Measurement and Accountability Module 15 LIS 580: Spring 2006 Instructor- Michael Crandall Roadmap • • Control systems Diagnostic systems • • • • • • • Financial control- the budget Financial ratios Other systems Boundary control systems Interactive control systems Commitment-based control systems Issues in control systems May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 2 What is Control? • The process of monitoring activities to ensure that they are being accomplished as planned and of correcting any significant deviations • An effective control system ensures that activities are completed in ways that lead to the attainment of the organization’s goals Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 3 The Fundamentals Of An Effective Control System • Control – The task of ensuring that planned activities are getting the desired results. – All control systems try to influence behavior. – Controlling involves setting a target (planning), measuring performance (evaluation), and taking corrective action. – Control also applies to monitoring every task—large and small—that is delegated. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 4 Management and the Control Process FIGURE 14–1 G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 5 Characteristics of Three Approaches to Control Systems • Market – Uses external market mechanisms, such as price competition and relative market share, to establish standards used in system to gain competitive advantage • Bureaucratic – Emphasizes organizational authority of administrative and hierarchical mechanisms to ensure appropriate employee behaviors and to meet performance standards • Clan – Regulates employee behavior by the shared values, norms, traditions, rituals, beliefs, and other aspects of the organization’s culture Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 6 Types of Control Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 7 Steps in the Control Process • Measuring actual performance – Personal observation, statistical reports, oral reports, and written reports – Management by walking around (MBWA) • Comparing actual performance against a standard – Comparison to objective measures: budgets, standards, goals – Range of variation Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 8 Defining an Acceptable Range of Variation Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 9 Steps in the Control Process (cont’d) • Taking managerial action to correct deviations or inadequate standards – Immediate corrective action • Correcting a problem at once to get performance back on track – Basic corrective action • Determining how and why performance has deviated and then correcting the source of deviation – Revising the standard • Adjusting the performance standard to reflect current and predicted future performance capabilities Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 10 The Control Process Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 11 Qualities of an Effective Control System Accuracy Timeliness Economy Flexibility Understandability Reasonable criteria Strategic placement Emphasis on the exception Multiple criteria Corrective action Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 12 Approaches To Maintaining Control • The Traditional Control Process – Step 1: Set a standard, target, or goal. – Step 2: Measure actual performance against standards (observation and timing). – Step 3: Take corrective action. • The Commitment-Based Control Process – Encouraging all employees to exercise ethical self-control (as they initiate process improvements and new ways of responding to customers’ needs. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 13 Two Basic Categories of Control Systems FIGURE 14–4 G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 14 Types of Traditional Control Systems • Diagnostic controls – A control method, such as a budget, that ensures that standards are being met and that variances are diagnosed and explained. • Boundary Controls – Policies, such as codes of conduct, that establish rules and identify the actions and pitfalls that employees must avoid. • Personal/Interactive Controls – Control methods that involve direct, face-to-face interaction with employees so as to monitor rapidly changing information and respond proactively to changing conditions. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 15 Examples of Control Standards FIGURE 14–3 G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 16 The Basic Management Control System • Budget – Formal financial expression of a manager’s plans. • Capital Budget – Shows the expenses for equipment with a life longer than one year. • Operating Budget – Shows the expected sales and/or expenses for each of the company’s departments for the planning period in question. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 17 University of Alberta Library • How does this budget present options for different funding levels? • What do they use to support their arguments for increased funding levels? – On the positive side? – On the negative side? • What is going to be the hardest thing to get approval for in this budget? • How does the budget explain the request for changes in their operating expenses? May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 18 2005 OSE Budget Org X1107 Example of a Budget Account 710110 720110 720114 820410 720600 820120 820130 820310 820320 820490 820530 820550 810310 730010 730220 730410 730450 730490 741190 810310 841190 743550 744110 744320 744350 744510 744575 744520 842580 Description Amount Salaries and Wages (4.0 FTE) $304,801.00 FICA $18,210.00 Medicare $4,550.00 Health Insurance Premium $25,991.37 Summary and Special Allowances $0.00 IF Unemployment $208.00 IF Worker's Compensation Claims $0.00 IF Pension-City Retirement Sys $25,195.00 IF Death Benefit Contribution $48.00 IF Dental Insurance $5,254.00 IF Group Fund Life Insurance $181.00 IF Long Term