Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

advertisement
1
PERFORMANCE
REVIEW COMMITTEE
(PRC) MEETING
8-9 July, 2015
(MGNREGA Division)
2
PHYSICAL
PERFORMANCE
UP TO JUN, 15
Performance against LB
120%
105%
102%
100%
80%
60%
49%
40%
20%
85% 80%
81%
78%
71%
64% 60% 58% 56%
60% 59%
50%
57%
51% 50% 42%
44%
39%
25%
25% 23%
20%
18% 12%
12% 12%
9%6%
4%
1%0%
National
PUDUCHERRY
KERALA
GOA
UP
AP
ASSAM
PUNJAB
NAGALAND
TRIPURA
HARYANA
JHARKHAND
TELANGANA
RAJASTHAN
Ar P
HP
MAHARASHTRA
TAMIL NADU
ODISHA
GUJARAT
UTTARAKHAND
MIZORAM
KARNATAKA
CHHATTISGARH
WEST BENGAL
SIKKIM
LAKSHADWEEP
MP
BIHAR
J&K
MANIPUR
MEGHALAYA
A&N
D & N HAVELI
0%
• States to share the reasons and strategy to achieve the LB
• Steps taken to conduct Rozgar Diwas
100%
50%
National
KERALA
PUDUCHERRY
AP
UP
TELANGANA
PUNJAB
HARYANA
KARNATAKA
HP
RAJASTHAN
ASSAM
TRIPURA
GOA
UTTARAKHAND
JHARKHAND
ODISHA
MAHARASHTRA
NAGALAND
Ar P
GUJARAT
SIKKIM
TAMIL NADU
MIZORAM
CHHATTISGARH
WEST BENGAL
J&K
LAKSHADWEEP
BIHAR
MP
MEGHALAYA
MANIPUR
A&N
LB Vs Allocated PDs
400%
358%
350%
300%
264%
250%
200%
150%
198%
157% 142%
187%
160%
158% 150%
130% 110%
142%
109%
116% 107%
88% 83%
70% 67%
61% 52%
86%
74% 68% 64%
32%
58%
28%
39% 31%
20%9%
1%
0%
Performance against LB
S.No.
State/ UTs
1 PUDUCHERRY
2 KERALA
3 GOA
4 UP
5 AP
6 ASSAM
7 PUNJAB
8 NAGALAND
9 TRIPURA
10 HARYANA
11 JHARKHAND
12 TELANGANA
13 RAJASTHAN
14 Ar P
15 HP
16 MAHARASHTRA
LB (PDs)
PDs Allocated Actual PDs
1.85
4.89
1.95
71.56
256.26
73.13
0.29
0.32
0.24
427.69
799.50
346.21
1263.34
2504.84
1014.09
67.57
87.75
52.49
26.89
42.45
19.01
84.48
62.24
53.97
49.31
57.00
29.78
16.75
26.22
10.04
256.63
227.07
151.03
932.88
1495.08
543.84
994.84
1411.07
570.90
10.88
7.63
6.09
58.68
83.35
29.72
517.12
428.98
259.54
Actual PDs
against LB (%)
105%
102%
85%
81%
80%
78%
71%
64%
60%
60%
59%
58%
57%
56%
51%
50%
Contd.
Performance against LB
S.No.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
State/ UTs
TAMIL NADU
ODISHA
GUJARAT
UTTARAKHAND
MIZORAM
KARNATAKA
CHHATTISGARH
WEST BENGAL
SIKKIM
LAKSHADWEEP
MP
BIHAR
J&K
MANIPUR
MEGHALAYA
A&N
D & N HAVELI
Total
LB (PDs)
PDs Allocated Actual PDs
1396.84
892.62
698.29
263.35
225.75
114.76
72.00
48.86
30.46
30.36
32.53
11.90
14.89
9.11
3.75
70.95
106.48
17.63
585.75
341.91
132.50
546.97
285.22
110.72
5.51
3.70
0.97
0.06
0.02
0.01
680.34
189.05
82.68
390.98
121.98
46.65
30.82
12.06
2.69
24.93
2.24
1.50
29.81
5.93
1.28
1.07
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
8925.38
9772.14
4417.84
Actual PDs
against LB (%)
50%
44%
42%
39%
25%
25%
23%
20%
18%
12%
12%
12%
9%
6%
4%
1%
0%
49%
PDs allocated Vs Actual persondays
3000
2505
2500
2000
1500
1495
1411
1014
1000
544
500
571
893
800
698
346
429
342 285
260
256 227 226 189
151 115
132 111
83 12247 10618 8852 8330
73
0
PDs Allocated (in Lakhs)
Actual PDs (in Lakhs)
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
Contd.
