Click to edit Master title style
Watts Waters Technologies
PPAP Requirements
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
1
Click to edit Master title style
What’s PPAP?
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
2
Click to
What
is PPAP
edit Master
?
title style
•Production Part Approval Process
•Standard used to formally reduce risks prior to product or service
release, in a team oriented manner using well established tools
and techniques.
•Initially developed by AIAG (Auto Industry Action Group) in 1993
with input from the Big 3 - Ford, Chrysler, and GM.
•AIAG’s 4th edition effective June 1, 2006 is the most recent
version as of this print.
•PPAP has now spread to many different industries beyond
automotive, this is now becoming a standard in the Water
industry.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
3
Click to edit
Purpose
of PPAP
Master title style
Provide evidence that all customer engineering design record and
specification requirements are properly understood by the
organization.
To demonstrate that the manufacturing process has the potential to
produce product that consistently meets ALL requirements during
an actual production run at the quoted production rate.
PPAP manages change and ensures
product conformance!
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
4
Watts
Notification
Changes
ClickRequired
to edit Master
titleof
style
for PPAP Consideration:
Supplier notification to Watts is required for any planned changes to
the design, process or site.
 Change of other construction or material than was previously approved.
 Production from new or modified tools , dies, molds, patterns, etc. including additional or
replacement tooling. (except perishables).
 Change in part processing (upgrade or rearrangement of tooling).
 Production from tooling and equipment transferred to different plant site or from an additional
plant location.
 Change of suppliers for parts, or material source changes or services.
 Tooling inactive greater than one year.
 Product & Process changes related to components of the production product manufactured
internally or manufactured by suppliers. e.g. (form, fit, function, performance, durability).
 Changes in test/inspection methods – equivalent and (no affect on acceptance criteria).
 Bulk materials – new source of raw materials from new or existing supplier.
 Bulk materials - Change in product appearance attributes.
 New part or product, or color not previously supplied.
 Correction of discrepancy on previously submitted parts.
 Engineering change to design records specifications or materials for production product/part
numbers.
 New process technology new to the organization not previously used for the product (bulk
material).
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
5
Click to edit
Benefits
of PPAP
Master
Submissions
title style
• Helps to maintain design integrity
• Identifies issues early for resolution
• Reduces warranty charges and prevents cost of poor quality
• Assists with managing supplier changes
• Prevents use of unapproved and nonconforming parts
• Identifies suppliers that need more development
• Improves the overall quality of the product & customer
satisfaction
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
6
Click to editRun
Production
Master title style
PPAP data must be submitted from a production run using:
 Production equipment and tooling
 Production employees
 Production rate
 Production process
All data reflects the actual production
process to be used at start-up!
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
7
Click
Production
to editRun
Master
Ratetitle style
• The purpose of a Production Run Rate is to verify the supplier’s
manufacturing process is capable of producing components that
meet Watts quality requirements, at quoted tooling capacity, for
a specified period of time.
• Verification of the Run Rate will be at the Supplier Quality
Engineer’s (SQE) discretion. The supplier will be notified of the
need to perform a Run Rate as early in the process as possible.
• The number of components to be produced during the Run Rate
should be sufficient to demonstrate process capability and will be
predetermined by the SQE and the supplier.
 Factors such as product complexity, shelf life, storage, cost and
single shift vs. multiple shift operations will be taken into
consideration.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
8
Click to PPAP
Official
edit Master
Requirements
title style
1.
Design Records (Necessary part drawings, specification used to produce the product).
2.
Authorized Engineering Change Documents
3.
Customer Engineering Approval, (if required)
4.
Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) applied in special situations
5.
Process Flow Diagram
6.
Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
7.
Control Plan
8.
Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) – [Gage R & R]
9.
Dimensional Results
10. Records of Material / Performance Test Results
11. Initial Process Studies
12. Qualified Laboratory Documentation
13. Appearance Approval Report
14. Sample Production Parts
15. Master Sample (Master Part Retained on Site)
16. Checking Aids
17. Customer-Specific Requirements
18. Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
9
Click to
Watts
PPAP
editRequirements
Master title style
1.
Design Records *
2.
Authorized Engineering Change Documents
3.
Team Feasibility Commitment (HQMS)
4.
Customer Engineering Approval, (if required)
5.
PPAP Report (Watts Requirements Checklist)
6.
Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) applied in special
situations*
7.
Process Flow Diagram
8.
Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
9.
Control Plan
10. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)
11. Dimensional Results (HQMS)
12. Records of Material / Performance Test Results (HQMS)
13. Initial Process Studies*
14. Qualified Laboratory Documentation
15. Appearance Approval Report (HQMS)
16. Sample Production Parts
17. Master Sample*
18. Checking aids (drawings)*
Supplier shall retain
these *6 items at
appropriate locations,
and make readily
available upon request.
19. Watts -Specific Requirements*
20. Part Submission Warrant (PSW) – “Production Warrant
21. Packaging Requirements
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
10
Click Submission
PPAP
to edit Master
Levels
title style
Level 1 Production Warrant and Appearance Approval Report
(if applicable) submitted to Watts.
Level 2 Production Warrant, product samples and dimensional
results submitted to Watts.
Level 3 Production Warrant, product samples and
complete supporting data submitted to Watts.
Level 4 Production Warrant, and other requirements as
defined by Watts.
Level 5 Production Warrant, product samples and complete
supporting data (review will be at the organizations location).
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
11
Click Submission
PPAP
to edit Master
Level
title
Table
style
* = Supplier shall retain
at appropriate
locations, and submit to
Watts upon request.
Watts will identify what
is needed for
submission.
R = Supplier shall
retain at appropriate
locations and make
readily available to
Watts upon request.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
12
Click to editofMaster
Definitions
Risk title style
High Risk
Parts associated with multiple critical features, complex design, or
high end technology that is not yet established in the general
manufacturing environment.
Supplier’s quality system and/or quality performance is not to
Watt’s satisfaction.
Medium Risk
Parts that have at least one critical feature.
Low Risk
Parts that have no critical features and can be manufactured by
any manufacturer in the commodity category.
Supplier’s quality system and quality performance are acceptable.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
13
Click to editLevel
Submission
Master
Requirements
title style
New Parts

Level 3 is required for all New Part Numbers.
Part Changes


Level 3 is required for Parts produced at a new or additional
locations and is the default level for Watts products.
Review PPAP 4th edition requirements for further defined details
for notification of changes and PPAP requirements.
Watts reserves the right to redefine the
submission level required.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
14
Click Status
PPAP
to edit Master title style
Approved

The part meets all Watts requirements.

Supplier is authorized to ship production quantities of the part.
Deviation

Permits shipment of part on a limited time or piece quantity basis
under deviation.
