Annual Evaluation Training PowerPoint

advertisement
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Annual Training
WELCOME
Please have one person log your
school into the chat room
Example: Wasilla High School
Presentation Outline
• Purpose of Evaluation
• Evaluation Groups
• Danielson Framework
– Break for Question & Answer
• Evaluation Process & Timeline
• Plan for Professional Growth & Improvement
• Community Feedback Surveys
– Break for Question & Answer
• The Fifth Domain: Student Learning Data
– Break for Question & Answer
Purpose of Evaluation
• Improvement, improvement, improvement!
 allows and encourages principals, administrators, and
teachers to work together to promote professional
excellence
 improves the quality of instructional practices
 facilitates student learning and growth
 brings structured assistance to teachers who need
improvement
 provides a basis for making a decision about the retention
and transfer of staff
 and facilitates the alignment of professional development
with educator needs
Evaluation Groups
Evaluation Category Group
MSBSD Positions
General
Teacher, Special Education, Music, Art,
Physical Education
Instructional Specialists
Library Media Specialists
Instructional Coach, ELL, TOSA, Resource
Specialist, Athletic Directors,
Correspondence Teacher
School Library/Media Specialists
School Counselors
School Counselors
School Nurse
School Nurse
School Psychologists
School Psychologist
Therapeutic Specialists
Occupational and Physical Therapist,
Speech/Language Pathologist
Danielson’s “Framework for
Teachers”
• Defines what good teaching looks like and consists of
• Provides a common language among professionals
• Structure that recognizes and respects the
complexities of teaching but provides a simple layout
for conversations about teaching
• Versatility for all levels of expertise and experience
• Able to modify components for evaluation groups
• Aligned with the Alaska State content, performance,
and cultural standards
A Framework for Teaching:
Domains of Professional Practice
Domain 1:
Domain 2:
Planning & Preparation
The Classroom Environment
Domain 4:
Domain 3:
Professional Responsibilities
Delivery of Instruction
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Components of Domain 1:
a.Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy
b.Demonstrating knowledge of students
c.Selecting instructional outcomes
d.Demonstrating knowledge of resources
e.Designing coherent instruction
f.Designing student assessment
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Components of Domain 2:
a.Creating an environment of respect & rapport
b.Establishing a culture for learning
c.Managing classroom procedures
d.Managing student behavior
e.Organizing physical space
Domain 3: Delivery of Instruction
Components of Domain 3:
a.Communicating with students
b.Using questioning and discussion techniques
c.Engaging students in learning
d.Using Assessment in Instruction
e.Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Components of Domain 4:
a.Reflecting on teaching
b.Maintaining accurate records
c.Communicating with families
d.Participating in a professional community
e.Growing and developing professionally
f.Demonstrating professionalism
Rating
Unsatisfactory
Basic
Proficient
Exemplary
Rating Structure
• Components are rated by the Supervisor
• Domain Ratings are determined by the
component ratings
• Overall Rating is determined by the
domain ratings
Components
Domains
Overall
Domain/Overall Ratings
Exemplary
• 50% of components/domains rated as Exemplary
• No components/domains rated below Proficient
Proficient
• No components/domains rated as Unsatisfactory
• No more than one component/domain rated as Basic
• Remaining components/domains rated as Proficient or Exemplary
Basic
• No components/domains rated as Unsatisfactory
• Two or more components/domains rated as Basic
Unsatisfactory
• One or more components/domains rated as Unsatisfactory
Component Ratings Continued
• Component Ratings also Determine
– Level of Support
• Plan for Professional Growth (PPG)
• Plan of Improvement (POI)
– Evaluation Waiver Eligibility (SKIP)
PPG
2 or more Basic
No Unsatisfactory
POI
1 Unsatisfactory
SKIP
1 Exemplary
No Basic
No Unsatisfactory
Common Descriptors for Levels
Unsatisfactory
Basic
No
Not
Not clear
Unaware
Does not respond
Poor
Not congruent
Little
Low
Inadequate
Some
Attempts to
Limited
Moderate
Uneven
Inconsistent
Rudimentary
Proficient
Exemplary
Consistent
High quality
Timely
Accurate
Appropriate
Clear
Effective
High expectations
Aligned
Solid
Smoothly
Productive
All students
Highly effective
Entirely appropriate
Adapted for
individual students
Fully aligned
Extensive
Highly developed
Frequently Asked Questions
• Where can I learn more about the Danielson
Framework?
