Introduction to Semiotics of Cultures, 2010 Ronald Barthes – Modern Myths Vesa Matteo Piludu University of Helsinki The first part of Mythologies Is fragmentary, kaleidoscopic The articles seems to be disconnected But there is a recurrent topic: all the myths are presented by media as natural and obvious fact, without historical and social background Even are all myths of the ‘50, some element of them could be easily found in contemporary popular cultures For the most part written every month for Les Lettres Nouvelles between 1954-56 The theoretic part, analyzed in the first lecture, Myth Today was written in 1972 The myths of French society are part of a process in which the middle class or bourgeois ideology falsely impart universal standing to symbols that have an historical status Best cultural criticism: no criticism at all! The Middle class hit lights well balanced rhetoric: it is always better be moderate Culture, as a noble universal thing, should be opposed to ideologies (reactionary or communist) Culture is falsely presented as something created ex-nihilo, outside the social choices It should be good for all, light, pure Opposed to heavy, dark ideologies The culture is supposed be good for all, something neutral, free from judgment The best literature is presented as eternal Eternal or social artist? The best artists or literates are heroes admired without critic, good only for National pride In Italy Dante is considered the eternal poet, it is mythologized and depurated from his historical and political environments But Dante is far to be a neutral moderate: he put an relevant number of popes, priests and politics into the Inferno (hell) Critics of novels and drama When the critics doesn’t understand a word of the book they add two arguments: Criticism is unnecessary because the subject is ineffable If they are too stupid to understand the book, this is unsuitable for the common folk (even more imbecile) So where is the problem? The clarity of the author Ideas seems dangerous if they are not controlled by common sense Culture should be nothing but a sweet rhetorical function, ready to be understood by all If critics fear the analysis, why they become a critic? Problem: it’s impossible to understand philosophy using the common sense But luckily the philosophers are able to understand the critics’ disappointment and common sense Verne as a national myth Verne is a myth of French literature, general synonym for adventures travels modernity technology Verne as the mythographer of closed spaces For Barthes Verne’s literature is something else: A self-sufficient cosmology of closed spaces The travels of Verne are mostly exploration if closures, the delight of the finite: something similar to a children’s tent The Mysterious Island, the travel to the centre of the World Verne, as man-child, re-invented a microcosms, it fills it and it close it: the writer seems to be obsessed by plentitude and appropriation, accumulation of object He tends to be encyclopedic as a Dutch painter and says: the world is finite, numerable, suitable for inventories and catalogues Nautilus as a nice house Is a progressive bourgeois: the world is like a nutshell, an object in his hand The ship is not a model for departure but closure: a nice finite space with many objects, a home, a house, like the nautilus, the most lovely of caves Inside the human habits Outside the vagueness of waters The Nautilus could be considered the opposite of Rimbaud’s Drunken boat, clearly a symbol of exploration Nemo in the Nautilus Outside the Nautilus Writers in holiday Article on Le Figaro Bossuet going down to Congo In vacation the writer add vocation to leisure Common holidays are for working people The writer is different from the common mortals: even in vacation, he doesn’t stop producing: He is writing memories, correcting proofs or preparing in absolute secret his next book It’s natural that the writer is writing all the time and in all the situations He is prey of an inner god who speaks all the time: his muse doesn’t know the word vacation Angiographies of genius, of different beings Women novellist According to Elle Women novelists produce essentially to things: children and novels Jacqueline Lenoir (two daughter, one novel), Marina Gray (one son, one novel), Nicole Dutreil (two sons, four novels) It seems that the little bohemia allowed (be a writer), is logically connected to the previous tribute to nature Discurse: Women novelists are obviously brave, symbols of self-confidence, they write like men: a model Even so, don’t forget they are women too Women are considered mostly as homogenous being The mystic brain of Einstein The genius’ brain had a magical dimension, that had been studied with seismographers Einstein