Rejected

The part does not meet Watts requirements, based on the
production lot from which it was taken and/or accompanying
documentation.
Production quantities may not be
shipped before Watts Approval
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
15
Click to edit
Electronic
Submission
Master title
Requirements
style
Watts requests that all PPAPs be submitted electronically via Watts
HQMS. (Harrington Quality Management System).
Use of paper submission must have prior approval by the Watts.
Submission must be received on or prior to the PPAP due date.
Review and Approval Process:

Watts will review and provide feedback within 10 business days.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
16
Click toPPAP
Watt’s
edit Documents
Master title style
What are Watt’s PPAP Documents?

An Excel spreadsheet containing labels & templates of the documents
suppliers are required to submit to Watts. These PPAP documents can
be found on our supplier website: www.wattswater.com/Suppliers
Why use the Watt’s PPAP Documents?



Simplifies the process for suppliers by serving as a “checklist” of
what needs to be submitted to Watts.
Reduces the number of files to manage.
Enables the engineer or commodity manager to quickly see if
anything is missing.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
17
Click to edit Master title style
Part Submission
Warrant
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
18
ClickSubmission
Part
to edit Master
Warrant
title (PSW)
style
What is it?
• Documents required for all newly tooled
or revised products in which the
supplier confirms that inspections and
tests on production parts show
conformance to Watts requirements.
Objective or purpose
• Used to:
Document part approval
Provide key information
Declare that the parts meet
specification.
When to use it
• Prior to shipping production
parts.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
19
ClickSubmission
Part
to edit Master
Warrant
title (PSW)
style
Supplier’s Checklist
 Must be completely filled out
 Must be signed by the supplier
 P/N must match the PO
 Submitted at the correct revision level
 Submitted at the correct submission level
 Specify the reason for submission
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
20
Click to edit Master title style
Authorized Engineering
Change Documents
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
21
Authorized
Click
to editEngineering
Master title style
Change Notice
The supplier shall provide authorized change documents as
required below but not limited to that affects the PPAP:
Specifications
Deviations
MA–Manufacturing
Feasibility
Supplier
studies (Team Feasibility Commitment next page)
change requests
Sub-assembly
Life
Alerts/ECN (must be approved, not pending)
drawings
or reliability testing requirements
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
22
Click to
Team
Feasibility
edit Master
Commitment
title style
What is it?
• Review required for all new or revised
product, tooling etc. in which the supplier
confirms that processes, controls,
specifications, tests, equipment and costs
on production parts meet Watts
requirements.
TEAM FEASIBILITY COMMITMENT (小组可行性承诺书)
Attention:
Watts Water Technologies
Supplier Name
供应商名称:
Dwg. Revision
Level
图纸修订级别:
Part / Item Number
生产件/项目号:
Part Name / Desc.
生产件名称/描述:
Our product quality planning team has considered the following questions, not intended to be all-inclusive, in performing
a feasibility evaluation. The drawings and / or specifications provided have been used as a basis for analyzing the ability
to meet all specified requirements. All "no" answers are supported with attached comments identifying our concerns
and / or proposed changes to enable us to meet the specified requirements.
我们的产品质量规划团队已经在进行可行性评估的过程中考虑了如下问题（但无意囊括一切问题）。
所提供的图纸和/或详细说明书均已用来作为分析是否能够满足一切明确规定要求的依据。凡是答案为 “否”的问题均附有说明，
以表示我们的忧虑和/或为了使我们能够满足明确规定的要求而建议进行的更改。
Yes
No
N/A(不适用)
Considerations(考虑因素)
Is product adequately defined (application requirements, etc.) to enable
feasibility evaluation?
是否对产品作了充分的规定（应用要求等）以便能够进行可行性评估？
Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written?
能否满足所写的工程性能技术要求？
Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on drawings?
产品是否能够按照图纸上明确规定的公差制造？
Can product be manufactured with Cpk's that meet requirements?
产品是否能够以符合要求的cpk制造？
Objective or purpose
Is there adequate capacity to produce product?
是否有足够的产能生产产品？
Can the product be manufactured without incurring any unusual:
制造该产品是否能够不招致如下的任何异常情况的发生？
• Used to:
Identify controls are in place and
being met.
Declare that the parts meet
specifications and requirements.
Cost for capital equipment?
资本设备的成本？
Cost for tooling?
工装的成本？
Alternative manufacturing methods?
替代制造方法？
Is statistical process control required on product?
是否要求对产品进行统计过程控制？
Is statistical process control presently used on similar products?
目前是否对类似的产品使用了统计过程控制？
Where statistical process control is used on similar products:
在哪里对类似的产品使用了统计过程控制？
Are the processes in control and stable?
这些过程是否在控制范围内而且稳定？
Are Cpk's greater than 1.67?
这些过程是否在控制范围内而且稳定？
Has Watts supplied samples?
沃茨公司是否已经提供了样品？
If sample is available, does it meet Engineering specification and print?
如果有样品可供使用，则它是否符合工程技术规格与打印材料？
When to use it
• Prior to shipping production
parts.
Conclusion:
Feasible.可行
Product can be produced as specified with no revisions. 产品可以按照明确规定的要求（无须修订）生产。
Feasible.可行
Changes recommended (see attached). 建议进行更改（参见随附文件）。
Not Feasible不可行. Design review required to produce product within the specified requirements. 要求进行设计复查以便在明确规定的要求范围之内生产产品。
Sign-Off签字同意：:
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Team Member / Title / Date团队成员/职衔/日期
Watts Form Number
沃茨表格编号:
Form Revision Date
表格修订日期:
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
WW-PPAP-112
3/20/2014
23
Click to edit Master title style
Process Flow
Diagram
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
24
Click to Flow
Process
edit Master
Diagram
title style
What is it?
• A visual diagram of the entire
process from receiving through
shipping, including outside
processes and services.
Objective or purpose
To help people “see” the real
process. Process maps can be used
to understand the following
characteristics of a process:
• Set-by-step process linkage
• Offline activities (measurement,
inspection, handling)
• Rework, scrap.
When to use it
• To understand how a process
flows.
• Prior to completing the PFMEA.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
25
Click to Flow
Process
edit Master
Diagrams
title style
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
Part Number:
Operation
Description
Item #
Store
Inspect
Move
STEP
Fabrication
Part Description:
Product and
Process
Characteristics
Item #
Date:
ECL:
Prepared By:
1
2
3
4
Control Methods
The process flow
example diagram
utilizes symbols to
clearly identify each
step in the process.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
26
Click to Flow
Process
edit Master
Diagram
title
Example
style
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
Part No.
: 800-3253535
Sample part
:
Part Name :
Incoming
Inspection
Doc. No.