PDs allocated Vs Actual persondays
70
62
60
54
57
49
50
42
40
30
20
30
33
30
26
19
12
10 12
10
3
9
4
7.6
6.1 5.9
1.3
4.9
2.0 3.7
1.5 0.3
1.0 2.2
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0
PDs Allocated (in Lakhs)
Actual PDs (in Lakhs)
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LB
S.No.
State/ UTs
1 UP
2 AP
3 ASSAM
4 KERALA
5 JHARKHAND
6 RAJASTHAN
7 NAGALAND
8 MAHARASHTRA
9 HARYANA
10 HP
11 TELANGANA
12 PUNJAB
13 TRIPURA
14 ODISHA
LB (PDs)
286.35
494.85
55.20
27.55
217.17
492.17
37.52
410.71
7.20
22.21
293.87
5.60
16.85
195.06
PDs
Actual PDs
Allocated Actual PDs against LB (%)
455.73
201.24
70%
658.62
323.46
65%
56.58
34.53
63%
51.11
16.18
59%
173.16
116.45
54%
552.24
242.96
49%
20.24
17.50
47%
324.56
191.60
47%
8.19
2.96
41%
24.53
9.05
41%
312.89
116.91
40%
7.19
2.13
38%
13.11
6.19
37%
149.79
67.00
34%
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
Contd.
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LB
S.No.
State/ UTs
15 Ar P
16 TAMIL NADU
17 UTTARAKHAND
18 GUJARAT
19 CHHATTISGARH
20 MIZORAM
21 KARNATAKA
22 WEST BENGAL
23 BIHAR
24 MP
25 SIKKIM
26 J & K
27 MEGHALAYA
28 MANIPUR
Total
LB (PDs) PDs Allocated Actual PDs
7.62
3.29
2.56
645.48
246.67
198.72
9.90
6.62
2.76
40.46
16.27
9.93
491.81
271.11
100.95
10.03
4.69
1.88
43.94
56.41
8.17
263.41
119.86
46.41
280.07
82.73
31.62
514.86
120.37
52.02
1.95
0.59
0.16
6.21
2.06
0.43
6.60
1.10
0.32
18.66
0.93
0.83
4903.30
3740.66
1804.93
Actual PDs
against LB (%)
34%
31%
28%
25%
21%
19%
19%
18%
11%
10%
8%
7%
5%
4%
37%
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LB
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
• IPPE block : 37%
• Non-IPPE : 65%
• Both
: 49%.
IPPE II
Key Achievements of IPPE
• Participatory Planning completed in about 93,500 GPs
• About 250,000 block planning team members trained from
among youth from MGNREGS workers families and
MGNREGS functionaries.
• More than 1.5 Crore vulnerable households reached
individually and their demand projections and work
priorities collected through structured survey format
• Compared to previous years, the new works planned in
2014-15 (for 2015-16) has far greater focus on agriculture
Key learnings from last year’s IPPE
• Transmission loss due to many layered training programme
• Inadequate provision in the planning design and in the MIS to
•
•
•
•
•
ensure adherence to people’s priorities
Inadequate participation of Line Departments
Inadequate preparatory work before the planning process in
terms of secondary information, maps etc.
Quality of Participation in the planning process was weak in
many areas
Collection and entry of data from household survey of
vulnerable households has been weak in many areas.
Of course considering that this is the first year of IPPE, the
achievement has been encouraging and further improvement
can be expected this year.
Key Aspects of IPPE for 2016-17
• Focusing on the livelihoods of the poorest 10% households
in each village identified based on the SECC database.
• All the automatically included and landless agricultural labor
households as per SECC shall be provided work for 100 days.