Disability Insurance $157.00 IF Salaries & Wages -TEMP $0.00 Personnel Total $384,595.37 Subscriptions/Publications/Books $1,000.00 Office Supplies $1,500.00 Equip- PCs & Other DP <$5000 $2,000.00 Software Purchases $250.00 Equipment-Misc <5000 Services-Othr Professional/Technic* $64,520.63 IF Salaries & Wages INTER - (Staff Loans)* $36,868.00 Services-Othr Professional/Technic** Maintenance-Data Processing Equip $250.00 Postage & Delivery Costs $200.00 Training Tuition & Fees $4,000.00 Out Of City Travel Costs $2,000.00 Dues & Memberships $4,000.00 Copying/Printing/Binding & Design $3,500.00 Volunteer-Employee Recognition $750.00 IF-Rentals Vehicles $750.00 Operational Total $121,588.63 TOTAL * This is the half-time position OSE pays Parks for Richard Gelb. $506,184.00 ** This is where we RECEIVE money (MOAs) from other departments May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 19 2006 Budget Issue Paper Department: BIP Title: BIP Number: Budget program(s) affected: Estimated $ change: Example of a Budget Regular positions affected: Other departments affected: Capital/Operating budget: OSE Planning & Development Specialist II OSE-02 2006 GF $ $55,000* No. of Positions: 1 “All Funds” 2006 Other $ Total FTE change: 1.0 * The total costs of the position are estimated at $75,000. We propose that OSE cover $20,000 of that (which constitutes about 30% of our available professional services budget for 2006), reducing the “new load” on the General Fund to $55,000 -- less when you factor in that OSE’s budget is cost-shared with City Light and Seattle Public Utilities. (1) Summary of BIP (100 words or less) This is a request to create a one-year Planning and Development Specialist 2 position in OSE for 2006, ending 12/31/06. This would sustain OSE’s 2005 human resource capacity, and allow us to continue to deliver on the Mayor’s priorities and OSE’s Accountability Contract -- notably the Mayor’s Climate Protection Initiative. The position will assume the duties currently performed by a TES employee; the position will focus primarily on implementation of the Mayor’s Climate Protection Initiative, but may be available for other priority projects as well. (2) Detailed explanation: A TES Planning & Development Specialist 2 was hired in April 2005 to support implementation of the Mayor’s Climate Protection Initiative. This position has played a key role in the development of the highly successful US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, and provides much-needed staff support to the Mayor’s Green Ribbon Commission on Climate Protection, which is developing the Seattle Climate Action Plan. The Commission is due to deliver its final report to the Mayor in December 2005; however OSE will need to retain staff capacity to ensure completion of the final document and implementation of the strategy. Specific duties will include: Provide staff support to the Mayor’s Green Ribbon Commission, including conducting research and analysis of action recommendations and preparing briefings and presentations. The Commission is a panel of high-level business, government and civic leaders charged with developing a set of recommendations to reduce global warming pollution in the Seattle community. Though the Commission’s report is due to the Mayor at the end of 2005, we anticipate that the Commission’s work will continue into at least part of 2006; Help write the Green Ribbon Commission’s final report to the Mayor; Help develop and write-up the Mayor’s implementation strategy -- a City-wide work plan that responds to the Commission’s recommendations). Help develop and implement a plan for distributing and doing extensive community outreach on the Action Plan, including a strategy for mobilizing neighborhoods and businesses behind the Plan; Work closely with a number of City departments and external partners (such as the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency) to implement the report’s recommendations. For example, work with SDOT and others to implement transportation-related recommendations; work with City Light and others to implement energy-related recommendations; work with SPU and others to implement waste management-related recommendations; work with Parks and others to implement forest management-related recommendations; work with DON and others to do community outreach and mobilize neighborhood-based action; Develop a system for monitoring implementation progress, and produce annual progress reports as part of overarching Environmental Action Agenda progress reporting process (3) Anticipated outcome of change: This conversion will ensure the successful completion and implementation of the Seattle Climate Protection Action Plan, an important component of the Mayor’s Climate Protection Initiative. (4) Department workforce change (regular positions to be added, abrogated, reduced in FTE or reassigned to different programs). Include titles when known: Addition of 1.0 FTE Planning & Development Specialist 2 for one year (2006). May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 20 Performance Reporting • Variances – Differences between budgeted and actual amounts. • Audit – A systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence of the firm’s performance, judging the accuracy and validity of the data, and communicating the results to interested users. • Financial Ratio – An arithmetic comparison of one financial measure to another, generally used to monitor and control financial performance. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 21 Example of a Performance Report FIGURE 14–6 G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 22 Widely Used Financial Ratios FIGURE 14–7a G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 23 Widely Used Financial Ratios (cont’d) FIGURE 14–7b G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 24 Widely Used Financial Ratios (cont’d) FIGURE 14–7c G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 25 Widely Used Financial Ratios (cont’d) FIGURE 14–7d G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 26 Ratio Analysis: Factors Affecting Return on Investment FIGURE 14–8 G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 27 Financial Responsibility Centers • Financial Responsibility Centers – Individuals or groups who are assigned the responsibility for a particular set of financial outputs and/or inputs. • Profit centers – Responsibility centers whose managers are held accountable for profit. • Revenue centers – Responsibility centers whose managers are held accountable for generating revenues, which is a financial measure of output. • Cost centers – Groups which are supported through internal taxes on other groups; overhead functions. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 28 Other Diagnostic Financial and Managerial Controls • Activity-Based Costing (ABC) – A method for allocating costs to products and services that takes all the product’s cost drivers into account when calculating the actual cost of each product or service. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 29 Other Diagnostic Financial and Managerial Controls (cont’d) • Balanced Scorecard – A management tool, usually a computerized model, that traces a multitude of performance measures simultaneously and shows their interactions. • Enterprise Resource Planning System – A companywide integrated computer system that gives managers real-time, instantaneous information regarding the costs and status of every activity and project in the business. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 30 Balanced Scorecard May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 31 Boundary Control Systems • Boundary Control Systems – Define the ethical rules for proper conduct in the organization and specify which actions and pitfalls that employees must avoid. – Include ethics standards, codes of conduct, and strategic policies. • Steps in establishing boundary controls: – – – – Emphasize top management’s commitment. Publish a code. Establish compliance mechanisms. Measure results. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 32 Personal/Interactive Control Systems • Interactive Control – Maintaining control by personally monitoring how everyone is doing is interactive control. • Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM) – Monitoring the work activities of employees through electronic means. G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 33 Implementing Commitmentbased Control Systems Motivation Techniques Belief Systems CommitmentBased Control System CommitmentBuilding Systems G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 34 Using Commitment-Building Systems to Foster Self-Control • • • • • • • Foster People-First Values Guarantee Organizational Justice Build a Sense of Shared Fate and Community Use Value-based Hiring Financial Rewards and Profit Sharing Communicate Your Vision Encourage Personal Development and SelfActualization G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 35 Contingency Factors in Control System Design • Size of the organization • The job/function’s position in the organization’s hierarchy • Degree of organizational decentralization • Type of organizational culture • Relative importance of the control activity to the organization’s success Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 36 Controls and Cultural Differences • Methods of controlling employee behavior and operations can be quite different in different countries • Distance creates a tendency for formalized controls in the form of extensive, formal reports • In less technologically advanced countries, direct supervision and highly centralized decision making are the basic means of control • Local laws may constrain the corrective actions that managers can take in foreign countries Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 37 The Dysfunctional Side of Control • Unfocused controls – Failure to achieve desired or intended results occur when control measures lack specificity • Incomplete control measures – Individuals or organizational units attempt to look good exclusively on control measures • Inflexible or unreasonable control standards – Controls and organizational goals will be ignored or manipulated Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 38 Behavioral Consequences of Controls Controls Behavioral Displacement Gamesmanship Operating Delays Negative Attitudes G.Dessler, 2003 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 39 Contemporary Issues In Control • The right to personal privacy in the workplace versus: – Employer’s monitoring of employee activities in the workplace – Employer’s liability for employees creating a hostile environment – Employer’s need to protect intellectual property The computer on the desk typically belongs to the organization Prentice Hall, 2002 May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 40 Next Time • Managing world-class operations – Read Chapter 15 and the assigned articles • Before lecture discussion group questions (Group E): – What impact does the streamlining of operations have on employees? – What process do you think SPL used to decide on their operations changes? – What measures could SPL institute to decide whether their changes are improving value? – What lessons do companies like UPS have for service organizations like libraries? May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 41 Next Time • After lecture discussion group questions (Group F): – Does a library director need to have an MLS? – Is subject matter expertise more important than management expertise in managerial positions? – What arguments would you make for or against your choice? – How well do you think our library schools are doing in educating library managers? – What steps would you take to provide better management education for MLIS graduates? May 16, 2006 LIS580- Spring 2006 42