: xyz12364
Page
: 1 of 1
Rev. No. / Date
: Rev A 10-11-89
Deburring & Cleaning
Pre shipment
audit
20
Patrol Insp.
report
Oiling, Packing &
Preservation
Pre shipment
audit report
Final Inspection
register
Pre delivery
Inspection
Layout
Inspection
50
60
Final Inspection
15
10
**RM receiving
Insp. report
70
: Horton
CNC Sliding
Machining
05
Despatch
Customer Name
40
30
Layout Inspection
Report
Self Inspection
Report
Not ok , Rejected
**
Inspection
per AAB
Inspection as per
Operation layout
If Rejected
Not ok , Rejected
Note :
Tags to be provided
for OK, Rework, Inspection
& Rejection
Return to
supplier
- MOVEMENT
If rework
possible
- PATROL INSPECTION
- SUPPLIER END OPERATION
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
- PROCESS
- STORAGE
- INSPECTION
Rework
Not ok
100%
Re-inspection
Ok
Next
operation
Scrap
PREPARED BY & DATE
Rbru 10-11-87
APPROVED BY &
DATE
Rose 12-09-87
27
Click to Flow
Process
edit Master
Diagrams
title style
Suppliers Checklist
Process Flow must identify each step in the process.
Should include abnormal handling processes.
• Scrap
• Rework
Process Flow must include all phases of the process.
• Receiving of raw material
• Part manufacturing
• Offline inspections and checks
• Assembly
• Shipping
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
28
Click to edit Master title style
Process FMEA
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
29
Click to FMEA
Process
edit Master
( PFMEA)
title style
What is it?
• A tool used to identify and
prioritize risk areas
and their mitigation plans.
Objective or purpose
PROCESS FMEA (潜在失效模式及后果分析/过程FMEA)
Part/Item Number
零件号/项目号:
Drawing Rev.图纸版本:
FMEA No.
(FMEA 编号):
Date(Orig.)
日期(编制):
Part Name
零件名称:
Process
Resp.过程责任:
Prepared By
编制人:
Date (Rev.)
日期(修订):
Analysis Team
分析团队:
Line
Number
行号
Process
Stages
工序
Page 第
Process Functions /
Requirements
过程功能/要求
Potential
Failure Mode
潜在失效模式
Potential Effect(s) of
Failure
潜在失效后果
Sev.
严重度(S)
Class
级别
Potential
Causes(s) /
Mechanism(s) of
Failure
潜在失效起因/机理
Occur.
频度(O)
Current Process
Controls
现行过程控制(预防)
Current Process
Controls
现行过程控制(探测)
Detect
RPN
探测度(D) 风险顺序数
Recommended
Action建议措施
Responsibility &
Target
Completion Date
责任及目标完成日
期
页Of共
页
Action Results 措施结果
Action
RPN
Sev.严 Occ.频 Det.
Taken
风险顺序系
重度
度 探测度
数
采取的措施
• Identifies potential failure modes,
causes, and effects. Inputs come
from the process flow diagram.
• Identifies key inputs which
positively or negatively affect
quality, reliability and safety of a
product or process. A proactive
approach used to manage risk.
When to use it
• After completion of the process
flow diagram.
• Prior to tooling for production.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Watts Form Number
(沃茨公司表格号):
WW-PPAP-102
Form Revision Date
(表格修订日期):
3/20/2014
30
PFMEA
Steps
1and
2
Click to Example
edit Master
title
style
Spray head
clogged:
- Viscosity too
high
- Temp too low
- Pressure too
low
R.P.N.
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
interior door
hardware
Manually
inserted spray
head not
inserter far
enough
Current Process
Controls
8
Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage
5 280
5 Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage; Test
spray at start-up
and after idle
periods and
preventative
maintenance
program to clean
heads
5 175
Detect
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity 7
application of
coverage over breach of inner
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
panel
Corroded interior
lower door
panels
Potential
Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s)
of Failure
Occur
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
Potential Failure
Mode
Sev
Process Step
2
Class
1
1. There should be at least one potential failure mode for each process step.
2. There should be at least one failure effects for each potential failure mode.
Effects should be specific, clear, and leave no doubt to the uninformed reviewer.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
31
Click to Example
PFMEA
edit Master
Steps
title
3 and
style4
3
Spray head
clogged:
- Viscosity too
high
- Temp too low
- Pressure too
low
R.P.N.
Manually
inserted spray
head not
inserter far
enough
4
Current Process
Controls
8
Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage
5 280
5 Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage; Test
spray at start-up
and after idle
periods and
preventative
maintenance
program to clean
heads
5 175
Detec
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
interior door
hardware
7
Potential
Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s)
of Failure
Occur
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity
application of
coverage over
breach of inner
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
panel
Corroded interior
lower door
panels
Class
Potential Failure
Mode
Sev
Process Step
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
3. There should be at least one potential cause for each failure mode.
4. This step in the FMEA begins to identify initial shortcomings or gaps in the current control
plan. If a procedure exists, enter the document number. If no current control exists, leave
block as a “NONE.”
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
32
Click toStep
PFMEA
edit5Master title style
Manually
inserted spray
head not
inserter far
enough
Spray head
clogged:
- Viscosity too
high
- Temp too low
- Pressure too
low
R.P.N.
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
interior door
hardware
7
Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s)
of Failure
5
5
Current Process
Controls
8
Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage
5 280
5 Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage; Test
spray at start-up
and after idle
periods and
preventative
maintenance
program to clean
heads
5 175
Detec
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity
application of
coverage over
breach of inner
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
panel
Corroded interior
lower door
panels
Class
Potential Failure
Mode
Sev
Process Step
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
Occur
Assign Severity, Occurrence, and Detection ratings
5
Potential
5. Severity, Occurrence and Detection rating details on next slide.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
33
Click to- edit
PFMEA
Definition
Masteroftitle
Terms
style



Severity (of Effect) - Severity of the effect on the customer
and other stakeholders (Higher Value = Higher Severity).
Occurence (of Cause) - Frequency with which a given failure
occurs and creates failure mode (Higher Value = Higher
Probability of Occurrence).
Detection (Capability of Current Controls) - Ability of current
control scheme to detect the cause before creating the
failure mode and/or the failure mode before suffering the
effect. (Higher Value = Lower Ability to Detect).
Notice the scale difference for Detection on the next page.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
34
Click
An
Example
to editof
Master
Rating
title
Definitions
style
Rating
High
10
Low
1
*If No Controls Exist, Detection = 10
Create a rating system that makes sense for the
defects you are trying to prevent.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
35
Click to- edit
PFMEA
StepMaster
6
title style
R.P.N.