• Every deprived household shall be provided a job card, and it shall
be in their possession. This will be assured during the IPPE-II.
• The IPPE-II would be a joint exercise of MGNREGA and
NRLM machineries, assisted by CSOs and line
departments.
• Of the 2,500 Blocks, Blocks with substantial SHG presence
will be monitored by NRLM/SRLMs
• In the Blocks which are resource Blocks or Intensive Blocks or
Partnership Blocks or MKSP Blocks under NRLM, all the resource
persons for the livelihood plan preparation will be provided by the
SRLM concerned.
• In the Blocks which are not covered by (a) above, the SRLM will
place livelihood specialists for training the BPTs in preparing the
livelihood plans.
Activities in IPPE to identify works for
2016-17
• The community and infrastructure works already existing in the
•
•
•
•
•
shelf of projects will be rechecked, and works which are not of use
to the rural poor or to the community will be deleted.
Such works that are needed by the poorest mohallas/tolas in the
village will be added.
New works will be identified to implement the livelihood plans of
the poorest households identified during the IPPE.
These works may be funded from MGNREGA if they are
permissible works under the Act.
If any work or a component of a work required for the livelihoods
cannot be funded from the MGNREGA, it may be tied up from the
funds of SHGs or from departmental funds or 14th Finance
Commission funds, or other sources as decided by the Block.
It is essential that funds for implementing these works are tied up
before the planning exercise is completed.
Training Flow
• A resource pool of about 120 national level trainers will be formed and
•
•
•
•
•
trained to bring them to similar levels of training competence. (by end
of July 2015)
States will constitute the State Resource Pool of Trainers with an
average of 2 trainers drawn from each IPPE Block (end of July 2015)
State level training programmes for the SRTs will be undertaken by
the state with trainers provided from the National Resource Pool. (end
of August 2015)
Block Planning Teams shall be constituted by drawing from women
and youth from worker households. In Blocks with substantial SHG
presence, the BPTs will be constituted jointly by the officials of the
SRLM and MGNREGS with principal focus on women from SHGs and
including CRPs (Cluster Resource Persons) (by 15th August 2015)
The SRT members will be grouped in to teams of 3 or 6 trainers
based on the size of the blocks (number of GPs / size of GPs) and
each such team will be in charge of three blocks for both training and
handholding support.
BPTs will be trained by the SRT members. (by 15th September 2015)
Muster Rolls vs Measurement Book
%age of Muster Rolls without Measurement Book
Zero
KR, AP, OR, TS and TR
Zero to 60 %
PU, HR, PB, MZ, GJ, UP, JH, BH
61 to 100 %
AS, NL, MG, WB, HP, MA, Goa, KR,
MP, TN, UK, RJ, SK, CH, MH, J&K, Ar
P, A&N,
DBT : ACTION PLAN
• 100% Saturation of Aadhaar Seeding in top 100 districts to be
completed by initiating a special verification drives. States to initiate a
drive for enrolling these workers under Aadhaar followed by 100%
seeding of Aadhaar in NREGASoft by 31st July 2015.
• Aadhaar Verification by Programme Officers at Block level to use
their logins to verify the Aadhaars failing demo-auth. All pending
Aadhaar (44.58 Lakhs) to be verified by 31st July, 2015
• Active worker not having bank accounts:
• States to expedite opening of Bank Accounts under PMJDY
• All exemptions for cash payments will be taken off from 01st
August, 15
• States to share issues if any by 15th July, 2015
• Addition of 84 districts under DBT having Aadhaar enrollment >
60%).
• States to initiate a drive for enrolling workers under Aadhaar.
• Complete Seeding of Aadhaar in NREGASoft by 31st July 2015.
• Verify the Aadhaars in the PO login.
• Ensure every worker has an account with aadhaar number
seeded in it.