 Professional Development Opportunities
 Site-Based FLTs & Annual Training
 District Office Resources
 Charlotte Danielson’s Framework For Teaching Book & DVD Series
• Who chooses to evaluate additional components?
– There are 12 required components in the evaluation
– Per principal discretion, he/she may require an
individual employee to be evaluated on any of the
remaining 10 components.
• These must be identified at the Beginning of the Year
Conference
Question & Answer
Please take two minutes to ask your
principal questions or have the
scribe type them into the chat room
OASYS:
Electronic Evaluations
• ALL educators will use the OASYS Electronic
Evaluation system for FY16
• OASYS Webinar Training Dates will be
posted in the upcoming Teacher and Principal
Posts
• Power Point Tutorials are available on the
MSBSD HR Website
– Educator Evaluation
– OASYS Electronic Evaluation
Evaluation Process Overview
Educator Self Reflection
Beginning of the Year Conference
Informal Observation(s)
Formal Observation
Summative Evaluation Conference
Educator Self-Reflection
• Designed to support the educator’s selfassessment and reflection on professional
practices
• Used as a foundation during the beginning
of the year conference
• To be completed by September 30th
Beginning of the Year Conference
• Evaluation planning meeting
– Review the Educator Self-Assessment
– Identify expectations for targeted growth
– Establish if any additional components will be
evaluated beyond the required 12
– Identify the teacher submitted artifacts for
components
• To be completed by October 15th
Frequently Asked Questions
• What is an artifact?
– Artifacts provide evidence of performance on
various components
– Examples: Lesson plans, social contracts, icue grade reports
• How many do I have to submit?
– Each required component must have at least
one artifact or observation evidence identified
– Artifacts may count for more than one
component
Classroom Observations
• Informal
– Recommended for 5 to 15 minutes
– Dates & times are documented and share
with the teacher during the summative
conference
– Do not need to be pre-arranged
– Most common form: Classroom Walkthrough
– Required #:
• Non-Tenured: Four per year
• Tenured: One per year
Classroom Observations
• Formal
– Teacher completes Pre-Observation Form
prior to observation
– Observation is scheduled
– Must be for a duration of at least 30 minutes
– Feedback is provided within two working days
– Required #:
• Non-Tenured: Two per year
• Tenured: One per year
Summative Evaluation & Conference
• Principal reviews a variety of evidence
sources including:
– Informal and Formal Observations
– Teacher submitted artifacts
– Principal gathered artifacts
– Community Feedback Surveys
• Teacher is provided a copy of the
summative evaluation
– Includes ratings for components, domains,
and overall
Summative Evaluation & Conference
• Teacher has two working days to
‘electronically’ sign the evaluation
– Five working days to submit written comments
• CHANGE:
– Copy of the evaluation will be stored
electronically in OASYS
• CHANGE:
– Non-Tenured Teachers will receive one
summative evaluation by May 1st
NON-TENURED
EVALUATION TIMELINE
EVALUATION STEPS
SEPTEMBER 30
TEACHER SELF-ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
OCTOBER 15
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR CONFERENCE
OCTOBER 15 & FEBRUARY 30
(RECOMMENDED)
INFORMAL OBSERVATION 1
NOVEMBER 15 & MARCH 30
(RECOMMENDED)
INFORMAL OBSERVATION 2
DECEMBER 1 & APRIL 15
(RECOMMENDED)
FORMAL OBSERVATION
December 10
First Semester Review
MAY 1
SUMMATIVE EVALUATION CONFERENCE
TENURED EVALUATION
TIMELINE
EVALUATION STEPS
SEPTEMBER 30
TEACHER SELF-ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
OCTOBER 15
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR CONFERENCE
October 30
(If eligible)
Evaluation Waiver Request
DECEMBER 15
(RECOMMENDED)
INFORMAL OBSERVATION 1
JANUARY 30
(RECOMMENDED)
FORMAL OBSERVATION
FEBRUARY 15
SUMMATIVE EVALUATION CONFERENCE
Evaluation Waiver (Skip Year)
• CHANGE: Per principal approval, an
educator is eligible for an evaluation
waiver starting their sixth year
• Eligibility Requirement: To exceed the
district standard, an educator must have at
least one exemplary rating and have
received no basic or unsatisfactory ratings
Plan for Professional Growth
• Plan of Professional Growth:
– A teacher may be placed on a Plan for Professional Growth
if no required component is rated Unsatisfactory and two or
more required components are rated Basic.
