October 8, 2008
Jim Haynes, ACTA Chair
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
The origins of Part 68 go back to the beginning of electrical wireline communications in the 1800’s.
The Telephone business as we know today, began in 1968 with the FCC’s approval of the
Carterphone Decision.
Two inventors standout:
Samuel F.B. Morse – Electric Telegraph
Alexander Graham Bell – Voice Telephone
October 2008 2
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Steps of the CarterPhone Decision
1966 – AT&T is sued to permit connection of Tom
Carter’s circuit to the telephone network.
1968 – Court orders AT&T to establish tariffs that permit connection of customer owned premise equipment.
1969 – Development of a telephone interconnection policy is initiated.
1975 – Report and Order in Docket 19528 is released which leads to the interconnection of answering machines, toll restrictors, and data modems.
1977 – Part 68 Registration program of telephones and other interconnected devices begins.
October 2008 3
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Per the FCC’s website, “Part 68 of the FCC rules (47
C.F.R. Part 68) governs the connection of Terminal
Equipment (TE) to the Public Switched Telephone
Network (PSTN).” also,
“Under Part 68, wireline telecommunications carriers must allow all TE to be connected directly to their networks, provided the TE meet certain criteria for preventing four proscribed harms.”
May 2002 4
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Provisions to protect consumers
Allow consumers to access competitive services
Rules concerning Hearing Aid Compatibility and
Volume Control for telephones
Dialing frequency for automatic dialing machines
Source identification for fax transmissions
Technical criteria for inside wiring
May 2002 5
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Electrical hazards to operating company personnel
Damage to network equipment
Malfunction of billing equipment
Degradation of service to customers other than the user of the TE and that person’s calling and called parties
May 2002 6
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Member of the FCC Staff with over 25 Years of Dedicated Service to the Commission
Manager of the FCC’s Part 68 program until his retirement in 1998
October 2008 7
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
ACTA was formed as a result of the FCC’s
2000 Biennial Review of Part 68 contained in the Report &Order (CC Docket No. 99-216).
The Order privatized the process by which technical criteria for the prevention of harm are established for customer premise or terminal equipment that may be sold for connection to the telephone network, and for the approval of such equipment to demonstrate compliance with the relevant technical criteria.
October 2008 8
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
The Order directed the industry, through the co-sponsorship and support of the
Telecommunications Industry Association and the
Alliance for Telecommunications Industry
Solutions to establish ACTA as the open body that would assume the FCC’s Part 68 role for those items privatized.
October 2008 9
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
ACTA is the acronym for:
Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments
The Council assumes the coordination and management role for the adoption and publication of technical requirements for terminal equipment and the associated databases.
The Council does not make technical decisions regarding the development of technical criteria.
The Mission, Scope, and the Responsibilities of the
Council are in the Operating Principles and
Procedures document located on the ACTA webpage
(www.part68.org).
October 2008 10
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
The original ACTA was comprised of two members
(plus one alternate) from six industry segments, and a non-voting Chair:
Local Exchange Carriers (“LEC”)
Interexchange Carriers (“IXC”)
Terminal Equipment Manufacturers (“TEM”)
Network Equipment Manufacturers (“NEM”)
Testing Laboratories (“LAB”)
Other Interested Parties (“OIP”)
October 2008 11
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
In December 2007, ACTA modified its
Operating Principals and Procedures to reduce the number of interest segments from six to four.
They are:
Service Provider Segment (“SPS”)
Manufacturer Segment (“MS”)
Testing Laboratories Segment (“LAB”)
Other Interested Parties (“OIP”)
October 2008 12
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
With the current ACTA segment configuration, the number of available council member seats has not changed.
Old
LEC – 2 seats + Alt.
New
SPS - 4 seats + Alt.
IXC – 2 seats + Alt. MS - 4 seats + Alt.
TEM – 2 seats + Alt. LAB - 2 seats + Alt.
NEM – 2 seats + Alt. OIP - 2 seats + Alt.
LAB – 2 seats + Alt.