death: “the most powerful brain has stopped thinking” The formula E=mc2 is of an unexpected simplicity, suitable for modern myth It has been considered a kid of magic formula of the word The magician that failed Also Einstein is a common mortal, suitable to failure He died without having been able to verify the equation in which the secret of the world was enclosed The craziness of genius The Riddle of Einstein’s Brain ???? Nibbing on Einstein’s brain Einstein Brain Station (!) Jet - pilot Jet – pilot as a new race: half robot with a new skin Dietetic prescriptions New technical race Aviators vs. Jet - pilot First aviators: hagiography, age of miracles and excess Jet-age: monastic, continence, temperance Uniform and mask Submission to collective ends Inhuman condition and religious call Electoral photography The nature of the election is elitist and paternalist Electoral photos try desperately to create a personal link between the politicians and the electorate The politic exalted himself as a perfect model of a social type, that is somewhat similar to the elector In a certain sense the elector is persuaded to elect a double of himself Electoral photography Mystical connection between thought, will, reflections, actions: the inner dream Hit lighted social status, respectability Spider-Obama The Savage Dragon Myths and elections: “Rome is a jungle … Vote for Tarzan!” The wrestling and performance of pain Is not a sport, a demonstration of excellence, as boxing or judo Judo in particular eludes any theatrical element, has a esoteric meaning and even the defeat is eluded rapidly Is a staged event Is a show of excess, like the one in Ancient theatres A spectacle, a performance of suffering and passion The public is completely disinterested if the contest is rigged or not, they are interested in the quality of the performance In wrestling there should be an immediate reading of passions: all the gestures are excessive, especially in defeat Wrestlers and theatre The wrestlers are presented as types, as mask of the antiquity or Commedia dell’Arte Orsano was the effeminate teddy boy Reinières the image of passivity Mauzard arrogant as a cock Thauyin was the very representation of ugliness, baseness: dead flesh All his action were represented by viscosity The body is a symbol of the moral values: treachery, cruelty and cowardice The types represent an Human comedy of passion were all is clear, intelligible, an immediate pantomime The suffering man is similar to a tragic mask Wrestling and justice The pleasure in wrestling is seeing a barbarian concept of justice working perfectly: eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth In wrestling the villain is about to win, doing all the kind of tricks and breaking all the rules: he is the very image of transgression The public is revolted against him and in favor of the contestant At the end the contestant win and the public enjoys to see how the villa is defeated For this reason, a fair fight is an exception, in wrestling the orgy of evil works better to create interest in the public The public loves the baroque confusion French and American wrestling In France wrestling is more connected with the barabarian concept of justice In America there are more complicate symbols connected to politics and ethnic issues: the wrestling seems a mythological fight between good and evil The Villain Is an unstable, socially unpredictable He accept the rules when they are useful to him, but takes refuge behind the rules when he consider that they are favorable to him It breaks all the possible laws when is useful to do so The wrestling villain isn’t only cruel, he is inconsistent: he offend not only moral, but logic For the public what is intolerable is not the rule-breaking, that is normal, but the fact that the villain remain unpunished, as it generally happens in real life The wrestling should be exactly what the public expect: pure signification of an ideal brutal justice The villains are somewhat similar to many Italian politics, but unfortunately these are never brutally punished by machos on a public stage Papa Shango vs. Ultimate Warrior 1992 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrQnoplcmz0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6nU3tU87ew&feature=related Spider Man – Green Goblin Asterix Bud Spencer & Terence Hill http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9jHnSNYMxU Striptease Few erotism Baroque exoticism: Chinese woman with an opium pipe Venetian decor with gondola Fours, adornments more important than naked skin: ritualized objects are acting as a luxurious shell The woman is presented as a mineral The alibi of art makes ritual gestures that are a kind of exorcism of sex Moulin Rouge even worse: contest