Energy Facts and Fiction

advertisement

Energy Myths and Facts

“Everything we consume or use—our homes, their contents, our cars and the roads we travel, the clothes we wear, and the food we eat —requires energy to produce and package, to distribute to shops or front doors, to operate, and then to get rid of.” Worldwatch Institute

Fuel is not getting any cheaper..

. . . but confusion abounds as to what, if anything, we can do about the rising cost of energy

 Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

 We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a “clean” fossil fuel

 Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

 Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

 Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

 Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

Gulf of Mexico Economics:

Industry

Oil & gas

Annual Revenue (billions)

$62.7

Tourism

Commercial Fishing

$38.1

$0.7

Jobs (estimate)

107,000

524,000

14,000

Approximately 50% of the electricity in the U.S. is generated by coal-burning power plants

The Coal Industry

There are approximately 174,000 blue-collar, fulltime, permanent jobs related to coal in the U.S.

mining (83,000; about 58% in underground mines, and 43% in surface mining)

transportation (31,000)

power plant employment (60,000)

In the early 1900s, some 500,000+ people were employed by the coal industry

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average earnings of nonsupervisory coal workers is about $55,000 annually

Coal Mining Deaths

YEAR

1907

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

U.S.

3,242

38

42

27

30

28

23

47

28

30

18

48

CHINA

5,300

5,670

5,791

7,200

6,027

5,986

4,746

3,786

3,215

2,631

600+?

Although China mines about 2x as much coal annually as the U.S., the death rate of miners in China is about 37x that in the U.S.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, mining is the second deadliest occupation in the U.S. (those who make a living in agriculture, fishing, and forestry have the highest death rate per 100,000 employees)

The Wind Industry

Less than about 2% of the electricity in the U.S. is generated by wind turbines

In the U.S., wind industry technician jobs surpassed coal mining jobs in 2008. Wind employment increased by 70% from

50,000 in 2007 to 85,000 in 2009

Median annual salary for wind turbine technicians (high school education + special training) is about $45,000

Since 1975, 44 deaths world-wide have been attributed to wind energy – mostly from accidents during installation of large turbines

Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a “clean” fossil fuel

Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

Natural gas is often described as the cleanest fuel, producing less carbon dioxide per joule delivered than either coal or oil

In particular, when compared to the energy-equivalent amount of coal:

Pollutant Natural gas

Carbon dioxide 117,000 ppm

Carbon monoxide 40 ppm

Nitrogen oxides 92 ppm

Sulfur dioxide

Mercury

Particulates

1 ppm

0

7 ppm

Coal

208,000 ppm

208 ppm

457 ppm

2,591 ppm

0.016

2,744 ppm

However, natural gas itself is a greenhouse gas more potent than carbon dioxide when released into the atmosphere

In addition:

Cornell scientist Robert Howarth recently completed a study that concludes:

Natural gas has a far greater carbon footprint than oil, and could even be more harmful to climate than coal.

The Reason?

All of the associated activities involved with recovering fossil natural gas: energy for digging the pipeline, laying the pipe, trucking the water, hydraulic fracturing – in addition to methane leakage from all of these activities

Howarth’s takehome message is that natural gas is going to accelerate global warming if we use it as a replacement for oil.

The hidden climate costs of natural gas: Emissions are measured in g C of CO

2 per million joules of energy.

Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a “clean” fossil fuel

Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

 The history of coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear power shows that no energy sector has been developed without subsidies

 The US federal government paid US$74 billion in energy subsidies to support R&D for nuclear power and fossil fuels from 1973 to 2003

 According to Donald Lubick, the U.S. Department of Treasury's former Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy, the petroleum industry

"probably has larger tax incentives relative to its size than any other industry in the country”

 Analysts say the U.S. is more generous to oil companies than most other countries, demanding a smaller share of revenues than others that let private companies drill on public lands and in public waters

In the U.S., the government’s take works out to be about 40% of revenue from oil and gas produced on federal property. By contrast, the worldwide average government take is about 60 - 65%

Rankings of subsidies based on absolute amount of direct subsidies and amounts per megawatt-hour of generation differ widely, reflecting substantial differences in the amount of generation across fuels.

Subsidies and Support to Electric Production by Selected Primary Energy Sources

FY 2007 Net

Generation

(billion kWh)

Natural Gas and Petroleum Liquids 919

Coal

Hydroelectric

1,946

258

Biomass

Geothermal

Nuclear

40

15

794

Wind

Solar

Refined Coal

31

1

72

Subsidies

(million FY 2007 dollars)

227

854

174

36

14

1,267

724

174

2,156

Subsidies

(dollars per MWh)

0.25

0.44

0.67

0.89

0.92

1.59

23.37

24.34

29.81

Energy Information Administration, Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in

Energy Markets 2007 , SR/CNEAF/2008-1 (Washington, DC, 2008).

