US CMS Advisory Board
University of California
At Riverside
May 18-19, 2001
US CMS Advisory Board
May 18, 2001 17:30
 Issues for this Meeting (Discussion)
H. Newman
 Contributions from the IB Chairs
 CP Project Items
D. Green
 SC Project Items
L. Bauerdick
 CMS and US CMS Items
D. Stickland
 Base Program: Action Committee V. Hagopian
 Election Committee: Result, Issues J. Hauser, J. Hanlon
 Next Meeting Site and Date
H. Newman
 Physics in the US
J. Branson, D. Green
 Remote Control Room: Working Group
 Discussion of a Physics Analysis Center
 AOB
Adjourn for Dinner by 19:15
US CMS Issues for Discussion;
Discussed at Advisory Board
 Launching the Research Program
 M&O, Ongoing S&C, Residence-at-CERN Costs
 Strengthening Physics Analysis Based in the US
 US-Based Centers: FNAL (Tier1) and Tier2s
 Requirements for Analysis Centers
 Remote Control Room
 We will need a WG; design, prototype, test
 The US HEP Base Program
 Problem of University Group Budgets
Support for Greater Funding for the DOE
Office of Science and NSF EPP
 Annual Base Program Requests
 Quantifying Our Projects’ Base Program Manpower
 Focus on Constructive Actions this year: Letter; Visit
 Snowmass
US CMS Annual Base Program
Requests from Projects
 Framework: Project Oriented Requests Only;
Need to Be Consistent with the Base Program
 Specifically identified as required to fulfill particular tasks
in the WBS, according to a known schedule
 Usually handled within the general funding envelope
determined through the normal annual review process
 Travel: treated as a Special Item;
(Also Software and Computing, until now)
 Prioritization of Requests: By L1 PMs, in consultation
with L2 PMs and Institutional Boards
 L2 Managers and IB Chairs conduct IB discussions
of project-related needs
 Each group needs to consider, prioritize what they request
 Software and Computing Project Base Program Requests:
Coordinated with the Construction Project Starting this Fall.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting
University of California
At Riverside
May 18-19, 2001
US CMS Collaboration Meeting
Agenda Friday May 18
 1:00
 1:10
 1:20
 1:35
 1:55
 2:15
 2:35
 3:05
 3:25
 3:55
 4:15
Introduction
Harvey Newman
Welcome to UC Riverside
Chancellor Ray Orbach
Meeting Logistics; UCR Group Activities Robert Clare
Physics Analysis in the US
James Branson
Report from the US SC User Facility Mgr Vivian O’Dell
Report from the US SC Core Software Mgr Ian Fisk
JetMet PRS Group Report
Shuichi Kunori
COFFEE
Muon PRS Group Report
Darin Acosta
E/Gamma PRS Group Report
Jim Branson
Remote Control Room and Analysis
Dan Green
Center In the US
 4:35 Discussion
All
 5:15
ADJOURN
 5:30 - 7:30 PM Advisory Board Meeting at Science Library (Bldg 60)
US CMS Collaboration Meeting
Agenda Saturday May 19
 8:30
 8:50
 9:10
 10:00






10:30
10:50
11:05
11:20
11:50
12:05
 12:20
Report to the US CMS Collaboration
Harvey Newman
The Status of CMS
Michel Della Negra [*]
US CMS Construction Project Report
Dan Green
US CMS Software and Computing Project
Lothar Bauerdick
Report
CMS Core Software and Computing
David Stickland
US Advisory Software and Computing Board
Irwin Gaines
COFFEE
CMS Physics and L1 Trigger; TriDAS Progress Wesley Smith
Grids for US CMS and CMS
Paul Avery
Election Committee Report: IB Chairs, ASCB Jim Hanlon
Jay Hauser
LUNCH
[*] By Video
US CMS Collaboration Meeting
Agenda Saturday May 19
 1:20 Heavy Ions In CMS
Bolek Wyslouch
Pablo Yepes
Dan Karmgard
Andris Skuja
John Layter
Renyuan Zhu
Tim Bolton
Dick Lander






2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15





3:30
COFFEE
3:55 Physics Reconstruction and Selection Report Jim Branson
4:15 Discussion of Issues
Vasken Hagopian
5:10 Next Meeting; AOB
Harvey Newman
5:30
ADJOURN
Education and Outreach
HCAL Report
EMU Report
ECAL Report
SiTrk Report
FPIX Report
Report to US CMS
Harvey B Newman, Caltech
US CMS Collaboration Meeting
May 18-19, 2001
PROGRESS at POINT 5
This image shows a portion of
the central barrel ring of the
CMS Return Yoke, on the right.
The ring is ~15m diameter and
weighs around 1800 tonnes. It
will support the magnet system
and all of the barrel detectors.
YB-2, YB-1, YB0 Ready; YB1
Started. YE-1 Assembly Started
at CERN Last Week.
SUSY: Discovery and Study
P.Lecoq
Higgs event into two Photons
The CMS Collaboration
Number of
Laboratories
Member States
Non-Member States
USA
Total
58
Belgium
USA
Bulgaria
Finland
CERN
50
36
144
France
Germany
Russia
Number of
Scientists
Member States
Austria
1010
Non-Member States
448
USA
351
Total
1809
Greece
Uzbekistan
Ukraine
Slovak Republic
Georgia
Belarus
Armenia Turkey
Pakistan
Korea
Associated Institutes
Number of Scientists
36
Number of Laboratories 5
Oct, 17th, 2000/sm
http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/pictures/cmsorg/overview.html
Hungary
Italy
UK
Poland
India
China
Estonia
Cyprus
Spain Portugal
Switzerland
China (Taiwan)
Croatia
1809 Physicists and Engineers
31 Countries
144 Institutions
US CMS is Progressing: 387 Members;
38 US Institutions