and prizes Striptease became a sport, a career, even a National institution The Lost Continent: postcard ethnography False ethnographic film 4 Italian explorers in Malay archipelago All is easy, innocent as a tourist boat trip Postcard world based on the glamour of the images Formal exotism without historical background The Far East is somewhat similar to west: the Buddhists monks are presented was quasi-Christian All the folkloric rituals are presented as natural, they “illustrate” the nature (season, death, storm or whatever), never history Fishing is not presented in its reality, but is presented the romantic essence of be a fisherman Edward Curtis’ staged natives The Lost Continent: postcard ethnography Fishing is not presented in its reality, but is presented the romantic essence of be a fisherman Beautiful sunset, eternal natural condition Peril on the sea and women weeping at home The madonnas of Curtis Curtis Natives Amazon indios Indios and boxers The Blue Guide’s world: human commedia? In classic tourist guide book’s all is picturesque: landscapes, humans, monuments Man seems to exist only as types: Basque sailor, Catalan tradesman, Cantabrian sentimental highlander, Italian romantic lover man, Brazilian sensual, Parisian sophisticate All the “national” characters are clear prototypes of a classical ballet or Commedia dell’arte Only in trains or metro: there is a very “mixed” people Any analytical description is futile Many of the monument preserved: Present a country selecting only national characters and monuments suppress the social reality of the land Art is presented as the fundamental value of cultures, eliminating the rest Arts is represented as an economic good, that could be “accumulated”: ´Spain is full of art, rich of sculpture … the museums are full of treasures of art The country seems in competition to demonstrate to have more art or more relevant, ancient art The contents of the art, or the meaning of paintings, seems to be less interesting of the great amount of it Abbé Pierre Presented bearded: a clear symbol of monastic evangelical life, missionaries, poverty, apostleship or hermits The secular, urban clergy is represented shaved, more temporal Padre pio – Sant’Antonio Abate Soap-powders and detergents In the first Word Detergent Congress There was Omo euphoria The detergents haven’t harmful effect on skin and they could save miners from silicosis Chlorinated fluids are presented as aggressive: they beats, pushes They are like liquid saviors but blind, liquid fire in war: they burn, kill the dirt Powders are selective: are separating agents of liberation The dirt isn’t killed, is forced out, as in an exorcism They aren’t soldiers, are police The dirt, in any case, is the enemy Omo myths: dept and foamy Commercial and social vanity: comparison between two objects and one is whither than the other In Omo myths, the consumer is helping the police, he is the accomplice of a liberation Omo is cleaning in dept all what is obscure But are the clothes so deep as seas or oceans Mythology of foam the foam is absolutely useless It’s only luxury, a symbol of abundant proliferation, a vigorous germ, an airy substance Bubbles connected with air and spirituality The mythology cover the real abrasive function of the detergent under the cover of a mystical substance that govern the molecular order of materials … transforming all in bubbles Commercials Retro Tide commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AVfhSWoI1g&feature=related Tide Detergent Commercial - VINTAGE - 1950s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSB7HTFECdk&feature=related OMO Commercial - Dirt Is Good http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MX2Fq2VZW4 Ajax washing powder - Australian TV commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhOOhqXyleg&feature=related Tide Laundry Detergent Ad from 1990 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiOUFkz1jcU&feature=related Mr. Clean Commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0YPsuZYZIY&feature=related Plastic Names of Greek shepherds (Polystirene, Polyvinil) Alchemical power: transmutation and infinite powers of transformation It seems that is possible to plasticize the entire world Plastic Plastic is the material of the imitations that have only the pretention and the appearance of the original material Plastic is reproducing cheaply something more luxurious, but have no noble mineral origin (wood, metal, glass) Plastic is not hard, not deep, but have resistance Disgraced material: opaque, creamy when it fall, make no sound Colors are chemical, of aggressive quality Finnish Wood Design: Tapio Wirkkala Finnish Glass Design: Tapio Wirkkala Finnish Plastic Design: Yki Nummi (1925-1984) Finnish