– Duration of Plan
• Non-Tenured: Minimum of 30 Work Days
• Tenured: 60 – 120 Work Days
Plan of Improvement
• Plan of Improvement:
– A teacher will be placed on a Plan of Improvement if any
required components is rated Unsatisfactory.
– A teacher may be placed on a Plan of Improvement if they
unsuccessfully complete a Plan for Professional Growth
– Duration of Time
• Non-Tenured: Minimum of 30 Work Days
• Tenured: 90 – 180 Work Days
Plan for Professional Growth
or Plan of Improvement
 The purpose of a plan of professional growth or improvement
is to document a concern and to clearly state what the teacher
must accomplish in order for his/her performance to meet the
teaching components
 Neither party is present to negotiate whether or not the
teacher is meeting the teaching components
 The principal/supervisor determines whether or not the teaching
components are being met
 Each plan of professional growth or improvement will be
tailored to the specific teacher
 Cooperation and recognition that improvement is needed will
be the key to success
Community Feedback Surveys
• Provide an opportunity for students, parents,
community members, teachers, and administrators to
provide information on the performance of the teacher
or administrator who is the subject of the evaluation
to the evaluating administrator
• Surveys are available on the district website, at
school sites, and the district office.
• Schools should advertise surveys in their newsletters
and on the website at least four times per year.
Community Feedback Surveys
 Forms are returned/forwarded to the administrative
secretary
 Unsigned forms are given directly to the employee
 Signed forms
 A copy is given to the employee and immediate supervisor
 The original is maintained at the school site for two years.
 If the feedback is used for a plan of improvement, a nonretention, or dismissal it will be kept longer
 May be considered as input into the teacher’s current evaluation if
received prior to February 1, otherwise the information will be used in
the next year’s evaluation
Frequently Asked Questions
• Is a Non-Tenured teacher required to
complete a Self-Reflection and Beginning
of the Year Conference each semester?
– No, a non-tenured teacher only needs to one
of each at the beginning of the year.
• What if my principal or I miss one of the
timeline dates?
– Any date can be extended if mutually agreed
upon by the principal and the educator.
Question & Answer
Please take two minutes to ask your
principal questions or have the
scribe type them into the chat room
The Fifth Domain - DATA
• Domain 1: Planning & Preparation
• Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
• Domain 3: Delivery of Instruction
• Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
• Domain 5: Student Growth Data
Student Learning Objectives
(SLOs)
An SLO is a measurable, long-term,
academic goal informed by data that a
teacher or teacher team sets at the
beginning of the year for all students.
39
Examples of Existing Assessments
• AIMSweb
– Oral Reading Fluency Assessment
• Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP)
– State Mandated Assessment
• Curriculum Embedded Assessments
– Text Books Pre- & Post-
• Industry Based Assessments
– CNA Certification
FY16 – Pilot the SLO model
FY17 – Growth data will be
incorporated into teacher evaluation
Frequently Asked Questions
• What if a student is chronically absent
from school?
– You cannot exclude a student from your data
based on qualifications (ex: ELL) or
attendance.
– The SLO is evaluated on the rating schedule
below:
Frequently Asked Questions
• Who will see my SLO and Student
Learning Data?
– Only your principal or direct supervisor and
yourself
– The district is required to submit numbers and
percentages for overall rating and student
growth data to the state
• The data is strictly anonymous
Question & Answer
Please take two minutes to ask your
principal questions or have the
scribe type them into the chat room
For More Information
 Certificated Employees Evaluation and Procedures
Instrument (BP/AR 4115.1)
 Your Principal or Supervisor
 Department of Human Resources
 Professional Development Opportunities
 Site-Based FLTs & Annual Training
 District Office Resources
 Charlotte Danielson’s Framework For Teaching Book &
DVD Series
 MSBSD Human Resources Website
Download