 FIT
CMS: A View to Physics
LHC Schedule V31
 CMS Working Detector Done
By 1 Nov.
2005
 Ring Closed and Cold
End
2005
 LHC One-Beam Commissioning
Feb. - Mar.
2006
 LHC 1 Month Pilot Run
April
2006
 Pre-Physics Shutdown
May - July
2006
 Physics Run: Lumi ~2 X 1033;
August
2006 -
February
2007
~10 fb-1 Accumulated
 Lead Ion Run (Six Weeks)
Mar. - April 2007
Commissioning



US CMS 2000-2001
Getting Down to Business
Construction Project: On Schedule and On Budget
HCAL and EMU In Mass Production
 Successful Lehman Review Last Week:
 Common Projects
 ECAL, EMU and HCAL
TriDAS and FPIX
 CSC Assembly Experience Favorable
~ 35 of 148 CSCs Produced;
 HCAL: HB- Absorber Done; Install
Scint. Planes at CERN From May 24;
12 of 18 HB+ Wedges Ready;
HB Optics 80% Complete
Dan Green,
PO and L2
Essentially Done
> 50% Complete;
~ 25% Complete
On Schedule
Ahead of Sched.
Fermilab CSC factory
US CMS 2000-2001
Getting Down to Business
 ECAL: Progress on APD Radiation Hardness;
First Monitor Laser System to CERN this Summer
Double EB, EE Crystal Boules in Russia;
Crystals to Spec. in China
 FPIX: Now moving from R&D to prototyping
14 micron resol’n confirmed in testbeam
 SiDet: Important US Involvement in Production
(J. Incandela)
New US Groups: Kansas, Kansas State, UCSB
62mm diameter PWO ingots
from Bogoroditsk
P.Lecoq
CMS TriDAS
 Trigger TDR: A CMS Level 1 Milestone
(With Thanks to Wesley Smith)
 Submitted to LHCC 11/28/2000:
CERN/LHCC 2000-38;
CMS TDR 6.1
 Approved in March 2001
 http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/
TDR/TRIGGER-public/trigger.html
 Level 1 Trigger: Successful Calorimeter
and Muon Prototype Tests
 E.g. Sector Processor 6 Crates 1
 DAQ Technology is Moving Fast
and In The Right Direction
 Single-step EVB now the baseline
 High Level Triggers: PRS Project Led by
Paris Sphicas. US active in all 4 Groups
 Full Level 2 Results by July; Now on Lvl 3
CPT Project
 CMS CPT: Actually Three Projects, closely coupled
Computing and Core Software
Physics Reconstruction and Selection
TriDAS(Online Farm and Software)
 CPT deliverables document:
D. Stickland
P. Sphicas
W. Smith;
P. Sphicas
L. Taylor
(http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/april01_rrb)
 Task Breakdown, Deliverables, Cross-projects
 Project plan allows clean management of
these three different types of task
 Cross Project Joint Technical Board (JTB)
 Cross Project Task Forces
 “CAFÉ” Soft. Arch. & Framework
J. Branson
CMS Management Board
and Steering Committee







CPT
 1 year delay
of LHC
 Online Core
-SW added
 Reassessment of
Core-SW roles
& planning
Software Professionals
(FTE's)
Software Professional
Manpower ( MoUs)
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
40
43
44
46
42
29
16
12
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Offline only:
Oct 1999 plan
(Hoffmann)
25
27
31
33
33
33
33
33
Offline + Online
(Hoffmann + Online
tasks)
26
28.5
34.9
38.9
40.8
42
42.9
39.6
Offline + Online
Core-SW
(March 2001
planning)
12
16
29
40
43
44
46
42
US and Worldwide Data Grid
for CMS
Bunch crossing per 25 nsecs.
100 triggers per second
Event is ~1 MByte in size
Experiment
~PBytes/sec
Online System
~100 MBytes/sec
Tier 0 +1
~0.6 - 2.5 Gbits/sec
+ Air Freight
France Center
Italy Center
UK Center
Tier 1
Offline Farm,
CERN Computer
Center
US Center @
FNAL
~2.4 Gbits/sec
Tier 2
Tier2 Center
Tier2 Center
Tier2 Center
Tier2 Center
Tier2 Center
~622 Mbits/sec
Tier 3
InstituteInstitute Institute
Physics data cache
Workstations
Institute
100 - 1000
Mbits/sec
Tier 4
Physicists work on analysis “channels”.
Each institute has ~10 physicists
working on one or more channels
US CMS Software and
Computing Project
 GOALS: To provide the software and computing
resources needed to enable US physicists to fully
participate in the physics program of CMS
 Allow US physicists to play key roles and exert
an appropriate level of leadership in all stages
of computing related activities
 From their home institutions
 LEADERSHIP:
 User Facility
L1 PM
Lothar Bauerdick
L2 PM
Vivian O’Dell
 Core Applications Software L2 PM
Ian Fisk
US-CMS S&C Project: Steps
to First-Round “Baseline”
 Aug 1998
 12/98 - 6/00
 11/98, 5/99
 7/99  12/99
 1/00