Glass Design: Alvar Aalto Citroen Cars as modern gothic cathedrals Supreme creation of an era Conceived by unknown artists New Citroen as Nautilus Round shaped Exaltation of glass Soap bubbles Toys as microcosms French toys are a small model of the adult world, a microcosms: army, the post office, transports, school, medicine The toys prefigure in the children the world of the adult They learn to accept is as natural, inevitable The social order is like a second nature, expressed as an imitation – abdication: even the dolls are able to urinate The children is essentially an owner, not a creator: doesn’t invent the world, he used it All is ready made by plastic, a product of chemistry, not nature Disappearance of wood toys, with their natural warm The wood toys last a long time and live with the child Are a product of the era of the craftsman, not of industry Block toys Different logic The children are creators, demiurges They create the world and the forms they want to, not necessarily the one that are imposed them Margarine: your uncle will be furious! Astra’s commercial Margarine? Unthinkable! “Your uncle will be furious!” The commercial show a prejudice Then the eyes are opened and margarine is a delicious food … And cheap It goes further than butter, and cost less Alchemical transformation of values Metaphor of political propaganda What does it matter if the political and economical order is a little brutal? It allows us to live cheaply Romans in films Many clichés All the Ancient Romans are presented with fringes Symbol of virtue, conquest, self righteousness, simplicity Evidence of the being a good Roman Many Anglo-Saxons actors are ridiculous in their Ancient Roman looks For Barthes, only Marlon Brando is Latin in off to be credible Another clichés: the Roman’s face sweat constantly, being full of Vaseline It’s a strange symbol for moral feeling: the Roman are beings tormented by virtues or violent things Banality: to sweat is to think Degraded spectacle of the sweating of thoughts Only Caesar isn’t sweating: it’s becaouse he is the object of the crime, he doesn’t know about it, so he doesn’t think and sweat Roman Brando Julius Caesar 1953 Theatrical Trailer adaptation of Shakespeare's play by Joseph L. Mankiewicz for MGM starring Marlon Brando. Brando's performance resulted in his third consecutive Best Actor nomination in 1953. Marlon Brando in Julius Caesar (1953) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KXhfjOkKPM&feature=related Troy Achilles dies: Directed by: Wolfgang Petersen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0g8uTZmKM4&feature=related Greta Garbo The Divine The iconographical image of female beauty Mystical feeling In Queen Christina the make is like a mask sculpted in snow Perfect and ephemeral A platonic idea of a human creature The perfection of Garbo is more intellectual than formal Her mask is a sum of lines and their thematic harmony Garbo is the archetype of the lyricism of women It creates awe and charm Audrey Hepburn is another model, more individualized, suitable for different themes (woman-kitten-child): its more “substance” than idea If Garbo is an Idea, Hepburn is an Event Greta Garbo: the Idea QUEEN CHRISTINA 1933 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52xrA9hQhI8 MGM 1933. Greta Garbo, John Gilbert In 1632, after her father, King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, dies on the battlefield, six-year-old Christina is crowned ruler. Reared by her father as a boy, Christina accepts the crown as the "king" of Sweden and then vows to her court, which is headed by Chancellor Oxenstierna, that Sweden will fight until it wins the war. Audrey Hepburn: the Event Chaplin and Modern Times Problem in socialist films or drama: the worker is fulfilled with sense of destiny, obviously he is a revolutionary In Modern Times, Chaplin offer a more realist image of the worker that is still blind: interested only in basic needs, he is a man who’s hungry He is totally alienated, at the hands of his masters-employers and police The artificial worker’s life is well expressed by the food dispensing machine Showing the blindness of the worker, Chaplin is able to show also the blindness of the public The anarchy of Chaplin seems the most efficient form of revolution in art No socialist work succeeded in expressing the condition of the worker so well In Brecht there is the representation of the workers’ conscious fight for their right, but the texts are poor of aesthetic force Charlie Chaplin - Modern times Charlie Chaplin - Modern times part 1/9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0XjRivGfiw Charlie Chaplin - Modern times part 2/9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvNQiF89Pek&feature=related