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
prioritizeinterior
the door
most
hardware
7
Current Process
Controls
8
Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage
5 280
5 Variables check
for film
thickness; Visual
check for
coverage; Test
spray at start-up
and after idle
periods and
preventative
maintenance
identified
the
programin
to clean
heads
5 175
Manually
inserted spray
head not
inserter far
enough
Spray head
clogged:
- Viscosity too
high
- Temp too low
- Pressure too
low
Detec
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity
application of
coverage over
breach of inner
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
panel
Corroded interior
lower door
panels
6
Occur
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
Class
Potential Failure
Mode
Sev
Process Step
Potential
Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s)
of Failure
Calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN)
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
6. The RPN is used to
FMEA.
critical risks
first half of the
High RPNs are flags to take efforts to reduce the calculated risk.
Regardless of RPN, high severity scores (9 or 10) should be given special attention.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
36
Click to edit
Analyzing
theMaster
PFMEAtitle style
Sort by RPN to determine
the most significant
failure modes
Once the RPN numbers are
determined, they can be used
to prioritize the most
significant failure modes.
Sort the FMEA by the RPN
numbers. Graphical and
statistical tools can help the
team select a “cut-off” RPN
for the next steps.
RPN Thresholds
When using an RPN threshold, DO NOT
forget to address high scores.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
37
Click to– edit
PFMEA
Remediation
Master title
Guidelines
style
Severity – Can only be improved by a design change to the
product or process.
Occurrence – Can only be reduced by a change which removes
or controls a cause. Examples are redundancy, substituting a
more reliable component or function or mistake-proofing.
Detection – Can be reduced by improving detection. Examples
are mistake-proofing, simplification and statistically sound
monitoring.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
38
Click to– edit
PFMEA
StepMaster
7
title style
Mfg. Eng. By
5/10/10
175 Use DOE on
viscosity vs.
temp vs.
pressure
Mfg. Eng. By
5/31/10
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
interior door
hardware
Mfg. Eng. By
5/25/10
R.P.N.
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity 280 Add positive
application of
coverage over breach of inner
depth stop to
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
sprayer
panel
Automate
Corroded interior
spraying
lower door
panels
Actions Taken
Det
Recommended Responsibility &
Actions
Target Date
Occ
Potential Failure
Mode
Action Results
Sev
Process Step
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
R.P.N.
Determine Actions Recommended to reduce High RPNs
7
Stop added,
7 2 5 70
sprayer checked
on-line
Rejected due to
complexity of
different doors on
the same line
Temp and press
7 1 5 35
limits were
determined and
limit controls
have been
installed - Control
charts show
process is in
control Cpk =
1.85
7. The higher RPN’s need to be reviewed for determined actions.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
39
Click to
FMEA
– Steps
edit Master
8,9 andtitle
10 style
8
175 Use DOE on
viscosity vs.
temp vs.
pressure
Mfg. Eng. By
5/31/10
Deteriorated life
of door leading
to:
- Unsatisfactory
appearance due
to rust through
paint over time
- Impaired
function of
interior door
hardware
Now recalculate your RPNs
based on mitigation plans.
Mfg. Eng. By
5/25/10
Stop added,
sprayer checked
on-line
Rejected due to
complexity of
different doors on
the same line
Temp and press
limits were
determined and
limit controls
have been
installed - Control
charts show
process is in
control Cpk =
1.85
7
2
5
7
1
R.P.N.
Mfg. Eng. By
5/10/10
Det
Op 70: Manual Insufficient wax Allows integrity 280 Add positive
application of
coverage over
breach of inner
depth stop to
wax inside door specified surface
door panel
sprayer
panel
Automate
Corroded interior
spraying
lower door
panels
Actions Taken
Occ
Recommended Responsibility &
Actions
Target Date
Action Results
9
Sev
Potential Failure
Mode
R.P.N.
Process Step
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
70
5 35
8. Responsibility - Assign a specific person who will be responsible for the
recommended actions.
9. As actions are completed, document it in the Actions Completed column.
SEV, OCC, DET, RPN – As actions are complete reassess the Severity, Occurrence
and Detection and recalculate RPN. Continue RPNs until all risks (are below 100).
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
40
Click to edit
Summary
Steps
Master
To Complete
title stylea FMEA
1.
For each process input, determine the ways in which the process
step can potentially fail. These are (failure modes).
2. For each failure mode associated with the inputs, determine
effects on the outputs.
3. Identify the potential causes of each failure mode.
4. List the current ccontrols for each cause.
5. Assign severity, occurrence and detection ratings after creating a
ratings key appropriate for your project.
6. Calculate RPN.
7. Determine the recommended actions to reduce High RPNs.
8. Take appropriate actions and ddocument the issue.
9. Recalculate RPNs.
10. Revisit steps 7 and 8 until all the significant RPNs have been
addressed.
A FMEA is living document that must be reviewed
and updated as processes change
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
41
Click to edit Master title style
Control Plan
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
42
Click to Plan
Control
edit Master title style
What is it?
• A document that describes
how to control the critical
inputs to continue to meet
Watts expectations of the
new output.
Objective or purpose
• Primary reference source for
minimizing process and product
variation.
• Description of how teams
should react to out-of-control
situations.
When to use It
• Implementation of new process.
• Following a process change.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
A control plan is considered a living document
as processes are expected to be continuously
updated and improved.
43
Click to Plan
Control
edit Master title style
Interaction of Tools
Process Steps
Process Flow chart
New/Revised Process
Steps
Process FMEA
Control Plan
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
44
Click to Plan
Control
edit Master title style
A Control Plan addresses the areas below:
 Three Distinct Phases – prototype, pre-launch and production.
 Administrative section – Identifies part numbers and descriptions, supplier,
required approvals, signature and dates.
 Part/Process requirements, characteristics of product or process, machine
/tools that are used in the manufacturing process.
 Specifications/tolerances, measurement technique, sample size and
frequency.
 Control methods, and reaction plans.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
45
Click to Plan
Control
edit Master title style
Suppliers Checklist
 Use process flow diagram and PFMEA to build the control plan; keep them
aligned.
 Controls must be used to be effective. Keep it simple.
 Ensure that the control plan is in the document control system of the business.
 Good control plans address:
 All testing requirements - dimensional, material, and performance.
 All product and process characteristics at every step throughout the
process.
 The control method should be based on an effective analysis of the process.
 Such as SPC, Inspection, Sampling Plan.
 Control plans should reference other documentation.
 Specifications, tooling, etc.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
46
Click to edit Master title style
Measurement System
Analysis (MSA)
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
47
Click
Measurement
to edit Master
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
What is it?
An MSA is a statistical tool used to
determine if a measurement system
is capable of precise measurement.
Objective or purpose
When to use it
On the critical inputs and outputs
prior to collecting data for analysis.
• For any new or modified process in
order to ensure the quality of the
data.
