Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• Before the visit
• During the visit
• After the visit
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• The monitor will assess or discuss:
Site, staffing, research labs or other facilities
Regulatory file and study records
Clinical procedures if possible or appropriate
Any problems and issues identified
Debrief at end of visit
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• The monitor will
Complete site visit report
Submit the report to the sponsor
• The sponsor will:
• Distribute site visit report to the site
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• Site assessment(pre trial)
• Site initiation
• Routine(interim) visits)
• Close out visit
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Purpose :
It’s a face to face meeting with the investigator to explore the overall feasibility of the site and the investigator to participate into the study.
May be combined with the study initiation visit .
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• Purpose:
- to uniformly provide study specific information to investigator(s) and study staff prior to study start up.
- reassess resources and capability to conduct a research study.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
The monitor will meet with the study staff to discuss research obligations under GCP:
Investigator administrative responsibilities
IRB approvals and communications
Regulatory file requirements(ICH GCP E6 8.2)
Informed consent forms and process
Protocol and protocol amendments
Source documentation
Study product handling and accountability
Safety reporting
Protocol specific training
Archiving of study documents
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• The monitor will
Review sponsor policies , standards and procedures for the conduct of clinical trials.
Reassess the site facilities
Provide additional guidance to the site as determined by his/her findings.
The better the site initiation, the better the site performance.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Purpose:
Protection of human subjects rights and wellbeing.
Accuracy, completeness and verification of reported trial data.
Trial conduct in compliance with protocol/amendments, GCP and regulatory requirements.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• Review /assess the following:
Enrollment status, rate and any drop outs.
regulatory files
CRF’s, source documents, informed consents,
AEs/SAEs/SUSARs
Study product
Protocol and regulatory compliance
laboratory review
clinical operations
• Follow up on previously identified issues
• Debrief
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Source data:
all information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction an evaluation of the trial. (ICH GCP1.51)
Source documents:
original documents, data and records(e.g. hospital records, lab notes, clinical charts, subjects diaries, pharmacy dispensing records, x-rays, subject files etc) (ICH GCP 1.52)
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
SDV: evaluation of the conformity of the data presented in CRFs with source data.
Main aim: confirm that the data collected is complete, accurate, reliable and verifiable so as to give confidence to sponsor and regulatory authorities in the data being used to support a marketing application.
Without SDV, no scientist can have confidence in data presented and conclusions derived.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Key data :
1 0 efficacy data
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Medical/medication history
Physical exam/vital signs
visit dates
Adverse events
Concomitant medication
Record that patient entered clinical study and date of IC
Any gross errors in these might be detrimental to the scientific and ethical quality of the clinical trial.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Methods of SDV:
Back to back
Direct method- monitor has direct access to source data (ICH GCP E6 1.21,5.15)
Extent of SDV ???
Depends on: clinical trial phase, quantity of data, time availability, man power availability, investigator research experience, company policy,
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
Common approach:
Critical data: focal to aims and objectives of study and must be correct.
Informed consent to participate
Clinical notes
Conformance to inclusion/exclusion criteria
Primary efficacy endpoints
Secondary efficacy endpoints
Recording and reporting of SAEs
Documentation that that study drug was prescribed and at the specified dosage
Visit dates as per protocol
Non-critical data e.g. very neat, high numbers of overwriting, rapid recruitment, lack of SAEs when they would be expected etc.
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• CRF content review:
Missing, incomplete or illegible entries, signatures or dates
Data recorded in wrong fields
Illogical, inconsistent or ambiguous data
Data omissions
Entries demonstrating failure to follow protocol
Inaccurate calculations
Inadequate documentation of corrections
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• Common problems
Data entered directly to CRF
Brief medical history/ scanty clinical notes
Several volumes of SD
SD/CRF mismatch
Illegible handwriting
Maximum acceptable error rate
• Document the SDV process
SD examined
CRFs checked and why they were selected
Critical and non-critical data items checked
Nature and frequency of errors
Any corrective actions undertaken
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008
• What to check:
Each participant has personally signed and dated ICD prior to study procedures.
Appropriate use of independent witness
Correct version being used
Names of subjects/person giving consent, date and time
Investigator appropriately signed ICD and dated.
All pages of ICD present
Author: Esther Kivaya, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Version: 3-Nov-2008