Active workers without Accounts (Bank/ Post Office)
SN
State
1 NAGALAND
2 A & NICOBAR
3 MEGHALAYA
4 AR. PRADESH
5 MANIPUR
6 LAKSHADWEEP
7 BIHAR
8 J&K
9 TELANGANA
10 CHHATTISGARH
11 UTTARAKHAND
12 HP
13 SIKKIM
14 WEST BENGAL
15 RAJASTHAN
16 JHARKHAND
17 ASSAM
18 AP
19 MP
20 MAHARASHTRA
21 GUJARAT
22 UP
23 MIZORAM
24 PUNJAB
25 GOA
26 ODISHA
27 KERALA
28 HARYANA
29 TAMIL NADU
30 TRIPURA
31 KARNATAKA
Total
Active worker * [Worker in
Last year or current FY]
507976
16276
446224
154475
492685
479
1395499
425098
4839592
3652906
563451
600518
63342
7571357
5838636
1534859
1357936
6334415
5810007
2531683
964505
5219045
241010
387553
7767
2363719
1562128
319289
6942325
1073416
2693465
65948174
Active workers without accounts
507853
14266
338952
93631
285108
89
181916
32572
298975
196412
27031
15392
1619
162778
118695
28913
23229
108065
97979
36581
13442
49684
2115
2545
46
9407
3484
563
9252
311
214
2661120
%age of workers without accounts
100.0
87.7
76.0
60.6
57.9
18.6
13.0
7.7
6.2
5.4
4.8
2.6
2.6
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
4.0
Aadhaar Seeding: Active workers - DBT districts
S No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
State
PUNJAB
ANDHRA PRADESH
SIKKIM
PUDUCHERRY
KERALA
HIMACHAL PRADESH
JHARKHAND
HARYANA
GOA
TELANGANA
TRIPURA
LAKSHADWEEP
CHHATTISGARH
MAHARASHTRA
KARNATAKA
TAMIL NADU
RAJASTHAN
WEST BENGAL
ODISHA
GUJARAT
MADHYA PRADESH
ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI
DAMAN & DIU
Total
Total workers
Aadhaar Seeded
% of seeding
529651
525151
99%
7461200
7186029
96%
82228
78978
96%
47828
45708
96%
1937141
1794345
93%
823965
756626
92%
2027162
1853635
91%
523044
459418
88%
2722
2364
87%
5826770
5055257
87%
728118
592249
81%
1007
750
74%
359617
261057
73%
3163962
2225807
70%
4286576
2980163
70%
7320235
5005110
68%
2788269
1892110
68%
2023037
1202618
59%
707877
375136
53%
390755
191317
49%
5898181
2384615
40%
17104
0
0%
0
0
0%
0
46946449
0
34868443
0%
74%
Status of Mobile monitoring system
S No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
State
ANDHRA PRADESH
AR. P
ASSAM
BIHAR
CHHATTISGARH
GOA
GUJARAT
HARYANA
HP
J&K
JHARKHAND
KARNATAKA
KERALA
MADHYA PRADESH
MAHARASHTRA
MANIPUR
MEGHALAYA
MIZORAM
NAGALAND
ODISHA
PUNJAB
RAJASTHAN
SIKKIM
TAMIL NADU
TELANGANA
TRIPURA
UTTAR PRADESH
UTTARAKHAND
WEST BENGAL
Total
10 GPs under IPPE Blocks
Other GPs
Device
Sanctioned
Identified
Sanctioned Identified Registered
1160
0
1889
0
0
610
0
0
0
0
1300
2
0
0
32
2930
0
641
0
1622
1050
0
569
0
1
10
0
0
0
2
770
0
0
0
1
230
0
0
0
0
110
89
567
174
287
270
8
0
0
0
1710
853
1322
88
3
690
0
0
0
9
220
0
0
0
0
1800
0
1076
7
69
1380
1336
1774
2
616
260
123
0
0
16
80
0
0
0
0
150
150
0
0
68
240
0
0
0
1
1800
1782
0
0
1
180
179
0
0
0
640
641
243
242
338
50
20
176
7
7
980
0
0
0
0
780
0
1743
0
0
150
141
0
0
31
4030
4030
0
0
2061
180
0
0
0
0
1240
9
0
0
846
25000
9363
10000
520
6011
• States to fast
pace the device
procurement
and
implementation.
• State have been
advised to
decentralize
procurement for
expediting
procurement
process.