Who should be involved
•
Everyone that measures and makes
decisions about these measurements
should be involved in the MSA.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
• To determine how much error is in
the measurement due to the
measurement process itself.
• Quantifies the variability added by
the measurement system.
• Applicable to attribute data and
variable data.
IMPORTANT!
Measurement System Analysis is
an analysis of the process,
not an analysis of the
people!
48
Types to
of edit
Data Master
-Attribute
andstyle
Variable MSA
Click
title
Attribute Data Examples:
 Count, pass/fail, yes/no, red/green/yellow, timekeeping
buckets
Variable Data Examples:
Physical measurement (length, width, area, …)
 Physical conditions (temperature, pressure…)
 Physical properties (strength, load, strain…)
 Continuous or non-ending
Unless approved by Watts attribute data
is not acceptable for PPAP submission
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
49
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
The observed variation in
process output
measurements is not
simply the variation in the
process itself; it is the
variation in the process
plus the variation in
measurement that results
from an inadequate
measurement system.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
50
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
Observed Variation
The output of the process
measured by:
• Cycle time
• Dimensional data
• Number of defects
and others
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
51
Click to edit Master
style (MSA)
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
Process
Variation
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Calibration addresses accuracy
52
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
Linearity
Accuracy
(Central
Location)
Bias
Stability
Process
Variation
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Let’s take a closer look
at Precision
53
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
Resolution
Error in Resolution
The inability to detect small
changes.
Possible Cause
Wrong measurement device
selected - divisions on scale not
fine enough to detect changes.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
54
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
Error in Repeatability
The inability to get the same
answer from repeated
measurements made of the
same item under absolutely
identical conditions.
Possible Cause
Lack of standard operating
procedures (SOP), lack of
training, measuring system
variability.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Equipment Variation
55
Click to edit Master
Measurement
Systemtitle
Analysis
style (MSA)
Reproducibility
Error in Reproducibility
The inability to get the same
answer from repeated
measurements made under
various conditions from
different inspectors.
Possible Cause
Lack of SOP, lack of training.
Appraiser Variation
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
56
Click to edit
Variable
MSA Master
– Gage title
R&R style
Study
• Gage R&R is the combined estimate of measurement
system Repeatability and Reproducibility.
• Typically, a 3-person study is performed
 Each person randomly measures 10 marked parts per
trial.
 Each person can perform up to 3 trials.
• There are 3 key indicators:
 EV or Equipment Variation
 AV or Appraiser Variation
 Overall % GRR
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
57
Click to edit
Variable
MSA Master
– Example
titleGage
styleR&R Form
Suppliers shall use their own
Gage R & R forms to address the
requirements for Measurement
System Analysis (MSA).
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
58
Click to edit
Variable
MSA Master
– Gage title
R&R style
Steps
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9 Step 10
1.
Select 10 items that represent the full range of long-term process variation.
2.
Identify the appraisers.
3.
If appropriate, calibrate the gage or verify that the last calibration date is valid
4.
Have your Gage R & R form available to record data.
5.
Have each appraiser assess each part 3 times (trials – first in order, second in
reverse order, third random).
6.
Input data into the Gage R&R worksheet.
7.
Enter the number of operators, trials, samples and specification limits
8.
Analyze data in the Gage R&R worksheet.
9.
Assess MSA trust level. ( > 30% fail) (10-30% marginal) ( <10% pass)
10.
Take actions for improvement if necessary.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
59
Click and
to edit
Master Learned
title style
Tips
Lessons
 Important: An MSA is an analysis of the process, not an
analysis of the people. If an MSA fails, the process failed.
 A Variable MSA provides more analysis capability than an
Attribute MSA. For this and other reasons, always use
variable data if possible.
The involvement of people is the key to success.
Involve the people that actually work the process
 Involve the supervision
 Involve the suppliers and customers of the process
 An MSA primarily addresses precision with limited accuracy
information.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
60
ClickReview
MSA
to edit Master title style
Supplier’s Checklist
If the gage/inspection affects quality and used for product
acceptance, then conduct a Gage R&R.
Make sure the study is recent - less than 1 year.
Compare the control plan gages against the Gage R&Rs.
If you question that gage, then;
Question the technique and part sampling.
Ask for additional studies.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
61
Click to edit Master title style
Dimensional Results
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
62
Click to edit Results
Dimensional
Master title style
What is it?
• Evidence that dimensional
verifications have been completed
and results indicate compliance
with specified requirements.
DIMENSIONAL TEST / RESULTS (尺寸报告)
Supplier to Watts
沃茨直接供应商:
Part / Item Number
零件号/项目号:
Supplier/Vendor
Code供应商/卖主代码:
Part Name / Desc.
零件名称/描述:
Inspection Facility
检验机构:
Draw ing Revision
图纸版本:
Engineering Change Documents
工程更改文件:
Sample Date Code/Lot Number
样品日期代码/批号:
Item
项目号
Dimension/Specification
尺寸/规格
Specification / Limits
规格/限制
Test Date QtyTested
测试日期 测试数量
Supplier Measurement Results (Data)
供应商测量结果(数据)
Measurement
Method
测量方法
OK Not OK
合格 不合格
Objective or purpose
• To show conformance to the
customer part print on dimensions
and all other noted requirements.
When to use it
• For each unique manufacturing
process (e.g., cells or production
lines and all molds, patterns, or
dies.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.
笼统地说“合格”,对于任何测试结果来说都是不可接受的。
Watts Form Number
(沃茨公司表格号):
WW-PPAP-104
Form Revision Date
(表格修订日期):
3/20/2014
SIGNATURE 签字：
TITLE 职衔：
DATE 日期：
63
Click to edit Requirements
Dimensional
Master title style





The Supplier shall provide the number of sample parts as specified on the
PPAP. The specific sample size will be determined based on factors such as
component size, complexity, projected volume, etc.
Take or make samples from actual production tooling and /or processes
unless otherwise approved in writing. Where multiple production molds,
cavities, dies, machines, etc., are utilized, samples are required from
each. For any questions consult Watts for data requirements.
Complete a Dimensional report for five parts. The dimensional report is a
comprehensive inspection report of the part being qualified. It is
considered a full part layout and must accompany all samples submitted.
It includes measurement and verification of all dimensions, drawing
notes, engineering specifications and quality standards. This is sometimes
referred to as a First Article Inspection (FAI).
Actual variable data must be provided in terms of measurements, not
attribute (pass / fail; go / no go; etc.) data. All results must be traceable
to the specific samples from which obtained.
The sample parts must be shipped with a copy of the dimensional report
work sheet. These parts when shipped need to be identified as PPAP
samples using the Watts PPAP sample label that can be obtained on the
Watts supplier website. www.wattswater.com/Suppliers from the (PPAP)
link.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
64
Click to edit Checklist
Dimensional
Master title style
A Watts determined quantity of parts are required for part
qualification. These initial production parts must be identified when
shipped for the first time.