Some groups feel that the petroleum industry benefits from not having to pay the full price of environmental damage and human health issues.

What would oil cost if the industry had to pay to protect its shipments, completely clean up its spills, and restore the environment?

In 1989, the Exxon Valdez spilled 10.8 million gallons of oil along 1,300 miles of

Alaskan coastline (this is only the 30 th largest oil spill in the world).

Exxon spent more than $3.8 billion in clean up costs, fines and compensation

In the case of Baker v. Exxon, a jury awarded $287 million for actual damages and

$5 billion for punitive damages. The punitive damages amount was equal to a single year's profit by Exxon at that time.

After many appeals (over more than 10 years) by Exxon, judgment by the U.S.

Supreme Court will limit punitive damages to $507.5 million.

While the appeals were taking place, it is estimated that Exxon earned nearly $800 million a year in interest on the original $5 billion

Exxon recovered a significant portion of clean-up and legal expenses through insurance claims associated with the grounding of the Exxon Valdez

Deepwater Horizon – Spring 2010

 On 20 April 2010, a blowout at a BP oil well in the Gulf of

Mexico starting releasing something like an Exxon Valdez-worth of oil into the water every four days

 By November, BP was reporting profits even with an estimated $40 billion price tag for the response to its blown out well in the Gulf of Mexico

 BP said that costs related to the April 20 oil spill dragged down its thirdquarter profit by more than 60 percent

 The London-based company earned $1.79 billion from July through

September, compared with $5.3 billion a year earlier

Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a

“clean” fossil fuel

Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

Each CFB contains about 5 milligrams (mg) of mercury

No mercury is released by the bulb when in use or being handled

On the other hand, about 50% of the electricity produced in the

U.S. is generated by coal-fired power plants.

 mercury is naturally contained in coal, and when coal is burned it releases that mercury into the air

 a coal-burning power plant releases about 0.02 mg of mercury into the air for every kWh of electricity used.

Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a “clean” fossil fuel

Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

Impacts of

Wind Power:

Noise

• Modern turbines are relatively quiet

• Rule of thumb – stay about 3x hub-height away from houses

For every 10,000 birds killed by human activities, less than one is caused by a wind turbine

The impact of wind turbines on wildlife is low compared to other forms of human and industrial activity

Wind Turbines vs. Radar

Large wind turbines have the potential to interfere with both commercial air traffic control and military radar, as well as weather radar

Wind towers, nacelles, and blades all reflect radar energy

Turbines have high reflectivity that can reduce radar sensitivity

Rotation of wind turbine blades causes Doppler reflections

Wind towers have a large

“radar cross sectional area”

Some in U.S. military argue that wind farms add unreasonable national security risk

Without fossil fuels, the U.S. economy would collapse/unemployment would sky-rocket

We should switch to using more natural gas because it is a “clean” fossil fuel

Renewable energies aren’t economically viable without huge subsidies

Compact fluorescent bulbs are bad because they contain mercury

Wind turbines are basically noisy bird-blenders

Ethanol will ruin your car’s engine

Is Ethanol Really Bad for Your Car?

• Study of a variety of 16 vehicles (cars and pickup trucks; domestic and imported)

• Range in model years from 1999 to 2007

• Various blends of gasoline, ranging from E0 (no ethanol) to E20

Main results of the study:

All 16 vehicles exhibited loss in fuel economy with increasing ethanol

 average reduction for E20 was ~7.7% compared to E0

As ethanol content increased:

 no significant change in oxides of nitrogen emission

 non-methane hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide emissions decreased

None of the vehicles displayed a malfunction indicator light as a result of the ethanol content of the fuel

No fuel filter plugging symptoms were observed

No degradation of the fuel systems were observed

Several states have offered a cash “reward” to anyone who can demonstrate that ethanol has damaged their car. To date, no one has collected.

Ethanol-blended fuels are approved under the warranties of all auto manufacturers marketing vehicles in the U.S. Some even recommend ethanol use for its clean burning benefits.

Is ethanol/biodisel an improvement over fossil fuels?

environmentally?

financially?

Who would benefit most from more use of ethanol/biodiesel?

Are there alternatives to using food crops?

What questions still need to be answered?

Download