• All devices must
be registered by
31st July, 2015
Status of selection of GPs for SBM
Total
No. of GPs need for
S No.
State
Panchayat
ODF
ANDHRA PRADESH
1
12997
3128
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
2
1828
141
ASSAM
3
2644
570
BIHAR
4
8529
2659
CHHATTISGARH
5
10969
1073
GOA
6
190
49
GUJARAT
7
14319
HARYANA
8
6140
HIMACHAL
PRADESH
9
3243
695
JAMMU AND KASHMIR
10
4199
273
JHARKHAND
11
4435
274
KARNATAKA
12
5632
KERALA
13
978
100
MADHYA PRADESH
14
22992
4237
MAHARASHTRA
15
28577
1990
MANIPUR
16
3097
938
MEGHALAYA
17
1825
MIZORAM
18
856
51
NAGALAND
19
1180
710
ODISHA
20
6232
1557
PUNJAB
21
13128
3297
RAJASTHAN
22
9897
11
SIKKIM
23
180
35
TAMIL NADU
24
12524
4231
TELANGANA
25
8866
TRIPURA
26
1127
475
UTTAR PRADESH
27
51997
4100
UTTARAKHAND
28
8054
2501
WEST BENGAL
29
3349
Total
2,50,102
33,168
Not communicated by States
GPs marked as
SBM
0
0
0
602
613
0
0
0
1
0
191
0
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4227
0
121
3897
71
0
10,224
IHHL taken up in
FY 15-16 in GPs
marked as SBM
87
37632
5809
386
5114
3532
287
52,847
Status of LIFE Project
SN
State
1
AP
2
ASSAM
3
BIHAR
4
CH
5
GUJARAT
6
HARYANA
7
HP
8
J&K
9
JH
10
KARNATAKA
11
KERALA
12
MP
13
MH
14
MANIPUR
15
MEGHALAYA
16
ODISHA
17
PUNJAB
18
RAJASTHAN
19
SIKKIM
20
TAMIL NADU
21
TELANGANA
22
TRIPURA
23
UP
24
UK
25
WB
Blocks
564
42
215
130
100
38
64
39
189
133
137
310
284
1
26
241
8
229
16
370
412
50
481
59
288
GPs
9232
331
1995
4099
1576
382
1589
676
3030
2854
854
14080
10290
6
472
3176
135
6771
89
10607
7004
1085
11409
1325
2456
Target HHs
Training status
Survey
215727 Done
No*
6977 NA
NA
20099 State level done
Started*
46360 Done
Ongoing*
13207 NA
NA
3967 NA
NA
16072 NA
NA
4828 NA
NA
73024 Dist. Level ongoing
No*
40566 Done
Ongoing*
54689 Mate trg. Done
Ongoing*
147336 Done
Ongoing*
149076 Done
Ongoing*
37 NA
NA
22929 Done
Ongoing*
71106 NA
NA
504 NA
NA
244258 Block level ongoing
2697 NA
202909 Dist. Level done
Ongoing*
NA
No*
107392 Strike of Staffs
219169 Done
Ongoing*
71771 Done
No
5632 NA
NA
131715 On 7th July
Ongoing*
HHs registered
0
0
426
174
0
0
0
0
0
1886
811
2288
189
0
0
6
62
118
0
0
0
4291
5
0
8641
SOCIAL AUDIT
Status of the State SAUs for 28 States
Name of State
Nature of SAU
Director, SAU
Adherence to Social Audit
Rules, 2011
1. West Bengal
Cell within the Department of Rural
Development
Full time Social Audit Director
No
* Begun the process of
housing the SAU within an
independent Society
2. Tamil Nadu
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
3. Rajasthan
Cell within the Department of Rural
Development
Full time Social Audit Director
No
4. Madhya Pradesh
Society
Director SIRD given additional charge
No
5. Andhra Pradesh
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
6. Uttar Pradesh
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
7. Chhattisgarh
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
8. Telengana
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
9. Karnataka
Society
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
10. Maharashtra
Cell within the Department of
Rural Development
Deputy Secretary, EGS given
additional charge
No
11. Bihar
Cell within the Department of
Rural Development
Additional Secretary, Department of
Rural Development given additional
charge
No
12. Odisha
Society
No Director appointed
No
13. Kerala
No SAU constituted
No Director appointed
No
* Initiated steps to set up
an independent agency
14. Jharkhand
Cell within SRLM
Director, JSLPS given additional
charge
No
15. Gujarat
No SAU set up
Deputy Commissioner, Rural
Development given additional