OIP – 2 seats + Alt.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Total = 12 + Alts.
Total = 12 + Alts.
October 2008 13
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
SPS Segment
Trone Bishop – Verizon
Jimmy Salinas – AT&T
Amar Ray – Embarq
ACTA Today
MS Segment
Roger Hunt – Thomson
Ken Biholar – Alcatel-Lucent
LAB Segment
Scott Lambert – Intertek
Sharon Hoffman – TIMCO
ALT. Christopher Brearley
- Curtis-Straus
OIP Segment
Milton Bush -The M Companies
John Bipes – Mobile Engineering
ACTA Chair
- Jim Haynes
October 2008 14
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
The Alliance for Telecommunications Industry
Solutions is the ACTA Secretariat.
Key People of the ACTA Secretariat
Mr. Jean-Paul Emard, Director – Industry Forums
Mr. Paul Anderson, Committee Administrator
Mr. Mark Cassarino, Database Manager
Ms. Meisha Goodhue, Administrative Assistant
October 2008 15
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Membership in the ACTA is open to any organization, company, or group having an interest in the business of the Council.
The Membership of the ACTA is represented on the
Council by the member’s specific Interest segment.
General communications to the ACTA are processed through the ACTA Secretariat.
Typically, there are four general ACTA meetings each year, two face-to-face (Washington DC) and two virtual.
Meetings are open to all interested parties.
Contributions and proposals should be submitted to the
ACTA Secretariat at least ten days prior to meetings.
October 2008 16
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
The ACTA does not recommend products or technologies.
The ACTA adopts and publishes technical documents submitted by ANSI-accredited standards development organizations (“SDOs”).
Current Active SDOs
TIA Committee – TR41
ATIS Sponsored Committee NIPP
Documents adopted and published by the ACTA have the ACTA-adopted logo and date affixed to the front cover.
(Section 10 of the ACTA OP&P provides a complete explanation and ruling)
October 2008 17
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
ACTA Database Filings
Refer to the Guidelines and Procedures for Submittal of
Information to the ACTA for Inclusion in the Database of
Approved Telephone Terminal Equipment (G&P).
Responsible Party Code
• Formerly Applicant or Grantee Code issued by the FCC
Two types of Filings:
• Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB) Filings
• Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) Filings
•
ACTA Filings should be made using AOF.
(ACTA Online Filing System)
October 2008 18
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
FEES
Fee for Original, Modification, and Notice of
Change filings is $425.00
Fee for Transfer of RPC is $425.00
Fee for SDoC Posting is $425.00
Fee for other AOF filings is $95.00
Refer to Section 3 of the G&P document on the
ACTA website
October 2008 19
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
From 2003 through 2007, ACTA processed a total of 5787 filings.
This consisted of 5227 total entries for telephone terminal devices added to the database.
•
•
•
• 66% for Original submittals
11% for Modification submittals
21% for Notice of Change submittals
2% for Recertification submittals
2003 – 1104 submittals
2005 – 993 submittals
2004 – 1279 submittals
2006 – 1023 submittals
2007 – 828 submittals
560 Responsible Party Code assigned or Transfers
October 2008 20
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
May 2002 21
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
ENFORCEMENT
ACTA is not Chartered to handle the responsibilities of Enforcement.
Rules, testing, report documentation, and database entries equal “
” without Enforcement.
ACTA is currently seeking a better method of notification to make the FCC aware of Part 68 equipment violations.
Your Help is Needed !
October 2008 22
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
Summary
The rules in Part 68 and the ACTA adopted criteria have a distinct purpose to prevent harm to the telephone network.
Also, they provide a “level playing field” to manufacturers and sellers of telephone equipment intended to be connected to the network.
If you find equipment that is not marked according to the Part 68 rules, or if the device is not compliant to the mandated requirements, it may be due to ignorance. Research and contact the responsible party, it may just be a great opportunity to obtain a new customer.
October 2008 23
ACTA and Part 68 Past, Present, and Future
May 2002 24