3/00
5/17/00
5/20/00
6/5/00
5/30/00
6/25/00
6/00 - 11/00
7/00 - 1/01
10/00
 11/14/00
 11/18/00
First presentation to DOE/NSF (Newman + Taylor)
Project Management Plan (PMP)
Favorable DOE/NSF “Peer” Reviews;
Funding for Software Engineers
Acting Software and Computing Board; L1/L2 PMs
Submission of Draft PMP to DOE/NSF
WBS, Draft Funding Profile for 2000-2006
Presented at DOE/NSF Peer Review
Start Up Funding for UF Subproject
First GriPhyN ITR Proposal (Grid IT R&D)
SC Organization Approved and PMP by US CMS CB
US CMS Constitution Amendments Competed
DOE/NSF Proposed Funding Profile
Finalize updated PMP, sent to collaboration
Update Requirements and Costs; Refine WBS
First Tier2 Center Prototype Startup
FNAL Oversight Panel Reviews Start
Project Baselining Review by DOE/NSF
L1 PM Starts; Appoints L2 PMs (CAS, UF)
US CMS Elective Offices
 CB Chair and Deputy: Term Through Mid-2002
 Advisory Board: Up for Re-Election (Term To Mid-2003)
Darin Acosta
U Florida
TRIDAS
Tom Ferguson
CMU
EMU
Vasken Hagopian
FSU
HCAL
Dick Lander
UC Davis
FPIX
Renyuan Zhu
Caltech
ECAL
Randy Ruchti
Notre Dame
EO Coordinator
Jim Branson
UCSD
Physics
Coordinator
 Election Committee: Through Early Spring 2002
Jim Hanlon
Jay Hauser
 Report by the Election Committee: Saturday Noon
US CMS ASCB
 Transition from the Acting SC Board in Fall 2000
 Provide Input and Feedback to the US S&C Project
on US CMS needs, within the project scope
 Well-versed in Software and Computing:
for Physics, and Technical Aspects
 Physics Coordinator Also a Member
 CP PM; US & Int’l SW PM’s, CD Head and CB Chair Ex-Officio
 Two Year Terms; Starting in Alternate Years
Shuichi Kunori (With Thanks)







Irwin Gaines (Chair)
Paul Avery
Sarah Eno
Sridhara Dasu
David Stickland
Jim Branson, Physics Coordinator
Robert Clare
FNAL
Florida
Maryland
Wisconsin
Princeton
UC San Diego
UC Riverside
US CMS Issues for Discussion;
Discussed at Advisory Board
 Launching the Research Program
 M&O, Ongoing S&C, Residence-at-CERN Costs
 Strengthening Physics Analysis Based in the US
 US-Based Centers: FNAL (Tier1) and Tier2s
 Requirements for Analysis Centers
 Remote Control Room
 We will need a WG; design, prototype, test
 The US HEP Base Program
 Problem of University Group Budgets
Support for Greater Funding for the DOE
Office of Science and NSF EPP
 Annual Base Program Requests
 Quantifying Our Projects’ Base Program Manpower
 Focus on Constructive Actions this year
 Snowmass
US CMS Remote Control Room
US CMS is using the CDF/KEK remote control room for Run II as a
starting point. However, we want to expand the scope to encompass a
US based physics group and US LHC accelerator tasks
-- Dan Green
A Working Example: SPARC
SPARC Real Time Data
US CMS Annual Base Program
Requests from Projects
 Framework: Project Oriented Requests Only;
Need to Be Consistent with the Base Program
 Specifically identified as required to fulfill particular tasks
in the WBS, according to a known schedule
 Usually handled within the general funding envelope
determined through the normal annual review process
 Travel: treated as a Special Item;
(Also Software and Computing, until now)
 Prioritization of Requests: By L1 PMs, in consultation
with L2 PMs and Institutional Boards
 L2 Managers and IB Chairs conduct IB discussions
of project-related needs
 Each group needs to consider, prioritize what they request
 Software and Computing Project Base Program Requests:
Coordinated with the Construction Project Starting this Fall.
US CMS Collaboration
Next Meetings
Next Collaboration Board Meeting
 December 2001 at Fermilab
 Annual Collaboration Meeting 2002:
Proposed for the End of May
 Candidate Host Institutions:
Propose by or at December 2000 CB
 Try to Coordinate with a Major
Subdetector Meeting
 This Year We Are Coordinated
with “Physics”