 Five of these parts must be shipped to Watts for verification of
form, fit, and function and properly labeled.
The same five parts will be used to verify both critical and noncritical dimensions.
Supplier must clearly identify the production sample parts that are
being shipped with Watts PPAP sample label.
Supplier should make every effort to ship five parts that represent
both the low and high ends of the specifications for dimensions.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
65
Click to edit Master title style
Records of Material
/ Performance Test
Results
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
66
Click to edit
Records
of Material
Master Test
title Results
style
MATERIAL TEST RESULTS (材料试验报告)
Records of Material Test Results
• The supplier shall have records of
material test results for the correct
raw material/grade as specified on
the design record or control plan.
Purchase Order
订单号
EDP Number
EDP号:
Supplier to Watts
沃茨 直接供应商:
Part / Item Number
零件号/项目号:
Supplier/Vendor Code
供应商/卖主代码:
Part Name / Desc.
零件名称/描述:
Material Supplier
原材料供应商:
Draw ing Revision
图纸版本:
*Custo mer Specified
Supplier/Vendo r Co de
客户指定的供应商/卖主代码:
Engineering Change Documents
工程更改文件:
Name of Laboratory
实验室名称:
*If so urce appro val is req'd, include the
Supplier (So urce) & Custo mer assigned
co de.如果要求审批供应商货源，则包括供
应商（货源）与客户指定代码
Material Specif ication /Chemicals
Comp/Physical
材料规格/化学成分/物理特性
Lot/Batch ID
批号:
Specif ication Limits
规格/限制
Test Date
测试日期
Qty.
Tested
测试数量
Test Results
测试结果
OK
合格
Not OK
不合格
Material Test Results
• The supplier shall perform tests for
all parts and product materials
when
chemical,
physical,
or
metallurgical requirements are
specified by the design record or
control plan and list the tests
performed on the form.
Example
Material Specification
Test Qty.
Specification
/Chemicals
Date Tested
Limits 规格/
Comp/Physical 材料规
测试日 测试数
限制
格/化学成分/物理特性
期
量
DOW CONTINUUM
DGDA-2490 BK
1/1/12
1
Test Results
测试结果
provided material cert
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
OK
合格
Not
OK
不合格
Blanket statements of conf ormance are unacceptable f or any test results.
笼统地说“合格”,对于任何测试结果来说都是不可接受的。
Watts Form Number
(沃茨公司表格号):
Form Revision Date
(表格修订日期):
WW-PPAP-105
SIGNATURE 签字:
TITLE 职衔:
DATE 日期:
3/20/2014
x
67
Click to edit
Records
of Performance
Master titleTest
styleResults
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS (性能试验报告)
Records of Performance Test Results
• The supplier shall have records of
performance test results for tests
specified by the design record or
control plan.
Supplier to Watts
沃茨直接供应商:
Supplier Code
供应商代码:
Name of Laboratory
实验室名称:
Part / Item
Number零件号/项目号:
Part Name /
Desc.零件名称/描述:
Draw ing Revision
图纸版本:
*Custo mer Specified
Supplier/Vendo r Co de
*客户指定的供应商/卖主代码:
Engineering Change
Documents
工程更改文件:
*If so urce appro val is req'd, include the Supplier (So urce) & Custo mer assigned
co de.如果要求审批供应商货源，则包括供应商（货源）与客户指定代码
Test Specification / Rev / Date
测试规格/版本/日期
Specification /
Limits
规格/限制
Test Date Qty. Tested
测试日期 测试数量
Supplier Test Results (Data) / Test Conditions
供应商测试结果(数据)/测试条件
OK
合格
Not OK
不合格
Performance Test Results
• The supplier shall perform tests for all
part(s) or product material(s) when
performance or functional requirements
are specified by the design record or
control plan.
Example
Test
Qty.
Test Specification / Specificatio
Supplier Test Results (Data) / Test
Date Tested
Rev / Date 测试规格/ n / Limits
Conditions 供应商测试结果(数据)/测试条
测试日 测试数
版本/日期
件
规格/限制
期
量
temp 10C to 85C 10c 85c 4/2/14
1
Test report provided
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
OK
合格
Not
OK
不合格
Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.
笼统地说“合格”,对于任何测试结果来说都是不可接受的。
Watts Form Number
(沃茨表格编号):
x
Form Revision Date:
(表格修订日期):
SIGNATURE 签字:
TITLE 职衔:
DATE 日期:
WW-PPAP-106
3/20/2014
68
Click to edit
Material/
Performance
Master title
Review
style
Reviewers Checklist
 For products with Watts-developed material specifications
and or an Watts-approved supplier list, the supplier shall
procure materials and or services from suppliers on that
list.
 Supplier shall address all areas on the Watts form(s) to
meet the PPAP requirements for both Material and
Performance requirements.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
69
Click to edit Master title style
Initial Process Study
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
70
Click to
Initial
Process
edit Master
Study title style
S = Supplier shall
submit to Watts a
copy of the records or
documented items at
appropriate locations.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
71
Click to
Initial
Process
edit Master
Study title style
What is it?
•
A set of tools used to understand
process capability.
Objective or purpose
• To evaluate the performance of
your process as compared to
specification limits.
• To determine if the production
process is likely to produce product
that will meet customer
requirements.
When to use it
•
•
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
To establish base line capability.
To validate process improvements.
72
Steps to
Click
foredit
Determining
Master title
Process
style
Capability
Step 1
Step 2 Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
1.
Decide on the product or process characteristic to be assessed (required or
all critical characteristics).
2.
Validate the specification limits ( through customers, suppliers, controlling
agencies).
3.
Validate the measurement system through appropriate (MSA).
4.
Collect data
Short term data:
» Free of special causes
» Collected across a narrow inference space i.e. one shift, one machine, one
operator, etc..
Long term data:
» Subjected to the effects of both random and special cause variation.
» Collected across a broad inference space i.e. multiple shifts, machines,
operators, etc.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
73
Steps to
Click
foredit
Determining
Master title
Process
style
Capability
Step 1
5.
Step 2 Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Assess Data characteristics - Is it what you would expect? If not, investigate.
6. *Assess Process stability - Assess process stability in order to understand how
your process behaves over time. Control charts are the recommended tool.
7. Calculate process capability - Calculate the appropriate statistical metrics in
order to determine how the “Voice of the Process” compares to the “Voice of
the Customer.”
Example: Capability Metrics: PPM, DPMO, Cp, Cpk, Pp, & Ppk ; Sigma Levels (Z
Scores)
*Capability is only valid when the
process being studied is stable!
