Connected Care Delivers: Telemedicine’ s Value Proposition June 8, 2015 | National Council of Behavioral Health Agenda Introduction U.S. Market Landscape and Outlook Evidence of Cost Savings & Quality Care Legislative and Regulatory Barriers The Alliance Prescription: Reimbursement Framework Alliance for Connected Care Alliance Advisory Board Alliance for Aging Research Alzheimer’s Foundation of America American Academy of Family Physicians American Academy of Physician Assistants American Heart Association American Language-Speech-Hearing Association American Osteopathic Association Association for Behavioral Health and Wellness Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Digestive Disease National Coalition Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society Family Voices HealthCare Chaplaincy Network Mental Health America National Alliance for Caregiving National Association of ACOs National Association of Chain Drug Stores National Association of Homecare & Hospice National Council for Behavioral Health National Alliance on Mental Illness National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved National Multiple Sclerosis Society National Organization for Rare Disorders Parkinson’s Action Network Population Health Alliance Stanford Hospitals & Clinics United Spinal Association Visiting Nurse Associations of America What is Telemedicine? Asynchronous communication • E-mail communication • Passive, remote monitoring through in-home sensors Virtual Communication • Phone consult or on-line video in real time • Computer, SmartPhone, Tablet • Access to LPN, RN or MD Live + Virtual communication • Kiosk or retail clinic model of patient connecting to NP via on-line video in real time differentiation is that the LPN/LVN acts as the “hands” of the remote NP allowing real time vaccinations, blood tests, etc. Store and Forward • Store and forward technologies allow for the electronic transmission of medical information, such as digital images, documents, and prerecorded videos through secure email transmission Telemedicine Goes Mainstream Medicaid Rural patients Employers & Health Plans Medicare Advantage Telemedicine Offerings Increasing Among Employers 71% 37% 22% Projected for 2017 2015 2014 *Source: http://www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Press/2014/08/current-telemedicine-technology-could-mean-big-savings Telemedicine Increasing in Medicaid 48 Medicaid Programs Have Some Type of Coverage for Telemedicine . Source: American Telemedicine Association Telemedicine Increasing Among Health Plans 23 states and DC have Full Reimbursement Parity Laws Source: American Telemedicine Association Behavioral Health After primary care, behavioral health and dermatology are targets for growth. Large platforms like Teladoc and MD Live now offering behavioral health services. Increase in digital solutions: Ginger.io, Wecounsel Legal and regulator barriers in public programs Why the Explosive Growth? Consumers are demanding more convenient care. Employers & plans looking for new ways to reduce costs Telehealth offerings are more sophisticated User satisfaction with telehealth is very high. Consumer Interest Attitudes toward telemedicine technologies in the U.S. have also undergone a significant shift in recent years: According to a recent survey by Cisco: 30% of patients already use computers or mobile devices to check for medical or diagnostic information ; 76% of patients prioritize access to health care services over the need for human interactions with health care providers ; 70% of patients are comfortable communicating with their health care providers via text, email or videos, in lieu of seeing them in person Why Continued Growth? Mounting evidence of quality, access, cost-reduction “Tipping point” in the commercial marketplace. (Major investment) Improves consumer engagement and satisfaction Bipartisan interest in Congress & state legislatures Movement toward value-based care in public programs. Broadband deployment helping make it possible Evidence is Key Data shows the importance of Connected Care to the bottom line issues of quality, patient satisfaction and cost. Investment in telehealth and remote patient monitoring will yield results. Commissioned literature review from two professors: Dr. Rashid Bashshur of University of Michigan and Dr. Gary Shannon of University of Kentucky. Looked at actuarial analysis of substitution rates. Looked at disease incidence, cost of disease, review of how telemedicine is typically applied to the disease. Examples of Evidence Journal of Telemedicine and Ehealth (2015): Showed telemedicine use for diabetes to be an "effective mode" of care, increases patient adherence and reduced cardiovascular risk factors. Journal of Telemedicine and Ehealth (2014): Improved care and lower costs for CHF, Stroke and COPD. Health Affairs (2014): Analysis Of Teladoc Use Seems To Indicate Expanded Access To Care For Patients Without Prior Connection to a Provider (Rand Study) Health Affairs (2014): HealthPartners’ Online Clinic for Simple Conditions Delivers Savings of $88 Per Episode and High Patient Approval Other Examples of Evidence JAMA Internal Medicine (2013): A Comparison of Care at E-visits and Physician Office Visits for Sinusitis and Urinary Tract Infection JAMA Dermatology (2014): Emergency Department Diagnosis and Management of Skin Diseases with Real-Time Teledermatologic Expertise Telemedicine and e-Health (2014): Is Telemedicine an Answer to Reducing 30-Day Readmission Rates Post–Acute Myocardial Infarction? JAMA Ophthalmology (2014): Validity of a Telemedicine System for the Evaluation of Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity Health Affairs (2014): Use of Telemedicine Can Reduce Hospitalizations of Nursing Home Residents and Generate Savings for Medicare Regulatory Roadblocks & Legislative Barriers Reimbursement Licensure Lack of clarity on definitions Standards of Care Credentialing Concerns about fraud and abuse State Level Issues State by state diversity Standards of Care Licensure FSMB Model Telemedicine Guidelines FSMB Licensure Compact Federal-level Issues Definitions Section 1834(m) of Social Security Act limits telehealth reimbursement to rural areas, and can only be conducted from approved “originating sites” to “distant sites” with a physician present. Originating site construct is very limiting. CMS approves code modifiers for telehealth services every year, but the services are always subject to the statutory restrictions. Ryan Haight Act Legislative Effort CBO Scoring In 2001, the Congressional Budget Office estimated it would cost CMS $150 million during the first 5 years, or $30 million a year to reimburse for telehealth encounters. According to data released by CTel, since 2001, CMS’s Medicare reimbursement for distant site services totals $38.6 million and $5 million for originating site fees, for a total of $43.7 million TOTAL over 13 years. Medicare Reimbursement for Telehealth *Information gathered and published by CTel New Reimbursement Structure Conventional wisdom is move from fee-for-service to accountable care will give patients more access to Connected Care. We all want movement away from fee-for-service, but there is a transition period. Today, most patients are still in fee- for-service. We need a transition. Primary Care: Substitution Virtual visits are not simply a supplement to in-person visits. Data shows that 83% of the time patient issue is resolved by telehealth. The average number of telehealth visits per patient is 1.3 visits/year. . Replacing in-person acute care with telehealth reimbursed at the same rate as a doctor’s office visit could save the Medicare program an estimated $45/visit. Actuarial Analysis Table 6: Estimated Costs – Best Estimate Utilization Alternative Site of Care Commercial Medicare Emergency room 5.6% $ 1,595 $ 943 Urgent care 45.8% 116 98 Physician office visit 30.9% 98 83 Other clinics 5.4% 57 83 Do nothing 12.3% 0 0 Average cost 100.0% $ 176 $ 128 Using the above calculations, Medicare will realize savings as long as the average cost for the alternative site of care is greater than the estimated $83 Medicarereimbursed office cost. Under the above scenario, the average savings to Medicare will be approximately $45 ($128 - $83) for each telehealth visit. Actuarial Analysis Concerns regarding “induced utilization” unfounded. Will only happen if the percentage of Medicare patients utilizing telehealth who would have otherwise have “done nothing” increases to more than 32.8 percent. Unlikely given that telehealth vendors currently report that this patient segment is approximately 13 percent within the commercial market. Questions Please contact Krista Drobac with questions. Krista Drobac Executive Director, Alliance for Connected Care kdrobac@sironastrategies.com 202-415-3260