Olimpia’s Key Terms & Phrases: Merrill Core 80A & 80B Sources: Michael Omi and Howard Winant Racial Formation in the United States From the 1960s to the 1980s. New York: Routledge, 1994. Beverly Daniel Tatum Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations About Race. New York: Basic Books, 1997. About the author: Olimpia Blanco is a Merrill student and CA. In the Fall of 2013 she created this list of definitions for our class discussions of the film Crash. Race According to Omi and Winant in Racial Formation in the United States race is a very definite social construction which alters over the course of time due to historical and social pressures. Omi and Winant's definition of race throws out both the popularized concepts that race is 1) a biological fact and 2) an illusion. Instead, they assert that race is a very real social classification that has both cultural ramifications as well as enforcing a definite social order (54-55). Race is socially constructed When we say that race is a social construct or race is socially constructed we are saying that “race” is a socially constructed identity where the content and importance of racial categories is determined by social, economic, and political forces. Omi and Winnant in Racial Formation in the United States developed racial formation theory as a way of thinking about “race” as a fluid, changing, category of difference that has been determined by specific social, economic, and political forces. Racialization Is the process whereby a group or people begin to be seen as a “race.” The discursive production of racial identity to a previously unclassified relationship, social practice, or group includes the extension of dehumanizing racial meanings and stereotypes. A current example of this process is the way historical forces (post-911 period) can combine with fear to create and sustain racial groupsīžin the U.S. Muslim and Arab-Americans are an example of a newly racialized other. Racism As defined in the book Why Are All the Black Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?. There are two definitions that stand out, one is a “system of advantage based on race” (David Wellness) This definition of racism can be useful since it allows us to see that racism is not just a personal ideology but a system which involves institutional policies and practices, and cultural beliefs as well as the beliefs and actions of individuals. (7) The other definition provided is racism as “prejudice plus power” Racial prejudice combined with social power (access to social, cultural, and economic resources and decision making) leads to the institutionalization of racist policies and practices. (7-8) “Active Racism” Blatant, intentional acts of racial bigotry and discrimination. “Passive Racism” More subtle, can be laughing when a racist joke is told, not challenging exclusionary hiring practices, accepting omissions of people of color from the curriculum as appropriate, asking your Asian-American dorm-mates to “speak Asian” for you so you can see what it sounds like up close and avoiding difficult race related issues. “Cultural Racism” The cultural images and messages that affirm the assured superiority of Whites and the assumed inferiority of people of color- like smog in the air. Sometimes so thick it’s visible, other times less apparent, but we are always breathing it in (6) Hegemony The dominance or leadership of one social group or nation above others. Racial Hegemony” According to Omi and Winant, racial hegemony developed in the United States after many years of racial dictatorship. According to the authors, a racial dictatorship draws a “color line,” which becomes society’s main way of dividing people, and then institutionalizes that line, mainly through politics and more importantly, the laws formed by politicians (66).Omi and Winant argue that, in contrast to the coercion of a racial dictatorship, an Italian named Antonio Gramsci placed great importance on the concept of hegemony, which is even more powerful because it includes the element of consent of the oppressed in addition to coercive, violent oppression. They say that “although rule can be obtained by force, it cannot be secured and maintained...without the element of consent” (67). Continuing, they note that if society can make racial oppression seem like “common sense” that there is a racial minority and it is oppressed, the ruling group will have little trouble staying in power (67).