charge
No
16. Tripura
NGO
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
17. Himachal Pradesh
No SAU constituted
No Director appointed
No
18. Assam
SIRD
No
19. Jammu and
Kashmir
20. Punjab
Cell within the Department of
Rural Development
SIRD
SIRD Director given additional
charge
No Director appointed
No
21. Uttarakhand
No SAU constituted
SIRD Director given additional
charge
No Director appointed
22. Manipur
Independent Society
No Director appointed
No
23. Meghalaya
Independent society
Full time SAU Director appointed
Yes
24. Haryana
Cell within the Department of
Rural Development
Director-cum-Special Secretary
No
25. Nagaland
SIRD
No
26. Mizoram
Independent Society
Director, SIRD having additional
charge
Full time Social Audit Director
27. Sikkim
NGO
Full time Social Audit Director
Yes
No
No
given additional charge
Yes
Pilot Social Audits
• Pilot social audits in 202 GPs of Bihar
• Pilot social audits in 510 GPs of Rajasthan
• Pilot social audits in 50 GPs of Jharkhand
• Proposed pilots in 549 GPs of Maharashtra
• Proposed pilot of 1 GP (27 wards) in Kerala
• Proposed pilot in West Bengal
CFT
CFT Expansion Model
1 block
coordin
ator
1.
2.
3.
4.
2
shrama
mitras
per GP
• 1
Barefoot
engineer
per 5
GPs
Block
Facilita
tion
Team
States will select Resource Organisation and Blocks
Resource Organisation will place 1 Block co-ordinator
Block co-ordinator will identify atleast 2 Shrama Mitras per GP
Shrama Mitras will be necessarily women or SC or ST or a SHG
member
5. Block co-ordinator will train Shrama Mitra at the block level for atleast
six days over a seven month period.
6. Barefoot Engineers will be identified, trained and attached in these
blocks.
What’s the same?
o Deliverables at block level of:
a) Average days per SC & ST household = 75
b) 100% wages on time
c) Participatory planning for NRM & livelihood focus plans
per GP
o Focus on demand generation, awareness building,
participatory planning and capacity building
o Preparation of Annual Action Plan per block
o Monitoring by block level co-ordination committees, state
and MoRD
Fund Structure
oResource Organisation will be paid for:
a) Salary for placement of 1 person per
block
b) Training at block level for Shrama Mitra
o State will be paid for State CFT cell
oShrama Mitras will be paid semi skilled
wage rate through muster roll of open
works
Immediate next steps
• 1. States are to identify blocks from list of Census Taluks.
The number of blocks per state is fixed from within these
220 blocks. Bulk of blocks are in Bihar (63), Odisha (51)
and Jharkhand (29).
• 2. State government to identify Resource Organisation to
execute project in these areas.
• 3. Communicate blocks and resource organisation by 31st
July 2015.
S. No.
State
No. of Backward
Blocks
1.
Andhra Pradesh
12
2.
Arunachal Pradesh
28
3.
Bihar
63
4.
Chhattisgarh
8
5.
Gujarat
1
6.
Jharkhand
29
7.
Madhya Pradesh
11
8.
Maharashtra
1
9.
Mizoram
2
10.
Nagaland
7
11.
Odisha
51
12.
Rajasthan
6
13.
Telengana
1
14.
West Bengal
1
Total
220
Barefoot Engineers
States which have sent
list of BFEs
Chhattisgarh
States which are yet to
send list of BFEs
Arunachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Kerala
Punjab
Gujarat
Jammu and Kashmir
Meghalaya
Rajasthan
Tripura
Uttrakhand
Next Steps
• 1. Pilot batches will be launched in August in
Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand.
• 2. 3 month program of intensive training through
Project Implementing Agencies identified by
DDU-GKY.
• 3. Following this, commercial roll out to rest of the
states.
THANKS
Download