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
74
Click to
Focus
onedit
Variable
Master
Data
title style
The initial process study should be focused on variable, not attribute
data.
Assembly errors, test failures, and surface defects are examples of
attribute data, which is important to understand, but is not covered in
this initial study.
To understand the performance of characteristics monitored by
attribute data will require more data collected over time.
Unless approved by an authorized Watts representative, attribute
data are not acceptable for PPAP submission.
Focus on variable data
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
75
Click to edit
Capability
Indices
Master
– Cpk
title&style
Ppk
Cpk predicts capability:
 Based on short term within subgroup variation.
 Does not include the effect of process variability between subgroups.
Cpk should be used when:
 Developing new parts.
 Revising specifications on a part.
 Materials, processes, manufacturing location, or equipment have significantly
changed.
 Material suppliers have changed (include certificate of analysis).
Ppk indicates past performance:
 Based on long term total variation.
 Unlike Cpk, Ppk is not limited to variation within subgroups.
 However, Ppk cannot isolate within subgroup variation from between subgroup
variation.
 When calculated from the same data set, Cpk and Ppk can be compared to analyze
the sources of process variation.
Ppk should be used when:
 The supplier is new to Watts, but has already been manufacturing a part.
 The supplier is existing, but has produced a number of nonconforming parts.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
76
Click to editCriteria
Acceptance
Master title style
Capability acceptance criteria for characteristics
 For Watts products based on short term capability a
1.33 Cpk or greater is required and for Ppk a 1.67 or
greater is required.
 For Long Term capability for Watts products the Cpk
must be 1.33 or greater for key characteristics.
Suppliers shall ensure that the results are
acceptable, and that the process is stable and
capable of producing a quality part to watts
Requirements.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
77
Click to edit Master title style
Qualified Laboratory
Documentation
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
78
Click to edit
Qualified
Laboratory
Master title
Documentation
style
•Inspection and testing for PPAP shall be performed by a
qualified laboratory as defined by Watts requirements (e.g., an
accredited laboratory).
•The qualified laboratory (internal or external to the supplier)
shall have a laboratory scope and documentation showing that
the laboratory is qualified for the type of measurements or
tests conducted.
When an external laboratory is used, the supplier shall submit
the test results on the laboratory letterhead or the normal
laboratory report format.
The name of the laboratory that performed the tests, the
date(s) of the tests, and the standards used to run the tests
shall be identified.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
79
Click to edit Master title style
Appearance
Approval Report
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
80
Click to editApproval
Appearance
Master title
Report
style
What is it?
• A report completed by the supplier
concerning areas such as paint,
plating, appearance, color, grain
etc.. that have criteria for these
areas.
APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT (外观批准报告)
Application 应用:
Draw ing
Revision
图纸版本:
Watts Part /Item Number
沃茨l零件号/项目号:
(Product Name
产品名称)
E/C Level
本次提交的工
程更改等级:
Buyer Code
买方代码:
Watts Part Name/Desc.
沃茨零件名称/描述:
Date
日期:
Manufacturing
Location
制造场所:
Supplier Name
供应商名称:
Reason for Submission 提交理由:
Supplier Code
供应商代码:
PART SUBM ISSION WARRANT生产件提交保证表
SPECIAL SAM PLE特殊样品
RE-SUBM ISSION重新提交
PRE TEXTURE纹饰预处理
FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPM ENT首批产品发运
ENGINEERING CHANGE工程更改
Other
其他:
APPEARANCE EVALUATION 外观评价
Objective or purpose
Watts Supplier Sourcing & Texture Information
沃茨供应商来源与纹理加工信息
Pre-Texture Evaluation
预处理表面评估
• To demonstrate that the part has
met the appearance requirements
on the design record.
Authorized Customer
Representative Signature &
Date
客户全权代表签字与日期
Correct & Proceed
纠正并继续进行
Correct & Resubmit
纠正并重新提交
Approved to Texture
对纹理加工签批
FINISH/COLOR EVALUATION 整饰/颜色评价
When to use it
Color 颜色
Grain
粒度
Plating
电镀
Coating
涂层
Paint
油漆
Material
Material Source(MFG)
Type
材料来源
材料类型
(制造)
RED红
• Prior to tooling for production.
IMPORTANT!
PHONE NUMBER
照片编号
SUPPLIER SIGNATURE/DATE
供应商签字/日期
Watts Form Number
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
YEL黄
Value
色值
Chroma
色度
Gloss
光泽
Metallic
Brilliance
金属光泽度
Part Dispositon
零件处理状况
GRN绿 BLU兰 LIGHT浅 DARK深 GRAY灰暗 CLEAN明亮 HIGH高 LOW低 HIGH高 LOW低
COMMENTS
说明
Typically applies for parts with color, grain,
or surface appearance requirements.
Hue
色调
WW-PPAP-107
EMAIL
电子邮箱
AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER
REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
客户全权代表签字
DATE
日期
Form Revision Date 3/20/2014
81
Click to edit Master title style
PPAP Sample
Productions Parts
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
82
Click Sample
PPAP
to edit Master
Production
title Parts
style
What is it?
• Actual samples that reflect the
parts documented in the PPAP.
Objective or purpose
• Confirm dimensional, cosmetic or
functional part approval.
When to use it
• Sample parts should be delivered
with the PPAP submission.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
83
Click Sample
PPAP
to edit Master
Production
title Parts
style
•The sample parts provided shall be the same parts measured for the
dimensional results.
•Where multiple production molds, cavities, dies, machines, etc., are
utilized, samples are required from each.
•Default quantity for all submissions is 5 parts unless otherwise
requested.
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
84
Click Sample
PPAP
to edit Master
Production
title Parts
style
PPAP sample production parts MUST be properly
identified.
At a minimum the following information is required on the
PPAP sample label:
• Part/Item
number
• Engineering
• Part
Change level
Name
• Supplier
Name
• Supplier
Code
See Watts sample part label
on the next slide.
• Quantity
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
85
Click Samples
PPAP
to edit Master
Label title style
PPAP SAMPLES Label (PPAP样品标签)
PPAP Label:
• Upper half is informational
and lower half is the label
portion used for identification
of shipment.
1
Part/Item Number
零件号/项目号：
Enter Watts part numbers
填入沃茨的零件号.
2
Engineering Change Level
工程更改级别：
Engineering Change Level of the part number
该零件的工程更改级别.
3
Part Name
零件名称：
Part Name / Description.
零件名称/描述.
4
Supplier Name
供应商名称：:
Supplier Name for the product in approval
.已批准产品的供应商名称.
5
Supplier Code
供应商代码:
Supplier Code assigned by Watts (see Purchase Order).
沃茨指定的供应商代码（见采购定单）.
