon Department of Education 2009
B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV
Consortium Funds
Required Activities Description of:
•Strategies
& activities
•Proposed outcomes
•Methods to measure your
performance & progress
Oregon Department of Education 2009
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund
Action
Plan/Local Improvement Plan for each of
the goals
A
one-year plan
An
expectation and a requirement that plans reflect
coherent planning that leads toward meeting the
2012-2013 performance goals
For
activities beyond those outlined in the 20092010 Local Plan Update
Oregon Department of Education 2009
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund
Explain
how you measure your progress and
performance for this goal
Describe
how you will use the Regional Reserve
Funds for activities beyond those outlined in your
2009-2010 Local Plan Update, and the ‘value added’
that those activities will provide
Oregon Department of Education 2009
C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund
2009-2010 Action Plan for Regional Reserve Funds
Specific Activity
Person Responsible
Timeline for the Activity
How the Implementation of the Activity Will Be
Monitored
What You Will Monitor for Evidence of Success for the
Activity (Include criteria for “success”)
Oregon Department of Education 2009
D. Improvement Planning Process
Team Member
Role and Responsibility
Oregon Department of Education 2009
D. Improvement Planning Process
Describe the different people/groups you
consulted, and how you worked with them
Oregon Department of Education 2009
D. Improvement Planning Process
Describe the process you used to:
 Identify your priority needs
 Develop your yearly goals
 Decide what strategies/activities you would
adopt
Oregon Department of Education 2009
D. Improvement Planning Process
Describe the process you used to develop your:
 Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan
 Monitoring plan
 Evaluation plan
Oregon Department of Education 2009
D. Improvement Planning Process
If you cannot complete the above information:
 Explain why you could not complete the above
information
 Explain how decisions were made concerning
the distribution of federal Perkins funds
 Describe how you will implement an
improvement planning process next year
Oregon Department of Education 2009
What Do We Expect?
A summary of the overall planning process
NOT
Detailed planning processes for each goal
The actual planning process used
(REALLY!!!)
A commitment to improving the process
Oregon Department of Education 2009
Thank You!
Oregon Department of Education 2009