6
Quantity
数量:
Sample size sent for evaluation.
送交评估的样品数量.
PPAP SAMPLES (生产件批准程序/PPAP样品)
Part / Item Number 零件号/项目号：
Engineering Change Level 工程更改级别：
Part Name 零件名称：
Supplier Name 供应商名称：
Supplier Code 供应商代码：
Quantity 数量：
ATTACH THIS LABEL TO THE "PPAP SAMPLES"
将此标签贴在“生产件审批程序/PPAP样品”上
Watts Form Number
沃茨表格编号:
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Form Revision Date
表格修订日期:
WW-PPAP-110
3/20/2014
86
Click to edit Master title style
First Shipment Label
for Production Parts
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
87
Click Shipment
First
to edit Master
Production
title style
Parts
First shipment production parts MUST be properly identified.
– Include the following information on the part label:
•
New Product – (Mark if this is the first shipment for a new product)
•
Process Change - (Mark if this is the first shipment after a process
change)
•
Design Change - (Mark if this is the first shipment after a design change)
•
Watts part number
•
Engineering Change level
•
Part Name
•
Supplier Name
•
Supplier Code
•
Quantity
See Watts First Shipment
label on the next slide
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
88
Click Shipment
First
to edit Master
Production
title style
Parts
FIRST SHIPMENT LABEL (首批发运标签)
First Shipment Label:
• Upper half is informational
and lower half is the label
portion used for identification
of shipment.
1
New Product
新产品
Mark if this is the first shipment for a new product.
标示这是否是新产品的首批发运.
2
Process Change
过程改变
Mark if this is the first shipment after a process change.
标示这是否是过程改变后的首批发运.
3
Design Change
设计更改
Mark if this is the first shipment after a design change
.标示这是否是设计更改后的首批发运.
4
Part / Item Number
零件号/项目号
Enter Watts part number(s).
填入沃茨的零件号.
5
Engineering Change Level
工程更改级别：
Engineering Change Level of the part number.
该零件的工程更改级别.
6
Part Name
零件名称：
Part Name and part description.
零件名称与零件描述.
Supplier Name
供应商名称：
Supplier Code
供应商代码：
Supplier Name for the product in approval.
该产品的供应商名称.
Supplier Code assigned by Watts.
沃茨指定的供应商代码.
Quantity
数量：
Sample size sent for evaluation.
送交评估的样品数量.
7
8
9
FIRST SHIPMENT(首批发运）
NEW PRODUCT新产品: ________
PROCESS CHANGE过程改变: ____________
DESIGN CHANGE设计更改: ______________
Part / Item Number零件号/项目号:
Engineering Change Level 工程更改级别：
Part Name 零件名称:
Supplier Name 供应商名称：
Supplier Code 供应商代码:
Quantity 数量:
ATTACH THIS LABEL TO THE FIRST SHIPMENT
将此标签贴在首批发运产品上
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Watts Form Number
沃茨表格编号:
Form Revision Date
表格修订日期:
WW-PPAP-111
3/20/2014
89
Click to edit
Packaging
Requirements
Master title style
What is it?
•
A form that is to be completed by the
supplier to identify all areas related to the
packaging of the part that is being shipped.
Objective or purpose
•
To detail how a part is packaged for
review and acceptance by the
Watts.
Packaging Requirements for Shipment of Product包装要求
(WATTS OR SUPPLIER) 沃茨或供应商
Part / Item Number:
生产件号/项目号
Part Name / Desc.:
零件号/零件描述
EDP Number EDP号
Supplier Name:
供应商名称
Contact Person:联系人
Address:地址
Phone:电话
City, State, Zip
省，市，邮编
E-Mail:邮箱
Country 村
Phone:电话
Packaging Check list:包装检查清单
Item 序号
Required Packaging Information要求的包装信息
1
Quantity of parts in box (Select appropriate formats)
纸盒中的零件数（选择合适的格式）
2
Weight of Master and Inner carton
外箱和内箱的重量
3
Open box fully Packaged - pictures required
打开装满的箱子-要求图片
4
Identify Box Type (material construction)
识别箱子类型（构造材料）
5
Identify Box Material Dimensions
识别箱子材料尺寸
6
Total parts per box
每盒零件数
Parts per Bag if applicable
每包零件数（如果适用）
Weight of Master Carton
外箱重量
Weight of Inner Carton
内箱重量
Bags per Box if applicable
每盒中包数（如果适用）
Qty of Boxes per master
carton每大箱中的纸盒数
Master Carton
外箱
Inner Carton
内箱
Layer Count - Master
外箱中层数
Layer Count - Inner
内箱中层数
please supply pictures
请提供图片
please supply pictures
请提供图片
If applicable
如果适用
If applicable
如果适用
Single / Double / Triple Wall
单层/双层/三层壁
Card board
纸板
Plastic or Wood
塑料或木头
Other
其他
Master Carton Box
Dimensions外箱尺寸
Inner Carton Box Dimensions
内盒尺寸
Date Code - M.7.1.D
日期编码-M.7.1.D
Domestic Packaging M.75.A.1
国内包装-M.75.A.1
Import Packaging - M.75.A3
进口包装-M.75.A3
Has supplier meet Watts requirements for date code,
labels & packaging. Place an X in areas that have been
met. (Samples required)
供应商提供的日期编码，标贴及包装符合沃茨要求吗？符
合的在对应区域打“X"。（需要样品）
7
Supplier to Identify Max. height of shipment allowed to
prevent product
damage.供应商确定允许装运的最大重量以防止产品损坏
。
8
Has packaging for external color/ print consistency been
addressed and verified. Enter Yes or No
包装的外部颜色/打印一致性是否已确定和验证，输入对或
错。
9
Are all packaging materials used free of the element
LEAD? 是不是所有的包装材料都不含铅？
Maximum Height
最大重量
External Packaging Color
外包装颜色
When to use it
•
Prior to first initial shipment of
product to the customer.
Lead Free - Yes or No
无铅产品- 是或不是
Recyclable Packaging
可回收的包装
10
Is all packaging being used recyclable? Yes or No
是不是所有的包装可循环使用？
Master Carton pass
外箱合格
11
Inner Carton Pass
内箱合格
Does packaging used for product provide sufficient
protection to prevent damage of product during
transportation?
Place a Yes or No in the appropriate box(s)
所用包装是否足够保护产品在运输中不被损坏？在相应箱
子填对或错
Packaging approval: 包装批准
Approved
接受
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
Watts Form Number
沃茨表格编号:
WW-PPAP-113
Form Revision Date
表格修订日期:
3/20/2014
Rejected
拒收
Date:
日期
90
Click to edit Master title style
THANK YOU
Business Confidential & Proprietary Information Rev: 00
91